Objective: To explore the outcome of different treatment strategies in patients with pancreatic cancer with synchronous liver metastasis (sLMPC). Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data and treatment results of 37 patients with sLMPC treated in China-Japan Friendship Hospital was performed from April 2017 to December 2022. A total of 23 males and 14 females were included,with an age(M(IQR)) of 61 (10) years (range: 45 to 74 years). Systemic chemotherapy was carried out after pathological diagnosis. The initial chemotherapy strategy included modified-Folfirinox, albumin paclitaxel combined with Gemcitabine, and Docetaxel+Cisplatin+Fluorouracil or Gemcitabine with S1. The possibility of surgical resection (reaching the standards of surgical intervention) was determined after systemic treatment,and the chemotherapy strategy was changed in the cases of failed initial chemotherapy plans. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival time and rate,while Log-rank and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the differences of survival curves. Results: The median follow-up time for the 37 sLMPC patients was 39 months,and the median overall survival time was 13 months (range:2 to 64 months) with overall survival rates of 1-,3-,and 5-year of 59.5%,14.7%,and 14.7%,respectively. Of the 37 patients,97.3%(36/37) initially received systemic chemotherapy, 29 completed more than four cycles,resulting in a disease control rate of 69.4% (partial response in 15 cases,stable disease in 10 cases,and progressive disease in 4 cases). In the 24 patients initially planned for conversion surgery,the successful conversion rate was 54.2% (13/24). Among the 13 successfully converted patients,9 underwent surgery and their treatment outcomes were significantly better than those (4 patients) of those who did not undergo surgery (median survival time not reached vs. 13 months,P<0.05). Regarding the 9 patients whose conversion was unsuccessful, no significant differences were observed in median survival time between the surgical group (4 cases) and the non-surgical group (5 cases) (P>0.05). In the allowed-surgery group(n=13),the decreased in pre-surgical CA19-9 levels and the regression of liver metastases were more significant in the successful conversion sub-group than in the ineffective conversion sub-group;however, no significant differences were observed in the changes in primary lesion between the two groups. Conclusion: For highly selective patients with sLMPC who achieve partial response after receiving effective systemic treatment,the adoption of an aggressive surgical treatment strategy can significantly improve survival time;however, surgery dose not provide such survival benefits in patients who do not achieve partial response after systemic chemotherapy.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Docetaxel/therapeutic use* ; Liver Neoplasms/secondary* ; Fluorouracil ; Leucovorin/therapeutic use*

Humans ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/secondary* ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery* ; Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery* ; Neoplasms, Second Primary

BACKGROUNDThe liver is the most common site for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Their removal is a critical and challenging aspect of CRC treatment. We investigated the prognosis and risk factors of patients with CRC and liver metastases (CRCLM) who underwent simultaneous resections for both lesions.

METHODSFrom January 2009 to August 2016, 102 patients with CRCLM received simultaneous resections of CRCLM at our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical data and analyzed their outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.

RESULTSMedian follow-up time was 22.7 months; no perioperative death or serious complications were observed. Median OS was 55.5 months; postoperative OS rates were 1-year: 93.8%, 3-year: 60.7%, and 5-year: 46.4%. Median DFS was 9.0 months; postoperative DFS rates were 1-year: 43.1%, 3-year: 23.0%, and 5-year 21.1%. Independent risk factors found in multivariate analysis included carcinoembryonic antigen ≥100 ng/ml, no adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor thrombus in liver metastases, and bilobar liver metastases for OS; age ≥60 years, no adjuvant chemotherapy, multiple metastases, and largest diameter ≥3 cm for DFS.

CONCLUSIONSSimultaneous surgical resection is a safe and effective treatment for patients with synchronous CRCLM. The main prognostic factors are pathological characteristics of liver metastases and whether standard adjuvant chemotherapy is performed.

Adult ; Aged ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; complications ; mortality ; surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; secondary ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the safety and efficacy of organ preservation surgery or "watch and wait" strategy for rectal cancer patients who are evaluated as clinical complete response(cCR) or near-cCR following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODFrom March 2011 to June 2016, 35 patients with mid-low rectal cancers who were diagnosed as cCR or near-cCR following nCRT underwent organ preservation surgery with local excision or surveillance following "watch and wait" strategy in the Peking University Cancer Hospital. All the patients received re-evaluation and re-staging 6-12 weeks after the completion of nCRT, according to Habr-Gama and MSKCC criteria for the diagnosis of cCR or near-cCR. The near-cCR patients who received local excision and were pathologically diagnosed as T0Nx were also regarded as cCR. The end-points of this study included organ-preservation rate (OPR), sphincter-preservation rate (SPR), non-re-growth disease-free survival (NR-DFS), stoma-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival(OS). Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the survival data at 3 years.

RESULTSA total of 35 cases were analyzed including 24 males (68.6%) and 11 females (31.4%). The median age was 60 (range 37-79) years and the median distance from tumor to anal edge was 4(2-8) cm. Thirty-three patients received 50.6 Gy/22f IMRT with capecitabine and two patients received 50 Gy/25f RT with capecitabine. The cCR and near-cCR rates were 74.3%(26/35) and 25.7%(9/35) respectively. Excision biopsy was performed in 4 near-cCR cases to confirm the diagnosis of cCR. The non-re-growth DFS rate was 14.3%(5/35) and the median time of tumor re-growth was 6.7 (4.7-37.4) months. In five patients with tumor re-growth, four were salvaged by radical rectal resections and one received local excision. The distant metastasis rate was 5.7%(2/35), one patient presented resectable liver metastasis and received radical resection, another patient presented multiple bone metastases and was still alive. The median follow-up time was 43.7(6.1-71.4) months. At three years, the organ-preservation rate was 88.6%(31/35), the sphincter-preservation rate was 97.1% (34/35). No local recurrence was observed in five patients who received salvage surgery. The non-re-growth DFS was 94.0%. Three patients died of non-rectal cancer related events. The cancer-specific survival was 100%, the overall survival was 92.7% and the stoma-free survival rate was 90.0%.

CONCLUSIONSOrgan preservation surgery or "watch and wait" strategy for cCR or near-cCR patients is feasible and achieves good outcomes. This strategy can be an alternative to standard care, improve patient's quality of life and facilitate tailored treatment for mid-low rectal cancer following nCRT, however, it should be cautiously applied in near-cCR patients before local excision biopsy.

Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Biopsy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; secondary ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; prevention & control ; Organ Preservation ; Quality of Life ; Rectal Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; therapy ; Reoperation ; Salvage Therapy ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Watchful Waiting ; methods

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of metachronous bone metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer within 5 years.

METHODSClinical data of 1 749 patients with colorectal cancer, of whom 50(2.8%) patients developed metastasis to bone after operation, in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital of The Second Military Medical University from January 2001 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to find the risk factors of metachronous bone metastasis from colorectal cancer using Chi square test and Logistic regression, respectively.

RESULTSOf 50 colorectal cancer cases with bone metastasis, 29 were male and 21 were female. The age was ≥ 60 years old in 28 cases. Tumors of 36 cases were located in the rectum and of 14 cases located in the colon. Pathology examination showed 43 cases were adenocarcinomas, 7 cases were mucinous adenocarcinoma. Forty-two cases had T3-4 stage lesions, 30 cases had lymph node metastasis, 14 cases had pulmonary metastasis, and 5 cases had liver metastasis. Univariate Chi square test indicated that factors associated with the metachronous bone metastasis of colorectal cancer within 5 years were tumor site (χ=4.932, P=0.026), preoperative carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) level (χ=4.266, P=0.039), lymph node metastasis (χ=13.054, P=0.000) and pulmonary metastasis(χ=35.524, P=0.000). The incidence of bone metastasis in patients with rectal cancer (3.6%, 36/991) was higher compared to those with colon cancer (1.8%, 14/758). The incidence of bone metastasis in patients with higher(> 37 kU/L) preoperative serum CA199 level (4.9%, 12/245) was higher compared to those with lower serum CA199 level (2.5%, 38/1504). The incidence of bone metastasis in patients with lymph node metastasis(4.8%,30/627) and pulmonary metastasis (11.6%, 14/121) was significantly higher compared to those without lymph node metastasis (1.8%, 20/1122) and pulmonary metastasis(2.2%, 36/1628), respectively. Logistic multivariate analysis showed that rectal cancer(OR:0.508, 95%CI:0.268 to 0.963, P=0.038), lymph node metastasis (OR:2.291, 95%CI:1.273 to 4.122, P=0.006) and metachronous pulmonary metastasis(OR:4.796, 95%CI:2.473 to 9.301, P=0.000) were the independent risk factors of metachronous bone metastasis of colorectal cancer within 5 years.

CONCLUSIONPatients with rectal cancer, lymph node metastasis and metachronous pulmonary metastasis are high risk groups of metachronous bone metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer within 5 years.

Adenocarcinoma ; surgery ; Aged ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; blood ; Bone Neoplasms ; epidemiology ; secondary ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Colonic Neoplasms ; surgery ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Colorectal Surgery ; statistics & numerical data ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Liver Neoplasms ; secondary ; Logistic Models ; Lung Neoplasms ; secondary ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

Neuroendocrine tumors in the digestive tract are rare, however their incidences increased obviously for the past few years. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the surgical management of locally advanced digestive tract neuroendocrine neoplasms(NENs) with or without liver metastasis and to discuss the present classification of gastrointestinal NENs in order to provide reference for clinicians. WHO re-classified the gastroenteropancreatic NENs in 2010, but this classification remains many questions and needs further clinical trials to answer. Up to now, radical resection of the lesions is the only cure for the gastrointestinal NENs. For resectable locally advanced gastrointestinal NENs, standard radical or extended resection should be performed according to gastrointestinal cancer. For patients who can not receive radical procedure because of unresectable primary lesions or diffuse metastases, cytoreductive operation should be considered when endocrine symptoms exist. Palliative surgery is beneficial to the improvement of bleeding or obstruction by tumor. For unresectable liver metastatic lesion and resectable primary lesion, the primary lesion should be resected. For tolerable patients with resectable liver metastatic lesion, one-stage resection involving the primary and the liver metastatic lesions should be performed. For unresectable liver metastasis, hepatic arterial chemoembolization, systematic chemotherapy, biotherapy, targeted therapy or radio frequency ablation (RFA) should be considered to control symptoms and prevent the tumor progression.
Catheter Ablation ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; secondary ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; surgery ; Palliative Care

The treatments of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of hepatic resection (HR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating resectable CRLM. Between January 2004 and May 2010, the enrolled patients were given hepatic resection (HR group; n=32) or percutaneous RFA (RFA group; n=21) as a first-line treatment for CRLM. All the tumors had a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm and all patients had five or less tumors. The patient background, tumor characteristics, cumulative survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were assessed in both groups. There were significantly more patients with comorbidities in the RFA group than those in the HR group (17 in RFA group vs. 10 in HR group; P<0.000). The mean maximum tumor diameter in the HR group and RFA group was 2.25±0.68 and 1.89±0.62 cm (P=0.054), and the mean number of tumors was 2.28±1.05 and 2.38±1.12 (P=0.744), respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates in the HR group were 87.5%, 53.1% and 31.3%, respectively, and those in the RFA group were 85.7%, 38.1% and 14.2%, respectively with the differences being not significant between the two groups (P=0.062). The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in the HR group were 90.6%, 56.3% and 28.1%, respectively, and those in the RFA group were 76.1%, 23.8% and 4.8%, respectively, with the differences being significant between the two groups (P=0.036). In conclusion, as HR has greater efficacy than RFA in the treatment of resectable CRLM, we recommend it as the first option for this malignancy.
Aged ; Catheter Ablation ; methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Liver ; pathology ; surgery ; Liver Neoplasms ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; secondary ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Metastatic pathological fractures of the spine are a major problem for cancer patients; however, there is no consensus on treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate various treatment options by analyzing their patterns for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine. METHODS: In this study, 54 patients (male:female = 36:18) who were diagnosed with metastatic pathological fractures of spine were recruited. Demographic data, origin of cancer, type of treatment, and results were obtained from electronic medical records. Treatment options were divided into radiotherapy (RT), vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP), operation (OP), and other treatments. Treatment results were defined as aggravation, no response, fair response, good response, and unknown. The survival time after detection of pathologic fractures was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.3 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common cancer of primary origin (n = 9), followed by multiple myeloma (n = 8). RT was the most common primary choice of treatment (n = 29, 53.7%), followed by OP (n = 13, 24.1%), and VP or KP (n = 10, 18.5%). Only 13 of 29 RT cases and 7 of 13 OP cases demonstrated a fair or good response. The mean survival time following detection of pathological spinal fractures was 11.1 months for 29 patients, who died during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: RT was the most common primary choice of treatment for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine. However, the response rate was suboptimal. Although OP should be considered for the relief of mechanical back pain or neurologic symptoms, care should be taken in determining the surgical indication. VP or KP could be considered for short-term control of localized pain, although the number of cases was too small to confirm the conclusion. It is difficult to determine the superiority of the treatment modalities, hence, a common guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic pathological fractures of the spine is required.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality/pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/mortality/pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma/mortality/pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fractures/etiology/mortality/*radiotherapy/*surgery ; Spinal Neoplasms/*complications/secondary ; Spine ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo analyze long-term outcomes and related risk factors in patients undergoing simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis.

METHODSClinicopathological, short- and long-term outcome data of 154 consecutive synchronous colorectal liver metastasis patients who underwent simultaneous resection between July 2003 and July 2013 were collected and analyzed with Cox multivariate methods retrospectively.

RESULTSNo perioperative death was found. A total of 46 patients (29.9%) had complications, which were all successfully treated medically or by percutaneous drainage. The 5-year overall survival rate was 46%, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 35%. Four factors were found to be independent predictors of poor overall survival by multivariate analysis: positive lymph node status (P=0.000), number of metastasis focus (≥4) (P=0.017), bilobar liver metastasis distribution (P=0.004) and non-R0 resection of liver metastasis (P=0.001). Three factors were found to be independent predictors of poor disease-free survival by multivariate analysis: positive lymph node status (P=0.031), bilobar liver metastasis distribution (P=0.001) and extrahepatic metastases (P=0.020).

CONCLUSIONSSimultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis is safe and its short- and long-term outcomes are quite good. Positive lymph node status, number of metastasis focus (≥4), bilobar liver metastasis distribution, non-R0 resection of liver metastasis and extrahepatic metastasis are risk factors of poor long-term prognosis.

Colorectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; Disease-Free Survival ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; secondary ; surgery ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate

No abstract available.
Breast Neoplasms/*complications/*surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/*secondary/*surgery ; Male