1.Safety of high-carbohydrate fluid diet 2 h versus overnight fasting before non-emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
Wenbo MENG ; W. Joseph LEUNG ; Zhenyu WANG ; Qiyong LI ; Leida ZHANG ; Kai ZHANG ; Xuefeng WANG ; Meng WANG ; Qi WANG ; Yingmei SHAO ; Jijun ZHANG ; Ping YUE ; Lei ZHANG ; Kexiang ZHU ; Xiaoliang ZHU ; Hui ZHANG ; Senlin HOU ; Kailin CAI ; Hao SUN ; Ping XUE ; Wei LIU ; Haiping WANG ; Li ZHANG ; Songming DING ; Zhiqing YANG ; Ming ZHANG ; Hao WENG ; Qingyuan WU ; Bendong CHEN ; Tiemin JIANG ; Yingkai WANG ; Lichao ZHANG ; Ke WU ; Xue YANG ; Zilong WEN ; Chun LIU ; Long MIAO ; Zhengfeng WANG ; Jiajia LI ; Xiaowen YAN ; Fangzhao WANG ; Lingen ZHANG ; Mingzhen BAI ; Ningning MI ; Xianzhuo ZHANG ; Wence ZHOU ; Jinqiu YUAN ; Azumi SUZUKI ; Kiyohito TANAKA ; Jiankang LIU ; Ula NUR ; Elisabete WEIDERPASS ; Xun LI
Chinese Medical Journal 2024;137(12):1437-1446
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Background::Although overnight fasting is recommended prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the benefits and safety of high-carbohydrate fluid diet (CFD) intake 2 h before ERCP remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze whether high-CFD intake 2 h before ERCP can be safe and accelerate patients’ recovery.Methods::This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involved 15 tertiary ERCP centers. A total of 1330 patients were randomized into CFD group ( n = 665) and fasting group ( n = 665). The CFD group received 400 mL of maltodextrin orally 2 h before ERCP, while the control group abstained from food/water overnight (>6 h) before ERCP. All ERCP procedures were performed using deep sedation with intravenous propofol. The investigators were blinded but not the patients. The primary outcomes included postoperative fatigue and abdominal pain score, and the secondary outcomes included complications and changes in metabolic indicators. The outcomes were analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle. Results::The post-ERCP fatigue scores were significantly lower at 4 h (4.1 ± 2.6 vs. 4.8 ± 2.8, t = 4.23, P <0.001) and 20 h (2.4 ± 2.1 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4, t= 7.94, P <0.001) in the CFD group, with least-squares mean differences of 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26–0.71, P <0.001) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57–0.95, P <0.001), respectively. The 4-h pain scores (2.1 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.7, t = 2.60, P = 0.009, with a least-squares mean difference of 0.21 [95% CI: 0.05–0.37]) and positive urine ketone levels (7.7% [39/509] vs. 15.4% [82/533], χ2 = 15.13, P <0.001) were lower in the CFD group. The CFD group had significantly less cholangitis (2.1% [13/634] vs. 4.0% [26/658], χ2 = 3.99, P = 0.046) but not pancreatitis (5.5% [35/634] vs. 6.5% [43/658], χ2 = 0.59, P = 0.444). Subgroup analysis revealed that CFD reduced the incidence of complications in patients with native papilla (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39–0.95, P = 0.028) in the multivariable models. Conclusion::Ingesting 400 mL of CFD 2 h before ERCP is safe, with a reduction in post-ERCP fatigue, abdominal pain, and cholangitis during recovery.Trail Registration::ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT03075280.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Determination of Optimal Treatment Plan for Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region: Case Series With Literature Review
Brandi W. PANG ; David J. MAZUR-HART ; Nasser K. YAGHI ; Seunggu Jude HAN ; Jesse J. LIU
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2024;12(4):221-229
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) is a rare neuroepithelial tumor with CentralNervous System (CNS) World Health Organization (WHO) grade II or III classification. Due to its rarity, there is no clear census on treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal treatment plan focused on extending overall survival (OS). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This is an institutional case series with review of the literature. Fifty-three publicationswere analyzed. Only cases with histological diagnosis of PTPR were included. Data collected included demographics, treatment modalities, disease progression, and OS. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The analysis included 105 patients from the literature and 3 new cases (54 female,50%) with an average age of 33.1 years (range 1–73 years). The average lesion size was 26.4 mm (range 5–50 mm) in longest axis. All patients underwent an initial resection. There were 46 cases of surgery alone. The remaining cases received adjuvant therapy including radiation (RT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), chemotherapy (CT), or RT and CT. The average follow-up was 61.4 months (range 1–240 months). OS at 1 year was 96.9%, at 5 years was 87.5%, and at 10 years was 80.2%. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 57.4%. Statistical significance was observed in PFS in the surgery plus SRS group and surgery plus CT and RT group. Surgery with SRS had the best PFS (75%), and OS at 1 year (100%) and 5 years (88.9%). Surgery with CT and RT had the best OS at 10 years (85.7%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			We describe a case series and literature review of PTPR to help guide the most effec-tive treatment strategies for this rare disease entity. We recommend surgery followed by SRS as the treatment of choice because of its best PFS and 5-year survival rates. We would also recommend adding chemotherapy in the event of disease progression or recurrence as adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy provided the best 10-year survival. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Determination of Optimal Treatment Plan for Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region: Case Series With Literature Review
Brandi W. PANG ; David J. MAZUR-HART ; Nasser K. YAGHI ; Seunggu Jude HAN ; Jesse J. LIU
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2024;12(4):221-229
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) is a rare neuroepithelial tumor with CentralNervous System (CNS) World Health Organization (WHO) grade II or III classification. Due to its rarity, there is no clear census on treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal treatment plan focused on extending overall survival (OS). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This is an institutional case series with review of the literature. Fifty-three publicationswere analyzed. Only cases with histological diagnosis of PTPR were included. Data collected included demographics, treatment modalities, disease progression, and OS. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The analysis included 105 patients from the literature and 3 new cases (54 female,50%) with an average age of 33.1 years (range 1–73 years). The average lesion size was 26.4 mm (range 5–50 mm) in longest axis. All patients underwent an initial resection. There were 46 cases of surgery alone. The remaining cases received adjuvant therapy including radiation (RT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), chemotherapy (CT), or RT and CT. The average follow-up was 61.4 months (range 1–240 months). OS at 1 year was 96.9%, at 5 years was 87.5%, and at 10 years was 80.2%. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 57.4%. Statistical significance was observed in PFS in the surgery plus SRS group and surgery plus CT and RT group. Surgery with SRS had the best PFS (75%), and OS at 1 year (100%) and 5 years (88.9%). Surgery with CT and RT had the best OS at 10 years (85.7%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			We describe a case series and literature review of PTPR to help guide the most effec-tive treatment strategies for this rare disease entity. We recommend surgery followed by SRS as the treatment of choice because of its best PFS and 5-year survival rates. We would also recommend adding chemotherapy in the event of disease progression or recurrence as adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy provided the best 10-year survival. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Determination of Optimal Treatment Plan for Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region: Case Series With Literature Review
Brandi W. PANG ; David J. MAZUR-HART ; Nasser K. YAGHI ; Seunggu Jude HAN ; Jesse J. LIU
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2024;12(4):221-229
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) is a rare neuroepithelial tumor with CentralNervous System (CNS) World Health Organization (WHO) grade II or III classification. Due to its rarity, there is no clear census on treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal treatment plan focused on extending overall survival (OS). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This is an institutional case series with review of the literature. Fifty-three publicationswere analyzed. Only cases with histological diagnosis of PTPR were included. Data collected included demographics, treatment modalities, disease progression, and OS. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The analysis included 105 patients from the literature and 3 new cases (54 female,50%) with an average age of 33.1 years (range 1–73 years). The average lesion size was 26.4 mm (range 5–50 mm) in longest axis. All patients underwent an initial resection. There were 46 cases of surgery alone. The remaining cases received adjuvant therapy including radiation (RT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), chemotherapy (CT), or RT and CT. The average follow-up was 61.4 months (range 1–240 months). OS at 1 year was 96.9%, at 5 years was 87.5%, and at 10 years was 80.2%. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 57.4%. Statistical significance was observed in PFS in the surgery plus SRS group and surgery plus CT and RT group. Surgery with SRS had the best PFS (75%), and OS at 1 year (100%) and 5 years (88.9%). Surgery with CT and RT had the best OS at 10 years (85.7%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			We describe a case series and literature review of PTPR to help guide the most effec-tive treatment strategies for this rare disease entity. We recommend surgery followed by SRS as the treatment of choice because of its best PFS and 5-year survival rates. We would also recommend adding chemotherapy in the event of disease progression or recurrence as adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy provided the best 10-year survival. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Venous thromboembolism in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in China: a report from the Chinese Children's Cancer Group-ALL-2015.
Mengmeng YIN ; Hongsheng WANG ; Xianmin GUAN ; Ju GAO ; Minghua YANG ; Ningling WANG ; Tianfeng LIU ; Jingyan TANG ; Alex W K LEUNG ; Fen ZHOU ; Xuedong WU ; Jie HUANG ; Hong LI ; Shaoyan HU ; Xin TIAN ; Hua JIANG ; Jiaoyang CAI ; Xiaowen ZHAI ; Shuhong SHEN ; Qun HU
Frontiers of Medicine 2023;17(3):518-526
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The Chinese Children's Cancer Group-ALL-2015 protocol was carried out in China, and epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with VTE were analyzed. We collected data on VTE in a multi-institutional clinical study of 7640 patients with ALL diagnosed in 20 hospitals from January 2015 to December 2019. First, VTE occurred in 159 (2.08%) patients, including 90 (56.6%) during induction therapy and 108 (67.92%) in the upper extremities. T-ALL had a 1.74-fold increased risk of VTE (95% CI 1.08-2.8, P = 0.022). Septicemia, as an adverse event of ALL treatment, can significantly promote the occurrence of VTE (P < 0.001). Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) accounted for 75.47% (n = 120); and, symptomatic VTE, 58.49% (n = 93), which was more common in patients aged 12-18 years (P = 0.023), non-CRT patients (P < 0.001), or patients with cerebral thrombosis (P < 0.001). Of the patients with VTE treated with anticoagulation therapy (n = 147), 4.08% (n = 6) had bleeding. The VTE recurrence rate was 5.03% (n = 8). Patients with VTE treated by non-ultrasound-guided venous cannulation (P = 0.02), with residual thrombus (P = 0.006), or with short anticoagulation period (P = 0.026) had high recurrence rates. Thus, preventing repeated venous puncture and appropriately prolonged anticoagulation time can reduce the risk of VTE recurrence.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Child
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Venous Thromboembolism/etiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			East Asian People
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Risk Factors
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Thrombosis/chemically induced*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			China/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Anticoagulants/adverse effects*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Recurrence
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
7.Survival analysis of early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
T X XIAO ; W Y HOU ; S W MEI ; Q LIU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(1):75-83
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective: To investigate the factors influencing tumor-specific survival of early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: All-age patients with primary locally advanced rectal cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010 to 2019) were included in this study. Early- and late-onset locally advanced rectal cancer was defined according to age of 50 years at diagnosis. Early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer was divided into five age groups for subgroup analyses. Age, sex, tumor-specific survival time and survival status of patients at diagnosis, pathological grade, TNM stage, perineural invasion, tumor deposits, tumor size, pretreatment CEA , radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and number of lymph node dissections were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed and compared between patients with early- and late-onset rectal cancer. Results: A total of 5,048 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included in the study (aged 27-70 years): 1,290 (25.55%) patients with early-onset rectal cancer and 3,758 (74.45%) patients with late-onset rectal cancer. Patients with early-onset rectal cancer had a higher rate of perineural invasion (P<0.001), more positive lymph nodes dissected (P<0.001), higher positive lymph node ratios (P<0.001), and a higher proportion receiving preoperative radiotherapy (P=0.002). Patients with early-onset rectal cancer had slightly better short-term survival than those with late-onset rectal cancer (median (IQR ): 54 (33-83) vs 50 (31-79) months, χ2=5.192, P=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression for all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer showed that age (P=0.008), grade of tumor differentiation (P=0.002), pretreatment CEA (P=0.008), perineural invasion (P=0.021), positive number (P=0.004) and positive ratio (P=0.001) of dissected lymph nodes, and sequence of surgery and radiotherapy (P=0.005) influenced PFS. This suggests that the Cox regression results for all patients may not be applicable to patients with early-onset cancer. Cox analysis showed tumor differentiation grade (patients with low differentiation had a higher risk of death, P=0.027), TNM stage (stage III patients had a higher risk of death, P=0.025), T stage (higher risk of death in stage T4, P<0.001), pretreatment CEA (P=0.002), perineural invasion (P<0.001), tumor deposits (P=0.005), number of dissected lymph nodes (patients with removal of 12-20 lymph nodes had a lower risk of death, P<0.001), and positive number of dissected lymph nodes (P<0.001) were independent factors influencing PFS of patients with early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusion: Patients with early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer were more likely to have adverse prognostic factors, but an adequate number of lymph node dissections (12-20) resulted in better survival outcomes.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prognosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Staging
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Extranodal Extension/pathology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Survival Analysis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lymph Nodes/pathology*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.Cryo-EM structures of a prokaryotic heme transporter CydDC.
Chen ZHU ; Yanfeng SHI ; Jing YU ; Wenhao ZHAO ; Lingqiao LI ; Jingxi LIANG ; Xiaolin YANG ; Bing ZHANG ; Yao ZHAO ; Yan GAO ; Xiaobo CHEN ; Xiuna YANG ; Lu ZHANG ; Luke W GUDDAT ; Lei LIU ; Haitao YANG ; Zihe RAO ; Jun LI
Protein & Cell 2023;14(12):919-923
9.International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
Audrius DULSKAS ; Philip F. CAUSHAJ ; Domas GRIGORAVICIUS ; Liu ZHENG ; Richard FORTUNATO ; Joseph W. NUNOO-MENSAH ; Narimantas E. SAMALAVICIUS
Annals of Coloproctology 2023;39(4):307-314
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer treatment if he/she was the patient. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A panel of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 10 questions that were included in a questionnaire that included other items including demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in our database and remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			One hundred sixty-three specialists completed the survey. The majority of surgeons (n=65, 39.9%) chose the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery for their personal treatment of rectal cancer. For low-lying rectal cancer T1 and T2, the treatment choice was standard chemoradiation+local excision (n=60, 36.8%) followed by local excision±chemoradiotherapy if needed (n=55, 33.7%). In regards to locally advanced low rectal cancer T3 or greater, the preference of the responders was for laparoscopic surgery (n=65, 39.9%). We found a statistically significant relationship between surgeons’ age and their preference for minimally invasive techniques demonstrating an age-based bias on senior surgeons’ inclination toward open approach. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			Our survey reveals an age-based preference by surgeons for minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as organ-preserving techniques for personal treatment of treating rectal cancer. Only 1/4 of specialists do adhere to the international guidelines for treating early rectal cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Aspirin Use Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients
Christopher JOHNS ; Allen YEN ; Asal RAHIMI ; Yu-Lun LIU ; Ann Marilyn LEITCH ; Ann SPANGLER ; Prasanna ALLURI ; Chika NWACHUKWU ; Rachel WOOLDRIDGE ; Deborah FARR ; D. W. Nathan KIM
Journal of Breast Cancer 2023;26(1):14-24
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer and has a high propensity for distant metastases. Our previous data suggested that aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) use may be associated with reduced risk of distant metastases in aggressive breast cancer; however, there are no reported studies on the potential benefit of ASA use in patients with IBC. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Data from patients with non-metastatic IBC treated between 2000–2017 at two institutions, were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify significant associated factors. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Of 59 patients meeting the criteria for analysis and available for review, 14 ASA users were identified. ASA users demonstrated increased OS (p = 0.03) and DMFS (p = 0.02), with 5-year OS and DMFS of 92% (p = 0.01) and 85% (p = 0.01) compared to 51% and 43%, respectively, for non-ASA users. In univariate analysis, pT stage, pN stage, and ASA use were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with OS and DFS. On multivariable analysis, ASA use (hazard ratio [HR], 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–0.8) and lymph node stage (HR, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.4–25.9) remained significant for OS and DFS ASA use (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03–0.56) and lymph node stage (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9–16.4). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			ASA use during remission was associated with significantly improved OS and DMFS in patients with IBC. These results suggest that ASA may provide survival benefits to patients with IBC. Prospective clinical trials of ASA use in patients with high-risk IBC in remission should be considered. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail