INTRODUCTION: The most recent local study on the incidence of histological subtypes of all brain and spinal tumours treated surgically was published in 2000. In view of the outdated data, we investigated the presenting characteristics, histological subtypes and outcomes of adult patients who underwent surgery for brain or spinal tumours at our institution. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review of 501 patients who underwent surgery for brain or spinal tumours from 2016 to 2020 was conducted. The inclusion criteria were (a) patients who had a brain or spinal tumour that was histologically verified and (b) patients who were aged 18 years and above at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-five patients (86.8%) had brain tumours and 66 patients (13.2%) had spinal tumours. Patients with brain tumours frequently presented with cranial nerve palsy, headache and weakness, while patients with spinal tumours frequently presented with weakness, numbness and back pain. Overall, the most common histological types of brain and spinal tumours were metastases, meningiomas and tumours of the sellar region. The most common complications after surgery were cerebrospinal fluid leak, diabetes insipidus and urinary tract infection. In addition, 15.2% of the brain tumours and 13.6% of the spinal tumours recurred, while 25.7% of patients with brain tumours and 18.2% of patients with spinal tumours died. High-grade gliomas and metastases had the poorest survival and highest recurrence rates. CONCLUSION This study serves as a comprehensive update of the epidemiology of brain and spinal tumours and could help guide further studies on brain and spinal tumours.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Aged ; Central Nervous System Neoplasms/pathology* ; Brain Neoplasms/pathology* ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications ; Young Adult ; Spinal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Aged, 80 and over ; Adolescent

INTRODUCTIONHigh workload volumes in a Cytogenetics laboratory can lead to long result turn-around times (TAT). This study aimed to improve laboratory efficiency by adopting Lean Management System initiatives to increase productivity through the elimination of wastes. This study examined if the prerequisite 20-cell analysis was sufficient for a conclusive result or if additional cell workup was necessary to ascertain the presence of a previous chromosome abnormality among cases on follow-up, or when a single abnormal cell was encountered during the analysis to determine the presence of a clone.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe karyotype results of cases that had additional workup were retrieved from among 8040 bone marrow cases of various haematological disorders performed between June 2003 and June 2008.

RESULTSOf 8040 cases analysed, 2915 cases (36.3%) had additional cell workup. Only 49 cases (1.7%) led to the establishment of a clone. The majority of these cases could have been resolved without the additional workup, especially if fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays had been utilised.

CONCLUSIONThis study shows that the additional workup procedure is redundant. The time saved by discontinuing the workup procedure can be used to analyse other cases, leading to increased laboratory efficiency and a faster TAT without compromise to patient care. The practice of additional workup over and above the 20- cell analysis should be dispensed with as little benefit was derived for the amount of additional manpower expended. FISH or PCR-based assays should be utilised to elucidate a case further.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Marrow ; Bone Marrow Cells ; Cytogenetics ; Efficiency ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Female ; Hematologic Diseases ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; instrumentation ; methods ; Karyotyping ; instrumentation ; methods ; Male ; Polymerase Chain Reaction