Holmium laser lithotripsy (HLL) is one of the common surgical methods for urolithiasis. It causes minor surgical trauma, but complications are not rare. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment of sepsis is common, but venoarterial (VA)-ECMO treatment of urosepsis has not been reported yet. In this article, we reported a 67-year-old female patient with refractory septic shock caused by HLL under percutaneous nephroscope, involving breathing, heart, kidney and other organs, and organs support treatment was ineffective for the patient. Finally, we successfully treated the patient under VA-ECMO with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Combined ECMO and CRRT may provide a solution for addressing refractory sepsis. Here we present the case and review relevant literature, so as to provide a treatment strategy for patients with refractory urogenic sepsis and to reduce the mortality rate.
Aged ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods* ; Female ; Humans ; Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects* ; Lithotripsy, Laser/methods* ; Postoperative Complications/therapy* ; Renal Replacement Therapy/methods* ; Shock, Septic/therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Tract Infections/therapy* ; Urolithiasis/surgery*

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in the elderly population and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an important method for its management. However, postoperative complications of HoLEP affects the patients' quality of life as well as the outcome of surgery. Based on the ten-year clinical practice and multi-center data analysis, the author puts forward the concept of "postoperative urethral recovery" for BPH patients receiving HoLEP, which involves postoperative pain recovery, urination recovery, urine control recovery, sexual function recovery, and a postoperative recovery system aiming at the acceleration of recovery.
Aged ; Holmium ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Lasers, Solid-State ; adverse effects ; Male ; Pain, Postoperative ; Postoperative Period ; Prostatectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function ; Sexual Behavior ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethra ; physiology ; Urination

Objective: To compare thulium laser vaporization of the prostate (TLVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) analyze the risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture. METHODS: From June 2015 to June 2016, 210 BPH patients in our hospital underwent TURP (n = 126) or TLVP (n = 84). We followed up the patients for 6 months, compared the effects of the two surgical strategies and analyzed the risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with TURP, TLVP achieved significantly shorter time of operation (［78.6 ± 27.5］ vs ［53.2 ± 21.6］ min, P <0.01), postoperative bladder irrigation (［31.5 ± 2.9］ vs ［26.1 ± 3.7］ h, P <0.01), urethral catheterization (［5.3 ± 1.7］ vs ［3.7 ± 1.5］ d, P <0.01) and postoperative hospitalization (［7.9 ± 2.1］ vs ［5.5 ± 1.4］ d, P <0.01) as well as lower urinary leukocyte count at 6 months after surgery (［32.1 ± 12.6］ vs ［24.9 ± 11.7］ /μl, P <0.01) and incidence rate of postoperative complications (11.9% ［15/126］ vs 3.6% ［3/84］, P <0.05), particularly that of urethral stricture (7.9% ［10/126］ vs 1.2% ［1/84］, P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative urinary leukocyte count, postoperative urethral catheterization time, and surgical method were independent risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture. CONCLUSIONS TLVP, in comparison with TURP, has the advantages of definite effect, fast recovery, high safety and low incidence of postoperative urethral stricture. The main risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture include preoperative urinary tract infection, postoperative urethral catheterization time and surgical method.
Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Quality of Life ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Thulium ; therapeutic use ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethral Stricture ; etiology ; Urinary Catheterization ; Urinary Tract Infections ; complications

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of CO2 laser assisted posterior cordotomy for patients with bilateral paralysis of the vocal cord. METHOD: Twenty-one patients with bilateral paralysis of the vocal cord underwent CO2 laser assisted posterior cordotomy in our hospital from Jul. 2009 to Jun. 2015. The causes of the bilateral paralysis of the vocal cord were thyroidectomy in 15 cases, cervical trauma in 2 cases, resection of pituitary tumor in 1 case, inflammation in 1 case and without cause in 2 cases. Ten patients underwent tracheotomy before the operation; 9 patients underwent tracheotomy after the operation; 2 cases without tracheotomy. RESULT: The tracheotomy tube was plugged next day after posterior cordotomy. Lots of patients were breathing well without any effort. A few patients were breathing hard, so the tracheotomy tube was plugged discontinuously. Seventeen patients were decannulated 1 year after operation. Two patients were failed to decannulated. The patients were followed up for 3 months 6 years after operation, and all of them were breathing well. CONCLUSION Our limited experience showed that CO2 laser assisted posterior cordotomyis an effective and reliable surgical procedure for patients with bilateral paralysis of the vocal cord.
Cordotomy ; methods ; Humans ; Inflammation ; complications ; Laser Therapy ; Lasers, Gas ; Neck Injuries ; complications ; Pituitary Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Thyroidectomy ; adverse effects ; Tracheotomy ; Treatment Outcome ; Vocal Cord Paralysis ; surgery ; Vocal Cords ; physiopathology

OBJECTIVETo compare the effect and impact of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and 120-W thulium: YAG vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) on erectile function in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 93 cases of symptomatic BPH treated by HoLEP or 120 W ThuVEP. We made comparisons between the two groups of patients in the baseline and postoperative clinical and surgical indexes as well as their IPSS, quality of life (QOL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), and IIEF-EF scores before surgery and during the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTSThuVEP, in comparison with HoLEP, achieved a significantly shorter operation time ([57.6 +/- 12. 8] vs. [70.4 +/- 21.8] min, P = 0.001) and a higher laser efficiency ([0.71 +/- 0.18] vs. [0.62 +/- 0.19] g/min, P = 0. 021). At 1, 6, or 12 months of follow-up, no significant differences were observed in IPSS, OOL, Omax, and PVR between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both the HoLEP and ThuVEP groups showed low incidences of complications and remarkably improved IIEF-EF scores at 12 months postoperatively, but with no significant differences (both P > 0.05). However, in those with relatively normal erectile functions before operation, the mean IIEF-EF score was reduced from 22.8 +/- 2.2 preoperatively to 21.0 +/- 2.7 after HoLEP, (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONBoth HoLEP and 120W ThuVEP are effective and safe in the treatment of BPH. Compared with HoLEP, 120 W ThuVEP has even a higher laser efficiency. However, neither can significantly improve erectile function, and HoLEP may have a short-term negative impact on the relatively normal erectile function of the patient.

Aged ; Holmium ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Lasers, Solid-State ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Penile Erection ; Prostatectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Thulium ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome ; Urine

OBJECTIVETo compare the incidences of complications associated with 3 different endoscopic procedures, namely transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and assess the clinical value of the Clavien-Dindo classification system for standardizing the evaluation of the complications.

METHODSBetween January 2010 and December 2013, a total of 625 patients with BPH scheduled for endoscopic surgery underwent TURP (214 cases), PKRP (207 cases), or HoLEP (204 cases). The complications were recorded in each group and analyzed using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

RESULTSThere was no significant difference in the baseline data among the 3 groups (P>0.05). TURP was associated with a higher total incidence rate of complications than PKRP and HoLEP, and the incidences of electrolyte disturbance, massive intraoperative hemorrhage, urinary irritation symptom, urinary blockage, transurethral resection syndrome (TRUS), and erectile dysfunction (ED) differed significantly among the 3 groups (P<0.05). According to Clavien-Dindo classification, the incidence of grade II complications was significantly higher in TURP group than in PKRP and HoLEP groups (P<0.05), and that of grades III and IV complications was significantly higher in TURP group than in HoLEP group (P<0.05); no significant difference was found in grade I or V complications among the 3 groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONAccording to the results of Clavien-Dindo classification analysis, PKRP and HoLEP are associated with fewer complications with a better safety profile in the treatment of BPH. The current Clavien-Dindo classification system can contribute to standardized evaluation of surgical complications but still needs further modifications for better performance.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Endoscopy ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Holmium ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; classification ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; adverse effects

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GreenLight 120-W laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODSWe searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP for randomized control trials and their references addressing 120-W PVP versus TURP in the treatment of BPH. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently accomplished the screening, quality assessment, and data extraction of the identified studies and performed meta-analyses using RevMan 5.2.

RESULTSTotally, 6 randomized control trials were included in this analysis, involving 703 cases, 351 treated by PVP and 352 by TURP. Compared with TURP, PVP showed significantly decreased time of catheterization (by 32. 55 hours, 95% CI 15.3 -49.8, P < 0.01), hospital stay (by 1.85 days, 95% CI 1.2-2.5, P < 0.01), and intraoperative blood loss (by 15.6 g/L, 95% CI 10.0-21.2, P < 0.01), but increased time of operation (by 9.37 minutes, 95% CI 5. 1-13.6, P < 0.01). There was also a significant reduction in blood transfusion, TUR syndrome, and capsular perforation in the PVP group. At 12 months after surgery, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the improvement of maximum urinary flow rate, IPSS, postvoid residual, and sexual function.

CONCLUSIONGreenLight 120-W laser PVP is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of BPH, with similar effectiveness to TURP but less blood loss, shorter time of catheterization and hospital stay, and lower incidences of blood transfusion, TUR syndrome and capsular perforation.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Prostate ; surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluated the safety and effect of the 120-W GreenLight HPS laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in different BPH populations.

METHODSThis study included 174 BPH patients treated by PVP using 120-W Green-Light HPS laser. According to the prostate volume (PV) ( < 80 or ≥ 80 ml), history of 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) medication, and history of acute urinary retention (AUR), we divided the patients into a PV < 80 ml, a PV ≥ 80 ml, a 5-ARI, a no 5-ARI; an AUR, and a no AUR group. We collected the baseline, perioperative, and follow-up data about the patients, and compared them among different groups.

RESULTSThe patients were aged 69.4 ± 7.7 years, of whom PVP was successfully performed for 136 and PVP was intraoperatively converted to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the other 38, with a mean operation time of (49.4 ± 16.3) min. The preoperative PV averaged (67.9 ± 29.8) ml. There was no intraoperative blood transfusion, transurethral resection syndrome, or capsule perforation. Bladder neck contracture occurred in 2 cases and urethral stricture developed in another 2 postoperatively. All the patients showed a significant improvement in the prostatic function parameters and no significant differences were observed between the PV < 80 ml and PV ≥ 80 ml, 5-ARI and no 5-ARI, or AUR and no AUR groups.

CONCLUSIONPVP with 120-W GreenLight HPS laser is safe and efficient for the treatment of BPH and the its effect is not influenced by the prostate volume, history of 5-ARI medication, or history of AUR. However, preoperative urinary catheterization may increase the difficulty of surgery and the risk of conversion to TURP.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Operative Time ; Organ Size ; Prostate ; pathology ; surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; pathology ; surgery ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethral Stricture ; etiology ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Retention

PURPOSE: Various articles have previously addressed the introduction of new surgical laser therapies for an enlarged prostate gland causing obstructive symptoms. The objective of this study was to report the feasibility of performing the thulium laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) procedure for benign prostatic obstruction in a 1-day surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2011 to September 2013, we conducted a prospective study on patients who underwent ThuVEP in a 1-day surgery. The primary outcomes measured perioperatively included operative time, resected tissue weight, hemoglobin decrease, transfusion rate, postoperative irrigation and catheterization time, and postoperative hospital stay. Also, the preoperative and postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and results of uroflowmetry performed on the 7th and 30th postoperative days were recorded. All perioperative and postoperative complications were monitored. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients underwent the surgical treatment in a 1-day surgery. Seven patients continued antiaggregant therapy with aspirin. Mean preoperative prostatic adenoma volume was 56.6 mL. Mean operative time was 71 minutes. The average catheter time was 14.8 hours. The peak urinary flow rate on day 7 improved from 9.3 to 17.42 mL/s (p<0.001) and the IPSS improved from 18 to 10.2 (p<0.01). Patients were routinely discharged on the day of catheter removal. No complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: ThuVEP can be safely conducted as a 1-day surgical procedure. This strategy results in cost savings. ThuVEP shows good standardized outcomes with respect to improvement in flow parameters and length of bladder catheterization.
Aged ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Laser Therapy/adverse effects/*instrumentation ; Lasers, Solid-State/*therapeutic use ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate/*surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia/*surgery ; Thulium/*therapeutic use ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for extremely large prostates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing HoLEP between July 2008 and December 2013 from the Seoul National University Hospital Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Database Registry were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to their total prostate volume (TPV): group A (TPV<100 mL), group B (100 mL< or =TPV<200 mL), and group C (TPV> or =200 mL); the clinical data of the three groups were compared. All patients were followed up 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 502 patients (group A, 426; group B, 70; group C, 6) with a mean age of 69.0 (standard deviation, +/-7.3) years were included in our analysis. The mean prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen level were 68.7+/-36.9 mL and 4.15+/-4.24 ng/mL, respectively. The enucleation and morcellation times were longer in group C (p<0.001), and the enucleation efficacy was higher in this group (p<0.001, R2=0.399). Moreover, the mean postoperative catheterization and hospitalization periods were significantly longer in group C (p=0.004 and p=0.011, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in any other postoperative events, including recatheterization, reoperation, urinary tract infection, clot retention, and bladder neck contracture (p range, 0.516-0.913). One patient in group C experienced recurrence of the urethral stricture. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP in patients with an extremely large prostate can be performed efficiently and safely.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Holmium ; Humans ; Laser Therapy/*adverse effects ; Lasers, Solid-State/*therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organ Size ; *Postoperative Complications ; Prostate/pathology/*surgery ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood ; Prostatic Hyperplasia/*surgery ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Seoul ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate/*methods ; Treatment Outcome