Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Glycemic control is particularly important in hemodialysis (HD) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Although fasting blood glucose (FBG) level is an important indicator of glycemic control, a clear target for reducing mortality in HD patients with DM is lacking. Methods: A total of 26,162 maintenance HD patients with DM were recruited from the National Health Insurance Database of Korea between 2002 and 2018. We analyzed the association of FBG levels at the baseline health examination with the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results: Patients with FBG 80–100 mg/dL showed a higher survival rate compared with that of other FBG categories (p < 0.001). The risk of all-cause mortality increased with the increase in FBG levels, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.17), 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13–1.29), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.26–1.46), and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.51–1.72) for patients with FBG 100–125, 125–150, 150–180, and ≥180 mg/dL, respectively. The HR for mortality was also significantly increased in patients with FBG <80 mg/dL (adjusted HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.23). The analysis of cause-specific mortality also revealed a J-shaped curve between FBG levels and the risk of cardiovascular deaths. However, the risk of infection or malignancy-related deaths was not linearly increased as FBG levels increased. Conclusion: A J-shaped association was observed between FBG levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, with the lowest risk at FBG 80–100 mg/dL in HD patients with DM.

Glycemic control is particularly important in hemodialysis (HD) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Although fasting blood glucose (FBG) level is an important indicator of glycemic control, a clear target for reducing mortality in HD patients with DM is lacking. Methods: A total of 26,162 maintenance HD patients with DM were recruited from the National Health Insurance Database of Korea between 2002 and 2018. We analyzed the association of FBG levels at the baseline health examination with the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results: Patients with FBG 80–100 mg/dL showed a higher survival rate compared with that of other FBG categories (p < 0.001). The risk of all-cause mortality increased with the increase in FBG levels, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.17), 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13–1.29), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.26–1.46), and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.51–1.72) for patients with FBG 100–125, 125–150, 150–180, and ≥180 mg/dL, respectively. The HR for mortality was also significantly increased in patients with FBG <80 mg/dL (adjusted HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.23). The analysis of cause-specific mortality also revealed a J-shaped curve between FBG levels and the risk of cardiovascular deaths. However, the risk of infection or malignancy-related deaths was not linearly increased as FBG levels increased. Conclusion: A J-shaped association was observed between FBG levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, with the lowest risk at FBG 80–100 mg/dL in HD patients with DM.

Glycemic control is particularly important in hemodialysis (HD) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Although fasting blood glucose (FBG) level is an important indicator of glycemic control, a clear target for reducing mortality in HD patients with DM is lacking. Methods: A total of 26,162 maintenance HD patients with DM were recruited from the National Health Insurance Database of Korea between 2002 and 2018. We analyzed the association of FBG levels at the baseline health examination with the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results: Patients with FBG 80–100 mg/dL showed a higher survival rate compared with that of other FBG categories (p < 0.001). The risk of all-cause mortality increased with the increase in FBG levels, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.17), 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13–1.29), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.26–1.46), and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.51–1.72) for patients with FBG 100–125, 125–150, 150–180, and ≥180 mg/dL, respectively. The HR for mortality was also significantly increased in patients with FBG <80 mg/dL (adjusted HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.23). The analysis of cause-specific mortality also revealed a J-shaped curve between FBG levels and the risk of cardiovascular deaths. However, the risk of infection or malignancy-related deaths was not linearly increased as FBG levels increased. Conclusion: A J-shaped association was observed between FBG levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, with the lowest risk at FBG 80–100 mg/dL in HD patients with DM.

Glycemic control is particularly important in hemodialysis (HD) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Although fasting blood glucose (FBG) level is an important indicator of glycemic control, a clear target for reducing mortality in HD patients with DM is lacking. Methods: A total of 26,162 maintenance HD patients with DM were recruited from the National Health Insurance Database of Korea between 2002 and 2018. We analyzed the association of FBG levels at the baseline health examination with the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results: Patients with FBG 80–100 mg/dL showed a higher survival rate compared with that of other FBG categories (p < 0.001). The risk of all-cause mortality increased with the increase in FBG levels, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.17), 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13–1.29), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.26–1.46), and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.51–1.72) for patients with FBG 100–125, 125–150, 150–180, and ≥180 mg/dL, respectively. The HR for mortality was also significantly increased in patients with FBG <80 mg/dL (adjusted HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.23). The analysis of cause-specific mortality also revealed a J-shaped curve between FBG levels and the risk of cardiovascular deaths. However, the risk of infection or malignancy-related deaths was not linearly increased as FBG levels increased. Conclusion: A J-shaped association was observed between FBG levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, with the lowest risk at FBG 80–100 mg/dL in HD patients with DM.

Endostatin is released during extracellular matrix remodeling and is involved in the development of vascular pathology and cardiovascular (CV) disease. However, the role of circulating endostatin as a biomarker of vascular calcification and CV events in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) remains unclear. Methods: A total of 372 patients undergoing HD were prospectively recruited. Plasma endostatin levels were measured at baseline, and their associations with circulating mineral bone disease (MBD) biomarkers and abdominal aortic vascular calcification scores were analyzed. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of CV and cardiac events. Results: Plasma levels of patients in endostatin tertile 3 were significantly associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and predialysis systolic blood pressure in multivariate analysis. However, endostatin levels did not correlate with circulating MBD biomarkers or vascular calcification scores. Patients in endostatin tertile 3 had a significantly higher cumulative event rate for the composite of CV events (p = 0.006). Endostatin tertile 3 was also associated with an increased cumulative rate of cardiac events (p = 0.04). In multivariate Cox regression analyses, endostatin tertile 3 was associated with a 4.37-fold risk for composite CV events and a 3.88-fold risk for cardiac events after adjusting for multiple variables. Conclusion: Higher circulating endostatin levels were independently associated with atherosclerotic risk factors but did not correlate with MBD markers or vascular calcification. Higher circulating endostatin levels were associated with a greater risk of composite CV events in patients undergoing HD, and endostatin is a biomarker that helps to determine the high risk of CV events.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update nursing practice guidelines for intravenous infusion published in 2017. Methods: The guideline update process was carried out using 22 steps developed by NICE and SIGN. It was agreed to update domains related to central venous infusion therapy. Contents related to peripheral infusion would be updated later. Results: Updated guidelines for central venous infusion therapy consisted of 6 domains and 195 recommendations. The number of recommendations by domain was 11 for general instruction, 14 for central vascular access devices (CVAD) and add-on devices, 13 for nursing management before insertion of CVAD, 30 for management during insertion of CVAD, 51 for management after insertion of CVAD, and 76 for complications. A grade was 29 (14.9%), B grade was 87 (44.6%), and C grade was 79 (40.5%) in the strength of recommendations. A total of 37 (19.0%) recommendations were newly developed and 23 (12.3%) previous recommendations have been modified. The newly developed recommendations were mainly related to the infection control methods. Conclusion The updated guideline is focused on safe maintenance of central venous infusion therapy. Through this guideline, it is hoped to minimize the occurrence of complications and improve the standardization and efficiency of nursing practice.