Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Since the cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) was first introduced in 2004, CCEP monitoring has been utilized in various types of brain surgery to achieve maximal safe resection (MSR). MSR is the primary goal in improving the prognosis of glioma; however, this is particularly challenging when the tumor is located around eloquent areas. Since the complexity of the language network system makes it more difficult to achieve MSR, language area mapping is essential when tumors are located around these areas. Awake surgery has been the gold standard for intraoperative language area mapping.However, awake craniotomy is not always feasible due to various clinical and patient-related factors.CCEP monitoring has emerged as a promising alternative for intraoperative language function assessment under general anesthesia to overcome the limitations of awake surgery. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on CCEP-guided surgery, focusing on its effectiveness in preserving language function.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: The 5th edition of WHO classification (WHO5) renamed pituitary adenoma as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), aligning with NET nomenclature from other sites.This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of surgically resected PitNET based on the WHO5 classification. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 cases of surgically resected and pathologically confirmed PitNET treated at Seoul National University Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The tumors were graded using the French five-tiered grading system proposed by Trouillas et al. Detailed information on grade 3 metastatic PitNET cases is provided. Results: The cohort’s median age was 53 years (age range: 8–84 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range: 0.1–6.5 cm). Macroadenomas predominated (91.9%), followed by microadenoma (6.7%), and giant tumors (1.4%), with 56.2% extending suprasellarly. SF1-lineage PitNET was most prevalent (49.5%), followed by PIT1-lineage (23.3%) and TPIT-lineage (17.1%). Null cell tumors (5.7%) and unclassified plurihormonal PitNET (4.3%) were rare. PIT1-lineage PitNET comprised somatotrophs (47.0%), mature plurihormonal PIT1 lineage tumors (18.4%), thyrotrophs (16.3%), immature PIT1-lineage tumors (16.3%), and acidophilic stem cell tumors (n=1), however, there was no lactotroph PitNET. Among SF1-lineage tumors, serologically non-functional tumors predominated (79%), while, immunohistochemically, 71.2% were gonadotrophin (FSH/LH)-positive.Tumor grades by the French five-tiered classification system were distributed as follows:grade 1a (58.1%), 1b (17.6%), 2a (16.2%), 2b (7.1%), and 3 (1.0%). Two cases of metastatic corticotroph PitNET were observed: The first case, a 50-year-old female had liver metastasis and experienced tumor recurrence 7 years after his initial diagnosis of PitNET, ultimately dying 9.5 years later. The primary tumor appeared bland, but the metastatic tumor exhibited a high mitotic rate and a Ki-67 index was 48%. The second case involved a 44-year-old man with metastases to the paranasal sinus, liver, and bone. Despite showing initial bland histopathology and a low proliferation index, this tumor displayed aggressive behavior.The patient had a recurrence 1.5 years after diagnosis, with additional metastases emerging 3 years later. He survived for 8.0 years and is currently disease-free following surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Conclusion This comprehensive analysis of surgically resected PitNETs using the new WHO5 classification provides valuable insights into the distribution of the subtypes in the surgical cohort. Key findings were the predominant gonadotroph PitNET, the absence of lactotroph PitNET, and the rarity of null cell tumors in surgical cases. The lack of lactotrophs was mainly due to medical treatment. This study highlights the discrepancy between serological and immunohistochemical findings of SF1-lineage PitNETs. While metastatic PitNET cases showed poor prognosis, the predictive value of the French grading system for PitNET requires further validation through extended follow-up.

Background: The 5th edition of WHO classification (WHO5) renamed pituitary adenoma as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), aligning with NET nomenclature from other sites.This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of surgically resected PitNET based on the WHO5 classification. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 cases of surgically resected and pathologically confirmed PitNET treated at Seoul National University Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The tumors were graded using the French five-tiered grading system proposed by Trouillas et al. Detailed information on grade 3 metastatic PitNET cases is provided. Results: The cohort’s median age was 53 years (age range: 8–84 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range: 0.1–6.5 cm). Macroadenomas predominated (91.9%), followed by microadenoma (6.7%), and giant tumors (1.4%), with 56.2% extending suprasellarly. SF1-lineage PitNET was most prevalent (49.5%), followed by PIT1-lineage (23.3%) and TPIT-lineage (17.1%). Null cell tumors (5.7%) and unclassified plurihormonal PitNET (4.3%) were rare. PIT1-lineage PitNET comprised somatotrophs (47.0%), mature plurihormonal PIT1 lineage tumors (18.4%), thyrotrophs (16.3%), immature PIT1-lineage tumors (16.3%), and acidophilic stem cell tumors (n=1), however, there was no lactotroph PitNET. Among SF1-lineage tumors, serologically non-functional tumors predominated (79%), while, immunohistochemically, 71.2% were gonadotrophin (FSH/LH)-positive.Tumor grades by the French five-tiered classification system were distributed as follows:grade 1a (58.1%), 1b (17.6%), 2a (16.2%), 2b (7.1%), and 3 (1.0%). Two cases of metastatic corticotroph PitNET were observed: The first case, a 50-year-old female had liver metastasis and experienced tumor recurrence 7 years after his initial diagnosis of PitNET, ultimately dying 9.5 years later. The primary tumor appeared bland, but the metastatic tumor exhibited a high mitotic rate and a Ki-67 index was 48%. The second case involved a 44-year-old man with metastases to the paranasal sinus, liver, and bone. Despite showing initial bland histopathology and a low proliferation index, this tumor displayed aggressive behavior.The patient had a recurrence 1.5 years after diagnosis, with additional metastases emerging 3 years later. He survived for 8.0 years and is currently disease-free following surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Conclusion This comprehensive analysis of surgically resected PitNETs using the new WHO5 classification provides valuable insights into the distribution of the subtypes in the surgical cohort. Key findings were the predominant gonadotroph PitNET, the absence of lactotroph PitNET, and the rarity of null cell tumors in surgical cases. The lack of lactotrophs was mainly due to medical treatment. This study highlights the discrepancy between serological and immunohistochemical findings of SF1-lineage PitNETs. While metastatic PitNET cases showed poor prognosis, the predictive value of the French grading system for PitNET requires further validation through extended follow-up.

Since the cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) was first introduced in 2004, CCEP monitoring has been utilized in various types of brain surgery to achieve maximal safe resection (MSR). MSR is the primary goal in improving the prognosis of glioma; however, this is particularly challenging when the tumor is located around eloquent areas. Since the complexity of the language network system makes it more difficult to achieve MSR, language area mapping is essential when tumors are located around these areas. Awake surgery has been the gold standard for intraoperative language area mapping.However, awake craniotomy is not always feasible due to various clinical and patient-related factors.CCEP monitoring has emerged as a promising alternative for intraoperative language function assessment under general anesthesia to overcome the limitations of awake surgery. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on CCEP-guided surgery, focusing on its effectiveness in preserving language function.

Background: The 5th edition of WHO classification (WHO5) renamed pituitary adenoma as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), aligning with NET nomenclature from other sites.This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of surgically resected PitNET based on the WHO5 classification. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 cases of surgically resected and pathologically confirmed PitNET treated at Seoul National University Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The tumors were graded using the French five-tiered grading system proposed by Trouillas et al. Detailed information on grade 3 metastatic PitNET cases is provided. Results: The cohort’s median age was 53 years (age range: 8–84 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range: 0.1–6.5 cm). Macroadenomas predominated (91.9%), followed by microadenoma (6.7%), and giant tumors (1.4%), with 56.2% extending suprasellarly. SF1-lineage PitNET was most prevalent (49.5%), followed by PIT1-lineage (23.3%) and TPIT-lineage (17.1%). Null cell tumors (5.7%) and unclassified plurihormonal PitNET (4.3%) were rare. PIT1-lineage PitNET comprised somatotrophs (47.0%), mature plurihormonal PIT1 lineage tumors (18.4%), thyrotrophs (16.3%), immature PIT1-lineage tumors (16.3%), and acidophilic stem cell tumors (n=1), however, there was no lactotroph PitNET. Among SF1-lineage tumors, serologically non-functional tumors predominated (79%), while, immunohistochemically, 71.2% were gonadotrophin (FSH/LH)-positive.Tumor grades by the French five-tiered classification system were distributed as follows:grade 1a (58.1%), 1b (17.6%), 2a (16.2%), 2b (7.1%), and 3 (1.0%). Two cases of metastatic corticotroph PitNET were observed: The first case, a 50-year-old female had liver metastasis and experienced tumor recurrence 7 years after his initial diagnosis of PitNET, ultimately dying 9.5 years later. The primary tumor appeared bland, but the metastatic tumor exhibited a high mitotic rate and a Ki-67 index was 48%. The second case involved a 44-year-old man with metastases to the paranasal sinus, liver, and bone. Despite showing initial bland histopathology and a low proliferation index, this tumor displayed aggressive behavior.The patient had a recurrence 1.5 years after diagnosis, with additional metastases emerging 3 years later. He survived for 8.0 years and is currently disease-free following surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Conclusion This comprehensive analysis of surgically resected PitNETs using the new WHO5 classification provides valuable insights into the distribution of the subtypes in the surgical cohort. Key findings were the predominant gonadotroph PitNET, the absence of lactotroph PitNET, and the rarity of null cell tumors in surgical cases. The lack of lactotrophs was mainly due to medical treatment. This study highlights the discrepancy between serological and immunohistochemical findings of SF1-lineage PitNETs. While metastatic PitNET cases showed poor prognosis, the predictive value of the French grading system for PitNET requires further validation through extended follow-up.

Since the cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) was first introduced in 2004, CCEP monitoring has been utilized in various types of brain surgery to achieve maximal safe resection (MSR). MSR is the primary goal in improving the prognosis of glioma; however, this is particularly challenging when the tumor is located around eloquent areas. Since the complexity of the language network system makes it more difficult to achieve MSR, language area mapping is essential when tumors are located around these areas. Awake surgery has been the gold standard for intraoperative language area mapping.However, awake craniotomy is not always feasible due to various clinical and patient-related factors.CCEP monitoring has emerged as a promising alternative for intraoperative language function assessment under general anesthesia to overcome the limitations of awake surgery. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on CCEP-guided surgery, focusing on its effectiveness in preserving language function.