Objective: Previous studies have reported an association between cancer-related symptoms and perceived social support (PSS). The objective of this study was to analyze whether Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), a prevalent side effect of chemotherapy, varies according to PSS level using a validated tool for CIPN at prospective follow-up. Methods: A total of 39 breast cancer patients were evaluated for PSS using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) prior to chemotherapy and were subsequently grouped into one of two categories for each subscale: low-to-moderate PSS and high PSS. CIPN was prospectively evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20) at five time points. A linear mixed-effects model with square root transformation was employed to investigate whether the CIPN20 scales varied by PSS level and time point. Results: Statistical analysis of the MSPSS total scale and subscales revealed a significant effect of the friends subscale group and time point on the CIPN20 sensory scale. The sensory scale score of CIPN20 was found to be lower in participants with high PSS from friends in comparison to those with low-to-moderate PSS at 1 month post-chemotherapy (p=0.010). Conclusion This is the first study to prospectively follow the long-term effect of pre-treatment PSS from friends on CIPN. Further studies based on larger samples are required to analyze the effects of PSS on the pathophysiology of CIPN.

Objective: Previous studies have reported an association between cancer-related symptoms and perceived social support (PSS). The objective of this study was to analyze whether Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), a prevalent side effect of chemotherapy, varies according to PSS level using a validated tool for CIPN at prospective follow-up. Methods: A total of 39 breast cancer patients were evaluated for PSS using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) prior to chemotherapy and were subsequently grouped into one of two categories for each subscale: low-to-moderate PSS and high PSS. CIPN was prospectively evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20) at five time points. A linear mixed-effects model with square root transformation was employed to investigate whether the CIPN20 scales varied by PSS level and time point. Results: Statistical analysis of the MSPSS total scale and subscales revealed a significant effect of the friends subscale group and time point on the CIPN20 sensory scale. The sensory scale score of CIPN20 was found to be lower in participants with high PSS from friends in comparison to those with low-to-moderate PSS at 1 month post-chemotherapy (p=0.010). Conclusion This is the first study to prospectively follow the long-term effect of pre-treatment PSS from friends on CIPN. Further studies based on larger samples are required to analyze the effects of PSS on the pathophysiology of CIPN.

Objective: Previous studies have reported an association between cancer-related symptoms and perceived social support (PSS). The objective of this study was to analyze whether Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), a prevalent side effect of chemotherapy, varies according to PSS level using a validated tool for CIPN at prospective follow-up. Methods: A total of 39 breast cancer patients were evaluated for PSS using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) prior to chemotherapy and were subsequently grouped into one of two categories for each subscale: low-to-moderate PSS and high PSS. CIPN was prospectively evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20) at five time points. A linear mixed-effects model with square root transformation was employed to investigate whether the CIPN20 scales varied by PSS level and time point. Results: Statistical analysis of the MSPSS total scale and subscales revealed a significant effect of the friends subscale group and time point on the CIPN20 sensory scale. The sensory scale score of CIPN20 was found to be lower in participants with high PSS from friends in comparison to those with low-to-moderate PSS at 1 month post-chemotherapy (p=0.010). Conclusion This is the first study to prospectively follow the long-term effect of pre-treatment PSS from friends on CIPN. Further studies based on larger samples are required to analyze the effects of PSS on the pathophysiology of CIPN.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX) in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) caused by glaucoma eye drops. Methods: This study included 20 patients (aged 18-85 years) who were using glaucoma eye drops and exhibited signs of MGD. Participants underwent four sessions of IPL therapy at 3-week intervals, each followed by MGX. Evaluative measures included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), best-corrected visual acuity, Schirmer's test, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining score (CFS), lid margin abnormalities, meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), meibum quality, lipid layer thickness (LLT), and meiboscore. These assessments were conducted before and after each treatment. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were observed across all measured parameters, including OSDI, Schirmer's test, TBUT, CFS, lid margin abnormalities, MGE, meibum quality, LLT, and meiboscore. Conclusions IPL therapy combined with MGX was effective in improving ocular surface and eyelid abnormalities among patients with MGD induced by glaucoma eye drops. Our findings support the use of IPL and MGX as safe and effective adjunct therapies for these patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX) in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) caused by glaucoma eye drops. Methods: This study included 20 patients (aged 18-85 years) who were using glaucoma eye drops and exhibited signs of MGD. Participants underwent four sessions of IPL therapy at 3-week intervals, each followed by MGX. Evaluative measures included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), best-corrected visual acuity, Schirmer's test, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining score (CFS), lid margin abnormalities, meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), meibum quality, lipid layer thickness (LLT), and meiboscore. These assessments were conducted before and after each treatment. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were observed across all measured parameters, including OSDI, Schirmer's test, TBUT, CFS, lid margin abnormalities, MGE, meibum quality, LLT, and meiboscore. Conclusions IPL therapy combined with MGX was effective in improving ocular surface and eyelid abnormalities among patients with MGD induced by glaucoma eye drops. Our findings support the use of IPL and MGX as safe and effective adjunct therapies for these patients.

Objective: Previous studies have reported an association between cancer-related symptoms and perceived social support (PSS). The objective of this study was to analyze whether Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), a prevalent side effect of chemotherapy, varies according to PSS level using a validated tool for CIPN at prospective follow-up. Methods: A total of 39 breast cancer patients were evaluated for PSS using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) prior to chemotherapy and were subsequently grouped into one of two categories for each subscale: low-to-moderate PSS and high PSS. CIPN was prospectively evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20) at five time points. A linear mixed-effects model with square root transformation was employed to investigate whether the CIPN20 scales varied by PSS level and time point. Results: Statistical analysis of the MSPSS total scale and subscales revealed a significant effect of the friends subscale group and time point on the CIPN20 sensory scale. The sensory scale score of CIPN20 was found to be lower in participants with high PSS from friends in comparison to those with low-to-moderate PSS at 1 month post-chemotherapy (p=0.010). Conclusion This is the first study to prospectively follow the long-term effect of pre-treatment PSS from friends on CIPN. Further studies based on larger samples are required to analyze the effects of PSS on the pathophysiology of CIPN.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX) in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) caused by glaucoma eye drops. Methods: This study included 20 patients (aged 18-85 years) who were using glaucoma eye drops and exhibited signs of MGD. Participants underwent four sessions of IPL therapy at 3-week intervals, each followed by MGX. Evaluative measures included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), best-corrected visual acuity, Schirmer's test, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining score (CFS), lid margin abnormalities, meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), meibum quality, lipid layer thickness (LLT), and meiboscore. These assessments were conducted before and after each treatment. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were observed across all measured parameters, including OSDI, Schirmer's test, TBUT, CFS, lid margin abnormalities, MGE, meibum quality, LLT, and meiboscore. Conclusions IPL therapy combined with MGX was effective in improving ocular surface and eyelid abnormalities among patients with MGD induced by glaucoma eye drops. Our findings support the use of IPL and MGX as safe and effective adjunct therapies for these patients.

Objective: Previous studies have reported an association between cancer-related symptoms and perceived social support (PSS). The objective of this study was to analyze whether Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), a prevalent side effect of chemotherapy, varies according to PSS level using a validated tool for CIPN at prospective follow-up. Methods: A total of 39 breast cancer patients were evaluated for PSS using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) prior to chemotherapy and were subsequently grouped into one of two categories for each subscale: low-to-moderate PSS and high PSS. CIPN was prospectively evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20) at five time points. A linear mixed-effects model with square root transformation was employed to investigate whether the CIPN20 scales varied by PSS level and time point. Results: Statistical analysis of the MSPSS total scale and subscales revealed a significant effect of the friends subscale group and time point on the CIPN20 sensory scale. The sensory scale score of CIPN20 was found to be lower in participants with high PSS from friends in comparison to those with low-to-moderate PSS at 1 month post-chemotherapy (p=0.010). Conclusion This is the first study to prospectively follow the long-term effect of pre-treatment PSS from friends on CIPN. Further studies based on larger samples are required to analyze the effects of PSS on the pathophysiology of CIPN.