1.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Continuing besifovir dipivoxil maleate versus switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Results of 192-week phase 3 trial
Do Seon SONG ; Won KIM ; Sang Hoon AHN ; Hyung Joon YIM ; Jae Young JANG ; Young Oh KWEON ; Yong Kyun CHO ; Yoon Jun KIM ; Gun Young HONG ; Dong Joon KIM ; Young Kul JUNG ; Joo Hyun SOHN ; Jin-Woo LEE ; Sung Jae PARK ; Byung Seok LEE ; Ju Hyun KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Kew YOON ; Moon Young KIM ; Kwan Sik LEE ; Young Suk LIM ; Wan Sik LEE ; Jin Mo YANG ; Kyun-Hwan KIM ; Kwang-Hyub HAN ; Soon Ho UM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(2):346-359
		                        		
		                        			Background/Aims:
		                        			Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV), an acyclic nucleotide phosphonate, shows potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Our previous 48-week trial revealed that BSV has comparable antiviral efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and better safety profiles in terms of improved renal and bone safety. This extension study evaluated the prolonged efficacy and safety of BSV in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Patients continued to participate in an open-label BSV study after an initial 48-week double-blind comparison of BSV and TDF treatment. The antiviral efficacy and drug safety was evaluated up to 192 weeks in two groups: patients continuing BSV treatment (BSV-BSV) and patients switching from TDF to BSV after 48 weeks (TDF-BSV). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Among 197 patients receiving randomized treatments, 170 (86%) entered the open-label phase and 152 (77%) entered the 192-week extension study. Virological response rates over 192 weeks were 92.50% and 93.06% in the BSV-BSV and TDF-BSV groups, respectively (P=0.90). Hepatitis B envelop antigen seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase normalization rates were similar between the groups (P=0.75 and P=0.36, respectively). There were no drug-resistant mutations to BSV. Bone mineral density and renal function were well preserved in the BSV-BSV group, whereas these initially worsened then recovered after switching therapy in the TDF-BSV group. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			BSV maintained potent antiviral efficacy after 192 weeks and showed no evidence of drug resistance. BSV was safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients who switched from TDF to BSV. Trial Registration Number: NCT01937806 (date: 10 Sep 2013).
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Continuing besifovir dipivoxil maleate versus switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Results of 192-week phase 3 trial
Do Seon SONG ; Won KIM ; Sang Hoon AHN ; Hyung Joon YIM ; Jae Young JANG ; Young Oh KWEON ; Yong Kyun CHO ; Yoon Jun KIM ; Gun Young HONG ; Dong Joon KIM ; Young Kul JUNG ; Joo Hyun SOHN ; Jin-Woo LEE ; Sung Jae PARK ; Byung Seok LEE ; Ju Hyun KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Kew YOON ; Moon Young KIM ; Kwan Sik LEE ; Young Suk LIM ; Wan Sik LEE ; Jin Mo YANG ; Kyun-Hwan KIM ; Kwang-Hyub HAN ; Soon Ho UM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(2):346-359
		                        		
		                        			Background/Aims:
		                        			Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV), an acyclic nucleotide phosphonate, shows potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Our previous 48-week trial revealed that BSV has comparable antiviral efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and better safety profiles in terms of improved renal and bone safety. This extension study evaluated the prolonged efficacy and safety of BSV in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Patients continued to participate in an open-label BSV study after an initial 48-week double-blind comparison of BSV and TDF treatment. The antiviral efficacy and drug safety was evaluated up to 192 weeks in two groups: patients continuing BSV treatment (BSV-BSV) and patients switching from TDF to BSV after 48 weeks (TDF-BSV). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Among 197 patients receiving randomized treatments, 170 (86%) entered the open-label phase and 152 (77%) entered the 192-week extension study. Virological response rates over 192 weeks were 92.50% and 93.06% in the BSV-BSV and TDF-BSV groups, respectively (P=0.90). Hepatitis B envelop antigen seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase normalization rates were similar between the groups (P=0.75 and P=0.36, respectively). There were no drug-resistant mutations to BSV. Bone mineral density and renal function were well preserved in the BSV-BSV group, whereas these initially worsened then recovered after switching therapy in the TDF-BSV group. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			BSV maintained potent antiviral efficacy after 192 weeks and showed no evidence of drug resistance. BSV was safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients who switched from TDF to BSV. Trial Registration Number: NCT01937806 (date: 10 Sep 2013).
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Feasibility of Single-Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
Jae Young KWAK ; Kwan Mo YANG ; Myeong Sik HAN
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2020;23(3):120-125
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a recently developed minimally invasive surgical technique. We aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic low anterior resection (S+1-LAR) with those of multi-port laparoscopic low anterior resection (M-LAR) for mid-to-low rectal cancer. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We retrospectively reviewed patient characteristics and surgical outcomes by assessing data collected from the medical records of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid-to-low rectal cancer at the Gangneung Asan Hospital. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			From April 2015 to April 2019, 52 patients underwent S+1-LAR (n=28) or M-LAR (n=24) for midto-low rectal cancer at Gangneung Asan Hospital. There were no significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics. The mean postoperative 1-day pain score was significantly lower in the S+1-LAR group. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			S+1-LAR is a feasible and safe technique and is comparable with M-LAR in terms of surgical outcomes of patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Treatment of a Total Obstructive Anastomosis Stricture Using a Transanal Laparoscopic Approach and Intraoperative Colonoscopic Balloon Dilatation
Jae Young KWAK ; Kwan Mo YANG ; Hyun Il SEO
Annals of Coloproctology 2020;36(5):353-356
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 An anastomosis stricture with a total obstruction is rare and treatment options are variable. We describe our experience with a combination of a single port transanal laparoscopic approach and intraoperative colonoscopic balloon dilatation. The patient was a 48-year-old man with rectal cancer. A laparoscopic single port lower anterior resection and diverting ileostomy were performed followed by a colon study and ileostomy takedown. The colon study and sigmoidoscopy revealed total obstruction of the rectum at the anastomosis level. We employed a transanal approach using a single port to correct this. We located the anastomosis stricture site and generated a lumen using a dissector and electocautery method to insert the balloon device. Colonoscopic balloon dilatation was subsequently successful. The patient was discharged with no postoperative complications. A laparoscopic single port transanal approach with an intraoperative colonoscopic balloon dilatation is a viable alternative approach to treating an anastomosis stricture of the rectum. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Does the Different Locations of Colon Cancer Affect the Oncologic Outcome? A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis
Kwan Mo YANG ; In Ja PARK ; Jong Lyul LEE ; Yong Sik YOON ; Chan Wook KIM ; Seok Byung LIM ; Na Young KIM ; Shinae HONG ; Chang Sik YU ; Jin Cheon KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(1):15-23
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: We evaluate the prognostic value of primary tumor location for oncologic outcomes in patients with colon cancer (CC). METHODS: CC patients treated with curative surgery between 2009 and 2012 were classified into 2 groups: right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined based on tumor stage. Propensity scores were created using eight variables (age, sex, T stage, N stage, histologic grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion/perineural invasion, and microsatellite instability status). RESULTS: Overall, 2,329 patients were identified. The 5-year RFSs for RCC and LCC patients were 89.7% and 88.4% (P = 0.328), respectively, and their 5-year OSs were 90.9% and 93.4% (P = 0.062). Multivariate survival analyses were carried out by using the Cox regression proportional hazard model. In the unadjusted analysis, a marginal increase in overall mortality was seen in RCC patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.297; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.987–1.704, P = 0.062); however, after multivariable adjustment, similar OSs were observed in those patients (HR, 1.219; 95% CI, 0.91–1.633; P = 0.183). After propensity-score matching with a total of 1,560 patients, no significant difference was identified (P = 0.183). A slightly worse OS was seen for stage III RCC patients (HR, 1.561; 95% CI, 0.967–2.522; P = 0.068) than for stage III LCC patients. The 5-year OSs for patients with stage III RCC and stage III LCC were 85.5% and 90.5%, respectively (P = 0.133). CONCLUSION: Although the results are inconclusive, tumor location tended to be associated with OS in CC patients with lymph node metastasis, but it was not related to oncologic outcome.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Colon
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Colonic Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lymph Nodes
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Microsatellite Instability
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mortality
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Metastasis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Propensity Score
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Proportional Hazards Models
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Treatment Outcome
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.Primary malignant melanoma of the small intestine: a report of 2 cases and a review of the literature.
Kwan Mo YANG ; Chan Wook KIM ; So Woon KIM ; Jong Lyul LEE ; Yong Sik YOON ; In Ja PARK ; Seok Byung LIM ; Chang Sik YU ; Jin Cheon KIM
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2018;94(5):274-278
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			The majority of malignant melanomas in the small intestine are metastases from primary cutaneous lesions, it can also develop as a primary mucosal tumor in the gastrointestinal tract. In this report, we present rare cases of primary small bowel melanoma and review the current literature. A 78-year-old male presented with abdominal pain and CT enterography identified a ileal mass. A 79-year-old female presented with signs and symptoms of partial small bowel obstruction. Abdominopelvic CT and small bowel series revealed a obstructing mass in the distal jejunum. The masses were confirmed on laparotomy and histologically diagnosed as melanoma. Extensive postoperative clinical examination revealed no cutaneous lesions. A primary small bowel melanoma is an extremely rare neoplasm. A definite diagnosis can only be made after a thorough investigation has been made to exclude the coexistence of a primary lesion. Curative resection of the tumor remains the treatment of choice.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Abdominal Pain
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gastrointestinal Tract
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Intestine, Small*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Jejunum
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Laparotomy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Melanoma*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Metastasis
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016.
Deog Young KIM ; Yun Hee KIM ; Jongmin LEE ; Won Hyuk CHANG ; Min Wook KIM ; Sung Bom PYUN ; Woo Kyoung YOO ; Suk Hoon OHN ; Ki Deok PARK ; Byung Mo OH ; Seong Hoon LIM ; Kang Jae JUNG ; Byung Ju RYU ; Sun IM ; Sung Ju JEE ; Han Gil SEO ; Ueon Woo RAH ; Joo Hyun PARK ; Min Kyun SOHN ; Min Ho CHUN ; Hee Suk SHIN ; Seong Jae LEE ; Yang Soo LEE ; Si Woon PARK ; Yoon Ghil PARK ; Nam Jong PAIK ; Sam Gyu LEE ; Ju Kang LEE ; Seong Eun KOH ; Don Kyu KIM ; Geun Young PARK ; Yong Il SHIN ; Myoung Hwan KO ; Yong Wook KIM ; Seung Don YOO ; Eun Joo KIM ; Min Kyun OH ; Jae Hyeok CHANG ; Se Hee JUNG ; Tae Woo KIM ; Won Seok KIM ; Dae Hyun KIM ; Tai Hwan PARK ; Kwan Sung LEE ; Byong Yong HWANG ; Young Jin SONG
Brain & Neurorehabilitation 2017;10(Suppl 1):e11-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			“Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” is the 3rd edition of clinical practice guideline (CPG) for stroke rehabilitation in Korea, which updates the 2nd edition published in 2014. Forty-two specialists in stroke rehabilitation from 21 universities and 4 rehabilitation hospitals and 4 consultants participated in this update. The purpose of this CPG is to provide optimum practical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation teams to make a decision when they manage stroke patients and ultimately, to help stroke patients obtain maximal functional recovery and return to the society. The recent two CPGs from Canada (2015) and USA (2016) and articles that were published following the 2nd edition were used to develop this 3rd edition of CPG for stroke rehabilitation in Korea. The chosen articles' level of evidence and grade of recommendation were decided by the criteria of Scotland (2010) and the formal consensus was derived by the nominal group technique. The levels of evidence range from 1++ to 4 and the grades of recommendation range from A to D. Good Practice Point was recommended as best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline developmental group. The draft of the developed CPG was reviewed by the experts group in the public hearings and then revised. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” consists of ‘Chapter 1; Introduction of Stroke Rehabilitation’, ‘Chapter 2; Rehabilitation for Stroke Syndrome, ‘Chapter 3; Rehabilitation for Returning to the Society’, and ‘Chapter 4; Advanced Technique for Stroke Rehabilitation’. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” will provide direction and standardization for acute, subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation in Korea.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Canada
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Consensus
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Consultants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Practice Guidelines as Topic
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Rehabilitation*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Scotland
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Specialization
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Stroke*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail