Background/Aims: Proprotein-converting enzyme subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors act more promptly and efficiently than statins and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the short-term effects of perioperative administration of a single-dose PCSK9 inhibitor in patients with ACS. Methods: This study included 789 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within one month, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unanticipated revascularization, stroke, stent thrombosis, and rehospitalization for ischemic causes or heart failure. Results: PCSK9 inhibitors were administered to 201 of 789 patients. MACEs occurred in eight patients (4.0%) in the treated group and 60 patients (10.2%) in the non-treated group for one month (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.80, p = 0.010). The benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors in terms of MACEs was greater in the subgroup of patients treated more than 1 hour before PCI than in the subgroup treated less than 1 hour before PCI or treated after PCI and in the non-treated group. Conclusions In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, the risk of MACEs was lower in those treated with perioperative single-dose PCSK9 inhibitors than in those in the untreated group. This benefit was especially noticeable in the subgroups treated > 1 hour before PCI than in those treated less than 1 hour before PCI or after PCI, regardless of the clinical presentation of ACS.

Background/Aims: Proprotein-converting enzyme subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors act more promptly and efficiently than statins and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the short-term effects of perioperative administration of a single-dose PCSK9 inhibitor in patients with ACS. Methods: This study included 789 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within one month, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unanticipated revascularization, stroke, stent thrombosis, and rehospitalization for ischemic causes or heart failure. Results: PCSK9 inhibitors were administered to 201 of 789 patients. MACEs occurred in eight patients (4.0%) in the treated group and 60 patients (10.2%) in the non-treated group for one month (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.80, p = 0.010). The benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors in terms of MACEs was greater in the subgroup of patients treated more than 1 hour before PCI than in the subgroup treated less than 1 hour before PCI or treated after PCI and in the non-treated group. Conclusions In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, the risk of MACEs was lower in those treated with perioperative single-dose PCSK9 inhibitors than in those in the untreated group. This benefit was especially noticeable in the subgroups treated > 1 hour before PCI than in those treated less than 1 hour before PCI or after PCI, regardless of the clinical presentation of ACS.

Background/Aims: Proprotein-converting enzyme subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors act more promptly and efficiently than statins and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the short-term effects of perioperative administration of a single-dose PCSK9 inhibitor in patients with ACS. Methods: This study included 789 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within one month, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unanticipated revascularization, stroke, stent thrombosis, and rehospitalization for ischemic causes or heart failure. Results: PCSK9 inhibitors were administered to 201 of 789 patients. MACEs occurred in eight patients (4.0%) in the treated group and 60 patients (10.2%) in the non-treated group for one month (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.80, p = 0.010). The benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors in terms of MACEs was greater in the subgroup of patients treated more than 1 hour before PCI than in the subgroup treated less than 1 hour before PCI or treated after PCI and in the non-treated group. Conclusions In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, the risk of MACEs was lower in those treated with perioperative single-dose PCSK9 inhibitors than in those in the untreated group. This benefit was especially noticeable in the subgroups treated > 1 hour before PCI than in those treated less than 1 hour before PCI or after PCI, regardless of the clinical presentation of ACS.

Background/Aims: Proprotein-converting enzyme subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors act more promptly and efficiently than statins and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the short-term effects of perioperative administration of a single-dose PCSK9 inhibitor in patients with ACS. Methods: This study included 789 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within one month, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unanticipated revascularization, stroke, stent thrombosis, and rehospitalization for ischemic causes or heart failure. Results: PCSK9 inhibitors were administered to 201 of 789 patients. MACEs occurred in eight patients (4.0%) in the treated group and 60 patients (10.2%) in the non-treated group for one month (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.80, p = 0.010). The benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors in terms of MACEs was greater in the subgroup of patients treated more than 1 hour before PCI than in the subgroup treated less than 1 hour before PCI or treated after PCI and in the non-treated group. Conclusions In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, the risk of MACEs was lower in those treated with perioperative single-dose PCSK9 inhibitors than in those in the untreated group. This benefit was especially noticeable in the subgroups treated > 1 hour before PCI than in those treated less than 1 hour before PCI or after PCI, regardless of the clinical presentation of ACS.

Background/Aims: Proprotein-converting enzyme subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors act more promptly and efficiently than statins and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the short-term effects of perioperative administration of a single-dose PCSK9 inhibitor in patients with ACS. Methods: This study included 789 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within one month, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unanticipated revascularization, stroke, stent thrombosis, and rehospitalization for ischemic causes or heart failure. Results: PCSK9 inhibitors were administered to 201 of 789 patients. MACEs occurred in eight patients (4.0%) in the treated group and 60 patients (10.2%) in the non-treated group for one month (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.80, p = 0.010). The benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors in terms of MACEs was greater in the subgroup of patients treated more than 1 hour before PCI than in the subgroup treated less than 1 hour before PCI or treated after PCI and in the non-treated group. Conclusions In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, the risk of MACEs was lower in those treated with perioperative single-dose PCSK9 inhibitors than in those in the untreated group. This benefit was especially noticeable in the subgroups treated > 1 hour before PCI than in those treated less than 1 hour before PCI or after PCI, regardless of the clinical presentation of ACS.

The long-term prognostic significance of maximal infarct transmurality evaluated by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CE-CMR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has yet to be determined. This study aimed to see if maximal infarct transmurality has any additional long-term prognostic value over other CE-CMR predictors in STEMI patients, such as microvascular obstruction (MVO) and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH). The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent CE-CMR after STEMI to assess established parameters of myocardial injury as well as the maximal infarct transmurality. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included all-cause death, non-fatal reinfarction, and new heart failure hospitalization. The MACE occurred in 10 patients over a median follow-up of 7.9 years (IQR, 5.8 to 9.2 years) (2 deaths, 3 nonfatal MI, and 5 heart failure hospitalization). Patients with MACE had significantly higher rates of transmural extent of infarction, infarct size ＞5.4 percent, MVO, and IMH compared to patients without MACE. In stepwise multivariable Cox regression analysis, the transmural extent of infarction defined as 75 percent or more of infarct transmurality was an independent predictor of the MACE after correction for MVO and IMH (hazard ratio 8.7, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.1-71; p=0.043).In revascularized STEMI patients, post-infarction CE-CMR-based maximal infarct transmurality is an independent long-term prognosticator. Adding maximal infarct transmurality to CE-CMR parameters like MVO and IMH could thus identify patients at high risk of long-term adverse outcomes in STEMI.

Background: The risk of device thrombosis and device-oriented clinical outcomes with bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) was reported to be significantly higher than with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DESs). However, optimal device implantation may improve clinical outcomes in patients receiving BVS. The current study evaluated mid-term safety and efficacy of Absorb BVS with meticulous device optimization under intravascular imaging guidance. Methods: The SMART-REWARD and PERSPECTIVE-PCI registries in Korea prospectively enrolled 390 patients with BVS and 675 patients with DES, respectively. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years and the secondary major endpoint was patientoriented composite outcome (POCO) at 2 years. Results: Patient-level pooled analysis evaluated 1,003 patients (377 patients with BVS and 626 patients with DES). Mean scaffold diameter per lesion was 3.24 ± 0.30 mm in BVS group.Most BVSs were implanted with pre-dilatation (90.9%), intravascular imaging guidance (74.9%), and post-dilatation (73.1%) at proximal to mid segment (81.9%) in target vessel.Patients treated with BVS showed comparable risks of 2-year TVF (2.9% vs. 3.7%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.283, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.487–3.378, P = 0.615) and 2-year POCO (4.5% vs. 5.9%, adjusted HR, 1.413, 95% CI, 0.663–3.012,P = 0.370) than those with DES. The rate of 2-year definite or probable device thrombosis (0.3% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.424) was also similar. The sensitivity analyses consistently showed comparable risk of TVF and POCO between the 2 groups. Conclusion With meticulous device optimization under imaging guidance and avoidance of implantation in small vessels, BVS showed comparable risks of 2-year TVF and device thrombosis with DES.

Given the progressive improvements in antithrombotic strategies, management of cardiovascular disease has become sophisticated/refined. However, the optimal perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome or who are scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention remains unclear. Assessments of the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks are essential to reduce the rates of mortality and major cardiac events. However, the existing guidelines do not mention these topics. This case-based consensus document deals with common clinical scenarios and offers evidence-based guidelines for individualized perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in the real world.

The prevalence of ischemic heart disease is steadily growing as populations age. Antithrombotic treatment is a key therapeutic modality for the prevention of secondary cerebro-cardiovascular disease. Patients with acute coronary syndrome or who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention must be treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for a mandatory period. The optimal perioperative antithrombotic regimen remains debatable; antithrombotics can cause bleeding. Inadequate antithrombotic regimens are associated with perioperative ischemic events, but continuation of therapy may increase the risks of perioperative hemorrhagic complications (including mortality). Many guidelines on the perioperative management of antithrombotic agents have been established by academic societies. However, the existing guidelines do not cover all specialties, nor do they describe the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks associated with various surgical interventions. Moreover, few practical recommendations on the modification of antithrombotic regimens in patients who require non-deferrable interventions/surgeries or procedures associated with a high risk of hemorrhage have appeared. Therefore, cardiologists, specialists performing invasive procedures, surgeons, dentists, and anesthesiologists have not come to a consensus on optimal perioperative antithrombotic regimens. The Korean Platelet-Thrombosis Research Group presented a positioning paper on perioperative antithrombotic management. We here discuss commonly encountered clinical scenarios and engage in evidence-based discussion to assist individualized, perioperative antithrombotic management in clinical practice.

Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, Viread® ) had been used as a standard treatment option of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DA-2802 (tenofovir disoproxil orotate) compared to TDF. Methods: The present study was a double blind randomized controlled trial. Patients with CHB were recruited from 25 hospitals in Korea and given DA-2802 at a dose of 319 mg once daily or Viread® at a dose of 300 mg once daily for 48 weeks from March 2017 to January 2019. Change in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level at week 48 after dosing compared to baseline was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints were proportions of subjects with undetectable HBV DNA, those with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and those with loss of hepatitis B envelop antigen (HBeAg), those with loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Adverse events (AEs) were also investigated. Results: A total of 122 patients (DA-2802 group: n = 61, Viread® group: n = 61) were used as full analysis set for efficacy analysis. Mean age, proportion of males, laboratory results and virologic characteristics were not different between the two groups. The change in HBV DNA level at week 48 from baseline was −5.13 ± 1.40 in the DA-2802 group and −4.97 ± 1.40 log 10 copies/mL in the Viread® group. The analysis of primary endpoint using the nonparametric analysis of covariance showed statistically significant results (P < 0.001), which confirmed non-inferiority of DA-2802 to Viread® by a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1. The proportion of undetectable HBV DNA was 78.7% in the DA-2802 group and 75.4% in the Viread® group (P = 0.698). The proportion of subjects who had normal ALT levels was 75.4% in the DA-2802 group and 73.3% in the Viread® group (P = 0.795). The proportion of those with HBeAg loss was 8.1% in the DA-2802 group and 10.8% in the Viread® group (P = 1.000). No subject showed HBsAg loss. The frequency of AEs during treatment was similar between the two groups. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusion DA-2802 is considered an effective and safe treatment for patients with CHB.