Background: and Purpose Perampanel (PER) is an α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid antagonist used to treat focal and generalized epilepsy. Comprehensive data from real-world settings with long-term follow-ups are still scarce. This study aimed to determine the factors related to PER retention and the polytherapy pattern with PER. Methods: We reviewed all patients with epilepsy with a history of PER prescription during 2008–2017 and over a follow-up of >3 years. PER usage patterns and associated factors were analyzed. Results: Among the 2,655 patients in the cohort, 328 (150 females, 178 males) were enrolled.The ages at onset and diagnosis were 21.1±14.7 years and 25.6±16.1 years (mean±standard deviation), respectively. The age at the first visit to our center was 31.8±13.8 years. Seizure types were focal, generalized, and unknown onset in 83.8%, 15.9%, and 0.3% of patients, respectively. The most common etiology was structural (n=109, 33.2%). The maintenance duration of PER was 22.6±19.2 months (range=1–66 months). The initial number of concomitant antiseizure medications was 2.4±1.4 (range=0–9). The most common regimen was PER plus levetiracetam (n=41, 12.5%). The median number of 1-year seizures before PER usage was 8 (range=0–1,400). A seizure reduction of >50% was recorded in 34.7% of patients (52.0% and 29.2% in generalized and focal seizures, respectively). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year retention rates for PER were 65.3%, 50.4%, 40.4%, 35.3%, and 21.5%, respectively. A multivariate analysis indicated that lower age at onset was associated with longer retention (p=0.01). Conclusions PER was safely used in patients with diverse characteristics and was maintained for a long time in a real-world setting, especially in patients with a lower age at onset.

Background: and Purpose Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is one of the most common causes of drug-resistant epilepsy, and necessitates a multimodal evaluation to ensure optimal surgical treatment. This study aimed to determine the supportive value of the morphometric analysis program (MAP) in detecting FCD using data from a single institution in Korea. Methods: To develop a standard reference for the MAP, normal-looking MRIs by two scanners that are frequently used in this center were chosen. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and FCD after surgery were candidates for the analysis. The three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI scans of the patients were analyzed as test cases using the MAP. Results: The MRI scans of 87 patients were included in the analysis. The radiologist detected abnormal findings correlated with FCD (RAD positive [RAD(+)]) in 34 cases (39.1%), while the MAP could detect FCD in 25.3% of cases. A combination of the MAP (MAP[+] cases) with interpretations by the radiologist increased the detection to 42.5% (37 cases). The lesion detection rate was not different according to the type of reference scanners except in one case. MAP(+)/RAD(-) presented in three cases, all of which had FCD type IIa. The detection rate was slightly higher using the same kind of scanner as a reference, but not significantly (35.0% vs. 22.4% p=0.26). Conclusions The results of postprocessing in the MAP for detecting FCD did not depend on the type of reference scanner, and the MAP was the strongest in detecting FCD IIa. We suggested that the MAP could be widely utilized without developing institutional standards and could become an effective tool for detecting FCD lesions.

Background: and Purpose Japanese encephalitis (JE) is caused by the JE virus of the Flaviviridae family and is spread by mosquito bites, and no specific antiviral treatment for it exists. Here we describe the clinical presentations, laboratory findings, clinical outcomes, and adverse events after combination treatment of immunoglobulin, ribavirin, and interferon-α2b administered to patients with JE. Methods: Data were collected and reviewed from a prospective cohort of encephalitis patients admitted to Seoul National University Hospital between August 1, 2010 and October 31, 2019.We reviewed the medical records of the patients diagnosed with JE and treated either with supportive care only or with combination treatment of intravenous immunoglobulin, oral ribavirin, and subcutaneous interferon-α2b. Results: Eleven patients were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed JE based on the diagnosis criteria of JE. The median age was 61 years, and five patients were male. Eight patients were treated with the combination therapy, while three patients received supportive management only. Four of the eight patients (50%) treated with the combination therapy showed partial recovery, while one patient (12.5%) showed complete recovery. Two patients experienced hemolytic anemia related to ribavirin and febrile reaction to immunoglobulin, respectively. Among the three patients who received supportive management only, one (33.3%) showed partial recovery and the other two (67.7%) did not show improvement. Conclusions Combination treatment of immunoglobulin, ribavirin, and interferon-α2b was found to be tolerable in JE in this study. Further studies of appropriate designs and involving larger numbers of patients are warranted to explore the efficacy of this combination therapy.

Background: and Purpose Japanese encephalitis (JE) is caused by the JE virus of the Flaviviridae family and is spread by mosquito bites, and no specific antiviral treatment for it exists. Here we describe the clinical presentations, laboratory findings, clinical outcomes, and adverse events after combination treatment of immunoglobulin, ribavirin, and interferon-α2b administered to patients with JE. Methods: Data were collected and reviewed from a prospective cohort of encephalitis patients admitted to Seoul National University Hospital between August 1, 2010 and October 31, 2019.We reviewed the medical records of the patients diagnosed with JE and treated either with supportive care only or with combination treatment of intravenous immunoglobulin, oral ribavirin, and subcutaneous interferon-α2b. Results: Eleven patients were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed JE based on the diagnosis criteria of JE. The median age was 61 years, and five patients were male. Eight patients were treated with the combination therapy, while three patients received supportive management only. Four of the eight patients (50%) treated with the combination therapy showed partial recovery, while one patient (12.5%) showed complete recovery. Two patients experienced hemolytic anemia related to ribavirin and febrile reaction to immunoglobulin, respectively. Among the three patients who received supportive management only, one (33.3%) showed partial recovery and the other two (67.7%) did not show improvement. Conclusions Combination treatment of immunoglobulin, ribavirin, and interferon-α2b was found to be tolerable in JE in this study. Further studies of appropriate designs and involving larger numbers of patients are warranted to explore the efficacy of this combination therapy.