1.Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment
Manabu SEINO ; Satoru NAGASE ; Hideki TOKUNAGA ; Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Yasuyuki HIRASHIMA ; Hitoshi NIIKURA ; Kiyoshi YOSHINO ; Kazuhiro TAKEHARA ; Tsukasa BABA ; Hidetaka KATABUCHI ; Mikio MIKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(1):e15-
The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer are revised from the 2017 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standard care for cervical cancer, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for cervical cancer, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden of patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of evidence gathered through the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The guidelines comprise seven chapters and 5 algorithms.The main features of the 2022 revision are as follows: 1) added discussed points at the final consensus meeting; 2) revised the treatment methods based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging system; 3) examined minimally invasive surgery based on Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial; 4) added clinical question (CQ) for treatments of rare histological types, gastric type, and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; 5) added CQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 6) added CQ for cancer genomic profiling test; and 7) added CQ for cancer survivorship. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSGO Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer.
2.Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment
Manabu SEINO ; Satoru NAGASE ; Hideki TOKUNAGA ; Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Yasuyuki HIRASHIMA ; Hitoshi NIIKURA ; Kiyoshi YOSHINO ; Kazuhiro TAKEHARA ; Tsukasa BABA ; Hidetaka KATABUCHI ; Mikio MIKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(1):e15-
The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer are revised from the 2017 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standard care for cervical cancer, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for cervical cancer, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden of patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of evidence gathered through the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The guidelines comprise seven chapters and 5 algorithms.The main features of the 2022 revision are as follows: 1) added discussed points at the final consensus meeting; 2) revised the treatment methods based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging system; 3) examined minimally invasive surgery based on Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial; 4) added clinical question (CQ) for treatments of rare histological types, gastric type, and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; 5) added CQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 6) added CQ for cancer genomic profiling test; and 7) added CQ for cancer survivorship. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSGO Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer.
3.Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment
Manabu SEINO ; Satoru NAGASE ; Hideki TOKUNAGA ; Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Yasuyuki HIRASHIMA ; Hitoshi NIIKURA ; Kiyoshi YOSHINO ; Kazuhiro TAKEHARA ; Tsukasa BABA ; Hidetaka KATABUCHI ; Mikio MIKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(1):e15-
The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer are revised from the 2017 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standard care for cervical cancer, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for cervical cancer, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden of patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of evidence gathered through the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The guidelines comprise seven chapters and 5 algorithms.The main features of the 2022 revision are as follows: 1) added discussed points at the final consensus meeting; 2) revised the treatment methods based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging system; 3) examined minimally invasive surgery based on Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial; 4) added clinical question (CQ) for treatments of rare histological types, gastric type, and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; 5) added CQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 6) added CQ for cancer genomic profiling test; and 7) added CQ for cancer survivorship. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSGO Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer.
4.Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasms
Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Mikio MIKAMI ; Satoru NAGASE ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Hiroaki KOBAYASHI ; Hidekazu YAMADA ; Kiyoshi HASEGAWA ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Hidetaka KATABUCHI ; Daisuke AOKI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):18-
5.Association between Lymphovascular Invasion and Recurrence in Patients with pT1N+ or pT2–3N0 Gastric Cancer: a Multi-institutional Dataset Analysis
Keizo FUJITA ; Mitsuro KANDA ; Seiji ITO ; Yoshinari MOCHIZUKI ; Hitoshi TERAMOTO ; Kiyoshi ISHIGURE ; Toshifumi MURAI ; Takahiro ASADA ; Akiharu ISHIYAMA ; Hidenobu MATSUSHITA ; Chie TANAKA ; Daisuke KOBAYASHI ; Michitaka FUJIWARA ; Kenta MUROTANI ; Yasuhiro KODERA
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2020;20(1):41-49
PURPOSE:
Patients with pathological stage T1N+ or T2–3N0 gastric cancer may experience disease recurrence following curative gastrectomy. However, the current Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines do not recommend postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for such patients. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for patients with pT1N+ or pT2–3N0 gastric cancer using a multi-institutional dataset.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed the data obtained from 401 patients with pT1N+ or pT2–3N0 gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy at 9 institutions between 2010 and 2014.
RESULTS:
Of the 401 patients assessed, 24 (6.0%) experienced postoperative disease recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–7.23; P=0.030) and lymphatic and/or venous invasion (lymphovascular invasion (LVI): HR, 7.88; 95% CI, 1.66–140.9; P=0.005) were independent prognostic factors for poor recurrence-free survival. There was no significant association between LVI and the site of initial recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
LVI is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with pT1N+ or pT2–3N0 gastric cancer.
6.Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasms
Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Mikio MIKAMI ; Satoru NAGASE ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Hiroaki KOBAYASHI ; Hidekazu YAMADA ; Kiyoshi HASEGAWA ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Hidetaka KATABUCHI ; Daisuke AOKI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):e18-
The Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for Treatment of Uterine Body Neoplasm was published in 2018. These guidelines include 9 chapters: 1. Overview of the guidelines, 2. Initial treatment for endometrial cancer, 3. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer, 4. Post-treatment surveillance for endometrial cancer, 5. Treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, 6. Fertility-sparing therapy, 7. Treatment of uterine carcinosarcoma and uterine sarcoma, 8. Treatment of trophoblastic disease, 9. Document collection; and nine algorithms: 1-3. Initial treatment of endometrial cancer, 4. Postoperative adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer, 5. Treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer, 6. Fertility-sparing therapy, 7. Treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma, 8. Treatment for uterine sarcoma, 9. Treatment for choriocarcinoma. Each chapter includes overviews and clinical questions, and recommendations, objectives, explanation, and references are provided for each clinical question. This revision has no major changes compared to the 3rd edition, but does have some differences: 1) an explanation of the recommendation decision process and conflict of interest considerations have been added in the overview, 2) nurses, pharmacists and patients participated in creation of the guidelines, in addition to physicians, 3) the approach to evidence collection is listed at the end of the guidelines, and 4) for clinical questions that lack evidence or clinical validation, the opinion of the Guidelines Committee is given as a “Recommendations for tomorrowâ€.
7.Joint Production of "Advance Directive" by Senior Citizens Club and Medical Practitioners
Nobuyuki UCHIDA ; Sakutarou HIRAKATA ; Kiyoshi KOBAYASHI ; Seiko TAKIZAWA ; Shichirouji ARIKAWA ; Mieko YAJIMA ; Rumi KENMOCHI ; Michiko KANOU ; Keiichi SAKURAI
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association 2019;42(2):124-126
8.Appendix 1
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):124-124
9.Appendix 2
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):125-130
10.Appendix 3
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):131-139


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail