Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: The Korean Renal Cancer Study Group (KRoCS) provides consensus recommendations on the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Materials and Methods: A group of mRCC experts from the Korean Urological Oncology Society convened at the 2021 KRoCS meeting on CRN for mRCC. Results: The consensus document was developed to address 4 questions related that were judged to be the most relevant to patient care: (1) Is there a role for CRN in patients planning targeted therapy? (2) Is there a role for CRN in patients planning immuno-oncology agents? (3) When is the optimal time of CRN in patients planning systemic treatment? (4) What is the ideal patient selection for CRN? The panelists have come up with following consensus. For mRCC patients, CRN should be considered only in those with IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) favorable and intermediate risk disease, regardless of the systemic treatment plans. Timing of CRN should consider the risk group as well as the number of risk factors, but is generally recommended for after assessing the degree of response to initial systemic treatment. Patients with good performance status, limited metastatic burden on top of resectable primary tumor are candidates recommended for CRN with or without metastasectomy with priority. Conclusions In conclusion, there is still a role for CRN in the multimodality treatment of mRCC. Careful patient selection is of paramount importance. As the treatment landscape of mRCC continues to change, the role of CRN in the current immuno-oncology era will require more exploration.

PURPOSE: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a potent antioxidant, and a free radical scavenger. We investigated the possible effects of NAC after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) of rat bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: I/R injury was induced by abdominal aorta clamping and ischemia for 60minutes, followed by 120minutes reperfusion. Twenty rats were divided into four groups: sham operation + saline group (S+S), sham operation + NAC group (S+NAC), I/R + saline group (I/R+S), I/R + NAC group (I/R+NAC). Blood levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were determined using the free oxygen radical tests (FORT). Superoxide generation was measured based on lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence. The level of malondialdehyde (MDA) was analyzed in order to measure lipid peroxidation. RESULTS: In I/R+S group, the isometric contractile responses to carbachol were significant lower than other groups and were reversed by the pretreatment with NAC. The level of FORT and MDA showed a marked increase in I/R+S group compared with S+S group. NADPH-stimulated superoxide production was also significantly increased. I/R+NAC decreased these parameters compared with I/R+S group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that treatment with NAC reversed the low contractile responses of rat bladder and prevented oxidative stress following I/R.
Acetylcysteine ; Animals ; Aorta, Abdominal ; Carbachol ; Constriction ; Ischemia ; Lipid Peroxidation ; Luminescence ; Malondialdehyde ; Oxidative Stress ; Oxygen ; Panax* ; Rats* ; Reactive Oxygen Species ; Reperfusion ; Superoxides ; Urinary Bladder*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate targeting the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) of colon cancer cells with fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles (FMNP) conjugated to anti-EGFR antibodies. METHODS: The expression of EGFRs was evaluated in the HT-29 colon cancer cell lines and the control H-520 lung cancer cells by performing Western blot analysis. We synthesized silica-overcoated iron oxide nanoparticles that contained rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RITC) within a silica shell of a controllable thickness. This FMNP was conjugated to anti-EGFR mouse monoclonal antibody. The cells were treated with this probe conjugate for 4 hours and then the targeting was assessed via confocal microscopy. The fluorescence properties were evaluated for their binding to the expressed EGFRs with using a FACScan flow cytometer. RESULTS: EGFR was expressed in the HT-29 cells, as assessed by Western blot analysis. Red fluorescence was only detected in the membrane regions of the HT-29 cells on the confocal microscope imaging. On the FACS analysis, there was a significant shift of fluorescence intensity for the HT-29 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the feasibility of targeting colon cancer cells with FMNP conjugated with anti-EGFR antibodies in vitro.
Animals ; Antibodies ; Blotting, Western ; Cell Line ; Colon ; Colonic Neoplasms ; Ferric Compounds ; Fluorescence ; HT29 Cells ; Humans ; Iron ; Lung Neoplasms ; Magnetics ; Magnets ; Membranes ; Mice ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Nanoparticles ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor ; Rhodamines ; Silicon Dioxide

There are growing evidences suggesting a pivotal role of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. We investigated oxidative stress in the rat model of preeclampsia, and in clinical cases. Pregnant female rats were injected intraperitoneally with deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) and given 0.9% saline as drinking water during their pregnancy. We assessed plasma F2-isoprostane (8-iso-PGF2alpha) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in a rat model, and the same markers in the plasma of maternal blood and fetal cord blood in pregnant women with preclampsia. Blood samples from the umbilical arteries and veins were collected separately. The concentrations of MDA were increased in the preeclampsia groups of animal and humans, compared with the control group; it was significantly increased in the umbilical artery and vein of the preeclampsia group. The concentrations of F2-isoprostane were elevated in the preeclampsia groups of animal and humans, compared with the control group, and the increase in F2-isoprostane concentration was prominent in the umbilical vein than umbilical artery of the preeclampsia group. Therefore, it appears that the placenta has an important role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, and the F2-isoprostanes of the umbilical vein may serve as a relatively reliable marker for ischemic/hypoxic injury to the fetus during the perinatal period.
Animals ; Desoxycorticosterone ; Drinking Water ; F2-Isoprostanes ; Female ; Fetal Blood ; Fetus ; Humans ; Malondialdehyde ; Models, Animal* ; Oxidative Stress ; Placenta ; Plasma ; Pre-Eclampsia* ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant Women ; Rats* ; Umbilical Arteries ; Umbilical Veins ; Veins

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: LMWH as a periprocedural anticoagulant during PCI has not yet been extensively studied. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of enoxaparin to those of unfractionated heparin (UH) during elective PCI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The eligible patients were randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms, either a single IV bolus of enoxaparin (75 IU/kg) or UH (100 IU/kg). The patients who had received any anticoagulants at therapeutic doses were excluded in this study. Data on patient characteristics, angiographic complications, laboratory variables and the in-hospital and 1-month clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 139 patients enrolled in this study, 68 received enoxaparin and 71 received UH. The patients' demographic and angiographic characteristics (gender, weight, creatinine and the PCI target vessel) were not different except for age between the groups. Multi-vessel angioplasty was performed in 59 (42.4%) patients. At least one stent was implanted in 130 (93.5%) patients. The sheath was removed immediately after PCI, except for one case, and then a collagen plug was applied in all the cases. There were no significant differences in angiographic complications like no reflow, thrombus at the treated lesion site, occlusion of collateral branches, distal embolism, dissection, coronary rupture or abrupt closure. Cardiac markers including CK (6 [8.8%] in the LMWH group vs 8 [11.3%] in the UH group), CK-MB (6 [8.8%] vs 8 [11.3%], respectively), and troponin-I (6 [8.8%] vs 10 [14.1%], respectively) were slightly increased after PCI compared to the last value obtained before the procedure in both groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. One patient in the enoxaparin arm and 2 patients in the UH arm developed NSTEMI during their admission. Four patients from the UH arm and 3 from the enoxaparin arm experienced hematoma at the puncture site. After discharge, no other events were reported at the 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The use of enoxaparin (75 IU/kg) during elective PCI was effective and safe as using UH. Enoxaparin could be used like UH as a periprocedural anticoagulant in the elective PCI setting.
Angioplasty ; Anticoagulants ; Arm ; Collagen ; Creatinine ; Embolism ; Enoxaparin ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematoma ; Heparin* ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight* ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* ; Prospective Studies* ; Punctures ; Rupture ; Stents ; Thrombosis ; Troponin I

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: LMWH as a periprocedural anticoagulant during PCI has not yet been extensively studied. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of enoxaparin to those of unfractionated heparin (UH) during elective PCI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The eligible patients were randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms, either a single IV bolus of enoxaparin (75 IU/kg) or UH (100 IU/kg). The patients who had received any anticoagulants at therapeutic doses were excluded in this study. Data on patient characteristics, angiographic complications, laboratory variables and the in-hospital and 1-month clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 139 patients enrolled in this study, 68 received enoxaparin and 71 received UH. The patients' demographic and angiographic characteristics (gender, weight, creatinine and the PCI target vessel) were not different except for age between the groups. Multi-vessel angioplasty was performed in 59 (42.4%) patients. At least one stent was implanted in 130 (93.5%) patients. The sheath was removed immediately after PCI, except for one case, and then a collagen plug was applied in all the cases. There were no significant differences in angiographic complications like no reflow, thrombus at the treated lesion site, occlusion of collateral branches, distal embolism, dissection, coronary rupture or abrupt closure. Cardiac markers including CK (6 [8.8%] in the LMWH group vs 8 [11.3%] in the UH group), CK-MB (6 [8.8%] vs 8 [11.3%], respectively), and troponin-I (6 [8.8%] vs 10 [14.1%], respectively) were slightly increased after PCI compared to the last value obtained before the procedure in both groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. One patient in the enoxaparin arm and 2 patients in the UH arm developed NSTEMI during their admission. Four patients from the UH arm and 3 from the enoxaparin arm experienced hematoma at the puncture site. After discharge, no other events were reported at the 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The use of enoxaparin (75 IU/kg) during elective PCI was effective and safe as using UH. Enoxaparin could be used like UH as a periprocedural anticoagulant in the elective PCI setting.
Angioplasty ; Anticoagulants ; Arm ; Collagen ; Creatinine ; Embolism ; Enoxaparin ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematoma ; Heparin* ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight* ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* ; Prospective Studies* ; Punctures ; Rupture ; Stents ; Thrombosis ; Troponin I