Purpose: This study examined the differences in pathogen survival between single and revision amputations in diabetic foot infections.Current research lacks data on the postoperative pathogen profiles, particularly in cases involving repeated surgeries, making this study essential for targeted infection management. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 168 diabetic foot ulcer patients treated at a single center, divided into single (n=113) and revision amputation groups (n=55) were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative deep tissue samples and postoperative wound swab samples were collected to analyze the pathogens. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured as an inflammation marker. The pathogen diversity, frequency, and survival rate were compared. The ‘survival rate’ was defined as the frequency of postoperative persistence of pathogens relative to the preoperative detection frequency. Results: Revision amputation cases showed a higher diversity (p=0.0029) and persistence of pathogens, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and most other detected pathogens displaying higher survival rates. The CRP levels generally decreased postoperatively, but the variability was more pronounced in the revision group, suggesting that CRP may not consistently correlate with infection control in complex cases. Conclusion These findings revealed significant differences in the pathogen profiles between single and revision amputations, with revision cases facing more significant infection challenges because of the higher resistant pathogen persistence.

Purpose: This study examined the differences in pathogen survival between single and revision amputations in diabetic foot infections.Current research lacks data on the postoperative pathogen profiles, particularly in cases involving repeated surgeries, making this study essential for targeted infection management. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 168 diabetic foot ulcer patients treated at a single center, divided into single (n=113) and revision amputation groups (n=55) were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative deep tissue samples and postoperative wound swab samples were collected to analyze the pathogens. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured as an inflammation marker. The pathogen diversity, frequency, and survival rate were compared. The ‘survival rate’ was defined as the frequency of postoperative persistence of pathogens relative to the preoperative detection frequency. Results: Revision amputation cases showed a higher diversity (p=0.0029) and persistence of pathogens, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and most other detected pathogens displaying higher survival rates. The CRP levels generally decreased postoperatively, but the variability was more pronounced in the revision group, suggesting that CRP may not consistently correlate with infection control in complex cases. Conclusion These findings revealed significant differences in the pathogen profiles between single and revision amputations, with revision cases facing more significant infection challenges because of the higher resistant pathogen persistence.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Purpose: This study examined the differences in pathogen survival between single and revision amputations in diabetic foot infections.Current research lacks data on the postoperative pathogen profiles, particularly in cases involving repeated surgeries, making this study essential for targeted infection management. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 168 diabetic foot ulcer patients treated at a single center, divided into single (n=113) and revision amputation groups (n=55) were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative deep tissue samples and postoperative wound swab samples were collected to analyze the pathogens. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured as an inflammation marker. The pathogen diversity, frequency, and survival rate were compared. The ‘survival rate’ was defined as the frequency of postoperative persistence of pathogens relative to the preoperative detection frequency. Results: Revision amputation cases showed a higher diversity (p=0.0029) and persistence of pathogens, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and most other detected pathogens displaying higher survival rates. The CRP levels generally decreased postoperatively, but the variability was more pronounced in the revision group, suggesting that CRP may not consistently correlate with infection control in complex cases. Conclusion These findings revealed significant differences in the pathogen profiles between single and revision amputations, with revision cases facing more significant infection challenges because of the higher resistant pathogen persistence.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Purpose: This study examined the differences in pathogen survival between single and revision amputations in diabetic foot infections.Current research lacks data on the postoperative pathogen profiles, particularly in cases involving repeated surgeries, making this study essential for targeted infection management. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 168 diabetic foot ulcer patients treated at a single center, divided into single (n=113) and revision amputation groups (n=55) were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative deep tissue samples and postoperative wound swab samples were collected to analyze the pathogens. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured as an inflammation marker. The pathogen diversity, frequency, and survival rate were compared. The ‘survival rate’ was defined as the frequency of postoperative persistence of pathogens relative to the preoperative detection frequency. Results: Revision amputation cases showed a higher diversity (p=0.0029) and persistence of pathogens, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and most other detected pathogens displaying higher survival rates. The CRP levels generally decreased postoperatively, but the variability was more pronounced in the revision group, suggesting that CRP may not consistently correlate with infection control in complex cases. Conclusion These findings revealed significant differences in the pathogen profiles between single and revision amputations, with revision cases facing more significant infection challenges because of the higher resistant pathogen persistence.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Viral load and the duration of viral shedding of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are important determinants of the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019.In this study, we examined the effects of viral doses on the lung and spleen of K18-hACE2 transgenic mice by temporal histological and transcriptional analyses. Approximately, 1×105 plaque-forming units (PFU) of SARS-CoV-2 induced strong host responses in the lungs from 2 days post inoculation (dpi) which did not recover until the mice died, whereas responses to the virus were obvious at 5 days, recovering to the basal state by 14 dpi at 1×102 PFU. Further, flow cytometry showed that number of CD8+ T cells continuously increased in 1×102 PFU-virusinfected lungs from 2 dpi, but not in 1×105 PFU-virus-infected lungs. In spleens, responses to the virus were prominent from 2 dpi, and number of B cells was significantly decreased at 1×105PFU; however, 1×102 PFU of virus induced very weak responses from 2 dpi which recovered by 10 dpi. Although the defense responses returned to normal and the mice survived, lung histology showed evidence of fibrosis, suggesting sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our findings indicate that specific effectors of the immune response in the lung and spleen were either increased or depleted in response to doses of SARS-CoV-2. This study demonstrated that the response of local and systemic immune effectors to a viral infection varies with viral dose, which either exacerbates the severity of the infection or accelerates its elimination.

Background/Aims: Prokinetic agents and neuromodulators are among the treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD), but their comparative efficacy is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy of mosapride controlled-release (CR) and nortriptyline in patients with FD after 4 weeks of treatment. Methods: Participants with FD were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mosapride CR (mosapride CR 15 mg and nortriptyline placebo) or nortriptyline (mosapride CR placebo and nortriptyline 10 mg) in double-placebo, double-blinded, randomized controlled, parallel clinical study. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients with overall dyspepsia improvement after 4 weeks treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in individual symptom scores, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Results: One hundred nine participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility, and 54 in the mosapride CR group and 50 in the nortriptyline group were included in the modified intention-to-treat protocol. The rate of overall dyspepsia improvement was similar between groups (53.7% vs 54.0%, P = 0.976). There was no difference in the efficacy of mosapride CR and nortriptyline in a subgroup analysis by FD subtype (59.3% vs 52.5% in postprandial distress syndrome, P = 0.615; 44.4% vs 40.0% in epigastric pain syndrome, P = > 0.999; 50.0% vs 59.1% in overlap, P = 0.565; respectively). Both treatments significantly improved anxiety, depression, and quality of life from baseline. Conclusion Mosapride CR and nortriptyline showed similar efficacy in patients with FD regardless of the subtype. Both treatments could be equally helpful for improving quality of life and psychological well-being while also relieving dyspepsia.