Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Background and Objectives: The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a “no-stent zone.”Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. Methods: This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)–free rate. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency. Conclusions DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLRfree survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.