1.Investigation of the Changes in Refractive Surgery Trends in Korea
Jong Ho AHN ; Dong Hyun KIM ; Kyung Hwan SHYN
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2018;32(1):8-15
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in clinical practice in the field of refractive surgery in Korea over the past 10 years. METHODS: A survey consisting of 59 multiple-choice questions regarding the preferred types of refractive surgery, excimer laser machine, and presbyopia surgery was mailed to 742 members of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery in January 2016, and 50 members responded to the survey. These data were compared with the 2005 or 2007 survey results.
Cataract
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ
;
Korea
;
Lasers, Excimer
;
Myopia
;
Phakic Intraocular Lenses
;
Postal Service
;
Presbyopia
;
Refractive Surgical Procedures
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
2.The Effect of Anti-glaucoma Eyedrops and 0.1% Fluorometholone on Myopic Regression after LASIK or LASEK.
Ik Hee RYU ; Hee Sun KIM ; Hee Kyung LEE ; Jung Sub KIM ; Jin Kuk KIM ; Wook Kyum KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017;58(1):13-20
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of combined medical treatment with anti-glaucoma eyedrops and 0.1% fluorometholone on visual acuity and refractive errors in patients complaining of blurred vision due to myopic regression after laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK). METHODS: This study comprised 155 patients (155 eyes) who were diagnosed with myopic regression after LASIK or LASEK and received medical treatment from January 2015 to January 2016. The visual acuity and refractive errors were compared before and after medical treatment and evaluated to determine whether the results differ between LASIK and LASEK. RESULTS: The mean time of medical treatment was 64.1 ± 36.8 months after surgery. The responder group whose vision was improved and whose myopic error was decreased after medical treatment was comprised of 63 patients (41%). Their visual acuity in this group improved -0.21 ± 0.11 logMAR, and the amount of myopic error decreased 0.56 ± 0.32 diopters. The full responder group was 24 patients (15%), and the partial responder group was 39 patients (26%). The frequency of response to medical treatment was higher after LASIK than after LASEK, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combined medical treatment with anti-glaucoma eyedrops and 0.1% fluorometholone was effective in 41% of patients with regard to visual acuity improvement when used for post-LASIK or post-LASEK myopic regression. The medical treatment was effective after both LASIK and LASEK.
Fluorometholone*
;
Humans
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted*
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ*
;
Ophthalmic Solutions*
;
Refractive Errors
;
Visual Acuity
3.Clinical Outcomes of an Optimized Prolate Ablation Procedure for Correcting Residual Refractive Errors Following Laser Surgery.
Byunghoon CHUNG ; Hun LEE ; Bong Joon CHOI ; Kyung Ryul SEO ; Eung Kwon KIM ; Dae Yune KIM ; Tae im KIM
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2017;31(1):16-24
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of an optimized prolate ablation procedure for correcting residual refractive errors following laser surgery. METHODS: We analyzed 24 eyes of 15 patients who underwent an optimized prolate ablation procedure for the correction of residual refractive errors following laser in situ keratomileusis, laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy, or photorefractive keratectomy surgeries. Preoperative ophthalmic examinations were performed, and uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction values (sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent), point spread function, modulation transfer function, corneal asphericity (Q value), ocular aberrations, and corneal haze measurements were obtained postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved and refractive errors decreased significantly at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Total coma aberration increased at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, while changes in all other aberrations were not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant changes in point spread function were detected, but modulation transfer function increased significantly at the postoperative time points measured. CONCLUSIONS: The optimized prolate ablation procedure was effective in terms of improving visual acuity and objective visual performance for the correction of persistent refractive errors following laser surgery.
Coma
;
Humans
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ
;
Laser Therapy*
;
Phosmet*
;
Photorefractive Keratectomy
;
Refractive Errors*
;
Refractive Surgical Procedures
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Visual Acuity
4.Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
Sung A LIM ; Yooyeon PARK ; Yu Jin CHEONG ; Kyung Sun NA ; Choun Ki JOO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2016;30(2):92-100
PURPOSE: High myopia is known to be a risk factor for long-term regression after laser refractive surgery. There have been few studies about the correction of moderate myopias that did not need retreatment after long-term follow-up. We evaluated 10 years of change in visual acuity and refractive power in eyes with moderate myopia after laser refractive surgery. METHODS: We included patients that had undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to correct their myopia and that had at least 10 years of follow-up. We evaluated the stability of visual acuity in terms of safety, efficacy, and refractive changes at examinations 6 months and 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years after surgery. RESULTS: The study evaluated 62 eyes (36 eyes in LASIK patients and 26 eyes in LASEK patients). In both groups, the efficacy index tended to decrease, and it was consistently higher in the LASEK group compared to the LASIK group over the 10 years of follow-up. The safety index improved over 10 years and was always higher than 0.9 in both groups. The difference between the spherical equivalent at 6 months postoperatively and later periods was statistically significant after 5, 7, and 10 years in both groups (LASIK, p = 0.036, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively; LASEK, p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001, respectively). Ten years after surgery,26 eyes (66.7%) in the LASIK group and 19 eyes (73.1%) in the LASEK group had myopia greater than 1 diopter. In comparison with the thickness at 6 months postoperatively, central corneal thickness was significantly increased after 5, 7, and 10 years in both LASIK and LASEK groups (LASIK, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively; LASEK, p = 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Moderately myopic eyes showed progressive myopic shifting and corneal thickening after LASIK and LASEK during 10 years of follow-up. We also found that early refractive regression may indicate the long-term refractive outcome.
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted*
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ*
;
Myopia*
;
Refractive Surgical Procedures
;
Retreatment
;
Risk Factors
;
Visual Acuity
5.Short-Term Clinical Results of Hyperopic LASEK in Korean Patients.
Se Hyun CHOI ; Seong Joon KIM ; Mee Kum KIM ; Won Ryang WEE
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(10):1527-1533
PURPOSE: To evaluate short-term clinical outcomes following hyperopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) in Korean patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 18 eyes of 10 patients who underwent hyperopic LASEK between May 2005 and March 2013 in Seoul National University Hospital. Visual acuity and spherical equivalent were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. High order aberrations and contrast sensitivity were measured before and 3 months after the operation. Alternative prism cover test (APCT) was performed both preoperatively with correction and postoperatively without correction. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 32 +/- 11 years and the mean spherical equivalent refractive error was -2.95 +/- 1.24 diopters (D). Uncorrected visual acuities were log MAR +0.17 +/- 0.15 and log MAR +0.14 +/- 0.15 at postoperative 1 month and 3 months, respectively and showed no significant difference in best corrected visual acuity (+0.25 +/- 0.30). Spherical equivalent was -0.22 +/- 1.22 D at 1 month and 0.38 +/- 0.91 D at 3 months postoperatively. In 6 patients who had esotropia before the operation, APCT was 7.83 +/- 3.60 prism diopters (PD) esotropia at distance with correction preoperatively and 4.67 +/- 5.65 PD at distance without correction postoperatively. Three patients (16.7%) showed delayed wound healing with 1 (5.56 %) having persistent corneal opacity without significant visual loss. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of LASEK may be comparable for correcting hyperopia and esotropia when compared with the effect of LASIK in previous reports; however, delayed wound healing may be a concern.
Contrast Sensitivity
;
Corneal Opacity
;
Esotropia
;
Humans
;
Hyperopia
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted*
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ
;
Refractive Errors
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Seoul
;
Strabismus
;
Visual Acuity
;
Wound Healing
6.Incidence of Retinal Lesions before and after Refractive Surgery and Preoperative Prophylactic Laser Treatment.
Min Kyo KIM ; Hoon LEE ; Hyung Keun LEE ; Kyoung Yul SEO ; Eung Kweon KIM ; Tae Im KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(11):1671-1676
PURPOSE: We investigated the incidence of retinal lesions before and after surgery and the percentage of preoperative prophylactic laser treatment in patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery or phakic intraocular lens implantation (pIOLi). METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent refractive surgery from January 2005 to June 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated the incidence and type of retinal lesions identified during the preoperative examination. Additionally, the percentage of preoperative prophylactic laser treatment and the incidence of postoperative newly developed retinal lesions were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 894 eyes of 466 subjects (laser in situ keratomileusis [LASIK] 225 eyes, 117 subjects; laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy [LASEK] or photorefractive keratectomy [PRK] 450 eyes, 231 subjects; pIOLi 219 eyes, 121 subjects) were enrolled in the present study. Retinal lesions were found in 268 eyes (29.98%) and of those, 144 eyes (16.11%) received prophylactic laser treatment. Postoperative newly developed retinal lesions were detected in 8 cases (LASEK or PRK, 5 cases; pIOLi, 3 cases) during the follow-up period. There was a significant correlation between preoperative spherical equivalent and the presence of retinal lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The patient population of refractive surgery is largely myopic and thus particularly vulnerable to retinal lesions. Additionally, a considerable number of patients required preoperative prophylactic laser treatment. Therefore, both surgeons and patients should be aware of the risks of developing postoperative retinal lesions.
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Incidence*
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
;
Medical Records
;
Myopia
;
Phakic Intraocular Lenses
;
Photorefractive Keratectomy
;
Refractive Surgical Procedures*
;
Retinaldehyde*
;
Retrospective Studies
7.Surface Ablation with 0.02% Mitomycin C for Retreatment after LASIK and LASEK.
Kang Yoon KIM ; Hong Seok KIM ; Ji Won JUNG ; Hyung Keun LEE ; Kyoung Yul SEO ; Eung Kweon KIM ; Tae Im KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(7):992-997
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surface ablation with mitomycin C (MMC) for the retreatment of refractive errors following laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK). METHODS: In this retrospective clinical study conducted at a single center, we evaluated 23 eyes that received surface ablation with MMC (0.02%, 20 seconds) between 2009 and 2013 for the treatment of residual refractive errors following myopic LASIK and LASEK. All eyes were evaluated for corneal thickness, initial refractive error, time interval to retreatment, amount of retreatment, duration of postoperative topical steroids use as well as uncorrected vision, spherical equivalent and corneal haziness preoperatively and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Initially corrected myopia in the LASIK group was -6.47 +/- 2.17 D and -5.68 +/- 2.51 D in the LASEK group. Mean time between initial and retreatment by surface ablation was 11.88 +/- 5.59 months for LASIK and 14.07 +/- 10.10 for LASEK. Retreat amount was 1.49 +/- 0.36 D after LASIK and -1.65 +/- 0.41 D after LASEK. At postoperative 12 months, uncorrected visions were -0.061 +/- 0.886 (log MAR) in the LASIK group and -0.004 +/- 0.745 (log MAR) in the LASEK group and spherical equivalents were -0.55 +/- 0.56 D in the LASIK group and 0.36 +/- 0.33 D in the LASEK group. Postoperative hazes developed in 1 of 8 LASIK eyes and 3 of 15 LASEK eyes which resolved with application of topical steroid for 2-3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Surface ablation with 0.02% MMC is safe and highly effective for treating myopic regression following LASIK or LASEK. Application of 0.02% MMC for 20 seconds was effective in preventing postoperative haze formation and maintaining stable vision and spherical equivalent at 12 months after retreatment.
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted*
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ*
;
Mitomycin*
;
Myopia
;
Refractive Errors
;
Retreatment*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Steroids
8.Surface Ablation with 0.02% Mitomycin C for Retreatment after LASIK and LASEK.
Kang Yoon KIM ; Hong Seok KIM ; Ji Won JUNG ; Hyung Keun LEE ; Kyoung Yul SEO ; Eung Kweon KIM ; Tae Im KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(7):992-997
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surface ablation with mitomycin C (MMC) for the retreatment of refractive errors following laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK). METHODS: In this retrospective clinical study conducted at a single center, we evaluated 23 eyes that received surface ablation with MMC (0.02%, 20 seconds) between 2009 and 2013 for the treatment of residual refractive errors following myopic LASIK and LASEK. All eyes were evaluated for corneal thickness, initial refractive error, time interval to retreatment, amount of retreatment, duration of postoperative topical steroids use as well as uncorrected vision, spherical equivalent and corneal haziness preoperatively and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Initially corrected myopia in the LASIK group was -6.47 +/- 2.17 D and -5.68 +/- 2.51 D in the LASEK group. Mean time between initial and retreatment by surface ablation was 11.88 +/- 5.59 months for LASIK and 14.07 +/- 10.10 for LASEK. Retreat amount was 1.49 +/- 0.36 D after LASIK and -1.65 +/- 0.41 D after LASEK. At postoperative 12 months, uncorrected visions were -0.061 +/- 0.886 (log MAR) in the LASIK group and -0.004 +/- 0.745 (log MAR) in the LASEK group and spherical equivalents were -0.55 +/- 0.56 D in the LASIK group and 0.36 +/- 0.33 D in the LASEK group. Postoperative hazes developed in 1 of 8 LASIK eyes and 3 of 15 LASEK eyes which resolved with application of topical steroid for 2-3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Surface ablation with 0.02% MMC is safe and highly effective for treating myopic regression following LASIK or LASEK. Application of 0.02% MMC for 20 seconds was effective in preventing postoperative haze formation and maintaining stable vision and spherical equivalent at 12 months after retreatment.
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted*
;
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ*
;
Mitomycin*
;
Myopia
;
Refractive Errors
;
Retreatment*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Steroids
9.The Incidence of Increased Intraocular Pressure when Using 0.1% Fluorometholone after Photorefractive Keratectomy.
Wook Kyum KIM ; Eun Young CHO ; Hee Sun KIM ; Jin Kuk KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(7):985-991
PURPOSE: To analyze the time and incidence of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) induced by 0.1% fluorometholone used to prevent corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: The present study included 826 patients (826 eyes) who underwent PRK between November 2012 and October 2013 and were followed up for more than 6 months. After surgery the patients were treated with 0.1% fluorometholone for 3-6 months according to their corneal conditions. The time and incidence was analyzed with the time and incidence when anti-glaucoma eye drops were used. RESULTS: Anti-glaucoma eye drops were used in 312 eyes (38%). The anti-glaucoma eye drops were started before 4 weeks postoperatively in 105 eyes (13%) and postoperatively at 5-8 weeks in 86 eyes (10%), at 9-12 weeks in 83 eyes (10%), at 13-16 weeks in 25 eyes (3%) and after 17 weeks in 13 eyes (2%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of increased IOP when treated with 0.1% fluorometholone for 3-6 months after PRK was approximately 38%. The incidence of increased IOP in each month for the first 3 months was almost identical implying that the longer 0.1 fluorometholone was used, the higher incidence of increased IOP occurred. These results can be helpful in educating patients regarding the risk of increased IOP and determining the follow-up period after PRK.
Fluorometholone*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Incidence*
;
Intraocular Pressure*
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Photorefractive Keratectomy*
10.The Incidence of Increased Intraocular Pressure when Using 0.1% Fluorometholone after Photorefractive Keratectomy.
Wook Kyum KIM ; Eun Young CHO ; Hee Sun KIM ; Jin Kuk KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(7):985-991
PURPOSE: To analyze the time and incidence of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) induced by 0.1% fluorometholone used to prevent corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: The present study included 826 patients (826 eyes) who underwent PRK between November 2012 and October 2013 and were followed up for more than 6 months. After surgery the patients were treated with 0.1% fluorometholone for 3-6 months according to their corneal conditions. The time and incidence was analyzed with the time and incidence when anti-glaucoma eye drops were used. RESULTS: Anti-glaucoma eye drops were used in 312 eyes (38%). The anti-glaucoma eye drops were started before 4 weeks postoperatively in 105 eyes (13%) and postoperatively at 5-8 weeks in 86 eyes (10%), at 9-12 weeks in 83 eyes (10%), at 13-16 weeks in 25 eyes (3%) and after 17 weeks in 13 eyes (2%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of increased IOP when treated with 0.1% fluorometholone for 3-6 months after PRK was approximately 38%. The incidence of increased IOP in each month for the first 3 months was almost identical implying that the longer 0.1 fluorometholone was used, the higher incidence of increased IOP occurred. These results can be helpful in educating patients regarding the risk of increased IOP and determining the follow-up period after PRK.
Fluorometholone*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Incidence*
;
Intraocular Pressure*
;
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Photorefractive Keratectomy*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail