1.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
2.Novel technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage to skip the needle tract dilation step: Efficacy of a 6-mm antimigration metal stent with a thin, tapered delivery catheter
Keiichi HATAMARU ; Masayuki KITANO ; Masahiro ITONAGA ; Yasunobu YAMASHITA ; Takashi TAMURA ; Yuki KAWAJI ; Junya NUTA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2025;14(1):9-14
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been recognized as an effective treatment for patients at high risk for surgery. An antimigration metal stent with tapered thin delivery system has recently been developed. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and longterm outcomes of EUS-GBD using the new metal stent.
Methods:
Between April 2017 and March 2020, 21 patients with acute cholecystitis unsuitable for cholecystectomy underwent EUS-GBD using the metal stent. The stent was 6 mm in diameter and 6 cm in length, with a large flare at both ends for antimigration, and mounted in a 7.5 Fr delivery catheter, which requires no dilation devices. We retrospectively evaluated clinical and technical success, adverse events, and stent patency.
Results:
The technical and clinical success rates of EUS-GBD using the metal stent were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. For 75% of the patients, metal stents could be placed without dilatation of the needle tract. These patients had significantly shorter procedure time (23.6 ± 9.8 min) than patients requiring needle tract dilatation (38.4 ± 17.1 min; P = 0.036). The median follow-up periods were 336 days (interquartile range [IQR] 152–919 days) and 1,135 days (IQR 1,009–1,675 days) for all and alive patients, respectively. No adverse events or recurrence of cholecystitis due to stent occlusion that occurred in any patient at follow-up was observed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, EUS-GBD using the newly designed metal stent showed excellent safety and longterm outcomes, and may be suitable as an alternative treatment in patients who are unsuitable for cholecystectomy.
3.The Presence of Preoperative Urinary Incontinence Significantly Correlates With Postoperative Urinary Incontinence Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Kenji KURODA ; Koetsu HAMAMOTO ; Hiroaki KOBAYASHI ; Akio HORIGUCHI ; Keiichi ITO
International Neurourology Journal 2025;29(1):27-33
Purpose:
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a significant complication following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), including laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). Although the incidence of postoperative UI is lower after LSC than after transvaginal mesh surgery, a subset of patients still experience UI. This study aimed to determine which factors, including mesh-related factors, contribute to UI impairing daily life following LSC.
Methods:
The study enrolled 96 patients who underwent LSC at our institution between June 2016 and September 2023. The Pearson chi-square test, multiple logistic regression analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine the independent factors contributing to UI after LSC.
Results:
The Pearson chi-square test showed that body mass index, POP quantification (POP-Q) stage 4 and the presence of preoperative UI significantly correlated with the postoperative UI among preoperative and intraoperative factors (all P<0.05). POP-Q stage 4 and the presence of preoperative UI were also significant factors in both univariate and multivariate analyses of multiple logistic regression analysis (all P<0.05). However, only preoperative UI remained an independent predictor for shorter time to UI onset in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.29–11.58; P=0.0158).
Conclusions
Patients with preoperative UI and stage 4 POP should receive close monitoring for postoperative UI.
4.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
5.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
7.Novel technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage to skip the needle tract dilation step: Efficacy of a 6-mm antimigration metal stent with a thin, tapered delivery catheter
Keiichi HATAMARU ; Masayuki KITANO ; Masahiro ITONAGA ; Yasunobu YAMASHITA ; Takashi TAMURA ; Yuki KAWAJI ; Junya NUTA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2025;14(1):9-14
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been recognized as an effective treatment for patients at high risk for surgery. An antimigration metal stent with tapered thin delivery system has recently been developed. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and longterm outcomes of EUS-GBD using the new metal stent.
Methods:
Between April 2017 and March 2020, 21 patients with acute cholecystitis unsuitable for cholecystectomy underwent EUS-GBD using the metal stent. The stent was 6 mm in diameter and 6 cm in length, with a large flare at both ends for antimigration, and mounted in a 7.5 Fr delivery catheter, which requires no dilation devices. We retrospectively evaluated clinical and technical success, adverse events, and stent patency.
Results:
The technical and clinical success rates of EUS-GBD using the metal stent were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. For 75% of the patients, metal stents could be placed without dilatation of the needle tract. These patients had significantly shorter procedure time (23.6 ± 9.8 min) than patients requiring needle tract dilatation (38.4 ± 17.1 min; P = 0.036). The median follow-up periods were 336 days (interquartile range [IQR] 152–919 days) and 1,135 days (IQR 1,009–1,675 days) for all and alive patients, respectively. No adverse events or recurrence of cholecystitis due to stent occlusion that occurred in any patient at follow-up was observed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, EUS-GBD using the newly designed metal stent showed excellent safety and longterm outcomes, and may be suitable as an alternative treatment in patients who are unsuitable for cholecystectomy.
8.The Presence of Preoperative Urinary Incontinence Significantly Correlates With Postoperative Urinary Incontinence Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Kenji KURODA ; Koetsu HAMAMOTO ; Hiroaki KOBAYASHI ; Akio HORIGUCHI ; Keiichi ITO
International Neurourology Journal 2025;29(1):27-33
Purpose:
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a significant complication following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), including laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). Although the incidence of postoperative UI is lower after LSC than after transvaginal mesh surgery, a subset of patients still experience UI. This study aimed to determine which factors, including mesh-related factors, contribute to UI impairing daily life following LSC.
Methods:
The study enrolled 96 patients who underwent LSC at our institution between June 2016 and September 2023. The Pearson chi-square test, multiple logistic regression analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine the independent factors contributing to UI after LSC.
Results:
The Pearson chi-square test showed that body mass index, POP quantification (POP-Q) stage 4 and the presence of preoperative UI significantly correlated with the postoperative UI among preoperative and intraoperative factors (all P<0.05). POP-Q stage 4 and the presence of preoperative UI were also significant factors in both univariate and multivariate analyses of multiple logistic regression analysis (all P<0.05). However, only preoperative UI remained an independent predictor for shorter time to UI onset in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.29–11.58; P=0.0158).
Conclusions
Patients with preoperative UI and stage 4 POP should receive close monitoring for postoperative UI.
9.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
10.Novel technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage to skip the needle tract dilation step: Efficacy of a 6-mm antimigration metal stent with a thin, tapered delivery catheter
Keiichi HATAMARU ; Masayuki KITANO ; Masahiro ITONAGA ; Yasunobu YAMASHITA ; Takashi TAMURA ; Yuki KAWAJI ; Junya NUTA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2025;14(1):9-14
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been recognized as an effective treatment for patients at high risk for surgery. An antimigration metal stent with tapered thin delivery system has recently been developed. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and longterm outcomes of EUS-GBD using the new metal stent.
Methods:
Between April 2017 and March 2020, 21 patients with acute cholecystitis unsuitable for cholecystectomy underwent EUS-GBD using the metal stent. The stent was 6 mm in diameter and 6 cm in length, with a large flare at both ends for antimigration, and mounted in a 7.5 Fr delivery catheter, which requires no dilation devices. We retrospectively evaluated clinical and technical success, adverse events, and stent patency.
Results:
The technical and clinical success rates of EUS-GBD using the metal stent were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. For 75% of the patients, metal stents could be placed without dilatation of the needle tract. These patients had significantly shorter procedure time (23.6 ± 9.8 min) than patients requiring needle tract dilatation (38.4 ± 17.1 min; P = 0.036). The median follow-up periods were 336 days (interquartile range [IQR] 152–919 days) and 1,135 days (IQR 1,009–1,675 days) for all and alive patients, respectively. No adverse events or recurrence of cholecystitis due to stent occlusion that occurred in any patient at follow-up was observed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, EUS-GBD using the newly designed metal stent showed excellent safety and longterm outcomes, and may be suitable as an alternative treatment in patients who are unsuitable for cholecystectomy.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail