1.Pre‑ and post‑hemodialysis differences in heart failure diagnosis by current heart failure guidelines in patients with end‑stage renal disease
Bong‑Joon KIM ; Su‑Hyun BAE ; Soo‑Jin KIM ; Sung‑Il IM ; Hyunsu KIM ; Jung‑Ho HEO ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Ye Na KIM ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2024;32(1):6-
Background:
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on hemodialysis (HD) have reduced vascular com‑ pliance and are likely to develop heart failure (HF). In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HF pre- and post-HD in ESRD using the current guidelines.
Methods:
We prospectively investigated HF in ESRD patients on HD using echocardiography pre- and post-HD. We used the structural and functional abnormality criteria of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Results:
A total of 54 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 62.6 years, and 40.1% were male. Forty-five patients (83.3%) had hypertension, 28 (51.9%) had diabetes, and 20 (37.0%) had ischemic heart disease. The mean N-terminalpro brain natriuretic peptide BNP (NT-proBNP) level was 12,388.8 ± 2,592.2 pg/dL. The mean ideal body weight was 59.3 kg, mean hemodialysis time was 237.4 min, and mean real filtration was 2.8 kg. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.4%, and mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 52.0 mm in pre-HD. Post-HD echocardiography showed significantly lower left atrial volume index (33.3 ± 15.9 vs. 40.6 ± 17.1, p = 0.030), tricuspid regurgitation jet V (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 m/s, p < 0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (32.1 ± 10.3 vs. 38.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.005) compared with pre-HD. There were no differences in LVEF, E/E′ ratio, or left ventricular global longitudinal strain. A total of 88.9% of pre-HD patients and 66.7% of post-HD patients had either structural or functional abnor‑ malities in echocardiographic parameters according to recent HF guidelines (p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Our data showed that the majority of patients undergoing hemodialysis satisfy the diagnostic criteria for HF according to current HF guidelines. Pre-HD patients had a 22.2% higher incidence in the prevalence of func‑ tional or structural abnormalities as compared with post-HD patients.
2.Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach
Tae-Han KIM ; In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Bang Wool EOM ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chang In CHOI ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chung sik GONG ; Dong Jin KIM ; Arthur Eung-Hyuck CHO ; Eun Jeong GONG ; Geum Jong SONG ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hye Seong AHN ; Hyun LIM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Ji Yeon PARK ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Kyoung Doo SONG ; Minkyu JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Sang-Yong SON ; Shin-Hoo PARK ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Tae-Yong KIM ; Woo Kyun BAE ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Yeseob JEE ; Yoo Min KIM ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Young Suk PARK ; Hye Sook HAN ; Su Youn NAM ; Seong-Ho KONG ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2023;23(1):3-106
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
3.Predictive role of absolute lymphocyte count in daratumumab-treated patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma
Hee Jeong CHO ; Jae-Cheol JO ; Yoo Jin LEE ; Myung Won LEE ; Do Young KIM ; Ho Jin SHIN ; Sung Nam IM ; Ji Hyun LEE ; Sung Hwa BAE ; Young Rok DO ; Won Sik LEE ; Min Kyung KIM ; Jina JUNG ; Jung Min LEE ; Ju-Hyung KIM ; Dong Won BAEK ; Sang-Kyun SOHN ; Joon Ho MOON
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2023;38(2):238-247
Background/Aims:
Daratumumab has shown an encouraging antitumor effect in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and was known to alter the immune properties by off-targeting immunosuppressive cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate the change in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as a surrogate marker for predicting survival outcomes of patients treated with daratumumab.
Methods:
Between 2018 and 2021, the medical records of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) treated with daratumumab monotherapy at 10 centers in South Korea were reviewed. We collected the ALC data at pre-infusion (D0), day 2 after the first infusion (D2), and prior to the third cycle of daratumumab therapy (D56).
Results:
Fifty patients who were administered at least two cycles of daratumumab were included. Overall response rate was 54.0% after two cycles of daratumumab treatment. On D2, almost all patients experienced a marked reduction in ALC. However, an increase in ALC on D56 (ALCD56) was observed in patients with non-progressive disease, whereas failure of ALC recovery was noted in those with progressive disease. Patients with ALCD56 > 700/μL (n = 39, 78.0%) had prolonged progression- free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with ALCD56 ≤ 700/μL (median PFS: 5.8 months vs. 2.6 months, p = 0.025; median OS: 24.1 months vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.004). In addition, ALCD56 >700/μL was a significant favorable prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22; p = 0.003) and OS (HR, 0.23; p = 0.012).
Conclusions
Increase in ALC during daratumumab treatment was significantly associated with prolonged survival outcomes in patients with RRMM. The ALC value can predict clinical outcomes in patients treated with daratumumab.
4.Erratum: Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidencebased, Multidisciplinary Approach
Tae-Han KIM ; In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Bang Wool EOM ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chang In CHOI ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chung sik GONG ; Dong Jin KIM ; Arthur Eung-Hyuck CHO ; Eun Jeong GONG ; Geum Jong SONG ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hye Seong AHN ; Hyun LIM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Ji Yeon PARK ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Kyoung Doo SONG ; Minkyu JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Sang-Yong SON ; Shin-Hoo PARK ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Tae-Yong KIM ; Woo Kyun BAE ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Yeseob JEE ; Yoo Min KIM ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Young Suk PARK ; Hye Sook HAN ; Su Youn NAM ; Seong-Ho KONG
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2023;23(2):365-373
5.Predictive role of absolute lymphocyte count in daratumumab-treated patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma
Hee Jeong CHO ; Jae-Cheol JO ; Yoo Jin LEE ; Myung Won LEE ; Do Young KIM ; Ho Jin SHIN ; Sung Nam IM ; Ji Hyun LEE ; Sung Hwa BAE ; Young Rok DO ; Won Sik LEE ; Min Kyung KIM ; Jina JUNG ; Jung Min LEE ; Ju-Hyung KIM ; Dong Won BAEK ; Sang-Kyun SOHN ; Joon Ho MOON
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2023;38(4):578-578
6.The Pattern of Care for Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer over the Past 10 Years in Korea: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 16-12)
Jae Sik KIM ; Kyubo KIM ; Wonguen JUNG ; Kyung Hwan SHIN ; Seock-Ah IM ; Hee-Jun KIM ; Yong Bae KIM ; Jee Suk CHANG ; Jee Hyun KIM ; Doo Ho CHOI ; Yeon Hee PARK ; Dae Yong KIM ; Tae Hyun KIM ; Byung Ock CHOI ; Sea-Won LEE ; Suzy KIM ; Jeanny KWON ; Ki Mun KANG ; Woong-Ki CHUNG ; Kyung Su KIM ; Ji Ho NAM ; Won Sup YOON ; Jin Hee KIM ; Jihye CHA ; Yoon Kyeong OH ; In Ah KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2022;54(4):1121-1129
Purpose:
We aimed to investigate manifestations and patterns of care for patients with brain metastasis (BM) from breast cancer (BC) and compared their overall survival (OS) from 2005 through 2014 in Korea.
Materials and Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 600 BC patients with BM diagnosed between 2005 and 2014. The median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. We categorized the patients into three groups according to the year when BM was initially diagnosed (group I [2005-2008], 98 patients; group II [2009-2011], 200 patients; and group III [2012-2014], 302 patients).
Results:
Over time, the median age at BM diagnosis increased by 2.2 years (group I, 49.0 years; group II, 48.3 years; and group III, 51.2 years; p=0.008). The percentage of patients with extracranial metastasis was 73.5%, 83.5%, and 86.4% for group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.011). The time interval between BC and BM was prolonged in patients with stage III primary BC (median, 2.4 to 3 years; p=0.029). As an initial brain-directed treatment, whole-brain radiotherapy alone decreased from 80.0% in 2005 to 41.1% in 2014. Meanwhile, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone increased from 13.3% to 34.7% during the same period (p=0.005). The median OS for group I, II, and III was 15.6, 17.9, and 15.0 months, respectively, with no statistical significance.
Conclusion
The manifestations of BM from BC and the pattern of care have changed from 2005 to 2014 in Korea. However, the OS has remained relatively unchanged over the 10 years.
7.Erratum: Correction of Affiliations in the Article “Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes in Children, Adolescents, and Young-adults with Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a KPHOG Lymphoma Working-party, Multicenter, Retrospective Study”
Jae Min LEE ; Jung Yoon CHOI ; Kyung Taek HONG ; Hyoung Jin KANG ; Hee Young SHIN ; Hee Jo BAEK ; Hoon KOOK ; Seongkoo KIM ; Jae Wook LEE ; Nack-Gyun CHUNG ; Bin CHO ; Seok-Goo CHO ; Kyung Mi PARK ; Eu Jeen YANG ; Young Tak LIM ; Jin Kyung SUH ; Sung Han KANG ; Hyery KIM ; Kyung-Nam KOH ; Ho Joon IM ; Jong Jin SEO ; Hee Won CHO ; Hee Young JU ; Ji Won LEE ; Keon Hee YOO ; Ki Woong SUNG ; Hong Hoe KOO ; Kyung Duk PARK ; Jeong Ok HAH ; Min Kyoung KIM ; Jung Woo HAN ; Seung Min HAHN ; Chuhl Joo LYU ; Ye Jee SHIM ; Heung Sik KIM ; Young Rok DO ; Jae Won YOO ; Yeon Jung LIM ; In-Sang JEON ; Hee won CHUEH ; Sung Yong OH ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Jun Eun PARK ; Jun Ah LEE ; Hyeon Jin PARK ; Byung-Kiu PARK ; Soon Ki KIM ; Jae Young LIM ; Eun Sil PARK ; Sang Kyu PARK ; Eun Jin CHOI ; Young Bae CHOI ; Jong Hyung YOON ;
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2021;36(4):e37-
8.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
9.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
10.Enteroscopy in Crohn’s Disease: Are There Any Changes in Role or Outcomes Over Time? A KASID Multicenter Study
Seong Ran JEON ; Jin-Oh KIM ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Bong Min KO ; Hyeon Jeong GOONG ; Hyun Joo JANG ; Soo Jung PARK ; Eun Ran KIM ; Sung Noh HONG ; Jong Pil IM ; Seong-Eun KIM ; Ja Seol KOO ; Chang Soo EUN ; Dong Kyung CHANG ;
Gut and Liver 2021;15(3):375-382
Background/Aims:
Although balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) enables endoscopic visualization of small bowel (SB) involvement in Crohn’s disease (CD), there is no data on the changes in outcomes over time. We therefore investigated the changes in BAE use on CD patients over different time periods in terms of its role and clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We used a multicenter enteroscopy database to identify CD patients with SB involvement who underwent BAE (131 procedures, 116 patients). We compared BAE-related factors and outcomes between the first period (70 procedures, 60 patients) and the second period (61procedures, 56 patients). The specific cutoff point for dividing the two periods was 2007, when BAE guidelines were introduced.
Results:
Initial diagnosis of SB involvement in CD was the most common indication for BAE during each period (50.0% vs 31.1%, p=0.034). The largest change was in the number of BAE uses for stricture evaluation and/or treatment, which increased significantly in the latter period (2.9% vs 21.3%, p=0.002). The diagnostic yield in patients with suspected CD was 90.7% in the first period and 95.0% in the second (p=0.695). More endoscopic interventions were performed in the second period than in the first (5.1% vs 17.6%, p=0.041). Enteroscopic success rates were high throughout (100% in the first period vs 80.0% in the second period, p>0.999). In the first and second periods, therapeutic plans were adjusted in 62.7% and 61.4% of patients, respectively.
Conclusions
The overall clinical indications, outcomes, and effectiveness of BAE were constant over time in CD patients with SB involvement, with the exception that the frequency of enteroscopic intervention increased remarkably.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail