Background: s/Aims: The recent increase in medical school admissions has potentially altered the working conditions of hospitalists in South Korea. This study investigated how these changes have affected the work patterns and responsibilities of hospitalists, particularly in light of the ongoing exodus of medical trainees that began on February 22, 2024. Methods: We surveyed members of the Korean Society of Hospital Medicine and the Korean Society of Surgery Hospital Medicine Study Group working as hospitalists from April 2 to 30, 2024. The survey was conducted via email and excluded personally identifiable information. Respondents’ characteristics, work types, hours, patient loads, support staff availability, and changes in job scope post-policy were analyzed. Results: Sixty-three hospitalists responded, with an equitable gender distribution and a median age of 39 years. A significant shift in work patterns was noted, with full-day shifts increasing from 22.2% to 39.7%, and a corresponding decrease in weekday daytime shifts. Work hours also significantly increased from a median of 40 to 45 hours per week. Changes in patient distribution were observed, with fewer hospitalists managing mid-range patient numbers and more handling smaller or larger loads. Despite the increased demands in the latter case, more than 50% of hospitalists reported a lack of support staff and a significant portion did not receive overtime compensation. Conclusions The increase in medical school admissions and subsequent shifts in hospitalist workloads and hours indicate a strained healthcare system. Hospitalists are taking on more intensive and extended roles. The absence of adequate support staff and adjustments in compensation suggest that further systemic changes are necessary to sustain the efforts of hospitalists, thereby ensuring patient safety and care quality.

Background: s/Aims: The recent increase in medical school admissions has potentially altered the working conditions of hospitalists in South Korea. This study investigated how these changes have affected the work patterns and responsibilities of hospitalists, particularly in light of the ongoing exodus of medical trainees that began on February 22, 2024. Methods: We surveyed members of the Korean Society of Hospital Medicine and the Korean Society of Surgery Hospital Medicine Study Group working as hospitalists from April 2 to 30, 2024. The survey was conducted via email and excluded personally identifiable information. Respondents’ characteristics, work types, hours, patient loads, support staff availability, and changes in job scope post-policy were analyzed. Results: Sixty-three hospitalists responded, with an equitable gender distribution and a median age of 39 years. A significant shift in work patterns was noted, with full-day shifts increasing from 22.2% to 39.7%, and a corresponding decrease in weekday daytime shifts. Work hours also significantly increased from a median of 40 to 45 hours per week. Changes in patient distribution were observed, with fewer hospitalists managing mid-range patient numbers and more handling smaller or larger loads. Despite the increased demands in the latter case, more than 50% of hospitalists reported a lack of support staff and a significant portion did not receive overtime compensation. Conclusions The increase in medical school admissions and subsequent shifts in hospitalist workloads and hours indicate a strained healthcare system. Hospitalists are taking on more intensive and extended roles. The absence of adequate support staff and adjustments in compensation suggest that further systemic changes are necessary to sustain the efforts of hospitalists, thereby ensuring patient safety and care quality.

Background: s/Aims: The recent increase in medical school admissions has potentially altered the working conditions of hospitalists in South Korea. This study investigated how these changes have affected the work patterns and responsibilities of hospitalists, particularly in light of the ongoing exodus of medical trainees that began on February 22, 2024. Methods: We surveyed members of the Korean Society of Hospital Medicine and the Korean Society of Surgery Hospital Medicine Study Group working as hospitalists from April 2 to 30, 2024. The survey was conducted via email and excluded personally identifiable information. Respondents’ characteristics, work types, hours, patient loads, support staff availability, and changes in job scope post-policy were analyzed. Results: Sixty-three hospitalists responded, with an equitable gender distribution and a median age of 39 years. A significant shift in work patterns was noted, with full-day shifts increasing from 22.2% to 39.7%, and a corresponding decrease in weekday daytime shifts. Work hours also significantly increased from a median of 40 to 45 hours per week. Changes in patient distribution were observed, with fewer hospitalists managing mid-range patient numbers and more handling smaller or larger loads. Despite the increased demands in the latter case, more than 50% of hospitalists reported a lack of support staff and a significant portion did not receive overtime compensation. Conclusions The increase in medical school admissions and subsequent shifts in hospitalist workloads and hours indicate a strained healthcare system. Hospitalists are taking on more intensive and extended roles. The absence of adequate support staff and adjustments in compensation suggest that further systemic changes are necessary to sustain the efforts of hospitalists, thereby ensuring patient safety and care quality.

Background: s/Aims: The recent increase in medical school admissions has potentially altered the working conditions of hospitalists in South Korea. This study investigated how these changes have affected the work patterns and responsibilities of hospitalists, particularly in light of the ongoing exodus of medical trainees that began on February 22, 2024. Methods: We surveyed members of the Korean Society of Hospital Medicine and the Korean Society of Surgery Hospital Medicine Study Group working as hospitalists from April 2 to 30, 2024. The survey was conducted via email and excluded personally identifiable information. Respondents’ characteristics, work types, hours, patient loads, support staff availability, and changes in job scope post-policy were analyzed. Results: Sixty-three hospitalists responded, with an equitable gender distribution and a median age of 39 years. A significant shift in work patterns was noted, with full-day shifts increasing from 22.2% to 39.7%, and a corresponding decrease in weekday daytime shifts. Work hours also significantly increased from a median of 40 to 45 hours per week. Changes in patient distribution were observed, with fewer hospitalists managing mid-range patient numbers and more handling smaller or larger loads. Despite the increased demands in the latter case, more than 50% of hospitalists reported a lack of support staff and a significant portion did not receive overtime compensation. Conclusions The increase in medical school admissions and subsequent shifts in hospitalist workloads and hours indicate a strained healthcare system. Hospitalists are taking on more intensive and extended roles. The absence of adequate support staff and adjustments in compensation suggest that further systemic changes are necessary to sustain the efforts of hospitalists, thereby ensuring patient safety and care quality.

Background: To evaluate whether insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion are useful predictors of incident diabetes in Koreans using nationwide population-representative data to enhance data privacy. Methods: This study analyzed the data of individuals without diabetes aged >40 years from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2007–2010 and 2015 and the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS). Owing to privacy concerns, these databases cannot be linked using direct identifiers. Therefore, we generated 10 synthetic datasets, followed by statistical matching with the NHIS-HEALS. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) were used as indicators of insulin resistance and insulin secretory function, respectively, and diabetes onset was captured in NHIS-HEALS. Results: A median of 4,580 (range, 4,463 to 4,761) adults were included in the analyses after statistical matching of 10 synthetic KNHANES and NHIS-HEALS datasets. During a mean follow-up duration of 5.8 years, a median of 4.7% (range, 4.3% to 5.0%) of the participants developed diabetes. Compared to the reference low–HOMA-IR/high–HOMA-β group, the high–HOMA-IR/low– HOMA-β group had the highest risk of diabetes, followed by high–HOMA-IR/high–HOMA-β group and low–HOMA-IR/low– HOMA-β group (median adjusted hazard ratio [ranges]: 3.36 [1.86 to 6.05], 1.81 [1.01 to 3.22], and 1.68 [0.93 to 3.04], respectively). Conclusion Insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion are robust predictors of diabetes in the Korean population. A retrospective cohort constructed by combining cross-sectional synthetic and longitudinal claims-based cohort data through statistical matching may be a reliable resource for studying the natural history of diabetes.

Background/Aims: Although a management fee for hospitalist service was established in Korea, the number of hospitalists required for the system to run remains outmatched. Methods: In January 2020 and February 2022, before and after the establishment of the hospitalist fee system respectively, cross-sectional online surveys were conducted among internal medicine board-certified hospitalists. Results: There were 59 and 64 respondents in the 2020 and 2022 surveys, respectively. The percentage of respondents who cited financial benefits as a motive for becoming a hospitalist was higher in the 2022 survey than in the 2020 survey (34.4% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.001). The annual salary of respondents was also higher in the 2022 survey than in the 2020 survey (mean, 182.9 vs. 163.0 million in South Korean Won; p = 0.006). A total of 81.3% of the respondents were willing to continue a hospitalist career in the 2022 survey. In multivariate regression analysis, the possibility of being appointed as a professor was found to be an independent predictive factor of continuing a hospitalist career (odds ratio, 4.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–14.75; p = 0.037). Conclusions Since the establishment of the hospitalist fee system, monetary compensation has improved for hospitalists. The possibility of being appointed as a professor could predict long-term work as hospitalists.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpatient care. Materials and Methods: Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satisfaction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards. Results: We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) required co-management for a significantly shorter duration (p=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (p=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (p=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (p=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores. Conclusion Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.

Although bicarbonate has traditionally been used to treat patients with rhabdomyolysis at high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), it is unclear whether this is beneficial. This study compared bicarbonate therapy to non-bicarbonate therapy for the prevention of AKI and mortality in rhabdomyolysis patients. Methods: In a propensity score-matched cohort study, patients with a creatine kinase (CK) level of >1,000 U/L during hospitalization were divided into bicarbonate and non-bicarbonate groups. Patients were subgrouped based on low-volume (<3 mL/kg/hr) or high-volume (≥3 mL/kg/hr) fluid resuscitation in the first 72 hours. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify the impacts of bicarbonate use and fluid resuscitation on AKI risk and need for dialysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Volume overload and electrolyte imbalances were assessed. Results: Among 4,077 patients, we assembled a cohort of 887 pairs of patients treated with and without bicarbonate. Bicarbonate group had a higher incidence of AKI, higher rate of dialysis dependency, higher 30-day mortality, and longer hospital stay than the non-bicarbonate group. Further, patients who received high-volume fluid therapy had worse renal outcomes and a higher mortality than those who received low-volume fluids regardless of bicarbonate use. Bicarbonate use, volume overload, and AKI were associated with higher mortality. Volume overload was significantly higher in the bicarbonate group than in the non-bicarbonate group. Conclusion: Bicarbonate or high-volume fluid therapy for patients with rhabdomyolysis did not reduce AKI or improve mortality compared to non-bicarbonate or low-volume fluid therapy. Limited use of bicarbonate and adjustment of fluid volume may improve the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with rhabdomyolysis.

Hospitalists are specialists in inpatient care who aim to improve patient safety and quality of care. Accordingly, hospitalist research focuses on patient safety and quality improvement (QI). Major hospital medicine journals publish studies on patient safety and QI. This review introduces the latest research related to patient safety and QI research in the field of hospital medicine.