Background: The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19. Results: During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12–18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.

Background: The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19. Results: During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12–18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.

Background: The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19. Results: During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12–18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Although glycopeptides remain the preferred treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia has been challenging. We investigated real-world treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia, with a specific emphasis on the use of antimicrobial agents and the frequency of changes during the treatment course. We retrospectively identified patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia in four university-affiliated hospitals between 2017 and 2021. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of antimicrobial uses for MRSA bacteremia. The secondary objectives were evaluating the associated factors with 1) overall 30-day mortality and 2) changing agents during the treatment course. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for immortal time bias. Among 116 patients, 37.1% underwent antimicrobials switching, primarily prompted by persistent bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates of groups with and without antimicrobial switching were 21.4% and 44.2%, respectively (p=0.010 by log-rank test); however, after adjustment for immortal time bias, there was no statistical significance between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.03–2.17, p=0.238). Only the Pitt bacteremia score on day 4 and pneumonia were associated with 30-day mortality. Meanwhile, the factors associated with antimicrobial switching were the duration of bacteremia, the initial use of teicoplanin, echocardiogram, and Charlson comorbidity index. This study showed that while over one-third of persistent MRSA bacteremia patients experience changes in antimicrobial agents during treatment, this practice does not significantly improve the 30-day mortality. Our study suggests the need for more effective treatment strategies in managing persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Although glycopeptides remain the preferred treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia has been challenging. We investigated real-world treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia, with a specific emphasis on the use of antimicrobial agents and the frequency of changes during the treatment course. We retrospectively identified patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia in four university-affiliated hospitals between 2017 and 2021. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of antimicrobial uses for MRSA bacteremia. The secondary objectives were evaluating the associated factors with 1) overall 30-day mortality and 2) changing agents during the treatment course. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for immortal time bias. Among 116 patients, 37.1% underwent antimicrobials switching, primarily prompted by persistent bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates of groups with and without antimicrobial switching were 21.4% and 44.2%, respectively (p=0.010 by log-rank test); however, after adjustment for immortal time bias, there was no statistical significance between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.03–2.17, p=0.238). Only the Pitt bacteremia score on day 4 and pneumonia were associated with 30-day mortality. Meanwhile, the factors associated with antimicrobial switching were the duration of bacteremia, the initial use of teicoplanin, echocardiogram, and Charlson comorbidity index. This study showed that while over one-third of persistent MRSA bacteremia patients experience changes in antimicrobial agents during treatment, this practice does not significantly improve the 30-day mortality. Our study suggests the need for more effective treatment strategies in managing persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Although glycopeptides remain the preferred treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia has been challenging. We investigated real-world treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia, with a specific emphasis on the use of antimicrobial agents and the frequency of changes during the treatment course. We retrospectively identified patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia in four university-affiliated hospitals between 2017 and 2021. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of antimicrobial uses for MRSA bacteremia. The secondary objectives were evaluating the associated factors with 1) overall 30-day mortality and 2) changing agents during the treatment course. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for immortal time bias. Among 116 patients, 37.1% underwent antimicrobials switching, primarily prompted by persistent bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates of groups with and without antimicrobial switching were 21.4% and 44.2%, respectively (p=0.010 by log-rank test); however, after adjustment for immortal time bias, there was no statistical significance between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.03–2.17, p=0.238). Only the Pitt bacteremia score on day 4 and pneumonia were associated with 30-day mortality. Meanwhile, the factors associated with antimicrobial switching were the duration of bacteremia, the initial use of teicoplanin, echocardiogram, and Charlson comorbidity index. This study showed that while over one-third of persistent MRSA bacteremia patients experience changes in antimicrobial agents during treatment, this practice does not significantly improve the 30-day mortality. Our study suggests the need for more effective treatment strategies in managing persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Although glycopeptides remain the preferred treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, the treatment of persistent MRSA bacteremia has been challenging. We investigated real-world treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia, with a specific emphasis on the use of antimicrobial agents and the frequency of changes during the treatment course. We retrospectively identified patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia in four university-affiliated hospitals between 2017 and 2021. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of antimicrobial uses for MRSA bacteremia. The secondary objectives were evaluating the associated factors with 1) overall 30-day mortality and 2) changing agents during the treatment course. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for immortal time bias. Among 116 patients, 37.1% underwent antimicrobials switching, primarily prompted by persistent bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates of groups with and without antimicrobial switching were 21.4% and 44.2%, respectively (p=0.010 by log-rank test); however, after adjustment for immortal time bias, there was no statistical significance between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.03–2.17, p=0.238). Only the Pitt bacteremia score on day 4 and pneumonia were associated with 30-day mortality. Meanwhile, the factors associated with antimicrobial switching were the duration of bacteremia, the initial use of teicoplanin, echocardiogram, and Charlson comorbidity index. This study showed that while over one-third of persistent MRSA bacteremia patients experience changes in antimicrobial agents during treatment, this practice does not significantly improve the 30-day mortality. Our study suggests the need for more effective treatment strategies in managing persistent MRSA bacteremia.