Perioperative care process in a hospital is considerably complex, involving multiple subprocesses, healthcare professionals, and systems in support of surgical care. The perioperative process is often the primary source of hospital admissions, driving the dominant part of hospital margins and accounts for a major part of all adverse events occurring in hospitals. The recent trend stresses the importance of adopting patient-centered and quality-proven care in many medical fields. Further, the emphasis on changing from fee-for-service to fee-for-value is increasing. These changes present challenges to anesthesiologists who play a central role in perioperative medicine.Current Concepts: Anesthesiologists are in contact with many surgeons and patients and are positioned to improve clinical outcomes. They need to have up-to-date, evidence-based knowledges on perioperative clinical management and know-how to apply, organize and practice them into efficient pathways for optimal outcomes. To accomplish such purposes, anesthesiologists need to acquire communication skills to reason and convincing related personnel including surgeons and patients.Discussion and Conclusion: The recent changing climate of perioperative medicine calls upon anesthesiologists to acquire knowledges driving quality care and demands the application of communicative skills to accomplish the required tasks.

Purpose: To assess patient radiation doses during diagnostic and therapeutic neurointerventional procedures from multiple centers and propose dose reference level (RL). Materials and Methods: Consecutive neurointerventional procedures, performed in 22 hospitals from December 2020 to June 2021, were retrospectively studied. We collected data from a sample of 429 diagnostic and 731 therapeutic procedures. Parameters including dose-area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), fluoroscopic time (FT), and total number of image frames (NI) were obtained. RL were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distribution. Results: Analysis of 1160 procedures from 22 hospitals confirmed the large variability in patient dose for similar procedures. RLs in terms of DAP, CAK, FT, and NI were 101.6 Gy·cm2, 711.3 mGy, 13.3 minutes, and 637 frames for cerebral angiography, 199.9 Gy·cm2, 3,458.7 mGy, 57.3 minutes, and 1,000 frames for aneurysm coiling, 225.1 Gy·cm2, 1,590 mGy, 44.7 minutes, and 800 frames for stroke thrombolysis, 412.3 Gy·cm2, 4,447.8 mGy, 99.3 minutes, and 1,621.3 frames for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) embolization, respectively. For all procedures, the results were comparable to most of those already published. Statistical analysis showed male and presence of procedural complications were significant factors in aneurysmal coiling. Male, number of passages, and procedural combined technique were significant factors in stroke thrombolysis. In AVM embolization, a significantly higher radiation dose was found in the definitive endovascular cure group. Conclusion Various RLs introduced in this study promote the optimization of patient doses in diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures. Proposed 3rd quartile DAP (Gy·cm2) values were 101.6 for diagnostic cerebral angiography, 199.9 for aneurysm coiling, 225.1 for stroke thrombolysis, and 412.3 for AVM embolization. Continual evolution of practices and technologies requires regular updates of RLs.

Perioperative care process in a hospital is considerably complex, involving multiple subprocesses, healthcare professionals, and systems in support of surgical care. The perioperative process is often the primary source of hospital admissions, driving the dominant part of hospital margins and accounts for a major part of all adverse events occurring in hospitals. The recent trend stresses the importance of adopting patient-centered and quality-proven care in many medical fields. Further, the emphasis on changing from fee-for-service to fee-for-value is increasing. These changes present challenges to anesthesiologists who play a central role in perioperative medicine.Current Concepts: Anesthesiologists are in contact with many surgeons and patients and are positioned to improve clinical outcomes. They need to have up-to-date, evidence-based knowledges on perioperative clinical management and know-how to apply, organize and practice them into efficient pathways for optimal outcomes. To accomplish such purposes, anesthesiologists need to acquire communication skills to reason and convincing related personnel including surgeons and patients.Discussion and Conclusion: The recent changing climate of perioperative medicine calls upon anesthesiologists to acquire knowledges driving quality care and demands the application of communicative skills to accomplish the required tasks.

Background: Submental intubation is commonly used during general anesthesia for maxillofacial surgeries as it provides a safe unrestricted surgical access compared to tracheostomy. During submental intubation, soft tissues and blood clots can become lodged in the endotracheal tube. To overcome this problem, we used a laparoscopic trocar.Case: A 52-year-old man with maxillofacial injury was scheduled to undergo an open reduction and internal fixation. We performed submental intubation using laparoscopic trocar, which created sufficient space for the insertion of the endotracheal tube. Unlike conventional methods, our method did not require any blunt dissection and caused significantly less soft tissue damage and required significantly less time. Conclusions Submental intubation with laparoscopic trocar is a one-step method and is quick and easy-to-perform technique with less complications.

BACKGROUND: Recently, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), have been used for treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome and predictors for 30-day mortality and complications, in patients that underwent EVAR and/or TEVAR under general anesthesia. METHODS: In this study, 151 cases of EVAR and/or TEVAR under general anesthesia in 140 patients during 2009–2017 were studied. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used, to clarify risk for postoperative 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 9.9% in the study population (10.3% in EVAR, and 9.3% in TEVAR, respectively). Seventy-two cases (47.7%) experienced postoperative complications within 30 days. Elderly older than age 76.5 (odds ratio [ORs] = 48.89, 95% confidential interval [95% CI] 1.40–1,710.25, P = 0.032), technically expertness (OR = 0.01, 95% CI 0.00–0.40, P = 0.013), severity of systemic complications (OR = 23.24, 95% CI, 2.27–238.24, P = 0.008), and severity of local-vascular complications (OR = 31.87, 95% CI, 1.29–784.66, P = 0.034) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that elderly, technically expertness, and severity of systemic and local-vascular complications were associated with 30-day mortality of EVAR and TEVAR in aortic aneurysm.
Aged ; Anesthesia, General ; Aortic Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Logistic Models ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Korea is regarded as a country that provides a high level of medical services despite a low burden of public health insurance premiums. However, patients face the burden of covering the costs of medical services that are not covered by health insurance, and providers face difficulties because the price of the medical service guaranteed by the health insurance system is very low. In this situation, the government is trying to expand health insurance coverage in the form of the ‘preliminary coverage system’ also known as the ‘selective coverage system’. In this system the government sets the price for a particular health care service not covered by health insurance and then the patient pays for the majority (50% to 90%) of the cost. Although it is possible to manage information about the amount of medical service usage at the national level through this system, it still places a high economic burden on patients with low incomes. In addition, since medical providers are forced to receive uniformly undervalued prices, specialized technologies that have been optimized by medical research institutions are threatened with extinction. Therefore, the preliminary coverage system needs to be reviewed before implementation of expanded coverage within this framework. First, the concept of essential medical care should be established. Based on this concept, the percentage of the cost to be paid by patients should be derived. If the preliminary coverage system is applied to medical services that are not covered by health insurance, a reasonable classification system should be developed and applied along with pricing considering customary market prices.
Classification ; Delivery of Health Care ; Humans ; Insurance ; Insurance, Health ; Korea ; Public Health

Korea is regarded as a country that provides a high level of medical services despite a low burden of public health insurance premiums. However, patients face the burden of covering the costs of medical services that are not covered by health insurance, and providers face difficulties because the price of the medical service guaranteed by the health insurance system is very low. In this situation, the government is trying to expand health insurance coverage in the form of the ‘preliminary coverage system’ also known as the ‘selective coverage system’. In this system the government sets the price for a particular health care service not covered by health insurance and then the patient pays for the majority (50% to 90%) of the cost. Although it is possible to manage information about the amount of medical service usage at the national level through this system, it still places a high economic burden on patients with low incomes. In addition, since medical providers are forced to receive uniformly undervalued prices, specialized technologies that have been optimized by medical research institutions are threatened with extinction. Therefore, the preliminary coverage system needs to be reviewed before implementation of expanded coverage within this framework. First, the concept of essential medical care should be established. Based on this concept, the percentage of the cost to be paid by patients should be derived. If the preliminary coverage system is applied to medical services that are not covered by health insurance, a reasonable classification system should be developed and applied along with pricing considering customary market prices.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess whether pre-anesthetic administration of dexmedetomidine reduces the postoperative consumption of opioids, in patients receiving patient-controlled fentanyl after gynecological laparotomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Ten minutes before induction of anesthesia, 36 patients scheduled for elective gynecological laparotomy were assigned to receive either normal saline (group N) or dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (group D). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device was used to administer fentanyl for the postoperative 24 h period. Cumulative fentanyl consumption and pain score were assessed at postoperative 30 min, 6 h and 24 h. Patient's satisfaction for pain control and other side effects (nausea, sedation score) were recorded for all corresponding time points. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in cumulative fentanyl consumption (Group N: 11.1 ± 3.2 µg/kg, Group D: 10.3 ± 2.9 µg/kg, P value: 0.706). The incidence of side-effects did not differ between the groups. Both groups showed similar blood pressure after anesthesia induction. However, 10 min after anesthesia induction, the heart rates in group D were significantly lower than group N (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy, the pre-anesthetic administration of single loading dose dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) given 10 min before anesthesia induction did not reduce the PCA consumption of postoperative fentanyl or the pain score.
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid* ; Anesthesia ; Blood Pressure ; Dexmedetomidine* ; Fentanyl ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Incidence ; Laparotomy ; Pain, Postoperative ; Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis ; Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypothermia, defined as a core temperature under 36℃, increases the risk of cardiac complication, bleeding and infection. This study aimed to compare the hypothermia-preventing effects of a warming blanket (Ready-heat®) and one-layer cotton blanket in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the bladder (TURBT) under general anesthesia. METHODS: Patients undergoing TURBT under general anesthesia were allocated to the warming blanket (N = 23) or one-layer cotton blanket (N = 23) groups. Ten minutes before induction of anesthesia, warming blanket or one-layer cotton blanket was applied according to the assigned group. Tympanic temperature was measured just before induction of anesthesia. Esophageal temperature and tympanic temperature were measured from 20 min after induction of anesthesia at 10-min intervals. Tympanic temperature was measured at 10-min intervals over a 30-min period in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). In addition, the incidence and intensity of shivering and thermal comfort were also measured. RESULTS: The core temperature during general anesthesia showed no significant intergroup difference. The warming blanket group showed a lower incidence of hypothermia at 1 h after induction of anesthesia. Tympanic temperature, the incidence and intensity of shivering, and thermal comfort in the PACU showed no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the warming blanket or one-layer cotton blanket for 10 min before induction of anesthesia showed no hypothermia-preventing effects. However, at one hour after induction of anesthesia, warming blanket application reduced the incidence of hypothermia to a greater degree than one-layer cotton blanket.
Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General* ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hypothermia* ; Incidence ; Perioperative Period ; Shivering ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms* ; Urinary Bladder*

PURPOSE: To assess patient radiation doses during cerebral angiography and embolization of intracranial aneurysms across multi-centers and propose a diagnostic reference level (DRL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied a sample of 490 diagnostic and 371 therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms, which were performed at 23 hospitals in Korea in 2015. Parameters including dose-area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), fluoroscopic time and total angiographic image frames were obtained and analyzed. RESULTS: Total mean DAP, CAK, fluoroscopy time, and total angiographic image frames were 106.2 ± 66.4 Gy-cm2, 697.1 ± 473.7 mGy, 9.7 ± 6.5 minutes, 241.5 ± 116.6 frames for diagnostic procedures, 218.8 ± 164.3 Gy-cm², 3365.7 ± 2205.8 mGy, 51.5 ± 31.1 minutes, 443.5 ± 270.7 frames for therapeutic procedures, respectively. For diagnostic procedure, the third quartiles for DRLs were 144.2 Gy-cm² for DAP, 921.1 mGy for CAK, 12.2 minutes for fluoroscopy times and 286.5 for number of image frames, respectively. For therapeutic procedures, the third quartiles for DRLs were 271.0 Gy-cm² for DAP, 4471.3 mGy for CAK, 64.7 minutes for fluoroscopy times and 567.3 for number of image frames, respectively. On average, rotational angiography was used 1.5 ± 0.7 times/session (range, 0-4; n=490) for diagnostic procedures and 1.6 ± 1.2 times/session (range, 0-4; n=368) for therapeutic procedures, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiation dose as measured by DAP, fluoroscopy time and image frames were lower in our patients compared to another study regarding cerebral angiography, and DAP was lower with fewer angiographic image frames for therapeutic procedures. Proposed DRLs can be used for quality assurance and patient safety in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Angiography ; Cerebral Angiography ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Intracranial Aneurysm* ; Korea ; Patient Safety ; Radiation Exposure*