Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Purpose: As global interest in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) has increased owing to weight loss effect, concerns regarding the risk of suicide/self-injury associated with GLP-1 RAs have garnered considerable attention. Given the limited evidence, in this study, we aimed to investigate the potential relationship between GLP-1 RAs and suicide/self-injury, stratified by therapeutic indications, using VigiBase, the largest global database. Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted to detect signals of disproportionate reporting using VigiBase data from April 28, 2005, to August 31, 2023. Subgroup analyses by indication were conducted, comparing against drugs that have different mechanisms but are used for similar indications (type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM] treatment: glucose-lowering agents; weight loss: orlistat). Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) were used as signal detection indicators. Results: A total of 485 reports of suicide/self-injury associated with GLP-1 RAs were identified. Indication-integrated analyses did not indicate a potential relationship between any GLP-1 RA and suicide/self-injury. In subgroup analyses by indication, signals of disproportionate reporting were not detected in patients using GLP-1 RAs for T2DM treatment but were detected in patients using GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: total (ROR, 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 3.01; IC025, 0.01), liraglutide (ROR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.49; IC025, 0.14), semaglutide (ROR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.31 to 4.14; IC025, 0.22). Conclusion Given the differences in results by indication, this study highlights the need for post-marketing surveillance of the suicide/self-injury risk in non-T2DM populations using GLP-1 RAs for simple weight loss.