Randomized clinical trials are important in both clinical and academic stroke communities with increasing numbers of new design concepts emerging. One of the “less traditional” designs that have gained increasing interest in the last decade is non-inferiority trials. Whilst the concept might appear straightforward, the design and interpretation of non-inferiority trials can be challenging. In this review, we will use exemplars from clinical trials in the stroke field to provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of non-inferiority trials and how they should be interpreted in stroke research.

Cerebral hypoperfusion plays a critical role in early neurological deterioration and long-term outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, which remains a major global health challenge. This review explored transdural angiogenesis as a promising therapeutic strategy to restore cerebral perfusion in patients with ischemic stroke. The multiple burr hole procedure has been preliminarily used as an indirect revascularization method to induce transdural arteriogenesis. Theoretically, its efficacy could be enhanced by combining it with angiogenic boosters, such as erythropoietin. Recent clinical and preclinical studies have revealed that this combination therapy promotes angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, leading to successful revascularization across the dura mater and improved cerebral blood flow. This strategy may be particularly beneficial for high-risk patients with recurrent ischemic events, such as those with moyamoya disease or intracranial arterial occlusion, representing an effective strategy when conventional medical treatments are insufficient. This review highlights the potential of transdural angiogenesis enhancement as a novel intervention for ischemic stroke, offering an alternative to thrombolysis or endovascular treatment, particularly in acute stroke patients with impaired cerebral perfusion. This approach has the potential to bridge the treatment gap for patients outside the therapeutic window for acute stroke interventions. Although further research is required to refine this technique and validate its efficacy in broader clinical settings, early results have revealed promising outcomes at reducing stroke-related complications and improving patient prognosis. This review indicates that this novel strategy may offer hope for managing ischemic stroke and related conditions associated with significant cerebral hypoperfusion.

Background: and Purpose Previous research on patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has shown a 0.5% incidence of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) requiring blood transfusion during hospitalization. The existing literature has insufficiently explored the long-term incidence in this population despite the decremental impact of GIB on stroke outcomes. Methods: We analyzed the data from a cohort of patients with AIS admitted to 14 hospitals as part of a nationwide multicenter prospective stroke registry between 2011 and 2013. These patients were followed up for up to 6 years. The occurrence of major GIB events, defined as GIB necessitating at least two units of blood transfusion, was tracked using the National Health Insurance Service claims data. Results: Among 10,818 patients with AIS (male, 59%; mean age, 68±13 years), 947 (8.8%) experienced 1,224 episodes of major GIB over a median follow-up duration of 3.1 years. Remarkably, 20% of 947 patients experienced multiple episodes of major GIB. The incidence peaked in the first month after AIS, reaching 19.2 per 100 person-years, and gradually decreased to approximately one-sixth of this rate by the 2nd year with subsequent stabilization. Multivariable analysis identified the following predictors of major GIB: anemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , and a 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of ≥4. Conclusion Patients with AIS are susceptible to major GIB, particularly in the first month after the onset of AIS, with the risk decreasing thereafter. Implementing preventive strategies may be important, especially for patients with anemia and impaired renal function at stroke onset and those with a disabling stroke.

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) such as aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer pose significant neurovascular risks, affecting patient outcomes. This review examines the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcomes of neurovascular complications in AAS patients. Common complications include stroke, spinal cord ischemia, and transient ischemic attacks, with stroke being the most prevalent. Managing aortic dissection necessitates careful blood pressure control to prevent dissection progression while avoiding compromised cerebral and spinal perfusion. Carotid involvement, particularly dissection, increases stroke and transient ischemic attack risks. Emergency surgical interventions, though essential to prevent rupture or repair dissection, carry risks of perioperative neurovascular complications. The use of electroencephalography and transcranial Doppler can aid in the early detection and monitoring of neurovascular events. We discuss the pros and cons of certain blood pressure medications in the acute treatment of aortic dissection. A multidisciplinary approach involving cardiovascular surgeons, neurologists, and critical care specialists is vital for optimizing outcomes and mitigating risks. Early recognition and management of neurovascular complications are crucial, and further research is needed to develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies.

Background: and Purpose Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a severe complication associated with adverse functional outcomes and increased mortality rates. Currently, a reliable predictive model for sICH risk after EVT is lacking. Methods: This study used data from patients aged ≥20 years who underwent EVT for anterior circulation stroke from the nationwide Taiwan Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke (TREAT-AIS). A predictive model including factors associated with an increased risk of sICH after EVT was developed to differentiate between patients with and without sICH. This model was compared existing predictive models using nationwide registry data to evaluate its relative performance. Results: Of the 2,507 identified patients, 158 developed sICH after EVT. Factors such as diastolic blood pressure, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, platelet count, glucose level, collateral score, and successful reperfusion were associated with the risk of sICH after EVT. The TREAT-AIS score demonstrated acceptable predictive accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]=0.694), with higher scores being associated with an increased risk of sICH (odds ratio=2.01 per score increase, 95% confidence interval=1.64–2.45, P<0.001). The discriminatory capacity of the score was similar in patients with symptom onset beyond 6 hours (AUC=0.705). Compared to existing models, the TREAT-AIS score consistently exhibited superior predictive accuracy, although this difference was marginal. Conclusions The TREAT-AIS score outperformed existing models, and demonstrated an acceptable discriminatory capacity for distinguishing patients according to sICH risk levels. However, the differences between models were only marginal. Further research incorporating periprocedural and postprocedural factors is required to improve the predictive accuracy.