Purpose: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) risk prediction model is a simple method for estimating risk for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The model considers both treatment methods and the physical characteristics of the aneurysm type as well as comorbidities. This research aimed to validate its effectiveness by analyzing retrospective data on Korean patients. Methods: Our single-center retrospective analysis included 1,227 patients who underwent elective open repair surgery (ORS) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) from 2005 to 2021. We assessed the discrimination of the risk score and the effects of several risk factors. Results: Most patients (66.7%) were classified as low risk in the model, with only 5.6% considered high risk. The mean risk score was 2.81, significantly lower than reported in previous studies. The actual 30-day mortality was only 0.7%, less than the predicted 1.1%. The accuracy of the model in predicting 30-day mortality was statistically significant (area under the curve, 0.822). Patients with high scores were associated with significantly increased mortality (odds ratio, 3.9; P < 0.001). Factors such as advanced age, cerebrovascular disease, and elevated creatinine levels were influential in mortality outcomes. However, a significant difference was not found in short-term mortality between ORS and EVAR. Conclusion Although the VSGNE model is an objective tool for assessing death risk in elective AAA repair, the actual risk scores in our patient population were lower than predicted. To create a more representative tool for the Korean population, we suggest developing a novel model based on multicenter data collection.

By investigating the characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients who have undergone hormone replacement therapy (HRT), this study addresses a gap in the existing literature. A total of 17,355 postmenopausal patients with BC were analyzed using data from the Korea Breast Cancer Society database (2000–2014). Among them, 3,585 (20.7%) had a history of HRT before BC diagnosis (HRT group), while 13,770 (79.3%) never received HRT (non-HRT group). The HRT group exhibited an earlier pathologic stage, lower histologic and nuclear grades, and a higher rate of breast conservation surgery compared to the non-HRT group. Furthermore, this group had a higher rate of screening participation and a greater proportion of patients with a normal or overweight body mass index (BMI). The prognosis of the HRT group was better than that of the non-HRT group, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 93.9% versus 91.7% (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for the HRT group was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.608–0.805; p < 0.001). Increased screening participation, longer HRT duration, and a normal or overweight BMI were associated with a better prognosis in the HRT group. Patients with BC who underwent HRT showed better clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis than those who did not receive HRT. The results highlighted significant differences in patients who underwent screening and those with a normal or overweight BMI. Furthermore, a longer HRT duration was associated with a better prognosis.

Purpose: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) risk prediction model is a simple method for estimating risk for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The model considers both treatment methods and the physical characteristics of the aneurysm type as well as comorbidities. This research aimed to validate its effectiveness by analyzing retrospective data on Korean patients. Methods: Our single-center retrospective analysis included 1,227 patients who underwent elective open repair surgery (ORS) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) from 2005 to 2021. We assessed the discrimination of the risk score and the effects of several risk factors. Results: Most patients (66.7%) were classified as low risk in the model, with only 5.6% considered high risk. The mean risk score was 2.81, significantly lower than reported in previous studies. The actual 30-day mortality was only 0.7%, less than the predicted 1.1%. The accuracy of the model in predicting 30-day mortality was statistically significant (area under the curve, 0.822). Patients with high scores were associated with significantly increased mortality (odds ratio, 3.9; P < 0.001). Factors such as advanced age, cerebrovascular disease, and elevated creatinine levels were influential in mortality outcomes. However, a significant difference was not found in short-term mortality between ORS and EVAR. Conclusion Although the VSGNE model is an objective tool for assessing death risk in elective AAA repair, the actual risk scores in our patient population were lower than predicted. To create a more representative tool for the Korean population, we suggest developing a novel model based on multicenter data collection.

By investigating the characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients who have undergone hormone replacement therapy (HRT), this study addresses a gap in the existing literature. A total of 17,355 postmenopausal patients with BC were analyzed using data from the Korea Breast Cancer Society database (2000–2014). Among them, 3,585 (20.7%) had a history of HRT before BC diagnosis (HRT group), while 13,770 (79.3%) never received HRT (non-HRT group). The HRT group exhibited an earlier pathologic stage, lower histologic and nuclear grades, and a higher rate of breast conservation surgery compared to the non-HRT group. Furthermore, this group had a higher rate of screening participation and a greater proportion of patients with a normal or overweight body mass index (BMI). The prognosis of the HRT group was better than that of the non-HRT group, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 93.9% versus 91.7% (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for the HRT group was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.608–0.805; p < 0.001). Increased screening participation, longer HRT duration, and a normal or overweight BMI were associated with a better prognosis in the HRT group. Patients with BC who underwent HRT showed better clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis than those who did not receive HRT. The results highlighted significant differences in patients who underwent screening and those with a normal or overweight BMI. Furthermore, a longer HRT duration was associated with a better prognosis.

Purpose: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) risk prediction model is a simple method for estimating risk for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The model considers both treatment methods and the physical characteristics of the aneurysm type as well as comorbidities. This research aimed to validate its effectiveness by analyzing retrospective data on Korean patients. Methods: Our single-center retrospective analysis included 1,227 patients who underwent elective open repair surgery (ORS) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) from 2005 to 2021. We assessed the discrimination of the risk score and the effects of several risk factors. Results: Most patients (66.7%) were classified as low risk in the model, with only 5.6% considered high risk. The mean risk score was 2.81, significantly lower than reported in previous studies. The actual 30-day mortality was only 0.7%, less than the predicted 1.1%. The accuracy of the model in predicting 30-day mortality was statistically significant (area under the curve, 0.822). Patients with high scores were associated with significantly increased mortality (odds ratio, 3.9; P < 0.001). Factors such as advanced age, cerebrovascular disease, and elevated creatinine levels were influential in mortality outcomes. However, a significant difference was not found in short-term mortality between ORS and EVAR. Conclusion Although the VSGNE model is an objective tool for assessing death risk in elective AAA repair, the actual risk scores in our patient population were lower than predicted. To create a more representative tool for the Korean population, we suggest developing a novel model based on multicenter data collection.

By investigating the characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients who have undergone hormone replacement therapy (HRT), this study addresses a gap in the existing literature. A total of 17,355 postmenopausal patients with BC were analyzed using data from the Korea Breast Cancer Society database (2000–2014). Among them, 3,585 (20.7%) had a history of HRT before BC diagnosis (HRT group), while 13,770 (79.3%) never received HRT (non-HRT group). The HRT group exhibited an earlier pathologic stage, lower histologic and nuclear grades, and a higher rate of breast conservation surgery compared to the non-HRT group. Furthermore, this group had a higher rate of screening participation and a greater proportion of patients with a normal or overweight body mass index (BMI). The prognosis of the HRT group was better than that of the non-HRT group, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 93.9% versus 91.7% (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for the HRT group was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.608–0.805; p < 0.001). Increased screening participation, longer HRT duration, and a normal or overweight BMI were associated with a better prognosis in the HRT group. Patients with BC who underwent HRT showed better clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis than those who did not receive HRT. The results highlighted significant differences in patients who underwent screening and those with a normal or overweight BMI. Furthermore, a longer HRT duration was associated with a better prognosis.

Background: s/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Purpose: This study was performed to analyze the association between age and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by comparing postoperative outcomes between octogenarians and younger patients. Methods: From November 1994 to December 2022, 1,585 internal carotid arteries of 1,434 patients were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: octogenarians (≥80 years old) and non-octogenarians (<80 years old). Primary endpoints were early (≤30 days) outcomes of ipsilateral stroke, any stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We also compared overall any stroke and death between the 2 groups. Results: One of 132 octogenarians (0.8%) and 17 of 1,453 non-octogenarians (1.1%) experienced ipsilateral stroke within 30 days. Thirty-day MACE occurred in 4 of 132 octogenarians (3%) and 44 of 1,453 non-octogenarians (3%). There were no significant differences in any early (≤30 days) outcomes. Symptomatic status was associated with increased 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR], 2.610; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.450–4.696; P = 0.003) and 30-day any stroke (OR, 3.999; 95% CI, 1.627–9.828; P = 0.003). Symptomatic status was also associated with overall any stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 2.885; 95% CI, 1.865–4.463; P < 0.001), but age of ≥80 years was not associated with 30-day MACE, 30-day any stroke, or overall stroke. Age of ≥80 years was only associated with overall survival (HR, 2.644; 95% CI, 1.967–3.555; P < 0.001). Conclusion CEA would be a safe and effective treatment for octogenarians with low 30-day complications and long-term stroke rates, comparable with that of younger counterparts. Advanced age is not a contraindication for CEA.