1.Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model
Hee Jae LEE ; Seok Hoon KANG ; Sang In PARK ; Wan Joo CHUN ; Kwon In YOUK
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2024;36(4):429-434
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendations for 2024–2025 in Korea
Wan Beom PARK ; Young Hoon HWANG ; Ki Tae KWON ; Ji Yun NOH ; Sun Hee PARK ; Joon Young SONG ; Eun Ju CHOO ; Min Joo CHOI ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Jung Yeon HEO ; Won Suk CHOI ;
Infection and Chemotherapy 2024;56(4):453-460
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases has been regularly publishing guidelines for adult immunization since 2007. Following the release of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination recommendations in 2023, significant changes have occurred due to the emergence of new variant strains and the waning immunity from previous vaccinations. This article provides a comprehensive update as of November 2024, incorporating the latest evidence and guidelines. Focusing on the 2024–2025 season, this article reviews vaccines currently authorized in Korea and assesses their effectiveness against the predominant JN.1 lineage variants. The updated recommendations prioritize high-risk groups, including adults aged 65 and older, individuals with underlying medical conditions, residents of facilities vulnerable to infection, pregnant women, and healthcare workers, for vaccination with updated vaccines targeting the JN.1 strain. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccination is available for all individuals aged 6 months and older. For most adults, a single-dose strategy is emphasized, while tailored schedules may be recommended for immunocompromised individuals. This update aims to optimize vaccination strategies in Korea to ensure comprehensive protection for high-risk populations. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model
Hee Jae LEE ; Seok Hoon KANG ; Sang In PARK ; Wan Joo CHUN ; Kwon In YOUK
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2024;36(4):429-434
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendations for 2024–2025 in Korea
Wan Beom PARK ; Young Hoon HWANG ; Ki Tae KWON ; Ji Yun NOH ; Sun Hee PARK ; Joon Young SONG ; Eun Ju CHOO ; Min Joo CHOI ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Jung Yeon HEO ; Won Suk CHOI ;
Infection and Chemotherapy 2024;56(4):453-460
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases has been regularly publishing guidelines for adult immunization since 2007. Following the release of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination recommendations in 2023, significant changes have occurred due to the emergence of new variant strains and the waning immunity from previous vaccinations. This article provides a comprehensive update as of November 2024, incorporating the latest evidence and guidelines. Focusing on the 2024–2025 season, this article reviews vaccines currently authorized in Korea and assesses their effectiveness against the predominant JN.1 lineage variants. The updated recommendations prioritize high-risk groups, including adults aged 65 and older, individuals with underlying medical conditions, residents of facilities vulnerable to infection, pregnant women, and healthcare workers, for vaccination with updated vaccines targeting the JN.1 strain. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccination is available for all individuals aged 6 months and older. For most adults, a single-dose strategy is emphasized, while tailored schedules may be recommended for immunocompromised individuals. This update aims to optimize vaccination strategies in Korea to ensure comprehensive protection for high-risk populations. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model
Hee Jae LEE ; Seok Hoon KANG ; Sang In PARK ; Wan Joo CHUN ; Kwon In YOUK
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2024;36(4):429-434
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendations for 2024–2025 in Korea
Wan Beom PARK ; Young Hoon HWANG ; Ki Tae KWON ; Ji Yun NOH ; Sun Hee PARK ; Joon Young SONG ; Eun Ju CHOO ; Min Joo CHOI ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Jung Yeon HEO ; Won Suk CHOI ;
Infection and Chemotherapy 2024;56(4):453-460
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases has been regularly publishing guidelines for adult immunization since 2007. Following the release of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination recommendations in 2023, significant changes have occurred due to the emergence of new variant strains and the waning immunity from previous vaccinations. This article provides a comprehensive update as of November 2024, incorporating the latest evidence and guidelines. Focusing on the 2024–2025 season, this article reviews vaccines currently authorized in Korea and assesses their effectiveness against the predominant JN.1 lineage variants. The updated recommendations prioritize high-risk groups, including adults aged 65 and older, individuals with underlying medical conditions, residents of facilities vulnerable to infection, pregnant women, and healthcare workers, for vaccination with updated vaccines targeting the JN.1 strain. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccination is available for all individuals aged 6 months and older. For most adults, a single-dose strategy is emphasized, while tailored schedules may be recommended for immunocompromised individuals. This update aims to optimize vaccination strategies in Korea to ensure comprehensive protection for high-risk populations. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model
Hee Jae LEE ; Seok Hoon KANG ; Sang In PARK ; Wan Joo CHUN ; Kwon In YOUK
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2024;36(4):429-434
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology–Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Lazertinib versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC: LASER301 Korean Subset
Ki Hyeong LEE ; Byoung Chul CHO ; Myung-Ju AHN ; Yun-Gyoo LEE ; Youngjoo LEE ; Jong-Seok LEE ; Joo-Hang KIM ; Young Joo MIN ; Gyeong-Won LEE ; Sung Sook LEE ; Kyung-Hee LEE ; Yoon Ho KO ; Byoung Yong SHIM ; Sang-We KIM ; Sang Won SHIN ; Jin-Hyuk CHOI ; Dong-Wan KIM ; Eun Kyung CHO ; Keon Uk PARK ; Jin-Soo KIM ; Sang Hoon CHUN ; Jangyoung WANG ; SeokYoung CHOI ; Jin Hyoung KANG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(1):48-60
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			This subgroup analysis of the Korean subset of patients in the phase 3 LASER301 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 
		                        		
		                        			Materials and Methods:
		                        			Patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to lazertinib (240 mg/day) or gefitinib (250 mg/day). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			In total, 172 Korean patients were enrolled (lazertinib, n=87; gefitinib, n=85). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. One-third of patients had brain metastases (BM) at baseline. Median PFS was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.7 to 26.1) for lazertinib and 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.3) for gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.60). This was supported by PFS analysis based on blinded independent central review. Significant PFS benefit with lazertinib was consistently observed across predefined subgroups, including patients with BM (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.53) and those with L858R mutations (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63). Lazertinib safety data were consistent with its previously reported safety profile. Common adverse events (AEs) in both groups included rash, pruritus, and diarrhoea. Numerically fewer severe AEs and severe treatment–related AEs occurred with lazertinib than gefitinib. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			Consistent with results for the overall LASER301 population, this analysis showed significant PFS benefit with lazertinib versus gefitinib with comparable safety in Korean patients with untreated EGFRm NSCLC, supporting lazertinib as a new potential treatment option for this patient population. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.A Nationwide Study on HER2-Low Breast Cancer in South Korea: Its Incidence of 2022 Real World Data and the Importance of Immunohistochemical Staining Protocols
Min Chong KIM ; Eun Yoon CHO ; So Yeon PARK ; Hee Jin LEE ; Ji Shin LEE ; Jee Yeon KIM ; Ho-chang LEE ; Jin Ye YOO ; Hee Sung KIM ; Bomi KIM ; Wan Seop KIM ; Nari SHIN ; Young Hee MAENG ; Hun Soo KIM ; Sun Young KWON ; Chungyeul KIM ; Sun-Young JUN ; Gui Young KWON ; Hye Jeong CHOI ; So Mang LEE ; Ji Eun CHOI ; Ae Ri AN ; Hyun Joo CHOI ; EunKyung KIM ; Ahrong KIM ; Ji-Young KIM ; Jeong Yun SHIM ; Gyungyub GONG ; Young Kyung BAE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(4):1096-1104
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			Notable effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–low advanced breast cancer (BC) has focused pathologists’ attention. We studied the incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low BC, and the effects of immunohistochemistry (IHC) associated factors on HER2 IHC results. 
		                        		
		                        			Materials and Methods:
		                        			The Breast Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists conducted a nationwide study using real-world data on HER2 status generated between January 2022 and December 2022. Information on HER2 IHC protocols at each participating institution was also collected. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Total 11,416 patients from 25 institutions included in this study. Of these patients, 40.7% (range, 6.0% to 76.3%) were classified as HER2-zero, 41.7% (range, 10.5% to 69.1%) as HER2-low, and 17.5% (range, 6.7% to 34.0%) as HER2-positive. HER2-low tumors were associated with positive estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor statuses (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Antigen retrieval times (≥ 36 minutes vs. < 36 minutes) and antibody incubation times (≥ 12 minutes vs. < 12 minutes) affected on the frequency of HER2 IHC 1+ BC at institutions using the PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) IHC assay and BenchMark XT or Ultra staining instruments. Furthermore, discordant results between core needle biopsy and subsequent resection specimen HER2 statuses were observed in 24.1% (787/3,259) of the patients. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The overall incidence of HER2-low BC in South Korea concurs with those reported in previously published studies. Significant inter-institutional differences in HER2 IHC protocols were observed, and it may have impact on HER2-low status. Thus, we recommend standardizing HER2 IHC conditions to ensure precise patient selection for targeted therapy. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Outcomes of Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation with Ipsilateral Lateral Talar Autograft for Medial Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Jae Wan SUH ; Joo Han KWON ; Dae Hee LEE ; Jae Uk JUNG ; Hyun-Woo PARK
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(4):620-627
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) has been widely used in the treatment of osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). Previous studies have reported successful outcomes following the use of osteochondral autogenous grafts from the intercondylar notch of the knee or a non-weight-bearing region of the femoral condyle. However, donor-site morbidity of the knee joint has been observed in several cases. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes and safety of OAT with autografts from the ipsilateral lateral talar articular facet as an alternative donor site for medial OLT. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Among 40 patients who underwent OAT, 29 patients were excluded. Eleven patients who underwent OAT with an osteochondral graft harvested from the ipsilateral lateral talar articular facet from 2011 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The size of OLT was measured on ankle magnetic resonance imaging, including coronal length, sagittal length, depth, and area. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and a visual analog scale (VAS). Weight-bearing ankle radiographs were obtained postoperatively and at 1 year after surgery. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The average follow-up time after surgery was 64.7 months (range, 14–137 months). The average diameter of lesions was 8.8 mm (range, 8–9.9 mm). The average size of lesions was 51.2 mm2 (range, 33.6–71.3 mm2 ) , and all lesions included subchondral cysts. The average depth of lesions was 7.3 mm (range, 6.2–9.1 mm). Graft sizes ranged from 8 to 10 mm in diameter (8 mm, n = 1; 10 mm, n = 10) All measured clinical outcomes improved postoperatively, including the AOFAS scores (preoperative, 55.4 ± 9.0;1-year follow-up, 92.1 ± 7.6; p = 0.001) and VAS scores (preoperative, 5.5 ± 0.7; 1-year follow-up, 1.9 ± 0.8; p = 0.001). All weightbearing ankle radiographs of the graft and donor sites did not reveal arthritic change in the ankle joint, lateral talar dome collapse, and graft-site delayed union or nonunion at 1 year after surgery. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			For a single medial OLT, harvesting autografts from the ipsilateral lateral talar articular facet without knee donorsite morbidities can be a good alternative in OAT for OLT. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail