Background/Aims: Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry has demonstrated utility in the assessment of esophageal motility as a complement to existing methodologies like high-resolution manometry. However, as FLIP is typically performed with sedation during routine endoscopy, there is potential for impact of sedation agents on esophageal motility. We aim to examine the effects of conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl on FLIP Panometry metrics and classification. Methods: A cross-over study was conducted on 12 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers that completed FLIP while sedated with intravenous fentanyl and midazolam and while awake on a separate day. FLIP was performed in the same manner in both conditions with transoral placement of the FLIP and stepwise FLIP filling. During awake FLIP, subjects also rated the presence and intensity of esophageal perception. Results: In both experimental conditions, all subjects demonstrated normal motility. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was lower (median [interquartile range]: 5.8 [5.15-6.85] vs 8.9 [7.68-9.38] mm 2 /mmHg; P = 0.025), and the FLIP pressure was higher (46.5 [38.125-52.5] vs 33 [26-36.8] mmHg; P = 0.010) in the sedated condition compared to the awake condition. Maximum esophagogastric junction diameter and body distensibility plateau were no different between conditions (P = 0.999 and P = 0.098, respectively). Perception of esophageal sensation during awake FLIP was reported in 7/12 (58%) subjects. Conclusions While numeric differences in FLIP Panometry metrics were observed between sedated and awake FLIP in healthy subjects, these differences did not change the FLIP Panometry diagnosis. Sedated FLIP offers a well-tolerated method to assess esophageal motility during endoscopy.

Background/Aims: Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry has demonstrated utility in the assessment of esophageal motility as a complement to existing methodologies like high-resolution manometry. However, as FLIP is typically performed with sedation during routine endoscopy, there is potential for impact of sedation agents on esophageal motility. We aim to examine the effects of conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl on FLIP Panometry metrics and classification. Methods: A cross-over study was conducted on 12 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers that completed FLIP while sedated with intravenous fentanyl and midazolam and while awake on a separate day. FLIP was performed in the same manner in both conditions with transoral placement of the FLIP and stepwise FLIP filling. During awake FLIP, subjects also rated the presence and intensity of esophageal perception. Results: In both experimental conditions, all subjects demonstrated normal motility. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was lower (median [interquartile range]: 5.8 [5.15-6.85] vs 8.9 [7.68-9.38] mm 2 /mmHg; P = 0.025), and the FLIP pressure was higher (46.5 [38.125-52.5] vs 33 [26-36.8] mmHg; P = 0.010) in the sedated condition compared to the awake condition. Maximum esophagogastric junction diameter and body distensibility plateau were no different between conditions (P = 0.999 and P = 0.098, respectively). Perception of esophageal sensation during awake FLIP was reported in 7/12 (58%) subjects. Conclusions While numeric differences in FLIP Panometry metrics were observed between sedated and awake FLIP in healthy subjects, these differences did not change the FLIP Panometry diagnosis. Sedated FLIP offers a well-tolerated method to assess esophageal motility during endoscopy.

Background/Aims: Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry has demonstrated utility in the assessment of esophageal motility as a complement to existing methodologies like high-resolution manometry. However, as FLIP is typically performed with sedation during routine endoscopy, there is potential for impact of sedation agents on esophageal motility. We aim to examine the effects of conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl on FLIP Panometry metrics and classification. Methods: A cross-over study was conducted on 12 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers that completed FLIP while sedated with intravenous fentanyl and midazolam and while awake on a separate day. FLIP was performed in the same manner in both conditions with transoral placement of the FLIP and stepwise FLIP filling. During awake FLIP, subjects also rated the presence and intensity of esophageal perception. Results: In both experimental conditions, all subjects demonstrated normal motility. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was lower (median [interquartile range]: 5.8 [5.15-6.85] vs 8.9 [7.68-9.38] mm 2 /mmHg; P = 0.025), and the FLIP pressure was higher (46.5 [38.125-52.5] vs 33 [26-36.8] mmHg; P = 0.010) in the sedated condition compared to the awake condition. Maximum esophagogastric junction diameter and body distensibility plateau were no different between conditions (P = 0.999 and P = 0.098, respectively). Perception of esophageal sensation during awake FLIP was reported in 7/12 (58%) subjects. Conclusions While numeric differences in FLIP Panometry metrics were observed between sedated and awake FLIP in healthy subjects, these differences did not change the FLIP Panometry diagnosis. Sedated FLIP offers a well-tolerated method to assess esophageal motility during endoscopy.

Background/Aims: Cholecystokinin (CCK) administration has been shown to reduce lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in normal subjects in manometric studies. Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry offers a method to assess esophageal motility in response to sustained distension though mechanisms related to this response remain unexplored. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of CCK-8 on the esophageal response to distension in asymptomatic volunteers using FLIP. Methods: Esophageal response to distension was studied in 7 asymptomatic volunteers (mean age ± SD [27 ± 2]; 86% female) before and after CCK-8 administration in a crossover study design. During sedated endoscopy, FLIP was performed twice with CCK-8 administered via intravenous push in one of 2 protocols: during filling (n = 4) or during emptying (n = 3). Esophagogastric junction distensibility index (EGJ-DI) at 60 mL fill volume and esophageal body contractile response patterns were analyzed. Results: During the baseline FLIP study, all subjects had a contractile response with repetitive antegrade contractions both before and after CCK-8 administration. However, a sustained LES contraction or a sustained occluding contraction with esophageal shortening was observed in all subjects in the filling protocol, but in none during the emptying protocol. EGJ-DI was similar before and after CCK-8 during both filling (4.7 ± 1.9 mm2 /mmHg vs 4.3 ± 1.8 mmmm2 /mmHg) and emptying protocol (7.5 ± 1.4 mmmm2 /mmHg vs 6.9 ± 0.6 mmmm2 /mmHg). Conclusion While EGJ-DI appeared unaffected by CCK-8 administration in asymptomatic volunteers, CCK induced spastic-reactive contractions of the LES during distention suggesting that exogenous CCK interferes with normal LES relaxation during secondary peristalsis.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to develop a diagnostic tool using machine learning to apply functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry data to determine the probability of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction as determined using the Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0) and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Methods: Five hundred and fifty-seven adult patients that completed FLIP and HRM (with a conclusive CCv4.0 assessment of EGJ outflow) and 35 asymptomatic volunteers (“controls”) were included. EGJ opening was evaluated with 16-cm FLIP performed during sedated endoscopy via EGJ-distensibility index and maximum EGJ diameter. HRM was classified according to the CCv4.0 as conclusive disorders of EGJ outflow or normal EGJ outflow (timed barium esophagram applied when required and available). The probability tool utilized Bayesian additive regression treesBART, which were evaluated using a leave-one-out approach and a holdout test set. Results: Per HRM and CCv4.0, 243 patients had a conclusive disorder of EGJ outflow while 314 patients (and all 35 controls) had normal EGJ outflow. The model accuracy to predict EGJ obstruction (based on leave-one-out/holdout test set, respectively) was 89%/90%, with 87%/85% sensitivity, 92%/97% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95/0.97. A free, opensource tool to calculate probability for EGJ obstruction using FLIP metrics is available at https://www.wklytics.commgi/prob_flip.html. Conclusions Application of FLIP metrics utilizing a probabilistic approach incorporates the diagnostic confidence (or uncertainty) into the clinical interpretation of EGJ obstruction. This tool can provide clinical decision support during application of FLIP Panometry for evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Background/Aims: Incorporation of complementary and provocative test swallows to the high-resolution manometry (HRM) protocol offers potential to address limitations posed by HRM protocols that involve only a single swallow type. The aim of this study is to describe normal findings of a comprehensive HRM testing protocol performed on healthy asymptomatic volunteers. Methods: Thirty healthy asymptomatic volunteers completed HRM with 5-mL liquid swallows in the supine position. They also completed 5-mL liquid swallows in the upright position, viscous swallows, solid test swallows, multiple rapid swallows, and a rapid drink challenge.HRM studies were analyzed via Chicago classification version 3.0. Results: The median (5th-95th percentiles) for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on supine swallows was 11 (4-16) mmHg; IRP was lower than supine on upright liquid 9 (0-17) mmHg, viscous 6 (0-15) mmHg, solid 9 (1-19) mmHg, multiple rapid swallows 3 (0-12) mmHg, and rapid drink challenge 5 (–3-12) mmHg; P < 0.005. While an “elevated” IRP value was observed on 1 to 2 test maneuvers in 8/30 (27%) subjects, all 30 subjects had an IRP value < 12 mmHg on at least one of the test maneuvers. Conclusions Normal values and findings from a comprehensive HRM testing protocol are reported based on evaluation of 30 healthy asymptomatic volunteers. Isolated “abnormalities” of IRP and contractile parameters were observed in the majority (80%) of these asymptomatic subjects, while all subjects also had normal features observed. Thus, the definition of “normal” should be recalibrated to focus on the entirety of the study and not individual metrics.

Background/Aims: Jackhammer esophagus is an uncommon heterogeneous motility disorder associated with a distal contractile integral > 8000 mmHg · sec · cm. The spectrum of abnormality ranges from a relatively normal looking contraction to chaotic repetitive contractions akin to a jackhammer. Although previous studies have shown an uncertain correlation between peristaltic vigor and symptoms, we hypothesize that symptoms may be more severe with repetitive contractions as opposed to an elevated contractile measure. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether symptom severity is related to the contraction pattern in the patients with hypercontractile esophagus. Methods: Patients with hypercontractile esophagus were retrospectively identified, their demographic and high-resolution manometry characteristics were collected. Contraction pattern on high-resolution manometry was categorized into single-peak and multiple-peak.Comparison was performed between patients with single-peak and multiple-peak. Results: Altogether 35 patients (age range, 45-70 years; female:male, 24:11) were included. Seven patients presented with single-peak hypercontractile swallows, while 28 patients presented with multiple-peak hypercontractile swallows. The patients with multiple-peak showed higher Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire scores compared with patients with single-peak. The jackhammer swallows with multiple-peak were associated with higher distal contractile integral values, longer distal latency intervals, and a lower integrated relaxation pressure. Conclusions Repetitive contractions akin to a jackhammer were common amongst patients with hypercontractile esophagus. Patients with the jackhammer pattern also presented with more severe symptoms. Further distinction of hypercontractile esophagus into a jackhammer dominant subtype may be warranted.

Background/Aims: Incorporation of complementary and provocative test swallows to the high-resolution manometry (HRM) protocol offers potential to address limitations posed by HRM protocols that involve only a single swallow type. The aim of this study is to describe normal findings of a comprehensive HRM testing protocol performed on healthy asymptomatic volunteers. Methods: Thirty healthy asymptomatic volunteers completed HRM with 5-mL liquid swallows in the supine position. They also completed 5-mL liquid swallows in the upright position, viscous swallows, solid test swallows, multiple rapid swallows, and a rapid drink challenge.HRM studies were analyzed via Chicago classification version 3.0. Results: The median (5th-95th percentiles) for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on supine swallows was 11 (4-16) mmHg; IRP was lower than supine on upright liquid 9 (0-17) mmHg, viscous 6 (0-15) mmHg, solid 9 (1-19) mmHg, multiple rapid swallows 3 (0-12) mmHg, and rapid drink challenge 5 (–3-12) mmHg; P < 0.005. While an “elevated” IRP value was observed on 1 to 2 test maneuvers in 8/30 (27%) subjects, all 30 subjects had an IRP value < 12 mmHg on at least one of the test maneuvers. Conclusions Normal values and findings from a comprehensive HRM testing protocol are reported based on evaluation of 30 healthy asymptomatic volunteers. Isolated “abnormalities” of IRP and contractile parameters were observed in the majority (80%) of these asymptomatic subjects, while all subjects also had normal features observed. Thus, the definition of “normal” should be recalibrated to focus on the entirety of the study and not individual metrics.

Background/Aims: Jackhammer esophagus is an uncommon heterogeneous motility disorder associated with a distal contractile integral > 8000 mmHg · sec · cm. The spectrum of abnormality ranges from a relatively normal looking contraction to chaotic repetitive contractions akin to a jackhammer. Although previous studies have shown an uncertain correlation between peristaltic vigor and symptoms, we hypothesize that symptoms may be more severe with repetitive contractions as opposed to an elevated contractile measure. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether symptom severity is related to the contraction pattern in the patients with hypercontractile esophagus. Methods: Patients with hypercontractile esophagus were retrospectively identified, their demographic and high-resolution manometry characteristics were collected. Contraction pattern on high-resolution manometry was categorized into single-peak and multiple-peak.Comparison was performed between patients with single-peak and multiple-peak. Results: Altogether 35 patients (age range, 45-70 years; female:male, 24:11) were included. Seven patients presented with single-peak hypercontractile swallows, while 28 patients presented with multiple-peak hypercontractile swallows. The patients with multiple-peak showed higher Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire scores compared with patients with single-peak. The jackhammer swallows with multiple-peak were associated with higher distal contractile integral values, longer distal latency intervals, and a lower integrated relaxation pressure. Conclusions Repetitive contractions akin to a jackhammer were common amongst patients with hypercontractile esophagus. Patients with the jackhammer pattern also presented with more severe symptoms. Further distinction of hypercontractile esophagus into a jackhammer dominant subtype may be warranted.

Esophageal achalasia is a primary motility disorder characterized by insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and loss of esophageal peristalsis. Achalasia is a chronic disease that causes progressive irreversible loss of esophageal motor function. The recent development of high-resolution manometry has facilitated the diagnosis of achalasia, and determining the achalasia subtypes based on high-resolution manometry can be important when deciding on treatment methods. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is less invasive than surgery with comparable efficacy. The present guidelines (the “2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines”) were developed based on evidence-based medicine; the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association and Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility served as the operating and development committees, respectively. The development of the guidelines began in June 2018, and a draft consensus based on the Delphi process was achieved in April 2019. The guidelines consist of 18 recommendations: 2 pertaining to the definition and epidemiology of achalasia, 6 pertaining to diagnoses, and 10 pertaining to treatments. The endoscopic treatment section is based on the latest evidence from meta-analyses. Clinicians (including gastroenterologists, upper gastrointestinal tract surgeons, general physicians, nurses, and other hospital workers) and patients could use these guidelines to make an informed decision on the management of achalasia.