Objectives: Evaluation of sarcopenia from computed tomography (CT) is often based on measuring skeletal muscle area on a single transverse slice. Automatic segmentation of muscle volume has a lower variance and may be a better proxy for the total muscle volume than single-slice areas. The aim of the study was to determine which abdominal and thoracic anatomical volumes were best at predicting the total muscle volume. Methods: A cloud-based artificial intelligence tool (recomia.org) was used to segment all skeletal muscle of the torso of 994 patients who had performed whole-torso CT 2008–2020 for various clinical indications. Linear regression models for several anatomical volumes and single-slice areas were compared with regard to predicting the total torso muscle volume. Results: The muscle volume from the tip of the coccyx and 25 cm cranially was the best of the abdominal volumes and was significantly better than the L3 slice muscle area (R 2 0.935 vs 0.830, P < 0.0001). For thoracic volumes, the muscle volume between the top of the sternum to the lower bound of the Th12 vertebra showed the best correlation with the total volume, significantly better than the Th12 slice muscle area (R 2 0.892 vs 0.775, P < 0.0001). Adjusting for body height improved the correlation slightly for all measurements but did not signifi cantly change the ordering. Conclusions We identified muscle volumes that can be reliably segmented by automated image analysis which is superior to single slice areas in predicting total muscle volume.

Purpose: Classification of focal skeleton/bone marrow uptake (BMU) can be challenging. The aim is to investigate whether an artificial intelligence–based method (AI), which highlights suspicious focal BMU, increases interobserver agreement among a group of physicians from different hospitals classifying Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) patients staged with [ ­ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Methods: Forty-eight patients staged with ­[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT at Sahlgenska University Hospital between 2017 and 2018 were reviewed twice, 6 months apart, regarding focal BMU. During the second time review, the 10 physicians also had access to AI-based advice regarding focal BMU. Results: Each physician’s classifications were pairwise compared with the classifications made by all the other physicians, resulting in 45 unique pairs of comparisons both without and with AI advice. The agreement between the physicians increased significantly when AI advice was available, which was measured as an increase in mean Kappa values from 0.51 (range 0.25–0.80) without AI advice to 0.61 (range 0.19–0.94) with AI advice (p = 0.005). The majority of the physicians agreed with the AI-based method in 40 (83%) of the 48 cases. Conclusion An AI-based method significantly increases interobserver agreement among physicians working at different hospitals by highlighting suspicious focal BMU in HL patients staged with ­[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT.