Objective: To analyze the relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health checkup and insurance data from 2002 to 2019. Women who used MHT for more than 6 months between 2002 and 2011 were included in the MHT group; postmenopausal women with no MHT use comprised the non-MHT group. Results: In the non-MHT group, there were 1,001,350 women, while the MHT group had 353,206 women. Tibolone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.87; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.926) and combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer (CEPM) (aHR, 0.821; 99% CI, 0.758-0.89) were associated with reduced POP risk. The other oral MHT groups and the transdermal estrogen group showed no significant difference in POP risk compared with the non-MHT group (other oral MHT: aHR, 1.045; 99% CI, 0.941-1.161) (transdermal estrogen: aHR, 1.252; 99% CI, 0.731-2.145). Lower body mass index (BMI) (<18.5) was associated with reduced POP risk (aHR, 0.822; 99% CI, 0.698-0.968), while a BMI between 23 and 29.9 was associated with increased risk (BMI 23-24.9: aHR, 1.143; 99% CI, 1.088-1.2) (BMI 25-29.9: aHR, 1.173; 99% CI, 1.12-1.228). All parities had a higher POP risk than parity 1 (parity 0 or no response: aHR, 1.785; 99% CI, 1.589-2.005; parity 2: aHR, 1.434; 99% CI, 1.292-1.592; parity ≥3: aHR, 1.916; 99% CI, 1.712-2.144). Conclusion Tibolone and CEPM use were associated with reduced POP risk in postmenopausal women. Other MHT types showed no significant association with POP.

Objective: To analyze the relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health checkup and insurance data from 2002 to 2019. Women who used MHT for more than 6 months between 2002 and 2011 were included in the MHT group; postmenopausal women with no MHT use comprised the non-MHT group. Results: In the non-MHT group, there were 1,001,350 women, while the MHT group had 353,206 women. Tibolone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.87; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.926) and combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer (CEPM) (aHR, 0.821; 99% CI, 0.758-0.89) were associated with reduced POP risk. The other oral MHT groups and the transdermal estrogen group showed no significant difference in POP risk compared with the non-MHT group (other oral MHT: aHR, 1.045; 99% CI, 0.941-1.161) (transdermal estrogen: aHR, 1.252; 99% CI, 0.731-2.145). Lower body mass index (BMI) (<18.5) was associated with reduced POP risk (aHR, 0.822; 99% CI, 0.698-0.968), while a BMI between 23 and 29.9 was associated with increased risk (BMI 23-24.9: aHR, 1.143; 99% CI, 1.088-1.2) (BMI 25-29.9: aHR, 1.173; 99% CI, 1.12-1.228). All parities had a higher POP risk than parity 1 (parity 0 or no response: aHR, 1.785; 99% CI, 1.589-2.005; parity 2: aHR, 1.434; 99% CI, 1.292-1.592; parity ≥3: aHR, 1.916; 99% CI, 1.712-2.144). Conclusion Tibolone and CEPM use were associated with reduced POP risk in postmenopausal women. Other MHT types showed no significant association with POP.

Objective: To analyze the relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health checkup and insurance data from 2002 to 2019. Women who used MHT for more than 6 months between 2002 and 2011 were included in the MHT group; postmenopausal women with no MHT use comprised the non-MHT group. Results: In the non-MHT group, there were 1,001,350 women, while the MHT group had 353,206 women. Tibolone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.87; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.926) and combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer (CEPM) (aHR, 0.821; 99% CI, 0.758-0.89) were associated with reduced POP risk. The other oral MHT groups and the transdermal estrogen group showed no significant difference in POP risk compared with the non-MHT group (other oral MHT: aHR, 1.045; 99% CI, 0.941-1.161) (transdermal estrogen: aHR, 1.252; 99% CI, 0.731-2.145). Lower body mass index (BMI) (<18.5) was associated with reduced POP risk (aHR, 0.822; 99% CI, 0.698-0.968), while a BMI between 23 and 29.9 was associated with increased risk (BMI 23-24.9: aHR, 1.143; 99% CI, 1.088-1.2) (BMI 25-29.9: aHR, 1.173; 99% CI, 1.12-1.228). All parities had a higher POP risk than parity 1 (parity 0 or no response: aHR, 1.785; 99% CI, 1.589-2.005; parity 2: aHR, 1.434; 99% CI, 1.292-1.592; parity ≥3: aHR, 1.916; 99% CI, 1.712-2.144). Conclusion Tibolone and CEPM use were associated with reduced POP risk in postmenopausal women. Other MHT types showed no significant association with POP.

Objective: To analyze the relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health checkup and insurance data from 2002 to 2019. Women who used MHT for more than 6 months between 2002 and 2011 were included in the MHT group; postmenopausal women with no MHT use comprised the non-MHT group. Results: In the non-MHT group, there were 1,001,350 women, while the MHT group had 353,206 women. Tibolone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.87; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.926) and combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer (CEPM) (aHR, 0.821; 99% CI, 0.758-0.89) were associated with reduced POP risk. The other oral MHT groups and the transdermal estrogen group showed no significant difference in POP risk compared with the non-MHT group (other oral MHT: aHR, 1.045; 99% CI, 0.941-1.161) (transdermal estrogen: aHR, 1.252; 99% CI, 0.731-2.145). Lower body mass index (BMI) (<18.5) was associated with reduced POP risk (aHR, 0.822; 99% CI, 0.698-0.968), while a BMI between 23 and 29.9 was associated with increased risk (BMI 23-24.9: aHR, 1.143; 99% CI, 1.088-1.2) (BMI 25-29.9: aHR, 1.173; 99% CI, 1.12-1.228). All parities had a higher POP risk than parity 1 (parity 0 or no response: aHR, 1.785; 99% CI, 1.589-2.005; parity 2: aHR, 1.434; 99% CI, 1.292-1.592; parity ≥3: aHR, 1.916; 99% CI, 1.712-2.144). Conclusion Tibolone and CEPM use were associated with reduced POP risk in postmenopausal women. Other MHT types showed no significant association with POP.

Objective: To analyze the relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health checkup and insurance data from 2002 to 2019. Women who used MHT for more than 6 months between 2002 and 2011 were included in the MHT group; postmenopausal women with no MHT use comprised the non-MHT group. Results: In the non-MHT group, there were 1,001,350 women, while the MHT group had 353,206 women. Tibolone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.87; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.926) and combined estrogen plus progestin by the manufacturer (CEPM) (aHR, 0.821; 99% CI, 0.758-0.89) were associated with reduced POP risk. The other oral MHT groups and the transdermal estrogen group showed no significant difference in POP risk compared with the non-MHT group (other oral MHT: aHR, 1.045; 99% CI, 0.941-1.161) (transdermal estrogen: aHR, 1.252; 99% CI, 0.731-2.145). Lower body mass index (BMI) (<18.5) was associated with reduced POP risk (aHR, 0.822; 99% CI, 0.698-0.968), while a BMI between 23 and 29.9 was associated with increased risk (BMI 23-24.9: aHR, 1.143; 99% CI, 1.088-1.2) (BMI 25-29.9: aHR, 1.173; 99% CI, 1.12-1.228). All parities had a higher POP risk than parity 1 (parity 0 or no response: aHR, 1.785; 99% CI, 1.589-2.005; parity 2: aHR, 1.434; 99% CI, 1.292-1.592; parity ≥3: aHR, 1.916; 99% CI, 1.712-2.144). Conclusion Tibolone and CEPM use were associated with reduced POP risk in postmenopausal women. Other MHT types showed no significant association with POP.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the risk of osteoarthritis associated with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study used a database of Korean health insurance claims (2007–2020). Females aged ≥ 40 who initiated menopause-related healthcare visits between 2011 and 2014 were identified. The MHT group comprised females aged ≥ 40 who initiated MHT for ≥ 6 months during this period. The non-MHT group comprised females aged ≥ 40 who attended menopause-related healthcare visits but did not receive MHT. To account for potential confounding factors, the two groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Results: A cohort of 453,040 postmenopausal females aged ≥ 40 years was identified, with 26,354 assigned to either the MHT or nonMHT group after propensity matching. The median age was 49 years, and the median follow-up was 8.2 years. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated an elevated risk of osteoarthritis with MHT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.154; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.117–1.193) for knee (HR, 1.148; 95% CI, 1.102–1.195) and other arthritis (HR, 1.205; 95% CI, 1.151–1.261), although not statistically significant for hip arthritis. Tibolone (HR, 1.211; 95% CI, 1.161–1.263), estrogen–progestogen therapy (EPT) (HR, 1.092; 95% CI, 1.048– 1.137), and estrogen therapy (ET) (HR, 1.235; 95% CI, 1.148–1.329) were associated with a higher risk of osteoarthritis compared to nonMHT users. Conclusions MHT was associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis, consistently observed across tibolone, EPT, and ET, particularly affecting joints other than the hip, with a trend toward an elevated risk of hip osteoarthritis.

Purpose: We evaluated the relationship between previous hysterectomy for uterine fibroids and subsequent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: This study analyzed national health insurance data. The hysterectomy group (aged 40 to 59) comprised patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine fibroids between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014, and the control group (aged 40 to 59) comprised patients who visited a medical facility for a checkup during the same time span. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to balance confounders. SUI was defined as the need for SUI surgery accompanied by a diagnosis code for SUI. Results: After matching, 81,373 cases (hysterectomy group) and 81,373 controls (nonhysterectomy group) were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 7.9 years for the cases and 7.8 years for the controls. The incidence of anti-incontinence surgery was slightly but significantly higher in the cases than in the controls (2.0% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001). Compared to the control group, abdominal hysterectomy significantly increased the likelihood of anti-incontinence surgery both before (hazard ratio [HR], 1.235; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.116–1.365) and after adjusting for confounders (HR, 1.215; 95% CI, 1.097–1.347). In contrast, laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy with adnexal surgery, and abdominal hysterectomy with adnexal surgery were not associated with an increased rate of anti-incontinence surgery. The significant association between abdominal hysterectomy and an elevated rate of anti-incontinence surgery persisted even after stratifying patients by age group. Conclusions Prior abdominal hysterectomy without adnexal surgery was associated with an increased incidence of subsequent anti-urinary incontinence surgery.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the risk of breast cancer on women at menopause from postmenopausal hormone therapy using Korea's national health checkup and insurance data.Method: Using the national health checkup and insurance data provided by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), we selected women who were over 40 years and confirmed to have menopause during the interview from 2003 to 2011. These women were followed up for breast cancer until December 31, 2019. The control group was defined as women who never used hormone drug during from 2003 to 2019, and the Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT) group was defined as women who used menopausal hormone drug for over 6 months. Menopausal hormone drugs were classified tibolone, combined estrogen plus progestin by manufacture (CEPM) (Estradiol Hemihydrate/Drospirenone, Estradiol Hemihydrate/Drospirenone, Estradiol Hemihydrate/Norethisterone Acetate, Cyproterone Acetate/Estradiol Valerate, Estradiol Hemihydrate/Norethisterone Acetate, Estradiol Valerate/Norethisterone Acetate), estrogen (Conjugated Estrogens, Estradiol Valerate, Estradiol Hemihydrate), combined estrogen plus progestin by physician (CEPP) (Estrogen + Progesterone Micronized, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Dydrogesterone), Topical estrogen (Estradiol Hemihydrate patch or gel). The variables that may affect breast cancer were adjusted, such as age, body mass index, socioeconomic status, region, Charlson Comorbidity Index, parity, age at menarche, age at menopause, smoking, alcohol, physical exercise, period from menopause to inclusion time. Results: The control group, the tibolone group, CEPM group, the oral estrogen group, CEPP group, and the topical estrogen group were 920,783, 165,222, 107,088, 45,609, 5,633, and 1,729, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazard analysis with adjusted variables, the risk of breast cancer increased in CEPM group. {Hazard ratio [HR] 1.439, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.374-1.507} However, there were no increase in the risk of breast cancer in the tibolone group, oral estrogen group, CEPP group and the topical estrogen group. (HR 0.968, 95% CI 0.925-1.012) (HR 1.002, 95% CI 0.929-1.081) (HR 0.929, 95% CI 0.75-1.15) (HR 1.139, 95% CI 0.809-1.603) There was no difference in the risk of breast cancer even with doubling the amount of tibolone used. (Over 5 mg: HR 1.306, 95% CI 0.326-5.226) The risk of breast cancer was lower in those in their 50s and 60s than in their 40s. (50s: HR 0.956, 95% CI 0.906-1.008) (60s: HR 0.846, 95% CI 0.776-0.922) As BMI increased, the risk of breast cancer increased. (25-29.9: HR 1.126, 95% CI 1.085-1.169) (30 or more: HR 1.356, 95% CI 1.258-1.462) There was an increased risk of breast cancer when menstrual age was 13 years or older. (HR 1.157, 95% CI 1.109-1.419) A history of smoking increased the risk of breast cancer (HR 1.254, 95% CI 1.109-1.419), and drinking history was not associated with breast cancer. Also, as the inclusion period from menopause increased, the risk of breast cancer decreased. (5-9 years: HR 0.918, 95% CI 0.879-0.959) (10 years or more: HR 0.846, 95% CI 0.791-0.904) Conclusion CEPM increased the risk of breast cancer. However, tibolone, oral estrogen, CEPP, and topical estrogen were not associated with breast cancer. The risk of breast cancer did not differ depending on the dose of tibolone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III. METHODS: Children younger than 42 months (n=62) with suspected developmental delay who visited our department between 2014 and 2015 were assessed with both the BSID-II and Bayley-III tests. RESULTS: The mean Bayley-III Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) score was 5.8 points higher than the mean BSID-II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score, and the mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) score was 7.9 points higher than the mean BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of a BSID-II MDI score < 70, Bayley-III CLC scores showed a cutoff of 78.0 (96.6% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity). In ROC analysis of a BSID-II PDI score < 70, the Bayley-III MC score showed a cutoff of 80. CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between the BSID-II and Bayley-III in children with suspected developmental delay. The Bayley-III identified fewer children with developmental delay. The recommended cutoff value for developmental delay increased from a BSID-II score of 70 to a Bayley-III CLC score of 78 and Bayley-III MC score of 80.
Child Development ; Child* ; Developmental Disabilities ; Humans ; ROC Curve ; Weights and Measures*