Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

The common data model (CDM) has found widespread application in healthcare studies, but its utilization in cancer research has been limited. This article describes the development and implementation strategy for Cancer Clinical Library Databases (CCLDs), which are standardized cancer-specific databases established under the Korea-Clinical Data Utilization Network for Research Excellence (K-CURE) project by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Fifteen leading hospitals and fourteen academic associations in Korea are engaged in constructing CCLDs for 10 primary cancer types. For each cancer type-specific CCLD, cancer data experts determine key clinical data items essential for cancer research, standardize these items across cancer types, and create a standardized schema. Comprehensive clinical records covering diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, with annual updates, are collected for each cancer patient in the target population, and quality control is based on six-sigma standards. To protect patient privacy, CCLDs follow stringent data security guidelines by pseudonymizing personal identification information and operating within a closed analysis environment. Researchers can apply for access to CCLD data through the K-CURE portal, which is subject to Institutional Review Board and Data Review Board approval. The CCLD is considered a pioneering standardized cancer-specific database, significantly representing Korea’s cancer data. It is expected to overcome limitations of previous CDMs and provide a valuable resource for multicenter cancer research in Korea.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

The common data model (CDM) has found widespread application in healthcare studies, but its utilization in cancer research has been limited. This article describes the development and implementation strategy for Cancer Clinical Library Databases (CCLDs), which are standardized cancer-specific databases established under the Korea-Clinical Data Utilization Network for Research Excellence (K-CURE) project by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Fifteen leading hospitals and fourteen academic associations in Korea are engaged in constructing CCLDs for 10 primary cancer types. For each cancer type-specific CCLD, cancer data experts determine key clinical data items essential for cancer research, standardize these items across cancer types, and create a standardized schema. Comprehensive clinical records covering diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, with annual updates, are collected for each cancer patient in the target population, and quality control is based on six-sigma standards. To protect patient privacy, CCLDs follow stringent data security guidelines by pseudonymizing personal identification information and operating within a closed analysis environment. Researchers can apply for access to CCLD data through the K-CURE portal, which is subject to Institutional Review Board and Data Review Board approval. The CCLD is considered a pioneering standardized cancer-specific database, significantly representing Korea’s cancer data. It is expected to overcome limitations of previous CDMs and provide a valuable resource for multicenter cancer research in Korea.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

The common data model (CDM) has found widespread application in healthcare studies, but its utilization in cancer research has been limited. This article describes the development and implementation strategy for Cancer Clinical Library Databases (CCLDs), which are standardized cancer-specific databases established under the Korea-Clinical Data Utilization Network for Research Excellence (K-CURE) project by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Fifteen leading hospitals and fourteen academic associations in Korea are engaged in constructing CCLDs for 10 primary cancer types. For each cancer type-specific CCLD, cancer data experts determine key clinical data items essential for cancer research, standardize these items across cancer types, and create a standardized schema. Comprehensive clinical records covering diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, with annual updates, are collected for each cancer patient in the target population, and quality control is based on six-sigma standards. To protect patient privacy, CCLDs follow stringent data security guidelines by pseudonymizing personal identification information and operating within a closed analysis environment. Researchers can apply for access to CCLD data through the K-CURE portal, which is subject to Institutional Review Board and Data Review Board approval. The CCLD is considered a pioneering standardized cancer-specific database, significantly representing Korea’s cancer data. It is expected to overcome limitations of previous CDMs and provide a valuable resource for multicenter cancer research in Korea.