Objective: The mandible is the most common fractured craniofacial bone of all craniofacial fractures in the Philippines, with the mandibular body as the most involved segment of all mandibular fractures. To the best of our knowledge, there are no existing guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mandibular body fractures in particular. General guidelines include the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAOHNSF) Resident Manual of Trauma to the Face, Head, and Neck chapter on Mandibular Trauma, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery section on the Mandibular Angle, Body, and Ramus, and a 2013 Cochrane Systematic Review on interventions for the management of mandibular fractures. On the other hand, a very specific Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Unilateral Condylar Fracture of the Mandible was published by the Ministry of Health Malaysia in 2005. Addressing the prevalence of mandibular body fractures, and dearth of specific guidelines for its diagnosis and management, this clinical practice guideline focuses on the management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults. Purpose: This guideline is meant for all clinicians (otolaryngologists – head and neck surgeons, as well as primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, midwives and community health workers, dentists, and emergency first-responders) who may provide care to adults aged 18 years and above that may present with an acute history and physical and/or laboratory examination findings that may lead to a diagnosis of isolated mandibular body fracture and its subsequent medical and surgical management, including health promotion and disease prevention. It is applicable in any setting (including urban and rural primary-care, community centers, treatment units, hospital emergency rooms, operating rooms) in which adults with isolated mandibular body fractures would be identified, diagnosed, or managed. Outcomes are functional resolution of isolated mandibular body fractures; achieving premorbid form; avoiding use of context-inappropriate diagnostics and therapeutics; minimizing use of ineffective interventions; avoiding co-morbid infections, conditions, complications and adverse events; minimizing cost; maximizing health-related quality of life of individuals with isolated mandibular body fracture; increasing patient satisfaction; and preventing recurrence in patients and occurrence in others. Action Statements The guideline development group made strong recommendationsfor the following key action statements: (6) pain management- clinicians should routinely evaluate pain in patients with isolated mandibular body fractures using a numerical rating scale (NRS) or visual analog scale (VAS); analgesics should be routinely offered to patients with a numerical rating pain scale score or VAS of at least 4/10 (paracetamol and a mild opioid with or without an adjuvant analgesic) until the numerical rating pain scale score or VAS is 3/10 at most; (7) antibiotics- prophylactic antibiotics should be given to adult patients with isolated mandibular body fractures with concomitant mucosal or skin opening with or without direct visualization of bone fragments; penicillin is the drug of choice while clindamycin may be used as an alternative; and (14) prevention- clinicians should advocate for compliance with road traffic safety laws (speed limit, anti-drunk driving, seatbelt and helmet use) for the prevention of motor vehicle, cycling and pedestrian accidents and maxillofacial injuries.The guideline development group made recommendations for the following key action statements: (1) history, clinical presentation, and diagnosis - clinicians should consider a presumptive diagnosis of mandibular fracture in adults presenting with a history of traumatic injury to the jaw plus a positive tongue blade test, and any of the following: malocclusion, trismus, tenderness on jaw closure and broken tooth; (2) panoramic x-ray - clinicians may request for panoramic x-ray as the initial imaging tool in evaluating patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis; (3) radiographs - where panoramic radiography is not available, clinicians may recommend plain mandibular radiography; (4) computed tomography - if available, non-contrast facial CT Scan may be obtained; (5) immobilization - fractures should be temporarily immobilized/splinted with a figure-of-eight bandage until definitive surgical management can be performed or while initiating transport during emergency situations; (8) anesthesia - nasotracheal intubation is the preferred route of anesthesia; in the presence of contraindications, submental intubation or tracheostomy may be performed; (9) observation - with a soft diet may serve as management for favorable isolated nondisplaced and nonmobile mandibular body fractures with unchanged pre - traumatic occlusion; (10) closed reduction - with immobilization by maxillomandibular fixation for 4-6 weeks may be considered for minimally displaced favorable isolated mandibular body fractures with stable dentition, good nutrition and willingness to comply with post-procedure care that may affect oral hygiene, diet modifications, appearance, oral health and functional concerns (eating, swallowing and speech); (11) open reduction with transosseous wiring - with MMF is an option for isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture patients who cannot afford or avail of titanium plates; (12) open reduction with titanium plates - ORIF using titanium plates and screws should be performed in isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture; (13) maxillomandibular fixation - intraoperative MMF may not be routinely needed prior to reduction and internal fixation; and (15) promotion - clinicians should play a positive role in the prevention of interpersonal and collective violence as well as the settings in which violence occurs in order to avoid injuries in general and mandibular fractures in particular.
Mandibular Fractures ; Jaw Fractures ; Classification ; History ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Imaging ; Therapeutics ; Diet Therapy ; Drug Therapy ; Rehabilitation ; General Surgery

Eosinophilic granuloma, a rare disease, has various clinical manifestations and no specific X-rays features and is thus easily misdiagnosed. This paper reports a case of multifocal eosinophilic granuloma of jaw with long-term follow-up. The patient initially presented with periodontal tissue destruction.The diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of multifocal eosinophilic granuloma of jaw were discussed in combination with the literature to alert this disease in clinical practice.
Diagnosis, Differential ; Eosinophilic Granuloma/diagnostic imaging* ; Humans ; Jaw ; Periodontium ; Radiography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the registration accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) facial scans for the design of full-arch implant supported restoration by five methods and to explore the suitable registration method. METHODS: According to the criteria, ten patients with maxillary edentulous jaw or end-stage dentition requiring implant supported restorations were enrolled in this study. A special rim with individual feature marks reflected appropriate occlusal relationship and esthetic characteristics was made for each patient. Both 3D facial scan data of natural laughter and with opener traction to expose the teeth or occlusal rim of each patient were acquired by facial scan and input to the digital analysis software Geomagic Qualify 2012. The dataset was superimposed by five different methods: seven facial anatomical landmark points alignment, facial immobile area alignment (forehead and nasal area), facial anatomical landmark points and immobile area combining alignment, facial feature points alignment, facial and intraoral feature points alignment with the same local coordinate system. The three-dimensional deviation of the same selected area was calculated, the smaller the deviation, the higher the registration accuracy. The 3D deviation was compared among the three registration methods of facial anatomical landmark points, facial immobile area alignment and the combination of the above two methods. Friedman test was performed to analyze the difference among the three methods (α=0.05). The effect of the aid of the facial and intraoral feature points were evaluated. Paired t test were performed to analyze the difference (P<0.05). RESULTS: The average three-dimensional deviation of the selected area after alignment with the facial anatomical landmarks was (1.501 2±0.406 1) mm, significantly larger than that of the facial immobile area best-fit alignment [(0.629 1±0.150 6) mm] and the combination of the two methods[(0.629 1±0.150 6) mm] (P < 0.001). The aid of the facial feature points could significantly reduce the deviation (t=1.001 3, P < 0.001). There was no significant statistical difference in the remaining groups. CONCLUSION The forehead area of the 3D facial scan can be exposed as much as possible. The establishment of facial characteristic landmark points and the use of the invariant area alignment can improve the accuracy of registration. It should be clinically feasible to apply three-dimensional facial scan to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration with the registration of the immobile area on the face especially the forehead area.
Computer-Aided Design ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Jaw, Edentulous/diagnostic imaging* ; Maxilla/diagnostic imaging* ; Radionuclide Imaging

Objective Logistic regression method was used to establish a multiple regression sex discriminant function to discriminate the complete skull model and the incomplete skull model without frontal bone, occipital bone and mandible of Uygur adults in Turpan, Xinjiang. Methods A total of 117 （60 male and 57 female） three-dimensional skull models were collected by CT. Sixteen cranial measurement indexes were measured and calculated by computer software. The multivariate regression sex discriminant function was established with Logistic regression method and retrospectively tested. Results Among the 16 measurement indexes, except for nose width （x₇） and maximum frontal breadth （x₁₃）, the remaining 14 indexes had statistical significance of differences between male and female （P<0.05）. For the discriminant function of complete skull established by eyebrow arch convexity （x₄）, mastoid width （x₆）, maximum cranial length （x₁₂）, cranial base length （x₁₅）, cranial circumference （x₁₆）, the male and female discrimination accuracy was 90.0% and 94.7%, respectively. For the sex discriminant function of incomplete skull without frontal bone established by mandibular angle width （x₁₀）, mandibular height （x₁₁） and cranial circumference （x₁₆）, the discrimination accuracy of male and female was 85.0% and 84.2%, respectively. For the sex discriminant function of incomplete skull without occipital bone established by the index of eyebrow arch convexity （x₄）, the discrimination accuracy of male and female was 80.0% and 73.7%, respectively. For the sex discriminant function of incomplete skull without mandible established by frontal chord （x₅） and occipital protrusion angle （x₉）, the discrimination accuracy of male and female was 85.0% and 78.9%, respectively. Conclusion The computer software and system developed in our study can achieve sex discrimination of complete skulls and incomplete skulls without frontal bone, occipital bone or mandible.
Adult ; China ; Discriminant Analysis ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Forensic Anthropology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Jaw/diagnostic imaging* ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex Determination by Skeleton/methods* ; Skull/diagnostic imaging* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods*

China ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Face ; diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Jaw ; diagnostic imaging ; Mouth ; diagnostic imaging

This article describes a case we experienced in which good postsurgical facial profiles were obtained for a patient with jaw deformities associated with facial asymmetry, by implementing surgical planning with SimPlant OMS. Using this method, we conducted LF1 osteotomy, intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), mandibular constriction and mandibular border genioplasty. Not only did we obtain a class I occlusal relationship, but the complicated surgery also improved the asymmetry of the frontal view, as well as of the profile view, of the patient. The virtual operation using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) could be especially useful for the treatment of patients with jaw deformities associated with facial asymmetry.
Adult ; Facial Asymmetry ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Genioplasty ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Jaw Abnormalities ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Male ; Mandible ; abnormalities ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Occlusal Splints ; Oral Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Osteotomy, Le Fort ; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus ; Patient Care Planning ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; methods ; Jaw, Edentulous ; diagnostic imaging ; rehabilitation ; surgery ; Male ; Mandible ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Maxilla ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; methods

Foreign Bodies ; surgery ; Head ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Jaw Fractures ; surgery ; Maxillofacial Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Radiography, Dental, Digital ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of delayed implant placements after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autologous bone or Bio-Oss grafting.

METHODSEighteen patients underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed implant placements from January, 2002 to December, 2008. Bone grafting and sinus floor augmentation were performed in 21 sides of maxilla and 46 implants were placed 6 - 8 months later. Residual bone height was less than 4 mm. The cases were divided to 2 groups and different materials (autologous bone + Bio-Oss and Bio-Oss alone) were grafted relatively. The bone resorption was assessed by panoramic X-ray and the stability of the implant was reviewed postoperatively.

RESULTSThe average follow-up time was 54 months. Only one implant was lost and the implant survival rate was 98%. X-ray showed that the bone resorption was observed in both groups. The absorption ratio of autologous bone + Bio-Oss group was 18.65% and that of the Bio-oss group was 1.93%. The difference was significantly different.

CONCLUSIONSThe result of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bone grafting was predictable. More bone absorption occurred in the Bio-Oss than in autologous bone + Bio-Oss.

Adult ; Bone Substitutes ; therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation ; methods ; Collagen ; therapeutic use ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Male ; Maxilla ; diagnostic imaging ; Middle Aged ; Minerals ; therapeutic use ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Sinus Floor Augmentation ; methods ; Young Adult

Adult ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Jaw Fixation Techniques ; Joint Dislocations ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; surgery ; Male ; Mandible ; surgery ; Mandibular Condyle ; diagnostic imaging ; injuries ; surgery ; Mandibular Fractures ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed