1.Establishing Regional Aβ Cutoffs andExploring Subgroup Prevalence Across Cognitive Stages Using BeauBrain Amylo®
Seongbeom PARK ; Kyoungmin KIM ; Soyeon YOON ; Seongmi KIM ; Jehyun AHN ; Kyoung Yoon LIM ; Hyemin JANG ; Duk L. NA ; Hee Jin KIM ; Seung Hwan MOON ; Jun Pyo KIM ; Sang Won SEO ; Jaeho KIM ; Kichang KWAK
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(2):135-146
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			and Purpose: Amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques are key in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with Aβ positron emission tomography imaging enabling non-invasive quantification.To address regional Aβ deposition, we developed regional Centiloid scales (rdcCL) and commercialized them through the computed tomography (CT)-based BeauBrain Amylo platform, eliminating the need for three-dimensional T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 
		                        		
		                        			Objective:
		                        			We aimed to establish robust regional Aβ cutoffs using the commercialized BeauBrain Amylo platform and to explore the prevalence of subgroups defined by global, regional, and striatal Aβ cutoffs across cognitive stages. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We included 2,428 individuals recruited from the Korea-Registries to Overcome Dementia and Accelerate Dementia Research project. We calculated regional Aβ cutoffs using Gaussian Mixture Modeling. Participants were classified into subgroups based on global, regional, and striatal Aβ positivity across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired [CU], mild cognitive impairment, and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			MRI-based and CT-based global Aβ cutoffs were highly comparable and consistent with previously reported Centiloid values. Regional cutoffs revealed both similarities and differences between MRI- and CT-based methods, reflecting modality-specific segmentation processes. Subgroups such as global(−)regional(+) were more frequent in non-dementia stages, while global(+)striatal(−) was primarily observed in CU individuals. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			Our study established robust regional Aβ cutoffs using a CT-based rdcCL method and demonstrated its clinical utility in classifying amyloid subgroups across cognitive stages. These findings highlight the importance of regional Aβ quantification in understanding amyloid pathology and its implications for biomarker-guided diagnosis and treatment in AD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Comprehensive Clinical and Behavioral Characteristics of Mild Cognitive Impairment According to Amyloid Positivity: A Large Multi-Center Korean Cohort
Seung Ae KIM ; Yeshin KIM ; Duk L. NA ; Sang Won SEO ; Hyemin JANG ;
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(2):102-114
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage to dementia, Alzheimer’s disease being a major cause. Although amyloid beta-positive (Aβ+) MCI has been well-characterized, Aβ-negative (Aβ−) MCI has not. This study compared the comprehensive clinical and behavioral characteristics of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI in a large multicenter cohort to better understand the heterogeneity of MCI, and to identify contributing factors to cognitive impairment. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A total of 686 MCI participants were included. Aβ positivity was determined using Aβ positron emission tomography imaging with a direct conversion Centiloid cutoff value of 25.5. Standardized assessment and questionnaires were used to collect a wide range of clinical information, including vascular risk factors, cognition, daily living function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and lifestyle behavior. Groups were compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Aβ+ participants (n=406) were older, predominantly female, and more likely to be ApoE4 carriers. In contrast, Aβ− participants (n=280) showed higher vascular risk factors, including diabetes, elevated body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.Aβ+ participants exhibited worse global cognition and functional decline, with a higher prevalence of delusions and appetite disturbances. Meanwhile, Aβ− participants reported greater social engagement, but poorer sleep quality. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			This study highlights the distinct clinical and lifestyle profiles of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI, illuminating the heterogeneity of MCI and its underlying factors in the Korean population. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions and Changes in Clinical Practice after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decision Act: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Korea
Yoon Jung JANG ; Yun Jung YANG ; Hoi Jung KOO ; Hye Won YOON ; Seongbeom UHM ; Sun Young KIM ; Jeong Eun KIM ; Jin Won HUH ; Tae Won KIM ; Seyoung SEO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(1):280-288
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			In Korea, the Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) was implemented on February 4, 2018. We aimed to investigate relevant factors and clinical changes associated with LST decisions after law enforcement. 
		                        		
		                        			Materials and Methods:
		                        			This single-center retrospective study included patients who completed LST documents using legal forms at Asan Medical Center from February 5, 2018, to June 30, 2020. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			5,896 patients completed LST documents, of which 2,704 (45.8%) signed the documents in person, while family members of 3,192 (54%) wrote the documents on behalf of the patients. Comparing first year and following year of implementation of the act, the self-documentation rate increased (43.9% to 47.2%, p=0.014). Moreover, the number of LST decisions made during or after intensive care unit admission decreased (37.8% vs. 35.2%, p=0.045), and the completion rate of LST documents during chemotherapy increased (6.6% vs. 8.9%, p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, age < 65 (odds ratio [OR], 1.724; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.538 to 1.933; p < 0.001), unmarried status (OR, 1.309; 95% CI, 1.097 to 1.561; p=0.003), palliative care consultation (OR, 1.538; 95% CI, 1.340 to 1.765; p < 0.001), malignancy (OR, 1.864; 95% CI, 1.628 to 2.133; p < 0.001), and changes in timing on the first year versus following year (OR, 1.124; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.260; p=0.045) were related to a higher self-documentation rate. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			Age < 65 years, unmarried status, malignancy, and referral to a palliative care team were associated with patients making LST decisions themselves. Furthermore, the subject and timing of LST decisions have changed with the LST act. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Clinicopathological Correlations of Neurodegenerative Diseases in the National Brain Biobank of Korea
Young Hee JUNG ; Jun Pyo KIM ; Hee Jin KIM ; Hyemin JANG ; Hyun Jeong HAN ; Young Ho KOH ; Duk L. NA ; Yeon-Lim SUH ; Gi Yeong HUH ; Jae-Kyung WON ; Seong-Ik KIM ; Ji-Young CHOI ; Sang Won SEO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Eun-Joo KIM
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2025;21(3):190-200
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			and Purpose The National Brain Biobank of Korea (NBBK) is a brain bank consortium supported by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and the Korea National Institute of Health, and was launched in 2015 to support research into neurodegenerative disease dementia (NDD). This study aimed to introduce the NBBK and describes clinicopathological correlations based on analyses of data collected from the NBBK. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Four hospital-based brain banks have been established in South Korea: Samsung Medical Center Brain Bank (SMCBB), Seoul National University Hospital Brain Bank (SNUHBB), Pusan National University Hospital Brain Bank (PNUHBB), and Myongji Hospital Brain Bank (MJHBB). Clinical and pathological data were collected from these brain banks using standardized protocols. The prevalence rates of clinical and pathological diagnoses were analyzed in order to characterize the clinicopathological correlations. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Between August 2016 and December 2023, 185 brain specimens were collected and pathologically evaluated (SNUHBB: 117; PNUHBB: 27; SMCBB: 34; MJHBB: 7). The age at consent was 70.8±12.6 years, and the age at autopsy was 71.7±12.4 years. The four-most-common clinical diagnoses were Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia (20.0%), idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (15.1%), unspecified dementia (11.9%), and cognitively unimpaired (CU) (11.4%).Most cases of unspecified dementia had a pathological diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) vasculopathy (31.8%) or AD (31.8%). Remarkably, only 14.2% of CU cases had normal pathological findings. The three-most-common pathological diagnoses were AD (26.5%), CNS vasculopathy (14.1%), and Lewy body disease (13.5%). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			These clinical and neuropathological findings provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying NDD in South Korea. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Prospective Multicenter Observational Study on Postoperative Quality of Life According to Type of Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Sung Eun OH ; Yun-Suhk SUH ; Ji Yeong AN ; Keun Won RYU ; In CHO ; Sung Geun KIM ; Ji-Ho PARK ; Hoon HUR ; Hyung-Ho KIM ; Sang-Hoon AHN ; Sun-Hwi HWANG ; Hong Man YOON ; Ki Bum PARK ; Hyoung-Il KIM ; In Gyu KWON ; Han-Kwang YANG ; Byoung-Jo SUH ; Sang-Ho JEONG ; Tae-Han KIM ; Oh Kyoung KWON ; Hye Seong AHN ; Ji Yeon PARK ; Ki Young YOON ; Myoung Won SON ; Seong-Ho KONG ; Young-Gil SON ; Geum Jong SONG ; Jong Hyuk YUN ; Jung-Min BAE ; Do Joong PARK ; Sol LEE ; Jun-Young YANG ; Kyung Won SEO ; You-Jin JANG ; So Hyun KANG ; Bang Wool EOM ; Joongyub LEE ; Hyuk-Joon LEE ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(2):382-399
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. 
		                        		
		                        			Materials and Methods:
		                        			A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)
In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Wonyoung CHOI ; An Na SEO ; Bang Wool EOM ; Beodeul KANG ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chang In CHOI ; Choong-kun LEE ; Ho Jung AN ; Hwa Kyung BYUN ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jang Ho CHO ; Kyoungjune PAK ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jae Seok BAE ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Jungyoon CHOI ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Miyoung CHOI ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Nieun SEO ; Sang Soo EOM ; Soomin AHN ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Sung Hee LIM ; Tae-Han KIM ; Hye Sook HAN ; On behalf of The Development Working Group for the Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2024
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(1):5-114
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Establishing Regional Aβ Cutoffs andExploring Subgroup Prevalence Across Cognitive Stages Using BeauBrain Amylo®
Seongbeom PARK ; Kyoungmin KIM ; Soyeon YOON ; Seongmi KIM ; Jehyun AHN ; Kyoung Yoon LIM ; Hyemin JANG ; Duk L. NA ; Hee Jin KIM ; Seung Hwan MOON ; Jun Pyo KIM ; Sang Won SEO ; Jaeho KIM ; Kichang KWAK
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(2):135-146
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			and Purpose: Amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques are key in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with Aβ positron emission tomography imaging enabling non-invasive quantification.To address regional Aβ deposition, we developed regional Centiloid scales (rdcCL) and commercialized them through the computed tomography (CT)-based BeauBrain Amylo platform, eliminating the need for three-dimensional T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 
		                        		
		                        			Objective:
		                        			We aimed to establish robust regional Aβ cutoffs using the commercialized BeauBrain Amylo platform and to explore the prevalence of subgroups defined by global, regional, and striatal Aβ cutoffs across cognitive stages. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We included 2,428 individuals recruited from the Korea-Registries to Overcome Dementia and Accelerate Dementia Research project. We calculated regional Aβ cutoffs using Gaussian Mixture Modeling. Participants were classified into subgroups based on global, regional, and striatal Aβ positivity across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired [CU], mild cognitive impairment, and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			MRI-based and CT-based global Aβ cutoffs were highly comparable and consistent with previously reported Centiloid values. Regional cutoffs revealed both similarities and differences between MRI- and CT-based methods, reflecting modality-specific segmentation processes. Subgroups such as global(−)regional(+) were more frequent in non-dementia stages, while global(+)striatal(−) was primarily observed in CU individuals. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			Our study established robust regional Aβ cutoffs using a CT-based rdcCL method and demonstrated its clinical utility in classifying amyloid subgroups across cognitive stages. These findings highlight the importance of regional Aβ quantification in understanding amyloid pathology and its implications for biomarker-guided diagnosis and treatment in AD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Comprehensive Clinical and Behavioral Characteristics of Mild Cognitive Impairment According to Amyloid Positivity: A Large Multi-Center Korean Cohort
Seung Ae KIM ; Yeshin KIM ; Duk L. NA ; Sang Won SEO ; Hyemin JANG ;
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(2):102-114
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage to dementia, Alzheimer’s disease being a major cause. Although amyloid beta-positive (Aβ+) MCI has been well-characterized, Aβ-negative (Aβ−) MCI has not. This study compared the comprehensive clinical and behavioral characteristics of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI in a large multicenter cohort to better understand the heterogeneity of MCI, and to identify contributing factors to cognitive impairment. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A total of 686 MCI participants were included. Aβ positivity was determined using Aβ positron emission tomography imaging with a direct conversion Centiloid cutoff value of 25.5. Standardized assessment and questionnaires were used to collect a wide range of clinical information, including vascular risk factors, cognition, daily living function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and lifestyle behavior. Groups were compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Aβ+ participants (n=406) were older, predominantly female, and more likely to be ApoE4 carriers. In contrast, Aβ− participants (n=280) showed higher vascular risk factors, including diabetes, elevated body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.Aβ+ participants exhibited worse global cognition and functional decline, with a higher prevalence of delusions and appetite disturbances. Meanwhile, Aβ− participants reported greater social engagement, but poorer sleep quality. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			This study highlights the distinct clinical and lifestyle profiles of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI, illuminating the heterogeneity of MCI and its underlying factors in the Korean population. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions and Changes in Clinical Practice after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decision Act: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Korea
Yoon Jung JANG ; Yun Jung YANG ; Hoi Jung KOO ; Hye Won YOON ; Seongbeom UHM ; Sun Young KIM ; Jeong Eun KIM ; Jin Won HUH ; Tae Won KIM ; Seyoung SEO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(1):280-288
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			In Korea, the Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) was implemented on February 4, 2018. We aimed to investigate relevant factors and clinical changes associated with LST decisions after law enforcement. 
		                        		
		                        			Materials and Methods:
		                        			This single-center retrospective study included patients who completed LST documents using legal forms at Asan Medical Center from February 5, 2018, to June 30, 2020. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			5,896 patients completed LST documents, of which 2,704 (45.8%) signed the documents in person, while family members of 3,192 (54%) wrote the documents on behalf of the patients. Comparing first year and following year of implementation of the act, the self-documentation rate increased (43.9% to 47.2%, p=0.014). Moreover, the number of LST decisions made during or after intensive care unit admission decreased (37.8% vs. 35.2%, p=0.045), and the completion rate of LST documents during chemotherapy increased (6.6% vs. 8.9%, p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, age < 65 (odds ratio [OR], 1.724; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.538 to 1.933; p < 0.001), unmarried status (OR, 1.309; 95% CI, 1.097 to 1.561; p=0.003), palliative care consultation (OR, 1.538; 95% CI, 1.340 to 1.765; p < 0.001), malignancy (OR, 1.864; 95% CI, 1.628 to 2.133; p < 0.001), and changes in timing on the first year versus following year (OR, 1.124; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.260; p=0.045) were related to a higher self-documentation rate. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			Age < 65 years, unmarried status, malignancy, and referral to a palliative care team were associated with patients making LST decisions themselves. Furthermore, the subject and timing of LST decisions have changed with the LST act. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Establishing Regional Aβ Cutoffs andExploring Subgroup Prevalence Across Cognitive Stages Using BeauBrain Amylo®
Seongbeom PARK ; Kyoungmin KIM ; Soyeon YOON ; Seongmi KIM ; Jehyun AHN ; Kyoung Yoon LIM ; Hyemin JANG ; Duk L. NA ; Hee Jin KIM ; Seung Hwan MOON ; Jun Pyo KIM ; Sang Won SEO ; Jaeho KIM ; Kichang KWAK
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(2):135-146
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			and Purpose: Amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques are key in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with Aβ positron emission tomography imaging enabling non-invasive quantification.To address regional Aβ deposition, we developed regional Centiloid scales (rdcCL) and commercialized them through the computed tomography (CT)-based BeauBrain Amylo platform, eliminating the need for three-dimensional T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 
		                        		
		                        			Objective:
		                        			We aimed to establish robust regional Aβ cutoffs using the commercialized BeauBrain Amylo platform and to explore the prevalence of subgroups defined by global, regional, and striatal Aβ cutoffs across cognitive stages. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We included 2,428 individuals recruited from the Korea-Registries to Overcome Dementia and Accelerate Dementia Research project. We calculated regional Aβ cutoffs using Gaussian Mixture Modeling. Participants were classified into subgroups based on global, regional, and striatal Aβ positivity across cognitive stages (cognitively unimpaired [CU], mild cognitive impairment, and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type). 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			MRI-based and CT-based global Aβ cutoffs were highly comparable and consistent with previously reported Centiloid values. Regional cutoffs revealed both similarities and differences between MRI- and CT-based methods, reflecting modality-specific segmentation processes. Subgroups such as global(−)regional(+) were more frequent in non-dementia stages, while global(+)striatal(−) was primarily observed in CU individuals. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			Our study established robust regional Aβ cutoffs using a CT-based rdcCL method and demonstrated its clinical utility in classifying amyloid subgroups across cognitive stages. These findings highlight the importance of regional Aβ quantification in understanding amyloid pathology and its implications for biomarker-guided diagnosis and treatment in AD. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail