Objective: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisors with clear aligners was evaluated using finite element analysis. Methods: Anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, combined with the design of 0.625-mmthick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Six distinct simulations were generated: (1) attachment-free, (2) labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) labial attachment placed incisally, (5) palatal attachment, and (6) attachment placed labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed using a default aligner activation of 0.25 mm. Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited palatal movement in all models. Group 6 showed the lowest crown and root displacements on both axes, whereas the attachmentfree group exhibited the greatest crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, with deformation progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. Group 6 demonstrated the least deformation of all groups. The Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were most pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side than on the labial side. Conclusions The use of attachments, particularly the combination of labial and palatal attachments, enables a more precise labialization process, helping to reduce tipping. Increasing crown movement of the lateral incisor elevates stress within the PDL, with the highest stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.

Objective: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisors with clear aligners was evaluated using finite element analysis. Methods: Anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, combined with the design of 0.625-mmthick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Six distinct simulations were generated: (1) attachment-free, (2) labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) labial attachment placed incisally, (5) palatal attachment, and (6) attachment placed labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed using a default aligner activation of 0.25 mm. Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited palatal movement in all models. Group 6 showed the lowest crown and root displacements on both axes, whereas the attachmentfree group exhibited the greatest crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, with deformation progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. Group 6 demonstrated the least deformation of all groups. The Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were most pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side than on the labial side. Conclusions The use of attachments, particularly the combination of labial and palatal attachments, enables a more precise labialization process, helping to reduce tipping. Increasing crown movement of the lateral incisor elevates stress within the PDL, with the highest stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.

Objective: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisors with clear aligners was evaluated using finite element analysis. Methods: Anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, combined with the design of 0.625-mmthick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Six distinct simulations were generated: (1) attachment-free, (2) labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) labial attachment placed incisally, (5) palatal attachment, and (6) attachment placed labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed using a default aligner activation of 0.25 mm. Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited palatal movement in all models. Group 6 showed the lowest crown and root displacements on both axes, whereas the attachmentfree group exhibited the greatest crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, with deformation progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. Group 6 demonstrated the least deformation of all groups. The Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were most pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side than on the labial side. Conclusions The use of attachments, particularly the combination of labial and palatal attachments, enables a more precise labialization process, helping to reduce tipping. Increasing crown movement of the lateral incisor elevates stress within the PDL, with the highest stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.

Objective: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisors with clear aligners was evaluated using finite element analysis. Methods: Anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, combined with the design of 0.625-mmthick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Six distinct simulations were generated: (1) attachment-free, (2) labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) labial attachment placed incisally, (5) palatal attachment, and (6) attachment placed labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed using a default aligner activation of 0.25 mm. Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited palatal movement in all models. Group 6 showed the lowest crown and root displacements on both axes, whereas the attachmentfree group exhibited the greatest crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, with deformation progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. Group 6 demonstrated the least deformation of all groups. The Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were most pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side than on the labial side. Conclusions The use of attachments, particularly the combination of labial and palatal attachments, enables a more precise labialization process, helping to reduce tipping. Increasing crown movement of the lateral incisor elevates stress within the PDL, with the highest stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.

Objective: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisors with clear aligners was evaluated using finite element analysis. Methods: Anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, combined with the design of 0.625-mmthick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Six distinct simulations were generated: (1) attachment-free, (2) labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) labial attachment placed incisally, (5) palatal attachment, and (6) attachment placed labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed using a default aligner activation of 0.25 mm. Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited palatal movement in all models. Group 6 showed the lowest crown and root displacements on both axes, whereas the attachmentfree group exhibited the greatest crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, with deformation progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. Group 6 demonstrated the least deformation of all groups. The Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were most pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side than on the labial side. Conclusions The use of attachments, particularly the combination of labial and palatal attachments, enables a more precise labialization process, helping to reduce tipping. Increasing crown movement of the lateral incisor elevates stress within the PDL, with the highest stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.