Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is rarely caused by radiocontrast media (RCM). The role of skin tests for the diagnosis and evaluation of cross-reactivity in a delayed type of RCM-induced hypersensitivity have yet to be determined. Here, we report a case of iodixanol-induced AGEP where we safely administered alternative RCM using patch tests. A 44-year-old woman had coronary artery angiography (CAG) for the evaluation of ischemic heart disease. She was on regular hemodialysis because of end-stage renal disease. She was given iodixanol (Visipaque) during CAG. Approximately 1 day after CAG, she developed AGEP. The patient was rehospitalized for CAG again after 1 year. We performed skin tests to choose safe alternative RCM. Intradermal tests with iodixanol, iohexol (Bonorex) and Iopamidol (Pamiray) showed negative responses. Patch tests showed a positive response to iodixanol, equivocal to iohexol, and negative to Iopamidol. We finally chose Iopamidol and performed CAG successfully without any adverse reaction. Patch tests may be a useful tool for the diagnosis and choice of safe alternatives in RCM-induced delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions such as AGEP.
Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis* ; Adult ; Angiography ; Contrast Media* ; Coronary Vessels ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Intradermal Tests ; Iohexol ; Iopamidol ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Myocardial Ischemia ; Patch Tests* ; Renal Dialysis ; Skin Tests

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several studies have reported on the clinical aspects of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). To date, no study has evaluated serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) in Korea. The current study evaluates the clinical expression of SADRs in a Korean hospital. METHODS: We reviewed a total of 3,386 cases of SADR occurring between March 2012 and November 2015 in a single tertiary care institution (Regional Pharmacovigilance Center). RESULTS: When classified by organ system, the most common SADRs were white cell and reticuloendothelial system disorders (n = 511). Skin/appendage (n = 296) and gastrointestinal (n = 216) disorders were the fourth- and eighth-most common SADRs, respectively. The three most common single symptoms were leukopenia (n = 499 events), hypotension (n = 444) and anaphylaxis (n = 215). Leukopenia was mainly caused by anti-tumor drugs, followed by piperacilin/tazobactam (n = 28), vancomycin (n = 10) and methimazole (n = 6). Hypotension was most often caused by propacetamol injection (n = 145), while anaphylaxis was mainly caused by cefaclor (n = 19), ranitidine (n = 12), iopamidol (n = 10) and multi-vitamin infusion (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were noted in the clinical aspects of ADRs and SADRs. Additional studies are warranted to further assess SADRs in response to frequently used causative drugs.
Anaphylaxis ; Cefaclor ; Drug Hypersensitivity ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions* ; Hypotension ; Iopamidol ; Korea* ; Leukopenia ; Methimazole ; Mononuclear Phagocyte System ; Pharmacovigilance ; Ranitidine ; Tertiary Healthcare* ; Vancomycin

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) can cause not only immediate onset hypersensitivity but also delayed onset hypersensitivity. While the most common form of delayed onset hypersensitivity reaction to ICM is exanthematous eruption, fixed drug eruption (FDE) can occur rarely related to ICM. A 70-year-old male with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma repeatedly experienced erythematous patches on his right forearm and hand 6 hours after exposure to iopromide for computed tomography scan. ICM induced FDE was diagnosed clinically. Intradermal test with 6 kinds of ICM (iobitridol, iohexol, iomeprol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iodixanol) was performed and showed the weakest positive reaction to iohexol compared to the others in 48 hours. After changing iopromide to iohexol based on these results, FDE did not recur. We report here a case of iopromide induced FDE which was successfully prevented by changing ICM to iohexol based on intradermal test results.
Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Contrast Media ; Drug Eruptions* ; Forearm ; Hand ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Hypersensitivity, Delayed ; Intradermal Tests ; Iohexol ; Iopamidol ; Liver Cirrhosis ; Male

Both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are relatively common. However, there are few data to determine the clinical utility of immunologic evaluation of ICM. To evaluate the utility of ICM skin testing in patients with ICM hypersensitivity, 23 patients (17 immediate and 6 delayed reactions) were enrolled from 3 university hospitals in Korea. With 6 commonly used ICM including iopromide, iohexol, ioversol, iomeprol, iopamidol and iodixanol, skin prick (SPT), intradermal (IDT) and patch tests were performed. Of 10 patients with anaphylaxis, 3 (30.0%) and 6 (60.0%) were positive respectively on SPTs and IDTs with the culprit ICM. Three of 6 patients with urticaria showed positive IDTs. In total, 11 (64.7%) had positive on either SPT or IDT. Three of 6 patients with delayed rashes had positive response to patch test and/or delayed IDT. Among 5 patients (3 anaphylaxis, 1 urticaria and 1 delayed rash) taken subsequent radiological examinations, 3 patients administered safe alternatives according to the results of skin testing had no adverse reaction. However, anaphylaxis developed in the other 2 patients administered the culprit ICM again. With 64.7% (11/17) and 50% (3/6) of the sensitivities of corresponding allergic skin tests with culprit ICM for immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions, the present study suggests that skin tests is useful for the diagnosis of ICM hypersensitivity and for selecting safe ICM and preventing a recurrence of anaphylaxis caused by the same ICM.
Anaphylaxis/chemically induced/diagnosis/immunology ; Contrast Media/*adverse effects ; Cross Reactions/immunology ; Dermatitis, Contact/*diagnosis/*immunology ; Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Iodides/*immunology ; Iohexol/analogs & derivatives ; Iopamidol/analogs & derivatives ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Republic of Korea ; Skin Tests/*methods ; Triiodobenzoic Acids ; Urticaria/diagnosis/immunology

Although hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are uncommon, their clinical impacts are considerable because of their wide use and potential fatality. The best way to prevent ICM-induced hypersensitivity is to avoid re-exposure to the ICM. However, ICM use is inevitable in the evaluation of many diseases. A 64-year-old male with renal cell carcinoma presented with anaphylaxis after computed tomography (CT) using iohexol. Intradermal test results were positive to iohexol, iomeprol, and ioversol. The following 3 CT scans using the test-negative agents iopromide, iopamidol, and iobitridol still provoked hypersensitivity reactions despite premedication using intravenous antihistamine and corticosteroid. For the next step, iodixanol, a nonionic iso-osmolar dimer, was tested by intravenous graded challenges in addition to the intradermal skin test, which and was confirmed to be negative. The patient underwent CT scan using iodixanol after premedication with chlorpheniramine 4 mg and methylprednisolone 40 mg, and hypersensitivity reactions did not recur. We report a case of a patient showing hyper reactivity to multiple ICMs despite negative intradermal skin tests, who eventually underwent successful enhanced CT scans after choosing ICM by the graded challenge test.
Anaphylaxis* ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell ; Chlorpheniramine ; Contrast Media* ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Intradermal Tests ; Iohexol ; Iopamidol ; Male ; Methylprednisolone ; Middle Aged ; Premedication ; Skin Tests ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of commonly used contrast media (CM) on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Isolated rat hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of regional ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion. The following CM (1 mL/1 L Krebs-Henseleit buffer) were randomly perfused for 15 minutes beginning 5 minutes before reperfusion and ending 10 minutes after reperfusion: iohexol (n=8), iopromide (n=8), ioversol (n=8), iomeprol (n=8), iopamidol (n=7), ioxaglate (n=8), and iodixanol (n=7). The effects of a direct bolus injection of undiluted iohexol, iopromide, or ioxaglate (each n=6) via the aortic root immediately prior to reperfusion were also evaluated. The area of necrosis, expressed as the percentage of the area at risk (AN/AR), and cardiodynamic variables were measured. RESULTS: The AN/AR of the control and experimental groups in the order described in methods was 33.7+/-6.4%, 30.3+/-7.4%, 34.7+/-12.6%, 29.2+/-10.2%, 20.9+/-7.6%, 22.6+/-8.7%, 18.8+/-7.9%, and 19.9+/-11.4%, respectively. Groups that received iomeprol and ioxaglate exhibited significantly decreased AN/AR values compared to those of control hearts (p=0.042 and p=0.013). No significant differences in the AN/AR were observed between control hearts and the groups injected with a single bolus of CM. No significant hemodynamic changes were noted after reperfusion among the groups. CONCLUSION: The overall effects of the CM on coronary reperfusion were not deleterious, and better effects were noted in two CM groups. However, it is unclear whether this result was attributed to a specific physiochemical property of the CM.
Animals ; Contrast Media* ; Heart* ; Hemodynamics ; Iohexol ; Iopamidol ; Ioxaglic Acid ; Ischemia ; Myocardial Infarction ; Myocardial Reperfusion ; Necrosis ; Rats* ; Reperfusion ; Reperfusion Injury*

A pulmonary artery aneurysm is a common manifestation and the leading cause of mortality in Behcet's disease. We describe a case of spontaneous rupture of a pulmonary artery aneurysm that, due to the inadequacy of medical therapy and the disadvantages of surgery, became the ideal candidate for endovascular management and was successfully performed by using the Amplatzer Vascular Plug 4.
Adult ; Aneurysm, Ruptured/*radiography/*surgery ; Behcet Syndrome/*complications ; Humans ; Iopamidol/analogs & derivatives/diagnostic use ; Male ; *Pulmonary Artery ; Radiography, Thoracic ; *Septal Occluder Device ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and usefulness of a two-tiered approach to balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) as a treatment for large gastric varices after portal hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 50 patients were studied who underwent B-RTO for gastric varices between October 2004 and October 2011 in our institution. The B-RTO procedure was performed from the right femoral vein and the B-RTO catheter was retained until the following morning. Distribution of sclerotic agents in the gastric varices on fluoroscopy was evaluated in all patients on days 1 and 2. When distribution of sclerotic agents in the gastric varices on day 1 had been none or very scanty even though the volume of the sclerotic agent infused was above the acceptable level, a second infusion was administered on day 2. When distribution was satisfactory, the B-RTO catheter was removed. RESULTS: In 8 (16%) patients, little or no sclerotic agent infused on day 1 was distributed in the gastric varices. However, on day 2, sclerotic agents were distributed in all gastric varices. Mean volume of ethanolamine oleate-iopamidol infused on day 1 was 24.6 mL and was 19.4 mL on day 2. Gastric varices were well obliterated with no recurrence. Complications caused by the sclerotic agent such as pulmonary edema or renal insufficiencies were not seen. CONCLUSION: When gastric varices are very large, a strategy involving thrombosis of only the drainage vein on the first day followed by infusing the sclerotic agent on the following day might be effective and feasible.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Balloon Occlusion/*methods ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Collateral Circulation ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology/radiography/*therapy ; Female ; Femoral Vein ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology/*therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/*complications ; Iopamidol/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oleic Acids/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Sclerosing Solutions/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema (NCPE) is a rare adverse reaction to iodinated radiocontrast media (RCM), in which all previous cases were immediate reactions. A 56-year-old male was given iopamidol, a non-ionic, low osmolar RCM, during coronary artery angiography. He developed pulmonary edema and fever a day after the procedure. Despite diuretic therapy, the patient's pulmonary edema worsened and his high fever persisted. The patient's pulmonary edema was eventually resolved with intravenous steroid treatment. We interpreted the patient's condition as NCPE manifesting as a delayed reaction to RCM. To our knowledge, our case is the first to show NCPE as a delayed hypersensitivity reaction.
Angiography ; Contrast Media ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Vessels ; Fever ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Hypersensitivity, Delayed ; Iopamidol ; Male ; Pulmonary Edema

We report the dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and histopathologic findings of a rare case of recurrent pulmonary capillary hemangiomas. The findings consisted of peripheral nodular enhancement at the early arterial phase and a subsequent "central filling-in" enhancement pattern on the delayed scans, which was identical to the well-known enhancement pattern of hemangiomas of the liver. Although there was no evidence of histological malignancy, pulmonary capillary hemangiomas manifested as multiple nodular lesions and showed postoperative recurrence.
Contrast Media/diagnostic use ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Hemangioma, Capillary/pathology/*radiography/surgery ; Humans ; Iopamidol/diagnostic use ; Lung/*blood supply ; Lung Neoplasms/pathology/*radiography/surgery ; Recurrence ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods ; Young Adult