intraocular pressure (IOP) in different primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) age groups.METHODS: This was a retrospective, consecutive case series study that included 60 eyes of 60 subjects with POAG, specifically 20 subjects aged 40 to 54 years, 21 aged 55 to 69 years, and 19 aged 70 years or older. All had been treated for at least 12 months with triple maximum medical therapy (TMT; dorzolamide/timolol, brimonidine, and latanoprost) to lower their IOP, which subsequently was changed to double maximum medical therapy (DMT, fixed drug combinations of tafluprost/timolol and brinzolamide/brimonidine). The rate of IOP change and adverse drug reactions were compared amongst the three age groups.RESULTS: The mean IOP change at three months after converting from TMT to DMT was −0.65 ± 1.42 mmHg (−3.84% ± 9.31%) among the overall study group, but this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.108). In the 40 to 54 years and 55 to 69 years groups, the mean IOP change rates were +0.29 ± 0.96 mmHg (+2.40% ± 6.85%, p = 0.087) and −0.50 ± 0.99 mmHg (−3.05% ± 6.40%, p = 0.084) respectively. In the 70 years or older group, the mean IOP change, interestingly, was −1.80 ± 1.46 mmHg (−11.29% ± 9.31%, p < 0.001) and nine (47.4%) of the 19 subjects showed additional IOP reductions of 10% or more after converting from TMT to DMT. In all three age groups, the incidence rate of dry eye was significantly lower for DMT than for TMT (p = 0.031).CONCLUSIONS: In POAG patients, DMT was proven to be both effective and safe for lowering the IOP, especially in those 70 years or older group, when compared with the TMT protocol.]]>
Brimonidine Tartrate ; Disease Management ; Drug Combinations ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intraocular Pressure ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To study the anti- scarring effect of rapamycin in rabbits receiving glaucoma filtering surgery. METHODS: Ninety-six Chinchilla rabbits were randomized equally into 3 rapamycin treatment groups and one control group. All the rabbits underwent trabeculectomy, after which the rabbits in the 3 rapamycin groups were treated with eye drops containing 1%, 3%, or 5% rapamycin in the operated eyes, and those in the control groups were given castor oil 4 times a day. The intraocular pressure (IOP) and inflammatory reaction in the treated eyes were observed, and the PCNA-positive cells in the filtering bleb were detected using immunohistochemistry. RTFs isolated from the Tenon's capsule of the rabbits were cultured , and the expressions of caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 in the fibroblasts were detected after treatment with different concentrations of rapamycin. RESULTS: The IOP was significantly lower in rapamycin-treated group than in the control group after the surgery ( < 0.05). The counts of the PCNA-positive cells were significantly lower in rapamycin-treated rabbits than in the control group ( < 0.05). Rapamycin treatment dose-dependently increased the expressions of caspase-3 and caspase- 9 at both the mRNA ( < 0.001) and protein ( < 0.001) levels without causing significant changes in the expressions of caspase-8. CONCLUSIONS Rapamycin can inhibit excessive proliferation of the fibroblasts in the filtering bleb to reduce scar formation after glaucoma filtration surgery in rabbits. Rapamycin also increases the expressions of caspase-3 and caspase-9 to induce apoptosis of the RTFs.
Animals ; Caspase 3 ; metabolism ; Caspase 9 ; metabolism ; Cell Proliferation ; drug effects ; Cicatrix ; prevention & control ; Filtering Surgery ; adverse effects ; Glaucoma ; surgery ; Intraocular Pressure ; Postoperative Complications ; enzymology ; prevention & control ; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen ; analysis ; Rabbits ; Random Allocation ; Sirolimus ; therapeutic use ; Trabeculectomy

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a brinzolamide 1%-brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination (BBFC) for normal tension glaucoma (NTG) in a South Korean population. METHODS: This study included 45 patients who were newly diagnosed with NTG and treated with BBFC as the first therapy from January 2016 through December 2016. The unilateral eye of NTG eyes of all patients were enrolled. If both eyes were eligible, the eye with the more severe glaucomatous change was selected. If the glaucomatous change was similar in both eyes, the right eye was selected. The patients received the BBFC twice a day. Diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured every 2 and 1/2 hours between 09:00 am and 04:30 pm. The IOP change with respect to body position (positional IOP) was measured at baseline and at 6 months after eyedrop instillation. Throughout the study, all side effects were recorded and monitored by the investigators. RESULTS: Ten patients were excluded due to an allergic reaction or follow-up loss. A total of 35 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean IOP was 15.32 ± 4.00 mmHg at baseline and 13.38 ± 3.30 mmHg at 6 months after BBFC instillation (p < 0.001). The IOP fluctuation decreased from 3.33 ± 3.10 to 2.35 ± 1.40 mmHg after BBFC instillation; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.150). The mean change in positional IOP showed a statistically significant reduction from 16.94 ± 3.18 to 14.80 ± 3.27 mmHg (p = 0.025). There was no serious adverse drug reaction except in three cases of allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: BBFC is effective for the reduction of mean IOP and positional IOP in NTG patients.
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Intraocular Pressure ; Low Tension Glaucoma ; Research Personnel ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brinzolamide 1%/brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination (BBFC) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. METHODS: This prospective study included patients treated with brinzolamide 1% monotherapy, brimonidine 0.2% monotherapy or brinzolamide 1% and brimonidine 0.2% concomitant therapy, as well as newly diagnosed NTG patients. The enrolled patients who used brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.2% switched to BBFC and newly diagnosed NTG patients were treated with BBFC. The patients receiving brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.2% monotherapy or brinzolamide 1% and brimonidine 0.2% concomitant therapy switched antiglaucoma drugs to BBFC. Newly diagnosed NTG patients used BBFC as the first therapy. The study consisted of 1 screening/baseline visit and 3 follow-up visits conducted after 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Intraocular pressure (IOP), mean deviation value and adverse drug reactions were evaluated before treatment and after treatment with BBFC. RESULTS: The mean IOP in the brinzolamide 1% monotherapy group was 13.5 ± 1.6 mm Hg and the mean IOP after switched from brinzolamide 1% monotherapy to BBFC was 12.1 ± 1.5 mm Hg. The mean IOP in the brimonidine 0.2% monotherapy group was 14.2 ± 1.3 mm Hg and the mean IOP after switched from brimonidine 0.2% monotherapy to BBFC was 11.7 ± 1.5 mm Hg. The mean IOP was 11.9 ± 2.1 mm Hg in the brinzolamide 1% and brimonidine 0.2% concomitant therapy group and the mean IOP after switched from brinzolamide 1% and brimonidine 0.2% concomitant therapy to BBFC was 12.0 ± 1.1 mm Hg. The mean IOP and reduction rate were 10.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg and 35.5%, respectively,in the newly diagnosed NTG patients treated with BBFC. There was no serious adverse drug reaction causing ocular damage. CONCLUSIONS: BBFC provides a significant IOP reduction and is a safe antiglaucoma medication for NTG patients.
Brimonidine Tartrate ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Low Tension Glaucoma* ; Prospective Studies

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection on refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection failure. METHODS: Patients with DME and central subfield thickness (CST) >300 microm who did not respond to IVB injections were retrospectively included. Specifically, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with refractory DME and who experienced an increase in CST after 1 to 2 IVB injections or no decrease after > or =3 consecutive IVB injections. One clinician injected 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide into the posterior subtenon space. All patients received ophthalmic examinations at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months post-baseline. Examinations included Snellen visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Forty eyes of 34 patients were included. The average baseline CST was 476 microm. The average CST decreased to 368 microm at 2 months, 374 microm at 4 months, and 427 microm at 6 months (p < 0.001 for all results, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The average intraocular pressure increased from 15.50 to 16.92 mmHg at 2 months but decreased to 16.30 mmHg at 4 months and 15.65 mmHg at 6 months. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity improved from 0.56 to 0.50 at 2 months (p = 0.023), 0.50 at 4 months (p = 0.083), and 0.48 at 6 months (p = 0.133, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide is an effective and safe treatment for reducing CST in DME refractory to IVB.
Aged ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab/*therapeutic use ; Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnostic imaging/*drug therapy/physiopathology ; Female ; Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections, Intraocular ; Intraocular Pressure/physiology ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Edema/diagnostic imaging/*drug therapy/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Tenon Capsule/*drug effects ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Treatment Failure ; Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors ; Visual Acuity/physiology

Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) during surgery is a risk factor for postoperative ophthalmological complications. We assessed the efficacy of systemically infused dexmedetomidine in preventing the increase in IOP caused by a steep Trendelenburg position, and evaluated the influence of underlying hypertension on IOP during surgery. Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in a steep Trendelenburg position were included. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group received a 1.0 µg/kg IV loading dose of dexmedetomidine before anesthesia, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/hr throughout the operation. Patients in the saline group were infused with the same volume of normal saline. IOP and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) were measured 16 times pre- and intraoperatively. In the saline group, IOP increased in the steep Trendelenburg position, and was 11.3 mmHg higher at the end of the time at the position compared with the baseline value (before anesthetic induction). This increase in IOP was attenuated in the dexmedetomidine group, for which IOP was only 4.2 mmHg higher (P < 0.001 vs. the saline group). The steep Trendelenburg position was associated with a decrease in OPP; the degree of decrease was comparable for both groups. In intragroup comparisons between patients with underlying hypertension and normotensive patients, the values of IOP at every time point were comparable. Dexmedetomidine infusion attenuated the increase in IOP during laparoscopic surgery in a steep Trendelenburg position, without further decreasing the OPP. Systemic hypertension did not seem to be associated with any additional increase in IOP during surgery. (Registration at the Clinical Research Information Service of Korea National Institute of Health ID: KCT0001482)
Aged ; Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage/*pharmacology ; Double-Blind Method ; Eye Diseases/surgery ; Female ; Head-Down Tilt ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage/pharmacology ; Intraocular Pressure/*drug effects ; Intraoperative Complications/drug therapy/prevention & control ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUNDNeovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a refractory glaucoma. The management of NVG is very difficult, and it is more difficult when combined with vitreous hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ranibizumab plus combined surgery for NVG with vitreous hemorrhage.

METHODSA total of 26 eyes of 26 NVG patients with vitreous hemorrhage were recruited in this study. The patients aged from 36 to 63 years with a mean age of 51.97 ± 7.60 years. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 46.38 ± 5.75 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) while being treated with the maximum medical therapy. The mean best-corrected visual acuities converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR BCVA) was 2.62 ± 0.43. All the patients underwent intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab combined with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), pars plana lensectomy (PPL) with a preserved anterior capsule, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and trabeculectomy (intravitreal ranibizumab [IVR] + PPV + PPL + PRP + trabeculectomy). The IOP and logMAR BCVA were the main outcome measures in this study.

RESULTSThe follow-up period was 12 months. The mean postoperative IOPs were 26.38 ± 3.75 mmHg, 21.36 ± 3.32 mmHg, 18.57 ± 3.21 mmHg, and 16.68 ± 2.96 mmHg, respectively at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months after PPV + PPL + PRP + trabeculectomy. At the last follow-up, the mean IOP was significantly lower than the preoperative one (t = 6.612, P = 0.001). At 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months after PPV + PPL + PRP + trabeculectomy, the mean logMAR BCVA were 1.30 ± 0.36, 1.29 ± 0.37, 1.29 ± 0.39, and 1.26 ± 0.29, respectively. At the last follow-up, the mean logMAR BCVA was significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant compared with preoperative one (t = 6.133, P = 0.002). The logMAR BCVA improved in 22 eyes (84.62%), and remained stable in 4 eyes (15.38%). The neovascularization in the iris and the angle regressed significantly in all patients 7 days after ranibizumab injection. No serious complications occurred during 12 months of the study.

CONCLUSIONSIVR + PPV + PPL + PRP + trabeculectomy can control IOP well and improve BCVA without severe complication for NVG patients with vitreous hemorrhage.

Adult ; Female ; Glaucoma, Neovascular ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; drug effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Ranibizumab ; therapeutic use ; Trabeculectomy ; adverse effects ; Vitrectomy ; adverse effects ; Vitreous Hemorrhage ; drug therapy ; surgery

BACKGROUNDCompound anisodine (CA) is a compound preparation made from hydrobromide anisodine and procaine hydrochloride. The former is an M-choline receptor blocker with the function of regulating the vegetative nervous system, improving microcirculation, and so on. The latter is an antioxidant with the activities of neuroprotection. This study aimed to investigate the potential neuroprotection of CA, which affects the degeneration of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in an animal model with chronic ocular hypertension.

METHODSFemale C57BL/6J mice (n = 24) were divided randomly into four groups: normal control group without any treatment (Group A, n = 6); CA control group with feeding the CA solution (Group B, n = 6); microbeads (MBs) control group with injecting MB into the anterior chamber (Group C, n = 6); CA study group with MB injection and with feeding the CA solution (Group D, n = 6). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured every 3 days after MB injection. At the 21st day, neurons were retrograde-labeled by Fluoro-Gold (FG). Animals were sacrificed on the 27th day. Retinal flat mounts were stained immunohistologically by α2-III-tubulin. FG-retrograde-labeled RGCs, α2-III-tubulin-positive RGCs, and α2-III-tubulin-positive nerve fibers were quantified.

RESULTSMice of Groups C and D expressed the incidence of consistent IOP elevation, which is above the IOP level of Group A with the normal one. There is no significant difference in IOP between Groups A and B (P > 0.05). On the 27th day, there were distinct loss in stained RGCs and nerve fibers from Groups C and D compared with Group A (allP < 0.001). The quantity was significantly higher in Group D as compared to Group C (allP < 0.001) but lower than Group A (allP > 0.001). There was no significant difference in the quantity of RGCs and nerve fibers between Groups A and B (allP > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSThese findings suggest that CA plays an importantly neuroprotective role on RGCs in a mouse model with chronic ocular hypertension.

Animals ; Cell Survival ; drug effects ; Female ; Immunohistochemistry ; Intraocular Pressure ; drug effects ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Neuroprotective Agents ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Ocular Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Random Allocation ; Retinal Ganglion Cells ; drug effects ; Scopolamine Derivatives ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost and timolol in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary-care centre. One hundred and forty patients with newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma were randomly assigned to treatment with latanoprost (0.005%), bimatoprost (0.03%), travoprost (0.004%) or timolol gel (0.5%); 35 patients were assigned to each group. All patients were followed for 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The main outcome measure studied was the change in IOP at week 12 from the baseline values. Safety measures included recording of adverse events. RESULTS: The mean IOP reduction from baseline at week 12 was significantly more with bimatoprost (8.8 mmHg, 35.9%) than with latanoprost (7.3 mmHg, 29.9%), travoprost (7.6 mmHg, 30.8%) or timolol (6.7 mmHg, 26.6%) (ANOVA and Student's t-tests, p < 0.001). Among the prostaglandins studied, bimatoprost produced a maximum reduction in IOP (-2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.25 to -3.18) followed by travoprost (-1.27; 95% CI, -0.81 to -1.27) and latanoprost (-1.25; 95% CI, -0.79 to -1.71); these values were significant when compared to timolol at week 12 (Bonferroni test, p < 0.001). Latanoprost and travoprost were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP at each patient visit. Ocular adverse-events were found in almost equal proportion in patients treated with bimatoprost (41.3%) and travoprost (41.9%), with a higher incidence of conjunctival hyperemia (24.1%) seen in the bimatoprost group. Timolol produced a significant drop in heart rate (p < 0.001) at week 12 when compared to the baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost showed greater efficacy when compared to the other prostaglandins, and timolol was the most efficacious at lowering the IOP. Conjunctional hyperemia was mainly seen with bimatoprost. However, the drug was tolerated well and found to be safe.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Bimatoprost/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; Female ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*drug therapy/physiopathology ; Heart Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/drug effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Timolol/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Travoprost/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity/drug effects ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields/drug effects

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) and a latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) on diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior ocular parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS: We enrolled 58 healthy subjects in this prospective clinical study. Thirty subjects were treated with BTFC and 28 subjects were treated with LTFC. IOP was measured every 2 hours except from 01:00 and 05:00. Axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth were obtained using the IOL master at baseline and 24 hours later. Adverse events were assessed by patient interview and by slit lamp examination. RESULTS: The largest difference in IOP between treated and untreated eyes 8 hours after instillation was 1.67 mmHg in the BTFC group (p < 0.001). The largest difference in IOP between treated and untreated eyes 10 hours after instillation was 1.93 mmHg in the LTFC group (p < 0.001). For anterior ocular parameters such as axial length, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth at baseline and 24 hours after instillation, there were no significant differences between the baseline and 24-hour values in either the BTFC or LTFC group. The most frequently occurring adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, which was found in 33.3% (n = 10) of the BTFC group and 25.0% (n = 7) of the LTFC group (p = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: BTFC and LTFC provided a significant reduction in IOP from baseline without changing any anterior ocular parameters. Our results provide a reference for monocular trials to assess the effect of eye drops in a clinical condition.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides/*administration & dosage ; Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage ; Circadian Rhythm/*physiology ; Cloprostenol/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy/*physiopathology ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/drug effects/*physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmic Solutions ; Prospective Studies ; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/*administration & dosage ; Timolol/*administration & dosage ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Treatment Outcome