1.Clinical Outcomes of Small Cell Carcinoma of the Genitourinary Tract and the Prognostic Significance of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment
Jaewon HYUNG ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Gi Hwan KIM ; Yong Mee CHO ; Yeon-Mi RYU ; Sang-Yeob KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Shinkyo YOON ; Jae Lyun LEE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(2):624-633
Purpose:
Small cell carcinoma of the genitourinary tract (GU SCC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. There are only limited treatment options due to insufficient understanding of the disease. In this study, we analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with GU SCC and their association with the tumor immune phenotype.
Materials and Methods:
Patients diagnosed with GU SCC were included. Survival outcomes according to the primary location (prostate and non-prostate) and stages (limited disease [LD] and extensive disease [ED]) were analyzed. We performed multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) in non-prostate SCC patients and analyzed the immune cell population.
Results:
A total of 77 patients were included in this study. Their median age was 71 years, 67 patients (87.0%) were male, and 48 patients (62.3%) had non-prostate SCC. All patients with ED (n=31, 40.3%) received etoposide plus platinum (EP) as initial treatment and median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1 to 18.6). Patients with LD (n=46, 59.7%) received EP followed by radiotherapy or surgery, and 24-months OS rate was 63.6% (95% CI, 49.9 to 81.0). The multiplex IHC analysis of 21 patients with non-prostate SCC showed that patients with a higher density of programmed death-ligand 1–expressing CD68+CD206+ M2-like macrophages had significantly worse OS outcomes with an adjusted hazards ratio of 4.17 (95% CI, 1.25 to 14.29; adjusted p=0.02).
Conclusion
Patients with GU SCC had a poor prognosis, even those with localized disease. The tumor immune phenotypes were significantly associated with survival. This finding provides new insights for treating GU SCC.
2.Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Solid Cancer: A Joint Report from KSMO and KSP
Miso KIM ; Hyo Sup SHIM ; Sheehyun KIM ; In Hee LEE ; Jihun KIM ; Shinkyo YOON ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Jae Ho JEONG ; Changhoon YOO ; Jaekyung CHEON ; In-Ho KIM ; Jieun LEE ; Sook Hee HONG ; Sehhoon PARK ; Hyun Ae JUNG ; Jin Won KIM ; Han Jo KIM ; Yongjun CHA ; Sun Min LIM ; Han Sang KIM ; Choong-kun LEE ; Jee Hung KIM ; Sang Hoon CHUN ; Jina YUN ; So Yeon PARK ; Hye Seung LEE ; Yong Mee CHO ; Soo Jeong NAM ; Kiyong NA ; Sun Och YOON ; Ahwon LEE ; Kee-Taek JANG ; Hongseok YUN ; Sungyoung LEE ; Jee Hyun KIM ; Wan-Seop KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(3):721-742
In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.
3.Clinical practice recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid cancer: a joint report from KSMO and KSP
Miso KIM ; Hyo Sup SHIM ; Sheehyun KIM ; In Hee LEE ; Jihun KIM ; Shinkyo YOON ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Jae Ho JEONG ; Changhoon YOO ; Jaekyung CHEON ; In-Ho KIM ; Jieun LEE ; Sook Hee HONG ; Sehhoon PARK ; Hyun Ae JUNG ; Jin Won KIM ; Han Jo KIM ; Yongjun CHA ; Sun Min LIM ; Han Sang KIM ; Choong-Kun LEE ; Jee Hung KIM ; Sang Hoon CHUN ; Jina YUN ; So Yeon PARK ; Hye Seung LEE ; Yong Mee CHO ; Soo Jeong NAM ; Kiyong NA ; Sun Och YOON ; Ahwon LEE ; Kee-Taek JANG ; Hongseok YUN ; Sungyoung LEE ; Jee Hyun KIM ; Wan-Seop KIM
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2024;58(4):147-164
In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.
4.ERRATUM: Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group
Shinkyo YOON ; Miso KIM ; Yong Sang HONG ; Han Sang KIM ; Seung Tae KIM ; Jihun KIM ; Hongseok YUN ; Changhoon YOO ; Hee Kyung AHN ; Hyo Song KIM ; In Hee LEE ; In-Ho KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Jae Ho JEONG ; Jaekyung CHEON ; Jin Won KIM ; Jina YUN ; Sun Min LIM ; Yongjun CHA ; Se Jin JANG ; Dae Young ZANG ; Tae Won KIM ; Jin Hyoung KANG ; Jee Hyun KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2023;55(3):1061-1061
5.Effectiveness of Adding Docetaxel to Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in Korean Real-World Practice
Kwonoh PARK ; Jin Young KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Seong Hoon SHIN ; Hyo Jin LEE ; Jae Lyun LEE
Yonsei Medical Journal 2023;64(2):86-93
Purpose:
Evidence in favor of adding docetaxel in treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has led to docetaxel in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as standard therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of docetaxel with ADT for Korean patients with mHSPC in real-world practice.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was performed at six Korean hospitals for patients with mHSPC treated with docetaxel plus ADT. Patients were treated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles with 75 mg/m 2 of docetaxel. The primary endpoint was time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
Results:
This study included 46 eligible patients from June 2016 to February 2021. Median age was 68.5 years (range, 52–84) and all patients present with de novo M1 with high-volume disease. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at ADT initiation was 205.4 (7.7–1933) ng/mL, and time from ADT to docetaxel was 2.4 months (0–5.3). All six planned cycles of docetaxel were delivered in 36 patients (78%), 7 patients (15%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and 3 patients (7%) discontinued due to progression. At the time of the analysis, CRPC had developed in 34 patients (74%), and the median time to CRPC was 18.0 (95% confidence interval, 14.1–21.9) months. PSA <0.2 ng/mL was achieved in 11 patients (24%) after 6 months of ADT and in 10 patients (22%) after 12 months. At last follow-up, 35 patients (76%) were alive; the median overall survival was not reached.
Conclusion
The effect of docetaxel combined with ADT for Korean patients with mHSPC is comparable with prior results in Western studies.
6.Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group
Shinkyo YOON ; Miso KIM ; Yong Sang HONG ; Han Sang KIM ; Seung Tae KIM ; Jihun KIM ; Hongseok YUN ; Changhoon YOO ; Hee Kyung AHN ; Hyo Song KIM ; In Hee LEE ; In-Ho KIM ; Inkeun PARK ; Jae Ho JEONG ; Jaekyung CHEON ; Jin Won KIM ; Jina YUN ; Sun Min LIM ; Yongjun CHA ; Se Jin JANG ; Dae Young ZANG ; Tae Won KIM ; Jin Hyoung KANG ; Jee Hyun KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2022;54(1):1-9
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming essential in the fields of precision oncology. With implementation of NGS in daily clinic, the needs for continued education, facilitated interpretation of NGS results and optimal treatment delivery based on NGS results have been addressed. Molecular tumor board (MTB) is multidisciplinary approach to keep pace with the growing knowledge of complex molecular alterations in patients with advanced solid cancer. Although guidelines for NGS use and MTB have been developed in western countries, there is limitation for reflection of Korea’s public health environment and daily clinical practice. These recommendations provide a critical guidance from NGS panel testing to final treatment decision based on MTB discussion.
7.An Increasing Trend in the Number of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Korea: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study
Kyu Sung CHUNG ; Jung Hoon KIM ; Doo Hwan KONG ; InKeun PARK ; Jin Goo KIM ; Jeong Ku HA
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2022;14(2):220-226
Background:
Most epidemiologic studies of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to date have been conducted in Western populations, whereas no studies have been conducted in Asian populations. In this study, the incidence and trend of ACLR in Korea were investigated through an epidemiological big data analysis.
Methods:
The data were collected by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2008 to 2016 in Korea. Patient records with the coding of cruciate ligament reconstruction were allocated, and ACLR patients were further refined by medical diagnosis coding. The total number and incidence of ACLR procedures per 100,000 person-years were investigated and more detailed analysis was conducted according to sex and age. Furthermore, concomitant surgical procedures performed during ACLR were investigated.
Results:
The total number and incidence of ACLR procedures rose from 10,248 and 21.8 to 14,500 and 29.1 between 2008 and 2016, respectively. The incidence of ACLR procedures increased by 33.5% over this 9-year period. Over this period, the total number and incidence increased from 8,543 and 36.4 to 11,534 and 46.4, respectively, in males and from 1,705 and 7.2 to 2,966 and 11.9, respectively, in females. ACLR was performed more frequently in males than in females; however, the increase rate was higher in females than males. ACLR was performed most frequently in patients in their 20s, followed by patients in their 30s, 40s, and 10s. The most frequent concomitant procedures performed during ACLR were meniscectomy (13.6% in 2008 and 9.8% in 2016) and meniscal repair (5.8% in 2008 and 8.8% in 2016).
Conclusions
The incidence of ACLR consistently rose between 2008 and 2016 in Korea. The current study will enhance our understanding of the epidemiology of ACLR, which is needed to devise cost-effective preventive measures.
8.Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer Syndrome in Korean Patients
Ja Young SEO ; Jeong-Yeal AHN ; Bhumsuk KEAM ; Miso KIM ; Shinkyo YOON ; Jae Lyun LEE ; Kwonoh PARK ; Inkeun PARK
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2021;41(2):207-213
Background:
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome. HLRCC is characterized by the development of cutaneous leiomyomas, early-onset uterine leiomyomas, and HLRCC-associated renal cell cancer (RCC) and caused by germline fumarate hydratase (FH) deficiency. We investigated the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Korean patients with HLRCC.
Methods:
We performed direct sequencing analysis of FH in 13 patients with suspected HLRCC and their family members. A chromosomal microarray test was performed in female patients with negative sequencing results but highly suspected HLRCC. In addition, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and evaluated the genotype–phenotype correlations in Korean patients with HLRCC.
Results:
We identified six different pathogenic or likely pathogenic FH variants in six of the 13 patients (46.2%). The variants included two nonsense variants, two splicing variants, one frameshift variant, and one missense variant. Of the six variants, two (33.3%) were novel (c.132+1G > C, and c.243dup). RCC and early-onset uterine leiomyoma were frequently observed in families with HLRCC, while cutaneous leiomyoma was less common. No significant genotype–phenotype correlation was observed.
Conclusions
We describe the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum in a small series of Korean patients with HLRCC. Our data reveal the unique characteristics of Korean patients with HLRCC and suggest a need for establishing an optimal diagnostic approach for them.
9.2020 Korean guidelines for the management of metastatic prostate cancer
In-Ho KIM ; Sang Joon SHIN ; Byung Woog KANG ; Jihoon KANG ; Dalyong KIM ; Miso KIM ; Jin Young KIM ; Chan Kyu KIM ; Hee-Jun KIM ; Chi Hoon MAENG ; Kwonoh PARK ; Inkeun PARK ; Woo Kyun BAE ; Byeong Seok SOHN ; Min-Young LEE ; Jae Lyun LEE ; Junglim LEE ; Seung Taek LIM ; Joo Han LIM ; Hyun CHANG ; Joo Young JUNG ; Yoon Ji CHOI ; Young Seok KIM ; Jaeho CHO ; Jae Young JOUNG ; Se Hoon PARK ; Hyo Jin LEE
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2021;36(3):491-514
In 2017, Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) published the Korean management guideline of metastatic prostate cancer. This paper is the 2nd edition of the Korean management guideline of metastatic prostate cancer. We updated recent many changes of management in metastatic prostate cancer in this 2nd edition guideline. The present guideline consists of the three categories: management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer; management of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer; and clinical consideration for treating patients with metastatic prostate cancer. In category 1 and 2, levels of evidence (LEs) have been mentioned according to the general principles of evidence-based medicine. And grades of recommendation (GR) was taken into account the quality of evidence, the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, the values and preferences, and the use of resources and GR were divided into strong recommendations (SR) and weak recommendations (WR). A total of 16 key questions are selected. And we proposed recommendations and described key evidence for each recommendation. The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer is changing very rapid and many trials are ongoing. To verify the results of the future trials is necessary and should be applied to the treatment for metastatic prostate cancer patients in the clinical practice. Especially, many prostate cancer patients are old age, have multiple underlying medical comorbidities, clinicians should be aware of the significance of medical management as well as clinical efficacy of systemic treatment.
10.Use of Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4-5
Hyung-Don KIM ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Hyehyun JEONG ; Shin Kyo YOON ; Inkeun PARK ; Jae Lyun LEE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2021;53(4):1166-1173
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes with gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCb), the standard treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based regimens, in advanced UC patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective cohort study involving GCb-treated advanced UC patients with GFR < 60 mL/min (n=89) was performed. Clinical outcomes were compared between subgroups with GFR < 30 mL/min and GFR ≥ 30 mL/min but < 60 mL/min.
Results:
Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the two subgroups. Patients with GFR < 30 mL/min had a significantly lower objective response rate (12.5%) compared to those with higher GFR levels (56.7%) (p=0.004). The number of GCb cycles was significantly lower in patients with GFR < 30 mL/min (median 2 cycles) than in those with higher GFR levels (median 6 cycles) (p=0.002). Compared to those with GFR ≥ 30 mL/min but < 60 mL/min, patients with GFR < 30 mL/min showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001 for both). Further stratification of patient subgroups according to their GFR (i.e., GFR ≥ 45 mL/min but < 60 mL/min vs. GFR ≥ 30 mL/min but < 45 mL/min vs. GFR < 30 mL/min) revealed significantly different PFS and OS (p < 0.001 for both).
Conclusion
The use of GCb is discouraged in advanced UC patients with GFR < 30 mL/min. Alternative therapeutic approaches with better efficacy are warranted for these patients.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail