OBJECTIVETo explore the clinical efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone for treating patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODSA total of 19 MM patients were enrolled to receive the therapeutic schedule of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in our hospital from May 2013 to June 2015. Lenalidomide 25 mg was taken orally daily for 21 days and resting for 7 days, and dexamethasone 10 mg was taken orally daily on the day 1-4, 7-10 and 13-16. The regimens were Rd (lenalidomide and dexamethasone, n = 12), and RCd (lenalidomide, ifosfamide and dexamethasone, n = 7).

RESULTSAmong 19 patients received 1 cycle of treatment 3 patients achieved complete remission (CR), 3 patients achieved very good partial remission (VGPR), 10 patients achieved partial remission (PR) and 3 patients in stable disease (SD) with an overall response rate (ORR = CR + VGPR + PR) of 84%; their ORR rate was 89% after 2 cycles of treatment. In the early stage of treatment, the renal function was improved in 4 out of 5 patients with renal dysfunction. And the common adverse reactions were hematologic toxicity in 4 patients, 1 degree rash in 5 patients, and gastrointestinal side effects in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONThe lenalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen has a good anti-multiple myeloma effect, which can control the disease rapidly and overcome the multidrug resistance in MM, improving the poor prognosis with renal dysfunction, and showing high remission rate in the patients exposed to bortezomib with low toxicity.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Dexamethasone ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; therapeutic use ; Multiple Myeloma ; drug therapy ; Remission Induction ; Thalidomide ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use

Abdominal Neoplasms ; complications ; secondary ; therapy ; Acute Lung Injury ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; Anemia ; complications ; therapy ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Child, Preschool ; Etoposide ; administration & dosage ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; administration & dosage ; Kidney Neoplasms ; pathology ; Lung Neoplasms ; complications ; secondary ; therapy ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Radiography, Thoracic ; Radiotherapy ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; Transfusion Reaction ; Vascular Access Devices

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with ifosfamide (GI regimen)in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODSThe clinical data of 27 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, who received GI regimen between April 2005 and March 2014 after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed,and relevant prognostic factors were explored.

RESULTSAll patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No patient achieved complete response (CR). Partial response (PR) was achieved in ten patients, stable disease (SD) in thirteen patients, progressive disease (PD) in four patients, with a response rate of 37.0% and an overall disease control rate (PR+SD) of 85.2%. For ten PR patients, the median duration of response was 5.5 months. The median progression-free survival of the whole group was 6.7 months, and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 17.4 months. The 1-year survival rate was 72.6%. Toxicity was mainly hematological: Grade III or IV anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were found in 3.7%, 37.0% and 18.5% of all patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that dose intensity of gemcitabine was a significant prognostic factor for PFS, whereas salvage treatment after failure of GI regimen was a significant prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONSGemcitabine and ifosfamide combination is effective and well tolerated by patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Further clinical study is warranted.

Anemia ; chemically induced ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma ; Deoxycytidine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Platinum ; therapeutic use ; Remission Induction ; Salvage Therapy ; Survival Rate ; Thrombocytopenia ; chemically induced ; Treatment Failure

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced cervical carcinoma, aged > or =18 years, were treated with intravenous ifosfamide 5,000 mg/m2 and mesna 5,000 mg/m2, on day 1; intravenous paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2, on day 2; every 3 weeks for three cycles. Following chemotherapy, operable patients underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and, if necessary, adjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients with median age 53 years (range, 24 to 79 years), FIGO stage IIB in 126 (89%), were treated with chemotherapy for median 3 cycles (range, 1 to 3). Treatment was delayed or withdrawn in 23 patients (15%). One hundred thirty-nine patients (91%) underwent surgery. Postchemotherapy pathological complete response rate was 18% (25 patients). Postoperative radiotherapy was administered in 100 patients (72%). The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.5 to 90.3) and 76.4% (95% CI, 73.5 to 79.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy was feasible and effective in the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma patients with older age and more advanced disease stage than reported in previous studies. Hematological and renal toxicity could be carefully prevented.
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/*drug therapy/mortality/pathology ; Cisplatin/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Disease Progression ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Paclitaxel/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*drug therapy/mortality/pathology ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: To investigate chemosensitivity with an adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay in patients with epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer according to tumor histology, grade, and disease status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred specimens were collected during primary or secondary debulking from 67 patients with primary ovarian cancer, 24 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, 5 patients with primary peritoneal cancer, and 4 patients with recurrent peritoneal cancer; samples were collected between August 2006 and June 2009. Tumor cells were isolated and cultured for 48 hours in media containing chemotherapy. The chemosensitivity index (CI) was calculated as 300 minus the sum of the cell death rate at 0.2x, 1x, and 5x drug concentrations, and the CI values were compared. RESULTS: CI values were obtained from 93 of 100 patients. The most active agents against primary disease were ifosfamide and paclitaxel. For primary serous adenocarcinoma, paclitaxel and irinotecan were the most active, followed by ifosfamide. For clear cell carcinoma, ifosfamide was the most active, followed by paclitaxel and irinotecan. Although not statistically significant, the CIs of cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, and docetaxel decreased as tumor grade increased. In 14 cases of recurrent disease, paclitaxel was the most active, followed by ifosfamide and cisplatin. CONCLUSION: Ifosfamide and paclitaxel were the most active drugs for primary and recurrent disease. Therefore, we recommend further clinical studies to confirm the efficacy of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for recurrent and primary ovarian cancer.
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/*drug therapy/metabolism/pathology ; Adenosine Triphosphate/*metabolism ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use ; Camptothecin/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives ; Carboplatin/therapeutic use ; Cisplatin/administration & dosage ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide/administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*drug therapy ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/*drug therapy/metabolism/pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms/*drug therapy/metabolism/pathology ; Paclitaxel/therapeutic use ; Peritoneal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/metabolism/pathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Taxoids/administration & dosage

Regardless of improvement in cure of Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the results in treatment of advanced stage of RMS in children are still dismal. Recently, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HDC/APBSCT) has been tried to manage the advanced high-risk RMS patients. We investigated the effectiveness of HDC/APBSCT by reviewing the clinical records of high-risk pediatric RMS patients in single institute database. Over twenty years, 37 patients were diagnosed as RMS with high-risk at the time of first diagnosis. These patients were classified as two groups according to treatment method. The first group was HDC/APBSCT and the other was conventional multi-agent chemotherapy group. Differences of clinical results between the two groups were analyzed. The median age of patients was 5 yr, ranging from 6 months to 15 yr. The 5-yr event free survival rate (EFS) of all patients was 24.8% +/- 4.8%. HDC/APBSCT group and conventional multi-agent chemotherapy group were 41.3% +/- 17.8% and 16.7% +/- 7.6% for 5-yr EFS, respectively (P = 0.023). There was a significant difference in the result of HDC/APBSCT between complete remission or very good partial response group and poor response group (50% +/- 20.4% vs 37.5% +/- 28.6%, P = 0.018). HDC/APBSCT can be a promising treatment modality in high-risk RMS patients.
Adolescent ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use ; Carboplatin/administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Disease-Free Survival ; Etoposide/administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide/administration & dosage ; Infant ; Male ; *Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Rhabdomyosarcoma/*drug therapy/mortality/pathology ; Survival Rate ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVEAutologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) is an important method for treatment of malignant solid tumors in children. The mobilization and collection of blood stem cells is crucial for APBSCT. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mobilization and collection of blood stem cells by CIE or IEV chemotherapy protocol in APBSCT in children with neuroblastoma (NB) or rhabdomyosarcoma.

METHODSThe protocols of CIE (cisplatin, etoposide) and IEV (vincristine, dosfamide, etoposide) were used as mobilization chemotherapy in 8 cases of NB with stage IV and 3 cases of rhabdomysacoma with stage III, respectively. The results of the mobilization of blood stem cells were observed.

RESULTSOf the 11 cases, mononuclear cells (MNC) and CD34+ cells were successfully collected and the volume of MNC and CD34 averaged (5.55 ± 1.43)× 10(8)/kg and (4.88 ± 2.48) × 10(6)/kg, respectively. No severe complications were observed during the mobilization and collection. A rapid hemopoietic reconstitution was observed in 10 children after APBSCT. One with NB out of the 10 children died of left heart failure 32 days after APBSCT. Others (9 cases) showed a nearly normal result of routine peripheral blood test 60 days after APBSCT.

CONCLUSIONSCIE or IEV protocol is effective and safe for the mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in children with NB or rhabdomysacoma.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Epirubicin ; administration & dosage ; Etoposide ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; pharmacology ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; administration & dosage ; Male ; Neuroblastoma ; therapy ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation ; Recombinant Proteins ; Rhabdomyosarcoma ; therapy ; Transplantation, Autologous

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ICE regimen (iphosphamide + carboplatin + etoposide) used in treating children with hepatoblastoma in the Shanghai Children's Medical Center.

METHODSFrom June 2000 to June 2008, 14 children with newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma (7 males and 7 females) were enrolled. Their median age on diagnosis was 1.33 years (range: 0.25-8.25 years). Six patients had stage I disease, 1 had stage II, 5 had stage III, and 2 had stage IV diseases. Thirteen children had markedly increased serum AFP level, and 1 had normal serum AFP level. Multidisciplinary co-operation treatment was performed. Eight patients had primary surgery while 3 patients had pre-operation chemotherapy before surgery. ICE chemotherapy regimen was used. Totally, 73 courses of chemotherapy were administered for the 14 children and 25 out of the 73 courses were performed before operation.

RESULTSTwelve patients responded to the treatment (85.7%) and 2 failed. Ten patients (71.4%) achieved complete remission after treatment, and two had partial remission. By July 31st, 2008, 9 patients survived without any event, with a median follow-up duration of 35 months (range: 16-96 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 70.71+/-12.37%, and the 5-year event-free survival rate was 64.29+/-12.81%. One patient had disease relapse and two patients were lost to follow-up after they achieved partial remission.

CONCLUSIONSThe ICE regimen combined with operation is effective and safe in treating children with hepatoblastoma.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Carboplatin ; administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Etoposide ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Hepatoblastoma ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; administration & dosage ; Infant ; Liver Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Male

The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with etoposide and ifosfamide (ETI) in the management of heavily pretreated recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients with recurrent or persistent EOC who had measurable disease and at least two prior chemotherapy participating in this phase II trial were to receive etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m2/day intravenously (IV) on days 1 to 3 in combination with ifosfamide 1 g/m2/day IV on days 1 to 5, every 21 days. Thirty-seven patients were treated; about 78% had previously received more than two separate regimens. The response rate (RR) was 18.9% and median duration of response was 7 months (range, 1-15). Treatment free interval prior to ETI (TFI) has significant correlation with RR rate (P=0.034). Patients (n=6) with TFI > or =6 months had 50% of RR, while patients (n=31) with TFI <6 months had 12.9%. Median survival was 9 months at a median follow-up of 9.2 months. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 20.1% of the 139 cycles of ETI, anemia in 7.2% and thrombocytopenia in 8.6%. The ETI produces relatively low toxicity and modest activity in heavily pretreated recurrent or persistent EOC. This is significant in patients with TFI > or =6 months.
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use ; Etoposide/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*drug therapy ; Ovarian Neoplasms/*drug therapy/mortality ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of DNCE [DXM, navelbine (NVB), DDP and Vp-16] regimen and DICE [dexamethasone (DXM), ifosfamide (IFO), cisplatin (DDP) and etoposide (Vp-16)] regimen in the treatment of refractory or relapsed aggressive and highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODSA total of 69 patients with histopathologically proved advanced aggressive and highly aggressive NHL were randomized into trial group (32 patients treated with DNCE regimen) and control group (37 patients treated with DICE regimen). The control group was given DICE regimen: DXM 20 mg, iv d1 approximately d4; IFO 1 g/m2), iv d1 approximately d4; Mesna 400 mg, iv q8h, d1 approximately d4; DDP 25 mg/m2, iv d1 approximately d4; Vp-16 100 mg/m2, iv d1 approximately d4; one cycle for 21 approximately 28 days. The trial group was given DNCE regimen: DXM 20 mg, iv d1 approximately d4; NVB 25 mg/m2, iv d1 and d5; DDP 25 mg/m2, iv d1 approximately d4; Vp-16 100 mg/m2, iv d1 approximately d4; one cycle for 21 approximately 28 days. Each patient completed at least 2 cycles of treatment.

RESULTSA better efficacy was shown in the complete response rate, partial response rate, and total response rate between DNCE and DICE groups (18.8% vs. 10.8%, 37.5% vs. 35.1%, and 56.3% vs. 45.9%, respectively), but the differences were statistically non-significant (P > 0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were not significantly increased in DNCE group compared with that in DICE group (86.5% vs. 87.5%, 58.3% vs. 63.2%, 42.9% vs.38.5%, respectively, P > 0.05). The major side effects were leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea in both groups. The bone marrow depression in DNCE group was significantly slighter than that in the DICE group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe efficacy of DNCE regimen is as good as DICE regimen, and the bone marrow toxicity is less severe in DNCE group than that in DICE regimen. Therefore, the DNCE regimen is an effective second-line salvage regimen for the treatment of refractory or relapsed aggressive and highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Dexamethasone ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Etoposide ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Leukopenia ; chemically induced ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Remission Induction ; Salvage Therapy ; Survival Rate ; Thrombocytopenia ; chemically induced ; Vinblastine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Young Adult