Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Objective: Dysphagia is a common clinical condition characterized by difficulty in swallowing. It is sub-classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the mouth and pharynx, and esophageal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction. Dysphagia can have a significant negative impact one’s physical health and quality of life as its severity increases. Therefore, proper assessment and management of dysphagia are critical for improving swallowing function and preventing complications. Thus a guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment and management in patients with dysphagia. Methods: Nineteen key questions on dysphagia were developed. These questions dealt with various aspects of problems related to dysphagia, including assessment, management, and complications. A literature search for relevant articles was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and one domestic database of KoreaMed, until April 2021. The level of evidence and recommendation grade were established according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Results: Early screening and assessment of videofluoroscopic swallowing were recommended for assessing the presence of dysphagia. Therapeutic methods, such as tongue and pharyngeal muscle strengthening exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing therapy, were effective in improving swallowing function and quality of life in patients with dysphagia. Nutritional intervention and an oral care program were also recommended. Conclusion This guideline presents recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, including rehabilitative strategies.