BACKGROUNDBalanced adjustment of the portal vein shunt volume during a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is critical for maintaining liver perfusion and decreasing the incidence of liver insufficiency. A stent-graft is proved to be superior to a bare metal stent (BMS) for the construction of a TIPS. However, the clinical results of the combination application of stents and stent-grafts have not been determined. This study aimed to compare the technique of using a combination of stents and stent-grafts with using a single stent-graft to construct a TIPS.

METHODSFrom April 2011 to November 2014, a total of fifty patients were randomly assigned to a stents-combination group (Group I, n = 28) or a stent-graft group (Group II, n = 22). Primary patency rates were calculated. Clinical data, including the technical success rate, bleeding control results, incidence of encephalopathy, liver function preservation, and survival rate, were assessed.

RESULTSTechnically, the success rate was 100% for both groups. The primary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for Group I were 96%, 84%, and 77%, respectively; for Group II, they were 90%, 90%, and 78%, respectively. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for Group I were 79%, 74%, and 68%, respectively; for Group II, they were 82%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. The incidence of hepatic encephalopathy was 14.3% for Group I and 13.6% for Group II. The Child-Pugh score in Group I was stable at the end of the follow-up but had significantly increased in Group II (t = -2.474, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONSThe construction of a TIPS with either the single stent-graft or BMS/stent-graft combination is effective for controlling variceal bleeding. The BMS/stent-graft combination technique is superior to the stent-graft technique in terms of hepatic function preservation indicated by the Child-Pugh score. However, considering the clinical results of the TIPS, the two techniques are comparable in their primary shunt patency, incidence of encephalopathy and patient survival during the long-term follow-up.

Aged ; Female ; Hepatic Encephalopathy ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; complications ; mortality ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Portal Vein ; surgery ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; adverse effects ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This retrospective study assessed the clinical outcome of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure for managing portal hypertension in Koreans with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: Between January 2003 and July 2013, 230 patients received a TIPS in 13 university-based hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 229 (99.6%) patients who successfully underwent TIPS placement, 142 received a TIPS for variceal bleeding, 84 for refractory ascites, and 3 for other indications. The follow-up period was 24.9+/-30.2 months (mean+/-SD), 74.7% of the stents were covered, and the primary patency rate at the 1-year follow-up was 78.7%. Hemorrhage occurred in 30 (21.1%) patients during follow-up; of these, 28 (93.3%) cases of rebleeding were associated with stent dysfunction. Fifty-four (23.6%) patients developed new hepatic encephalopathy, and most of these patients were successfully managed conservatively. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months were 87.5%, 75.0%, 66.8%, and 57.5%, respectively. A high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was significantly associated with the risk of death within the first month after receiving a TIPS (P=0.018). Old age (P<0.001), indication for a TIPS (ascites vs. bleeding, P=0.005), low serum albumin (P<0.001), and high MELD score (P=0.006) were associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A high MELD score was found to be significantly associated with early and overall mortality rate in TIPS patients. Determining the appropriate indication is warranted to improve survival in these patients.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; End Stage Liver Disease/pathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemorrhage/etiology ; Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/*diagnosis/mortality/surgery ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; *Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Portal hypertension is a severe consequence of chronic liver diseases and is responsible for the main clinical complications of liver cirrhosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is the best available method to evaluate the presence and severity of portal hypertension. Clinically significant portal hypertension is defined as an increase in HVPG to >10 mmHg. In this condition, the complications of portal hypertension might begin to appear. HVPG measurement is increasingly used in the clinical fields, and the HVPG is a robust surrogate marker in many clinical applications such as diagnosis, risk stratification, identification of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for liver resection, monitoring of the efficacy of medical treatment, and assessment of progression of portal hypertension. Patients who had a reduction in HVPG of > or =20% or to < or =12 mmHg in response to drug therapy are defined as responders. Responders have a markedly decreased risk of bleeding/rebleeding, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, which results in improved survival. This review provides clinical use of HVPG measurement in the field of liver disease.
Chronic Disease ; Hemodynamics ; Hemorrhage/etiology ; Hepatic Veins/physiology ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/complications ; Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis ; Liver Diseases/complications/*physiopathology ; Portal Pressure

Enbucrilate ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary ; drug therapy ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Embolism ; chemically induced ; diagnosis ; Sepsis ; chemically induced ; etiology

Previous studies reported that oxaliplatin is associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. However few reports on oxaliplatin induced liver fibrosis are found in the literature. Furthermore pathogenesis of liver fibrosis is not well known. We report a case of 45-yr-old Korean man in whom liver fibrosis with splenomegaly developed after 12 cycles of oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (T4N2M0). Thorough history taking and serological examination revealed no evidence of chronic liver disease. Restaging CT scans demonstrated a good response to chemotherapy. Five month after chemotherapy, he underwent right hepatectomy due to isolated metastatic lesion. The liver parenchyma showed diffuse sinusoidal dilatation and centrilobular vein fibrosis with necrosis without steatosis. We could conclude that splenomegaly was due to perisinusoidal liver fibrosis and liver cell necrosis induced portal hypertension by oxaliplatin. In addition, to investigate the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis, immunohistochemical stains such as CD31 and alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) were conducted with control group. The immunohistochemical stains for CD31 and alpha-SMA were positive along the sinusoidal space in the patient, while negative in the control group. Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin induces liver fibrosis which should be kept in mind as a serious complication.
Actins/metabolism ; Antigens, CD31/metabolism ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use ; Camptothecin/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Colonic Neoplasms/*drug therapy ; Fluorouracil/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/etiology ; Immunohistochemistry ; Leucovorin/therapeutic use ; Liver Cirrhosis/*diagnosis/etiology/pathology ; Liver Neoplasms/secondary/surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organoplatinum Compounds/*administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Splenomegaly/*diagnosis/etiology ; Thrombocytopenia/etiology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is a term used to define the endoscopic findings of gastric mucosa with a characteristic mosaic-like pattern with or without red spots, and a common finding in patients with portal hypertension. These endoscopic findings correspond to dilated mucosal capillaries without inflammation. The pathogenesis of PHG in not well known, but portal hypertension and some humoral factors seem to be crucial factors for its development. Pharmacological (e.g. propranolol), or interventional radiological (such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) procedures may be useful in preventing re-bleeding from PHG. The classic features of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) syndrome include red, often haemorrhagic lesions predominantly located in the gastric antrum which can result in significant blood loss. Although the pathogenesis of GAVE is not clearly defined, it seems to be a separate disease entity from PHG, because GAVE generally does not respond to a reduction of portal pressures. Endoscopic ablation (such as argon plasma coagulation) is the first-line treatment of choice. This review will focus on the incidence, clinical importance, etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of PHG and GAVE syndrome in the setting of portal hypertension.
Esophageal and Gastric Varices/*diagnosis/etiology/therapy ; Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia/*diagnosis/etiology/therapy ; Gastric Mucosa/metabolism/pathology ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/*complications ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic ; Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use

Ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and variceal hemorrhage are three major complications of portal hypertension. The diagnostic evaluation of ascites involves an assessment of its etiology by determining the serum-ascites albumin gradient and the exclusion of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Ascites is primarily related to an inability to excrete an adequate amount of sodium into urine, leading to a positive sodium balance. Sodium restriction and diuretic therapy are keys of ascites control. But, with the case of refractory ascites, large volume paracentesis and transjugular portosystemic shunts are required. In hepatorenal syndrome, splanchnic vasodilatation with reduction in effective arterial volume causes intense renal vasoconstriction. Splanchnic and/or peripheral vasoconstrictors with albumin infusion, and renal replacement therapy are only bridging therapy. Liver transplantation is the only definitive modality of improving the long term prognosis.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Ascites/complications/*diagnosis/therapy ; Bacterial Infections/*diagnosis ; Hepatic Encephalopathy/complications ; Hepatorenal Syndrome/complications/*diagnosis/therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/*complications ; Liver Transplantation ; Peritonitis/*diagnosis/drug therapy/etiology ; Serum Albumin/administration & dosage

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the predictive value of portal vein flow rate preoperative for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after periesophagastric devascularization in hepatitis B cirrhosis-related portal hypertension.

METHODSFrom January 2007 to July 2008, 45 patients with portal hypertension caused by hepatitis B cirrhosis were performed splenectomy with peri-esophagogastric devascularization in the same medical group in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The portal vein flow rate and the diameter of portal vein were measured with doppler sonography respectively before and after the operation. At the same time, the level of PT and PLT were detected. The weight of spleens were measured after operation.

RESULTSThirteen cases suffered from PVT postoperatively. Portal vein flow rate was significantly lower in patients with PVT postoperation than that in patients without PVT (P < 0.01). In patients with PVT (n = 13) postoperation, the preoperative portal vein flow rate was (19.5 +/- 5.3) cm/s. Among the 13 cases, there were 12 cases whose flow rate were lower than 25 cm/s, and 1 case whose flow rate was 32. 3 cm/s; In patients without PVT (n = 32), the preoperative portal vein flow rate was (9.6 +/- 8.0) cm/s. In patients with lower rate (n = 17), the incidence rate of PVT was 70.6%; in patients with higher rate (n = 28), the incidence rate of PVT was 3.6%. The incidence rate of PVT in patients with lower rate was significantly lower than patients with higher rate (P < 0.01). The diameter of portal vein in patients with PVT was significantly wider than patients without PVT. The diameter of portal vein was negative correlative with the portal vein flow rate. The value 25 cm/s was of diagnostic efficiency, the sensitivity was 92.3%, and specificity was 70.6%.

CONCLUSIONSThe portal vein flow rate preoperative can be used as an early predictor of portal vein thrombosis after periesophagastric devascularization in hepatitis B cirrhosis-related portal hypertension to give a guide to clinical work.

Adult ; Aged ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; etiology ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Portal Vein ; diagnostic imaging ; physiopathology ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Preoperative Care ; Risk Factors ; Splenectomy ; Ultrasonography ; Venous Thrombosis ; diagnosis ; etiology

Animals ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Disease Models, Animal ; Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Gastric Mucosa ; pathology ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; pathology ; therapy ; Gastroscopy ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; complications ; epidemiology ; pathology ; Intestinal Mucosa ; pathology ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; pathology ; Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental ; complications ; pathology ; Rats ; Stomach Diseases ; epidemiology ; etiology ; pathology ; therapy

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Antiviral Agents ; therapeutic use ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; diagnosis ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Gastroscopy ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic ; methods ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Hemostatics ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; complications ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications