Purpose: This study aimed to examine changes in nurse staffing grades and nursing fee revenues in intensive care units (ICUs) following the third amendment of the resource-based relative value scale, which was implemented in January 2024. Methods: Changes in staffing grades from the fourth quarter of 2023 to the first quarter of 2024 were analyzed among 588 general ICUs, 94 neonatal ICUs, and 13 pediatric ICUs. Annual nursing fee revenues per nurse were estimated based on the new nursing fee structure for each grade. Results: In general ICUs, the highest grade (grade S) and the second-highest grade (grade A) accounted for 7.3% and 41.5%, respectively, in tertiary hospitals, whereas 3.8% were grade S and 11.5% were grade A in general hospitals. In neonatal ICUs, the proportion of higher grades (S, A, and 1) was greater in general hospitals (54.3%) than in tertiary hospitals (38.6%). In pediatric ICUs, 30.8% were grade S and 61.5% were grade A. When applying the same grading criteria (i.e., beds per nurse) across both quarters, staffing levels remained unchanged in most ICUs. Nursing fees and their revenues did not increase proportionally to staffing requirements (i.e., the number of nurses required per patient). Conclusion Revisions to staffing grade and nursing fee systems are necessary to induce medical institutions to improve their ICU staffing levels.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine changes in nurse staffing grades and nursing fee revenues in intensive care units (ICUs) following the third amendment of the resource-based relative value scale, which was implemented in January 2024. Methods: Changes in staffing grades from the fourth quarter of 2023 to the first quarter of 2024 were analyzed among 588 general ICUs, 94 neonatal ICUs, and 13 pediatric ICUs. Annual nursing fee revenues per nurse were estimated based on the new nursing fee structure for each grade. Results: In general ICUs, the highest grade (grade S) and the second-highest grade (grade A) accounted for 7.3% and 41.5%, respectively, in tertiary hospitals, whereas 3.8% were grade S and 11.5% were grade A in general hospitals. In neonatal ICUs, the proportion of higher grades (S, A, and 1) was greater in general hospitals (54.3%) than in tertiary hospitals (38.6%). In pediatric ICUs, 30.8% were grade S and 61.5% were grade A. When applying the same grading criteria (i.e., beds per nurse) across both quarters, staffing levels remained unchanged in most ICUs. Nursing fees and their revenues did not increase proportionally to staffing requirements (i.e., the number of nurses required per patient). Conclusion Revisions to staffing grade and nursing fee systems are necessary to induce medical institutions to improve their ICU staffing levels.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine changes in nurse staffing grades and nursing fee revenues in intensive care units (ICUs) following the third amendment of the resource-based relative value scale, which was implemented in January 2024. Methods: Changes in staffing grades from the fourth quarter of 2023 to the first quarter of 2024 were analyzed among 588 general ICUs, 94 neonatal ICUs, and 13 pediatric ICUs. Annual nursing fee revenues per nurse were estimated based on the new nursing fee structure for each grade. Results: In general ICUs, the highest grade (grade S) and the second-highest grade (grade A) accounted for 7.3% and 41.5%, respectively, in tertiary hospitals, whereas 3.8% were grade S and 11.5% were grade A in general hospitals. In neonatal ICUs, the proportion of higher grades (S, A, and 1) was greater in general hospitals (54.3%) than in tertiary hospitals (38.6%). In pediatric ICUs, 30.8% were grade S and 61.5% were grade A. When applying the same grading criteria (i.e., beds per nurse) across both quarters, staffing levels remained unchanged in most ICUs. Nursing fees and their revenues did not increase proportionally to staffing requirements (i.e., the number of nurses required per patient). Conclusion Revisions to staffing grade and nursing fee systems are necessary to induce medical institutions to improve their ICU staffing levels.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine changes in nurse staffing grades and nursing fee revenues in intensive care units (ICUs) following the third amendment of the resource-based relative value scale, which was implemented in January 2024. Methods: Changes in staffing grades from the fourth quarter of 2023 to the first quarter of 2024 were analyzed among 588 general ICUs, 94 neonatal ICUs, and 13 pediatric ICUs. Annual nursing fee revenues per nurse were estimated based on the new nursing fee structure for each grade. Results: In general ICUs, the highest grade (grade S) and the second-highest grade (grade A) accounted for 7.3% and 41.5%, respectively, in tertiary hospitals, whereas 3.8% were grade S and 11.5% were grade A in general hospitals. In neonatal ICUs, the proportion of higher grades (S, A, and 1) was greater in general hospitals (54.3%) than in tertiary hospitals (38.6%). In pediatric ICUs, 30.8% were grade S and 61.5% were grade A. When applying the same grading criteria (i.e., beds per nurse) across both quarters, staffing levels remained unchanged in most ICUs. Nursing fees and their revenues did not increase proportionally to staffing requirements (i.e., the number of nurses required per patient). Conclusion Revisions to staffing grade and nursing fee systems are necessary to induce medical institutions to improve their ICU staffing levels.

Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Purpose: Notable effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–low advanced breast cancer (BC) has focused pathologists’ attention. We studied the incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low BC, and the effects of immunohistochemistry (IHC) associated factors on HER2 IHC results. Materials and Methods: The Breast Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists conducted a nationwide study using real-world data on HER2 status generated between January 2022 and December 2022. Information on HER2 IHC protocols at each participating institution was also collected. Results: Total 11,416 patients from 25 institutions included in this study. Of these patients, 40.7% (range, 6.0% to 76.3%) were classified as HER2-zero, 41.7% (range, 10.5% to 69.1%) as HER2-low, and 17.5% (range, 6.7% to 34.0%) as HER2-positive. HER2-low tumors were associated with positive estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor statuses (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Antigen retrieval times (≥ 36 minutes vs. < 36 minutes) and antibody incubation times (≥ 12 minutes vs. < 12 minutes) affected on the frequency of HER2 IHC 1+ BC at institutions using the PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) IHC assay and BenchMark XT or Ultra staining instruments. Furthermore, discordant results between core needle biopsy and subsequent resection specimen HER2 statuses were observed in 24.1% (787/3,259) of the patients. Conclusion The overall incidence of HER2-low BC in South Korea concurs with those reported in previously published studies. Significant inter-institutional differences in HER2 IHC protocols were observed, and it may have impact on HER2-low status. Thus, we recommend standardizing HER2 IHC conditions to ensure precise patient selection for targeted therapy.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and procedural characteristics of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous transthoracic pleural forceps biopsy (PTPFB) in patients with exudative pleural effusion. Materials and Methods: Patients with exudative pleural effusion who underwent PTPFB between May 1, 2014, and February 28, 2023, were included in this retrospective study. The interval between percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) and PTPFB, number of biopsies, procedural time, and procedure-related complications were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosing malignancy were computed for pleural cytology using PCD drainage, PTPFB, and combined PTPFB and pleural cytology. Results: Seventy-one patients, comprising 50 male and 21 female (mean age, 69.5 ± 15.3 years), were included in this study.The final diagnoses were benign lesions in 48 patients (67.6%) and malignant in 23 patients (32.4%). The overall interval between PCD and biopsy was 2.4 ± 3.7 days. The interval between PCD and biopsy in the group that underwent delayed PTPFB was 5.2 ± 3.9 days. The mean number of biopsies was 4.5 ± 1.3. The mean procedural time was 4.4 ± 2.1 minutes. Minor bleeding complications were reported in one patient (1.4%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for pleural cytology, PTPFB, and combined PTPFB and pleural cytology were 47.8% (11/23), 100% (48/48), and 83.1% (59/71), respectively;65.2% (15/23), 100% (48/48), and 88.7% (63/71), respectively; and 78.3% (18/23), 100% (48/48), and 93.0% (66/71), respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of cytology combined with PTPFB were significantly higher than those of cytological testing alone (P = 0.008 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Fluoroscopy-guided PTPFB is an accurate and safe diagnostic technique for patients with exudative pleural effusion, with acceptable diagnostic performance, low complication rates, and reasonable procedural times.