Objective: In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM). Methods: An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM. Results: The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32). Conclusion This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.

Schwann cells are the most abundant cells in the peripheral nervous system, maintaining the development, function and regeneration of peripheral nerves. Defects in these Schwann cells injury response potentially contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus. The protein p66shc is essential in regulating oxidative stress responses, autophagy induction and cell survival, and is also vital in the development of DPN. In this study, we hypothesized that p66shc mediates high glucose-induced oxidative stress and autophagic dysfunction. In Schwann cells treated with high glucose; p66shc expression, levels of reactive oxygen species, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis were elevated. Inhibition of p66shc gene expression by siRNA reversed high glucose-induced oxidative stress, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis. We also demonstrated that the levels of p66shc was increased, while autophagy-related proteins p62 and LC3 (LC3-II/I) were suppressed in the sciatic nerve of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mice. P66shc-deficient mice exhibited the improvement in autophagy impairment after diabetes onset. Our findings suggest that the p66 plays a crucial role in Schwann cell dysfunction, identifying its potential as a therapeutic target.

Objective: In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM). Methods: An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM. Results: The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32). Conclusion This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.

Schwann cells are the most abundant cells in the peripheral nervous system, maintaining the development, function and regeneration of peripheral nerves. Defects in these Schwann cells injury response potentially contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus. The protein p66shc is essential in regulating oxidative stress responses, autophagy induction and cell survival, and is also vital in the development of DPN. In this study, we hypothesized that p66shc mediates high glucose-induced oxidative stress and autophagic dysfunction. In Schwann cells treated with high glucose; p66shc expression, levels of reactive oxygen species, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis were elevated. Inhibition of p66shc gene expression by siRNA reversed high glucose-induced oxidative stress, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis. We also demonstrated that the levels of p66shc was increased, while autophagy-related proteins p62 and LC3 (LC3-II/I) were suppressed in the sciatic nerve of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mice. P66shc-deficient mice exhibited the improvement in autophagy impairment after diabetes onset. Our findings suggest that the p66 plays a crucial role in Schwann cell dysfunction, identifying its potential as a therapeutic target.

Objective: In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM). Methods: An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM. Results: The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32). Conclusion This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.

Schwann cells are the most abundant cells in the peripheral nervous system, maintaining the development, function and regeneration of peripheral nerves. Defects in these Schwann cells injury response potentially contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus. The protein p66shc is essential in regulating oxidative stress responses, autophagy induction and cell survival, and is also vital in the development of DPN. In this study, we hypothesized that p66shc mediates high glucose-induced oxidative stress and autophagic dysfunction. In Schwann cells treated with high glucose; p66shc expression, levels of reactive oxygen species, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis were elevated. Inhibition of p66shc gene expression by siRNA reversed high glucose-induced oxidative stress, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis. We also demonstrated that the levels of p66shc was increased, while autophagy-related proteins p62 and LC3 (LC3-II/I) were suppressed in the sciatic nerve of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mice. P66shc-deficient mice exhibited the improvement in autophagy impairment after diabetes onset. Our findings suggest that the p66 plays a crucial role in Schwann cell dysfunction, identifying its potential as a therapeutic target.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Objective: In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM). Methods: An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM. Results: The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32). Conclusion This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.

Schwann cells are the most abundant cells in the peripheral nervous system, maintaining the development, function and regeneration of peripheral nerves. Defects in these Schwann cells injury response potentially contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus. The protein p66shc is essential in regulating oxidative stress responses, autophagy induction and cell survival, and is also vital in the development of DPN. In this study, we hypothesized that p66shc mediates high glucose-induced oxidative stress and autophagic dysfunction. In Schwann cells treated with high glucose; p66shc expression, levels of reactive oxygen species, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis were elevated. Inhibition of p66shc gene expression by siRNA reversed high glucose-induced oxidative stress, autophagy impairment, and early apoptosis. We also demonstrated that the levels of p66shc was increased, while autophagy-related proteins p62 and LC3 (LC3-II/I) were suppressed in the sciatic nerve of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mice. P66shc-deficient mice exhibited the improvement in autophagy impairment after diabetes onset. Our findings suggest that the p66 plays a crucial role in Schwann cell dysfunction, identifying its potential as a therapeutic target.