Background: Laryngotracheal invasion occurs in a subset of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to analyze patterns and predictors/outcomes related to this high-risk manifestation. Methods: This population-based analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (2000 to 2015) to identify WDTC patients. Temporal trends and geographic variation in invasion rates were assessed. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were employed to identify predictors of secondary malignancy, mortality, and treatment impact on overall and thyroid cancer (TC)-specific survival. Results: Of 131,721 WDTC patients, 1,662 (1.3%) had tracheal invasion and 976 (0.7%) had laryngeal invasion at diagnosis. Tracheal and laryngeal invasion rates declined from 3.7%–0.7% and 1.5%–0.6%, respectively, from 2000 to 2015. Compared to 98,835 noninvasive cases, patients with laryngotracheal invasion were older and more often male, Asian, and Hispanic (all P<0.001). This group had larger tumors with higher rates of nodal (N1: 61.8% vs. 15.1%) and distant metastases (M1: 9.3% vs. 0.4%). Age ≥55 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; P=0.004) and metastases (HR, 1.75; P<0.001) increased TC-specific mortality, whereas the converse pattern was found for Asian race (HR, 0.63; P=0.002) and surgery (HR, 0.35; P<0.001). In rigorously matched groups to control confounding, adding radioactive iodine to surgery reduced mortality by 30% (P<0.001). However, external beam radiation and systemic therapy did not improve survival over surgery alone. Conclusion Laryngotracheal invasion is present in 0.7% to 1.3% of cases, conferring over double the mortality risk. Radioactive iodine with surgery improves outcomes in this aggressive WDTC subset.

Background: Laryngotracheal invasion occurs in a subset of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to analyze patterns and predictors/outcomes related to this high-risk manifestation. Methods: This population-based analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (2000 to 2015) to identify WDTC patients. Temporal trends and geographic variation in invasion rates were assessed. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were employed to identify predictors of secondary malignancy, mortality, and treatment impact on overall and thyroid cancer (TC)-specific survival. Results: Of 131,721 WDTC patients, 1,662 (1.3%) had tracheal invasion and 976 (0.7%) had laryngeal invasion at diagnosis. Tracheal and laryngeal invasion rates declined from 3.7%–0.7% and 1.5%–0.6%, respectively, from 2000 to 2015. Compared to 98,835 noninvasive cases, patients with laryngotracheal invasion were older and more often male, Asian, and Hispanic (all P<0.001). This group had larger tumors with higher rates of nodal (N1: 61.8% vs. 15.1%) and distant metastases (M1: 9.3% vs. 0.4%). Age ≥55 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; P=0.004) and metastases (HR, 1.75; P<0.001) increased TC-specific mortality, whereas the converse pattern was found for Asian race (HR, 0.63; P=0.002) and surgery (HR, 0.35; P<0.001). In rigorously matched groups to control confounding, adding radioactive iodine to surgery reduced mortality by 30% (P<0.001). However, external beam radiation and systemic therapy did not improve survival over surgery alone. Conclusion Laryngotracheal invasion is present in 0.7% to 1.3% of cases, conferring over double the mortality risk. Radioactive iodine with surgery improves outcomes in this aggressive WDTC subset.

Background: Laryngotracheal invasion occurs in a subset of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to analyze patterns and predictors/outcomes related to this high-risk manifestation. Methods: This population-based analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (2000 to 2015) to identify WDTC patients. Temporal trends and geographic variation in invasion rates were assessed. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were employed to identify predictors of secondary malignancy, mortality, and treatment impact on overall and thyroid cancer (TC)-specific survival. Results: Of 131,721 WDTC patients, 1,662 (1.3%) had tracheal invasion and 976 (0.7%) had laryngeal invasion at diagnosis. Tracheal and laryngeal invasion rates declined from 3.7%–0.7% and 1.5%–0.6%, respectively, from 2000 to 2015. Compared to 98,835 noninvasive cases, patients with laryngotracheal invasion were older and more often male, Asian, and Hispanic (all P<0.001). This group had larger tumors with higher rates of nodal (N1: 61.8% vs. 15.1%) and distant metastases (M1: 9.3% vs. 0.4%). Age ≥55 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; P=0.004) and metastases (HR, 1.75; P<0.001) increased TC-specific mortality, whereas the converse pattern was found for Asian race (HR, 0.63; P=0.002) and surgery (HR, 0.35; P<0.001). In rigorously matched groups to control confounding, adding radioactive iodine to surgery reduced mortality by 30% (P<0.001). However, external beam radiation and systemic therapy did not improve survival over surgery alone. Conclusion Laryngotracheal invasion is present in 0.7% to 1.3% of cases, conferring over double the mortality risk. Radioactive iodine with surgery improves outcomes in this aggressive WDTC subset.

Background: Laryngotracheal invasion occurs in a subset of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to analyze patterns and predictors/outcomes related to this high-risk manifestation. Methods: This population-based analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (2000 to 2015) to identify WDTC patients. Temporal trends and geographic variation in invasion rates were assessed. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were employed to identify predictors of secondary malignancy, mortality, and treatment impact on overall and thyroid cancer (TC)-specific survival. Results: Of 131,721 WDTC patients, 1,662 (1.3%) had tracheal invasion and 976 (0.7%) had laryngeal invasion at diagnosis. Tracheal and laryngeal invasion rates declined from 3.7%–0.7% and 1.5%–0.6%, respectively, from 2000 to 2015. Compared to 98,835 noninvasive cases, patients with laryngotracheal invasion were older and more often male, Asian, and Hispanic (all P<0.001). This group had larger tumors with higher rates of nodal (N1: 61.8% vs. 15.1%) and distant metastases (M1: 9.3% vs. 0.4%). Age ≥55 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; P=0.004) and metastases (HR, 1.75; P<0.001) increased TC-specific mortality, whereas the converse pattern was found for Asian race (HR, 0.63; P=0.002) and surgery (HR, 0.35; P<0.001). In rigorously matched groups to control confounding, adding radioactive iodine to surgery reduced mortality by 30% (P<0.001). However, external beam radiation and systemic therapy did not improve survival over surgery alone. Conclusion Laryngotracheal invasion is present in 0.7% to 1.3% of cases, conferring over double the mortality risk. Radioactive iodine with surgery improves outcomes in this aggressive WDTC subset.

Purpose: Varicoceles can be a source of elevated seminal oxidative stress (OS) and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). However, it remains unclear whether varicocele repair (VR) could reduce these parameters. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aims to investigate the impact of VR on SDF and seminal malondialdehyde (MDA). Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases. This SRMA included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting the pre- and postoperative levels of SDF and seminal OS in infertile men with clinical varicocele that underwent VR. Subgroup analyses included techniques of VR and SDF testing. The effect size was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD). Results: Out of 1,632 abstracts assessed for eligibility, 29 studies with 1,491 infertile men were included. The analysis showed a significant reduction in SDF after VR, compared to preoperative values (SMD −1.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.410, −0.840; p<0.0001) with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2=90.965%). Reduction in SDF was evident with microsurgical technique and non-microsurgical inguinal approaches (SMD −1.014, 95% CI −1.263, −0.765; p<0.0001, and SMD −1.495, 95% CI −2.116, −0.873; p<0.0001), respectively. Reduction in SDF was significant irrespective of testing was done by sperm chromatin dispersion (SMD −2.197, 95% CI −3.187, −1.207; p<0.0001), sperm chromatin structure assay (SMD −0.857, 95% CI −1.156, −0.559; p<0.0001) or TUNEL (SMD −1.599, 95% CI −2.478, −0.719; p<0.0001). A significant decrease in seminal MDA levels was observed following VR (SMD −2.450, 95% CI −3.903 to −0.997, p=0.001) with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2=93.7%). Conclusions Using pre- and post-intervention data, this SRMA indicates a significant reduction in SDF and seminal MDA levels in infertile men with clinical varicocele treated with VR. These findings may have important implications for the future management of this selected group of infertile patients.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has gained a lot of momentum in the last decades and has been applied to various fields of medicine. Advances in computer science, medical informatics, robotics, and the need for personalized medicine have facilitated the role of AI in modern healthcare. Similarly, as in other fields, AI applications, such as machine learning, artificial neural networks, and deep learning, have shown great potential in andrology and reproductive medicine. AI-based tools are poised to become valuable assets with abilities to support and aid in diagnosing and treating male infertility, and in improving the accuracy of patient care. These automated, AI-based predictions may offer consistency and efficiency in terms of time and cost in infertility research and clinical management. In andrology and reproductive medicine, AI has been used for objective sperm, oocyte, and embryo selection, prediction of surgical outcomes, cost-effective assessment, development of robotic surgery, and clinical decision-making systems. In the future, better integration and implementation of AI into medicine will undoubtedly lead to pioneering evidence-based breakthroughs and the reshaping of andrology and reproductive medicine.

There have been many significant scientific advances in the diagnostics and treatment modalities in the field of male infertility in recent decades. Examples of these include assisted reproductive technologies, sperm selection techniques for intracytoplasmic sperm injection, surgical procedures for sperm retrieval, and novel tests of sperm function. However, there is certainly a need for new developments in this field. In this review, we discuss advances in the management of male infertility, such as seminal oxidative stress testing, sperm DNA fragmentation testing, genetic and epigenetic tests, genetic manipulations, artificial intelligence, personalized medicine, and telemedicine. The role of the reproductive urologist will continue to expand in future years to address different topzics related to diverse questions and controversies of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy of male infertility, training researchers and physicians in medical and scientific research in reproductive urology/ andrology, and further development of andrology as an independent specialty.

Purpose: Despite the significant role of varicocele in the pathogenesis of male infertility, the impact of varicocele repair (VR) on conventional semen parameters remains controversial. Only a few systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) have evaluated the impact of VR on sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility, mostly using a before-after analytic approach. No SRMA to date has evaluated the change in conventional semen parameters after VR compared to untreated controls. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of VR on conventional semen parameters in infertile patients with clinical varicocele compared to untreated controls. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICOS) model (Population: infertile patients with clinical varicocele; Intervention: VR [any technique]; Comparison: infertile patients with clinical varicocele that were untreated; Outcome: sperm concentration, sperm total count, progressive sperm motility, total sperm motility, sperm morphology, and semen volume; Study type: randomized controlled trials and observational studies). Results: A total of 1,632 abstracts were initially assessed for eligibility. Sixteen studies were finally included with a total of 2,420 infertile men with clinical varicocele (1,424 patients treated with VR vs. 996 untreated controls). The analysis showed significantly improved post-operative semen parameters in patients compared to controls with regards to sperm concentration (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.739; 95% CI 1.129 to 2.349; p<0.001; I2=97.6%), total sperm count (SMD 1.894; 95% CI 0.566 to 3.222; p<0.05; I2=97.8%), progressive sperm motility (SMD 3.301; 95% CI 2.164 to 4.437; p<0.01; I2=98.5%), total sperm motility (SMD 0.887; 95% CI 0.036 to 1.738; p=0.04; I2=97.3%) and normal sperm morphology (SMD 1.673; 95% CI 0.876 to 2.470; p<0.05; I2=98.5%). All the outcomes showed a high inter-study heterogeneity, but the sensitivity analysis showed that no study was sensitive enough to change these results. Publication bias was present only in the analysis of the sperm concentration and progressive motility. No significant difference was found for the semen volume (SMD 0.313; 95% CI -0.242 to 0.868; I2=89.7%). Conclusions This study provides a high level of evidence in favor of a positive effect of VR to improve conventional semen parameters in infertile men with clinical varicocele. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first SRMA to compare changes in conventional semen parameters after VR with changes in parameters of a control group over the same period. This is in contrast to other SRMAs which have compared semen parameters before and after VR, without reference to a control group. Our findings strengthen the available evidence and have a potential to upgrade professional societies’ practice recommendations favoring VR to improve conventional semen parameters in infertile men.

Infertility affects nearly 186 million people worldwide and the male partner is the cause in about half of the cases. Meta-regression data indicate an unexplained decline in sperm concentration and total sperm count over the last four decades, with an increasing prevalence of male infertility. This suggests an urgent need to implement further basic and clinical research in Andrology. Andrology developed as a branch of urology, gynecology, endocrinology, and, dermatology. The first scientific journal devoted to andrological sciences was founded in 1969. Since then, despite great advancements, andrology has encountered several obstacles in its growth. In fact, for cultural reasons, the male partner has often been neglected in the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of the infertile couple. Furthermore, the development of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has driven a strong impression that this biotechnology can overcome all forms of infertility, with a common belief that having a spermatozoon from a male partner (a sort of sperm donor) is all that is needed to achieve pregnancy. However, clinical practice has shown that the quality of the male gamete is important for a successful ART outcome. Furthermore, the safety of ART has been questioned because of the high prevalence of comorbidities in the offspring of ART conceptions compared to spontaneous conceptions. These issues have paved the way for more research and a greater understanding of the mechanisms of spermatogenesis and male infertility. Consequently, numerous discoveries have been made in the field of andrology, ranging from genetics to several “omics” technologies, oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation, the sixth edition of the WHO manual, artificial intelligence, management of azoospermia, fertility in cancers survivors, artificial testis, 3D printing, gene engineering, stem cells therapy for spermatogenesis, and reconstructive microsurgery and seminal microbiome. Nevertheless, as many cases of male infertility remain idiopathic, further studies are required to improve the clinical management of infertile males. A multidisciplinary strategy involving both clinicians and scientists in basic, translational, and clinical research is the core principle that will allow andrology to overcome its limits and reach further goals. This state-of-the-art article aims to present a historical review of andrology, and, particularly, male infertility, from its “Middle Ages” to its “Renaissance”, a golden age of andrology.

Purpose: Varicocele is a common problem among infertile men. Varicocele repair (VR) is frequently performed to improve semen parameters and the chances of pregnancy. However, there is a lack of consensus about the diagnosis, indications for VR and its outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore global practice patterns on the management of varicocele in the context of male infertility. Materials and Methods: Sixty practicing urologists/andrologists from 23 countries contributed 382 multiple-choice-questions pertaining to varicocele management. These were condensed into an online questionnaire that was forwarded to clinicians involved in male infertility management through direct invitation. The results were analyzed for disagreement and agreement in practice patterns and, compared with the latest guidelines of international professional societies (American Urological Association [AUA], American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM], and European Association of Urology [EAU]), and with evidence emerging from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Additionally, an expert opinion on each topic was provided based on the consensus of 16 experts in the field. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 574 clinicians from 59 countries. The majority of respondents were urologists/ uro-andrologists. A wide diversity of opinion was seen in every aspect of varicocele diagnosis, indications for repair, choice of technique, management of sub-clinical varicocele and the role of VR in azoospermia. A significant proportion of the responses were at odds with the recommendations of AUA, ASRM, and EAU. A large number of clinical situations were identified where no guidelines are available. Conclusions This study is the largest global survey performed to date on the clinical management of varicocele for male infertility. It demonstrates: 1) a wide disagreement in the approach to varicocele management, 2) large gaps in the clinical practice guidelines from professional societies, and 3) the need for further studies on several aspects of varicocele management in infertile men.