In the context of a global shortage of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, we assessed the impact of discontinuing dulaglutide on metabolic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our analysis included data from 69 individuals and revealed a significant deterioration in glycemic control following the discontinuation. Specifically, the average hemoglobin A1c level increased from 7.0%±0.9% to 8.1%±1.4% (P<0.001), and fasting glucose levels rose from 129±31 to 156±50 mg/dL (P<0.001) within 3 months after stopping the medication. Alternative treatments such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter- 2 inhibitors were insufficient substitutes, highlighting the essential role of continuous GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in maintaining metabolic health.

In the context of a global shortage of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, we assessed the impact of discontinuing dulaglutide on metabolic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our analysis included data from 69 individuals and revealed a significant deterioration in glycemic control following the discontinuation. Specifically, the average hemoglobin A1c level increased from 7.0%±0.9% to 8.1%±1.4% (P<0.001), and fasting glucose levels rose from 129±31 to 156±50 mg/dL (P<0.001) within 3 months after stopping the medication. Alternative treatments such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter- 2 inhibitors were insufficient substitutes, highlighting the essential role of continuous GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in maintaining metabolic health.

In the context of a global shortage of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, we assessed the impact of discontinuing dulaglutide on metabolic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our analysis included data from 69 individuals and revealed a significant deterioration in glycemic control following the discontinuation. Specifically, the average hemoglobin A1c level increased from 7.0%±0.9% to 8.1%±1.4% (P<0.001), and fasting glucose levels rose from 129±31 to 156±50 mg/dL (P<0.001) within 3 months after stopping the medication. Alternative treatments such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter- 2 inhibitors were insufficient substitutes, highlighting the essential role of continuous GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in maintaining metabolic health.

In the context of a global shortage of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, we assessed the impact of discontinuing dulaglutide on metabolic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our analysis included data from 69 individuals and revealed a significant deterioration in glycemic control following the discontinuation. Specifically, the average hemoglobin A1c level increased from 7.0%±0.9% to 8.1%±1.4% (P<0.001), and fasting glucose levels rose from 129±31 to 156±50 mg/dL (P<0.001) within 3 months after stopping the medication. Alternative treatments such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter- 2 inhibitors were insufficient substitutes, highlighting the essential role of continuous GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in maintaining metabolic health.

Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors are frequently prescribed for patients with type 2 diabetes; however, their cost can pose a significant barrier for those with impaired kidney function. This study aimed to estimate the economic benefits of substituting non-renal dose-adjusted (NRDA) DPP4 inhibitors with renal dose-adjusted (RDA) DPP4 inhibitors in patients with both impaired kidney function and type 2 diabetes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018, using data obtained from common data models of five medical centers in Korea. Model 1 applied the prescription pattern of participants with preserved kidney function to those with impaired kidney function. In contrast, model 2 replaced all NRDA DPP4 inhibitors with RDA DPP4 inhibitors, adjusting the doses of RDA DPP4 inhibitors based on individual kidney function. The primary outcome was the cost difference between the two models. Results: In total, 67,964,996 prescription records were analyzed. NRDA DPP4 inhibitors were more frequently prescribed to patients with impaired kidney function than in those with preserved kidney function (25.7%, 51.3%, 64.3%, and 71.6% in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates [eGFRs] of ≥60, <60, <45, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively). When model 1 was applied, the cost savings per year were 7.6% for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 30.4% for eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. According to model 2, 15.4% to 51.2% per year could be saved depending on kidney impairment severity. Conclusion Adjusting the doses of RDA DPP4 inhibitors based on individual kidney function could alleviate the economic burden associated with medical expenses.

Background: Prevailing insulin regimens for glycemic control in hospitalized patients have changed over time. We aimed to determine whether the current basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen is superior to the previous insulin regimen, mainly comprising split-mixed insulin therapy. Methods: This was a single tertiary center, retrospective observational study that included non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated with split-mixed insulin regimens from 2004 to 2007 (period 1) and with BBI from 2008 to 2018 (period 2). Patients from each period were analyzed after propensity score matching. The mean difference in glucose levels and the achievement of fasting and preprandial glycemic targets by day 6 of admission were assessed. The total daily insulin dose, incidence of hypoglycemia, and length of hospital stay were also evaluated. Results: Among 244 patients from each period, both fasting glucose (estimated mean±standard error, 147.4±3.1 mg/dL vs. 129.4±3.2 mg/dL, P<0.001, day 6) and preprandial glucose (177.7±2.8 mg/dL vs. 152.8±2.8 mg/dL, P<0.001, day 6) were lower in period 2 than in period 1. By day 6 of hospital admission, 42.6% and 67.2% of patients achieved a preprandial glycemic target of <140 mg/dL in periods 1 and 2, respectively (relative risk, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.54 to 2.59), without an increased incidence of hypoglycemia. Length of stay was shorter in period 2 (10.23±0.26 days vs. 8.70±0.26 days, P<0.001). Conclusion BBI improved glycemic control in a more efficacious manner than a split-mixed insulin regimen without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia in a hospital setting.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are efficacious glucose-lowering medications with salient benefits for body weight and cardiovascular events. This class of medications is now recommended as the top priority for patients with established cardiovascular disease or indicators of high risk. Until the advent of oral semaglutide, however, GLP-1 receptor agonists were available only in the form of subcutaneous injections. Aversion to needles, discomfort with self-injection, or skin problems at the injection site are commonly voiced problems in people with diabetes, and thus, attempts for non-invasive delivery strategies have continued. Herein, we review the evolution of GLP-1 therapy from its discovery and the development of currently approved drugs to the unprecedented endeavor to administer GLP-1 receptor agonists via the oral route. We focus on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the recently approved oral GLP-1 receptor agonist, oral semaglutide. Small molecule oral GLP-1 receptor agonists are currently in development, and we introduce how these chemicals have addressed the challenge posed by interactions with the large extracellular ligand binding domain of the GLP-1 receptor. We specifically discuss the structure and pharmacological properties of TT-OAD2, LY3502970, and PF-06882961, and envision an era where more patients could benefit from oral GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy.

Abscess ; Adolescent ; Body Mass Index ; Child ; Classification ; Colonic Diseases ; Crohn Disease ; Diagnosis ; Europe ; Fistula ; Humans ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ; Korea ; Male ; Pediatrics ; Phenotype ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of our new video-assisted asthma education program on patients' knowledge regarding asthma and asthma control. METHODS: Adult asthmatics who were diagnosed by primary care physicians and followed for at least 1 year were educated via smart devices and pamphlets. The education sessions were carried out three times at 2-week intervals. Each education period lasted at most 5 minutes. The effectiveness was then evaluated using questionnaires and an asthma control test (ACT). RESULTS: The study enrolled 144 patients (mean age, 56.7±16.7 years). Half of the patients had not been taught how to use their inhalers. After participating in the education program, the participants' understanding of asthma improved significantly across all six items of a questionnaire assessing their general knowledge of asthma. The proportion of patients who made errors while manipulating their inhalers was reduced to less than 10%. The ACT score increased from 16.6±4.6 to 20.0±3.9 (p<0.001). The number of asthmatics whose ACT score was at least 20 increased from 45 (33.3%) to 93 (65.3%) (p<0.001). The magnitude of improvement in the ACT score did not differ between patients who received an education session at least three times within 1 year and those who had not. The majority of patients agreed to the need for an education program (95.8%) and showed a willingness to pay an additional cost for the education (81.9%). CONCLUSION: This study indicated that our newly developed education program would become an effective component of asthma management in primary care clinics.
Adult ; Asthma* ; Education* ; Humans ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; Pamphlets ; Physicians, Primary Care ; Primary Health Care*