In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

In the field of health,with the innovation drive as the core,the new quality of productivity has successfully gets rid of the shackles of traditional health service delivery mode and industrial development trajectory,showing high-tech,high-efficiency and high-quality characteristics,which is in line with the development concept advocated in the new development stage,representing an advanced productivity quality.In the field of health economics,the new-quality productivity will have a decisive impact on the supply and demand of health services,the allocation and optimization of health resources,health policies and intervention measurement,health system performance and health equity.Meanwhile,the new quality productivity has a profound impact on health economic evaluation and technology evaluation,and even changes the health economic research paradigm.It is undoubtedly an important responsibility and challenge for the health economy research field to give timely and in-depth theoretical discussion on the new quality productivity and actively promote its practical application and development.It requires us to keep up with the pace of the times at the theoretical level and dig deep into the inherent law and value of the new-quality productivity.At the same time,in practice,it is committed to guiding and promoting the effective transformation and implementation of new-quality productivity in the field of health,so as to facilitate the elevation of health economic research and practice to a new qualitative level.

The treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma(PACG),especially in the initial phase,is crucial to the prognostic effect.Currently,we have multiple PACG treatment options but lack high-level clinical research evidence as a reference for determining the optimal treatment strategy for PACG.This article reviews and discusses both domestic and in-ternational PACG treatment methods with their efficacy,influencing factors,and complications,providing a reference for the selection of initial treatment methods for PACG.

Objective To investigate the expression of DNA methyltransferase 2 (DNMT2) and 3a (DNMT3a) in the epidermis of patients with psoriasis vulgaris.Methods Between March 2009 and December 2010,46 patients with psoriasis vulgaris were enrolled from the Department of Dermatology,Hospital for Skin Diseases,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,and the Department of Dermatology of Yixing People's Hospital,and 28 healthy controls were enrolled from the Department of Dermatologic Surgery,Hospital for Skin Diseases,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to determine the mRNA expression of DNMT2 and DNMT3a in the epidermis of the lesional and nonlesional skin of patients with psoriasis vulgaris,as well as in the epidermis of normal skin of the healthy controls.Results The mRNA expression of DNMT2 (expressed as 2-△△Ct) in the lesional skin,non-lesional skin of the patients and normal skin of the healthy controls was 0.62 ± 0.02,0.36-± 0.05 and 0.15 ± 0.11,respectively.The mRNA expression of DNMT2 was significantly higher in the lesional skin than in the non-lesional skin of the patients (t =6.23,P ＜ 0.01),and higher in the non-lesional skin of the patients than in the normal skin of the healthy controls (t =7.33,P ＜ 0.01).Additionally,the mRNA expression of DNMT3a was significantly higher in the lesional skin (0.85 ± 0.03) than in the non-lesional skin (0.43 ± 0.04) of the patients (t =5.66,P ＜ 0.01),and higher in the non-lesiona] skin of the patients than in the normal skin of healthy controls (0.18 ± 0.09,t =8.62,P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion Both DNMT2 and DNMT3a mRNA were abnormally expressed in the epidermis of patients with psoriasis vulgaris.