INTRODUCTIONPrevious trials have demonstrated reductions in atopic dermatitis (AD) incidence when healthy, high-risk, non-exclusively breastfed infants were fed until four months of age with 100% whey-based partially hydrolysed formula (PHF-W) versus standard cow's milk formula (CMF). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of this intervention in Singapore.

METHODSModelling techniques were used to simulate, from birth to Month 30, the incidence and clinical/economic burden of AD in high-risk, non-exclusively breastfed infants fed with PHF-W or CMF for up to four months. Epidemiologic and clinical data were from a local comparative trial. Expert opinion informed AD treatment patterns and outcomes. Outcomes included reduction in AD risk, time spent with AD, days without AD flare, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct/indirect costs. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to assess model parameter uncertainty.

RESULTSOver 30 months, with the use of PHF-W instead of CMF, the proportion of children who developed AD and the time spent with AD decreased by 16.0% (28.3% vs. 44.3%) and 6.4 months, respectively, while time without AD flare and QALYs increased by 14.9 days and 0.021 QALYs per patient, respectively. Estimated AD-related discounted costs per child for PHF-W and CMF were SGD 771 and SGD 1,309, respectively (net savings: SGD 538). PHF-W was less expensive and more effective than CMF for 73%, and cost less than SGD 50,000 per QALY for 87% of all multivariate simulations.

CONCLUSIONEarly short-term nutritional intervention with PHF-W instead of CMF may reduce AD incidence and costs for healthy, high-risk, non-exclusively breastfed infants in Singapore.

Asthma ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; statistics & numerical data

Effective management of atopic dermatitis (AD) involves the treatment of a defective skin barrier. Patients with AD are therefore advised to use moisturizers regularly. To date, there are few comparative studies involving moisturizers in patients with AD, and no classification system exists to objectively determine which types of moisturizers are best suited to specific AD phenotypes. With this in mind, a group of experts from allergy and immunology, adult and pediatric dermatology, and pediatrics centers within Southeast Asia met to review current data and practice, and to develop recommendations regarding the use of moisturizers in patients with AD within the Asia-Pacific region. Chronicity and severity of AD, along with patient age, treatment compliance, and economic background should all be taken into account when selecting an appropriate moisturizer for AD patients. Other considerations include adjuvant properties of the product, cosmetic acceptability, and availability over the counter. Well-defined clinical phenotypes of AD could optimally benefit from specific moisturizers. It is hoped that future studies may identify such differences by means of filaggrin mutation subtypes, confocal microscopic evaluation, pH, transepidermal water loss or presence of allergy specific IgE. Recommendations to improve the regular use of moisturizers among AD patients include measures that focus on treatment compliance, patient and caregiver education, appropriate treatment goals, avoidance of sensitizing agents, and collaboration with other relevant specialists.
Adult ; Allergy and Immunology ; Asia, Southeastern ; Caregivers ; Classification ; Compliance ; Cooperative Behavior ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; Dermatology ; Education ; Hope ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Hypersensitivity ; Immunoglobulin E ; Patient Compliance ; Pediatrics ; Phenotype ; Skin ; Specialization ; Water

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported that early febrile episodes and febrile episodes with infections are associated with a decreased risk of developing atopy. OBJECTIVE: To examine further the association between presence of and number of febrile episodes are with atopy and atopic diseases and if there was a difference between all fevers and fever after vaccination. METHODS: We studied 448 infants in a Singapore mother-offspring cohort study (Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes) which had complete data for the exposures and outcomes of interest. Fever was defined as more than 38.0℃ and was self-reported. The presence of and number of febrile episodes were examined for association with outcome measures, namely parental reports of doctor-diagnosed asthma and eczema, and rhinitis, which was evaluated by doctors involved in the study at 18 and 36 months. These outcomes were considered atopic if there were 1 or more positive skin prick tests. RESULTS: The presence of all fevers from 0–6 months of age was associated with reduced odds of having atopy at 36 months of age (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.628; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.396–0.995). The presence of fever after vaccination from 0–24 months of age was associated with reduced odds of having atopy at 36 months of age (OR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.350–0.915). The presence of all fevers from 0–6 months of age was associated with reduced odds of having atopic eczema at 36 months (OR, 0.430; 95% CI, 0.191–0.970). Fever was associated with increased odds of having doctor-diagnosed asthma and rhinitis. CONCLUSION: There was an inverse relationship between the presence of all fevers from 0–6 months of age and the development of atopy and eczema at 36 months of age. Fever after vaccination might be considered a subclinical infection that did not show the same effect in early life.
Asthma ; Asymptomatic Infections ; Cohort Studies ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; Eczema ; Fever ; Humans ; Infant ; Odds Ratio ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Parents ; Rhinitis ; Singapore ; Skin ; Vaccination

INTRODUCTIONThe prevalence of perceived food allergies exceeds that of true food allergies. Unnecessary food avoidance may increase parental and patient anxiety, reduce quality of life and increase the risk of nutritional deficiency. An oral food challenge (OFC) can provide an objective measure regarding the presence or absence of food allergies in a child. This study reviews the indications for and outcomes of OFCs performed on children.

METHODSA retrospective review was performed on all children who underwent OFCs at the Allergy Unit of the National University Hospital, Singapore, over a three-year period.

RESULTSA total of 197 OFCs were performed among 58 patients (34 male, 24 female). Most of the tests were for allergies to tree nuts (n = 107). Among the OFCs, 43.1% were for foods that were avoided and never eaten due to perceived food allergies, 25.9% were for foods that had previously resulted in positive skin prick tests (SPTs) and/or immunoassay results, 16.2% were for foods thought to worsen eczema and 14.7% were for foods thought to have caused a previous reaction. Of all the OFCs, 5% were positive, although adverse reactions were mostly cutaneous. Challenge-positive patients had either positive SPTs (wheal > 3 mm) or raised serum immunoglobulin E levels to specific foods that they reacted to during the challenges. No episodes of anaphylaxis were reported after the challenge. Most of the patients were able to safely introduce the avoided foods into their diets.

CONCLUSIONOFCs provide an objective assessment for suspected food allergies.

Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Food ; adverse effects ; Food Hypersensitivity ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Prevalence ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Skin Tests ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Time Factors

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an emergency condition that requires immediate, accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. However, little is known about the level of knowledge of doctors and nurses treating these patients in the Emergency Department. OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge of doctors and nurses in the Emergency Department on the recent definition and treatment recommendations of anaphylaxis. METHODS: We surveyed doctors and nurses of all grades in a tertiary Hospital Emergency Department using a standardized anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: We had a total of 190 respondents-47 doctors and 143 nurses. The response rate was 79.7% for doctors and 75.3% for nurses. Ninety-seven point eight percent of the doctors and 83.7% of the nurses chose the accepted definition of anaphylaxis. High proportions of doctors (89-94%) and nurses (65-72%) diagnose anaphylaxis in the three scenarios demonstrating anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. Forty-two point six percent of the doctors and 76.9% of the nurses incorrectly diagnosed single organ involvement without hypotension as anaphylaxis. As for treatment, 89.4% of the doctors indicated adrenaline as the drug of choice and 85.1% chose intramuscular route for adrenaline administration. Among the nurses, 40.3% indicated adrenaline as the drug of choice and 47.4% chose the intramuscular route for adrenaline. CONCLUSION: High proportion of doctors and nurses are able to recognize the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis, although there is a trend towards over diagnosis. There is good knowledge on drug of choice and the accepted route of adrenaline among the doctors. However, knowledge of treatment of anaphylaxis among nurses was moderate and can be improved.
Anaphylaxis ; Anonyms and Pseudonyms ; Data Collection ; Diagnosis ; Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Epinephrine ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Tertiary Care Centers

The skin of individuals with atopic dermatitis has a susceptibility to be colonized with Staphylococcus aureus. This has been associated with increased frequency and severity of exacerbations of atopic dermatitis. Therefore, there is a growing interest in the use of antiseptic agents to target primary bacterial colonization and infection. Antiseptic agents have been found to be better tolerated and less likely to induce bacterial resistance as compared to antibiotics. There is also a wide variety of antiseptic agents available. The efficacy of antiseptic agents has yet to be established as the studies reviewed previously have been small and of suboptimal quality. This review discusses the rationale behind targeting S. aureus with antiseptic agents and presents findings from a review of studies assessing the efficacy of antiseptics in atopic dermatitis in the last five years. Four studies were found, including a bleach bath study which has already been reviewed elsewhere. The remaining 3 studies assessed the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite containing cleansing body wash, sodium hypochlorite baths and 1% triclosan in leave on emollient. These studies suggested some benefit for the inclusion of antiseptic use with the mainstay management of atopic dermatitis, including a potential steroid sparring effect. However, there are many limitations to these studies which therefore warrant further investigation on the impact of antiseptic use in atopic dermatitis.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local ; Baths ; Colon ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; Skin ; Sodium Hypochlorite ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Triclosan

INTRODUCTIONPatients who have an adverse drug reaction are frequently labelled drug allergic without undergoing proper evaluation and confirmatory testing. These drug allergy labels may be inaccurate, leading to unnecessary lifelong avoidance. The aim of this study was to review the patients that underwent drug provocation tests (DPTs) in our centre and examine the usefulness of DPTs in confirming or rejecting a diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study design was a retrospective chart review of all adult patients who underwent drug provocation in the allergy unit at the National University Hospital, Singapore, for single or multiple suspected drug allergies from the period January 2009 to June 2011.

RESULTSEighty-seven patients underwent 123 DPTs (median age 41; interquartile range 28 to 50). Twenty-one patients underwent multiple DPTs. The most common culprit drugs reported were antibiotics (43.9%) of which beta-lactams were implicated in 75.9% of the cases. This was followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in 15.4%, paracetamol in 7.3% and both NSAIDs and paracetamol in 3.3%. Rash was the most commonly reported symptom (41.5%), followed by angioedema (32.5%), anaphylaxis (9.8%), and other symptoms including respiratory (2.4%), gastrointestinal (0.8%) and others (13.0%). The majority of DPTs were performed to antibiotics (43.9%), NSAIDs (19.5%) and paracetamol (6.5%). DPTs were negative in 93.5% of subjects and positive in 6.5%. Of the 8 positive DPTs, none had a serious reaction, with 5 patients requiring rescue therapy, which comprised solely of oral antihistamines.

CONCLUSIONSuspected drug hypersensitivity is common but true drug allergy is rare. DPTs remain the gold standard and should be included as part of an investigative protocol. DPTs are a safe and valuable diagnostic tool in the hands of the experienced clinician.

Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; adverse effects ; Drug Hypersensitivity ; diagnosis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Skin Tests ; methods

BACKGROUND: Latex allergy and its clinical presentation are rising in prevalence across the globe, especially amongst patients with spina bifida (SB). While studies have been well-established in Europe and America, data from Asia are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the scenario in Singapore. METHODS: 35 subjects with SB, aged 5 to 32 years answered a questionnaire and underwent skin prick test (SPT) using a latex solution, 3 common house dust mites and 3 commonly cross-reacting food allergens (banana, kiwi and avocado). We also noted the relation between latex sensitization with atopy and doctor-diagnosed allergy. The prevalence of cross-reactivity with fruits was also studied. RESULTS: Sensitization to latex (i.e. a positive SPT) was found in 16 (46%, 95% confidence interval 29%-63%) of the subjects. Only 5 (31%) of the subjects who were sensitized to latex had clinical manifestations. Atopy (i.e. positive SPT to house dust mites) was present in 23 (66%) of the subjects and 13 (57%) of them was also sensitized to latex. There was a positive trend between latex sensitization and atopy (81.2% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.076), as well as latex sensitization with those having both atopy and doctor-diagnosed allergy (i.e. asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, drug allergy) (93.8% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.032). Only 6 (38%) subjects had allergy to the food allergens tested. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the SB patients in Singapore are sensitized to latex. This number is comparable to that in Europe and America. Positive trend between latex sensitization and those with both atopy and doctor-diagnosed allergy (p = 0.032) is suggestive of a possible cause-effect relationship.
Allergens ; Americas ; Asia ; Asthma ; Dust ; Eczema ; Europe ; Fruit ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Latex Hypersensitivity ; Latex ; Prevalence ; Pyroglyphidae ; Rhinitis, Allergic ; Singapore ; Skin ; Spinal Dysraphism

In the original publication, we created a mistake in typing the name. Thus it was spelled as Antony Hadjojo when submitted to the publisher. We request for a correction of the author name into Antony Hardjojo.
Child ; Humans ; Publications ; Rhinitis