Background: and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18 F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions 18 F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas is a neoplasm with low malignant potential. It is often challenging to diagnose SPT due to its nonspecific clinical and radiological features, and ­[18F]FDOPA is effective in diagnosing SPT, particularly in differentiating SPT from benign conditions such as splenosis. A 55-year-old woman underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy for histologically confirmed SPT. She was also initially diagnosed with splenosis. During follow-up, sizes of multiple nodular lesions were increased, raising the possibility of peritoneal seeding of SPT. For diagnosis, a spleen scan and SPECT/CT were performed using 99mTc-labeled damaged red blood cells, which showed no uptake in the peritoneal nodules. Subsequent ­[18F]FDOPA PET/CT revealed ­[18F]FDOPA-avidity of the nodules. The patient underwent tumor resection surgery, and the nodules were pathologically confirmed as SPT.

Methods: 150 amyloid brain PET images were visually assessed by experts and categorized as negative and positive. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated with cerebellum grey matter as the reference region, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) analysis for BTXBrain-Amyloid were conducted. For comparison, same image processing and analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) program. In addition, to evaluate the spatial normalization (SN) performance, mutual information (MI) between MRI template and spatially normalized PET images was calculated and SPM group analysis was conducted. Results: Both BTXBrain and SPM methods discriminated between negative and positive groups. However, BTXBrain exhibited lower SUVR standard deviation (0.06 and 0.21 for negative and positive, respectively) than SPM method (0.11 and 0.25). In ROC analysis, BTXBrain had an AUC of 0.979, compared to 0.959 for SPM, while PR curves showed an AUC of 0.983 for BTXBrain and 0.949 for SPM. At the optimal cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.983 and 0.921 for BTXBrain and 0.917 and 0.921 for SPM12, respectively. MI evaluation also favored BTXBrain (0.848 vs. 0.823), indicating improved SN. In SPM group analysis, BTXBrain exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting basal ganglia differences between negative and positive groups. Conclusion BTXBrain-Amyloid outperformed SPM in clinical performance evaluation, also demonstrating superior SN and improved detection of deep brain differences. These results suggest the potential of BTXBrain-Amyloid as a valuable tool for clinical amyloid PET image evaluation.

Purpose: Since accurate lung cancer segmentation is required to determine the functional volume of a tumor in [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT, we propose a two-stage U-Net architecture to enhance the performance of lung cancer segmentation using [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Methods: The whole-body [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT scan data of 887 patients with lung cancer were retrospectively used for network training and evaluation. The ground-truth tumor volume of interest was drawn using the LifeX software. The dataset was randomly partitioned into training, validation, and test sets. Among the 887 PET/CT and VOI datasets, 730 were used to train the proposed models, 81 were used as the validation set, and the remaining 76 were used to evaluate the model. In Stage 1, the global U-net receives 3D PET/CT volume as input and extracts the preliminary tumor area, generating a 3D binary volume as output. In Stage 2, the regional U-net receives eight consecutive PET/CT slices around the slice selected by the Global U-net in Stage 1 and generates a 2D binary image as the output. Results: The proposed two-stage U-Net architecture outperformed the conventional one-stage 3D U-Net in primary lung cancer segmentation. The two-stage U-Net model successfully predicted the detailed margin of the tumors, which was determined by manually drawing spherical VOIs and applying an adaptive threshold. Quantitative analysis using the Dice similarity coefficient confirmed the advantages of the two-stage U-Net. Conclusion The proposed method will be useful for reducing the time and effort required for accurate lung cancer segmentation in [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT.

The dramatic spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has profound impacts on every continent and life. Due to humanto-human transmission of COVID-19, nuclear medicine staffs also cannot escape the risk of infection from workplaces. Everystaff in the nuclear medicine department must prepare for and respond to COVID-19 pandemic which tailored to the characteristicsof our profession. This article provided the guidance prepared by the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM) incooperation with the Korean Society of Infectious Disease (KSID) and Korean Society for Healthcare-Associated InfectionControl and Prevention (KOSHIC) in managing the COVID-19 pandemic for the nuclear medicine department.We hope that thisguidance will support every practice in nuclear medicine during this chaotic period.