1.Cutting-edge progress of intravascular ultrasound in lower-extremity vascular interventions
Xin GUAN ; Hong HAN ; Huixiong XU
Ultrasonography 2025;44(1):5-18
Lower-extremity vascular disease has a high morbidity rate and often leads to disability and death in its advanced stages. Although angiography-guided endovascular intervention is the primary treatment for peripheral vascular disease, it frequently fails to detect subtle lumen features and falls short of meeting the increasing clinical need for precise management. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) merges noninvasive ultrasound imaging with invasive catheterization techniques, providing 360° imaging of the vascular cross-section and delivering accurate information about lesion morphology. IVUS has been crucial in supporting decisionmaking for preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative optimization during vascular interventions. This review aims to summarize the latest applications of IVUS in lower-extremity vascular disease, discuss its strengths and limitations, and explore future directions for its use.
2.Cutting-edge progress of intravascular ultrasound in lower-extremity vascular interventions
Xin GUAN ; Hong HAN ; Huixiong XU
Ultrasonography 2025;44(1):5-18
Lower-extremity vascular disease has a high morbidity rate and often leads to disability and death in its advanced stages. Although angiography-guided endovascular intervention is the primary treatment for peripheral vascular disease, it frequently fails to detect subtle lumen features and falls short of meeting the increasing clinical need for precise management. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) merges noninvasive ultrasound imaging with invasive catheterization techniques, providing 360° imaging of the vascular cross-section and delivering accurate information about lesion morphology. IVUS has been crucial in supporting decisionmaking for preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative optimization during vascular interventions. This review aims to summarize the latest applications of IVUS in lower-extremity vascular disease, discuss its strengths and limitations, and explore future directions for its use.
3.Cutting-edge progress of intravascular ultrasound in lower-extremity vascular interventions
Xin GUAN ; Hong HAN ; Huixiong XU
Ultrasonography 2025;44(1):5-18
Lower-extremity vascular disease has a high morbidity rate and often leads to disability and death in its advanced stages. Although angiography-guided endovascular intervention is the primary treatment for peripheral vascular disease, it frequently fails to detect subtle lumen features and falls short of meeting the increasing clinical need for precise management. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) merges noninvasive ultrasound imaging with invasive catheterization techniques, providing 360° imaging of the vascular cross-section and delivering accurate information about lesion morphology. IVUS has been crucial in supporting decisionmaking for preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative optimization during vascular interventions. This review aims to summarize the latest applications of IVUS in lower-extremity vascular disease, discuss its strengths and limitations, and explore future directions for its use.
4.Cutting-edge progress of intravascular ultrasound in lower-extremity vascular interventions
Xin GUAN ; Hong HAN ; Huixiong XU
Ultrasonography 2025;44(1):5-18
Lower-extremity vascular disease has a high morbidity rate and often leads to disability and death in its advanced stages. Although angiography-guided endovascular intervention is the primary treatment for peripheral vascular disease, it frequently fails to detect subtle lumen features and falls short of meeting the increasing clinical need for precise management. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) merges noninvasive ultrasound imaging with invasive catheterization techniques, providing 360° imaging of the vascular cross-section and delivering accurate information about lesion morphology. IVUS has been crucial in supporting decisionmaking for preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative optimization during vascular interventions. This review aims to summarize the latest applications of IVUS in lower-extremity vascular disease, discuss its strengths and limitations, and explore future directions for its use.
5.Comparison of Reduced Port Gastrectomy and Multiport Gastrectomy in Korea: Ad Hoc Analysis and Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer 2019
Duyeong HWANG ; Mira YOO ; Guan Hong MIN ; Eunju LEE ; So Hyun KANG ; Young Suk PARK ; Sang-Hoon AHN ; Hyung-Ho KIM ; Yun-Suhk SUH ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(2):330-342
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA).
Materials and Methods:
The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed.
Results:
Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240).
Conclusions
This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.
6.Comparison of Reduced Port Gastrectomy and Multiport Gastrectomy in Korea: Ad Hoc Analysis and Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer 2019
Duyeong HWANG ; Mira YOO ; Guan Hong MIN ; Eunju LEE ; So Hyun KANG ; Young Suk PARK ; Sang-Hoon AHN ; Hyung-Ho KIM ; Yun-Suhk SUH ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(2):330-342
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA).
Materials and Methods:
The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed.
Results:
Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240).
Conclusions
This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.
7.Comparison of Reduced Port Gastrectomy and Multiport Gastrectomy in Korea: Ad Hoc Analysis and Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer 2019
Duyeong HWANG ; Mira YOO ; Guan Hong MIN ; Eunju LEE ; So Hyun KANG ; Young Suk PARK ; Sang-Hoon AHN ; Hyung-Ho KIM ; Yun-Suhk SUH ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(2):330-342
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA).
Materials and Methods:
The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed.
Results:
Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240).
Conclusions
This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.
8.Cutting-edge progress of intravascular ultrasound in lower-extremity vascular interventions
Xin GUAN ; Hong HAN ; Huixiong XU
Ultrasonography 2025;44(1):5-18
Lower-extremity vascular disease has a high morbidity rate and often leads to disability and death in its advanced stages. Although angiography-guided endovascular intervention is the primary treatment for peripheral vascular disease, it frequently fails to detect subtle lumen features and falls short of meeting the increasing clinical need for precise management. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) merges noninvasive ultrasound imaging with invasive catheterization techniques, providing 360° imaging of the vascular cross-section and delivering accurate information about lesion morphology. IVUS has been crucial in supporting decisionmaking for preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative optimization during vascular interventions. This review aims to summarize the latest applications of IVUS in lower-extremity vascular disease, discuss its strengths and limitations, and explore future directions for its use.
9.Research on cardiometabolic risk factors of workers in new forms of employment
Siyuan WANG ; Xiaoshun WANG ; Rui GUAN ; Hong YU ; Xin SONG ; Binshuo HU ; Zhihui WANG ; Xiaowen DING ; Dongsheng NIU ; Tenglong YAN ; Huadong XU
China Occupational Medicine 2025;52(2):150-154
Objective To analyze the prevalence status of cardiometabolic risk factor (CMRF) and its aggregation among workers engaged in new forms of employment. Methods A total of 5 429 new employment workers (including couriers, online food delivery workers, and ride hailing drivers) who underwent health medical examinations at a tertiary hospital in Beijing City were selected as the research subjects using the judgment sampling method. Data on waist circumference, blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid levels were collected to analyze their CMRF [central obesity, elevated blood pressure, elevated blood glucose, elevated triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] and their aggregation (with ≥ 2 of the above 5 risk factors) status. Results The detection rates of central obesity, elevated blood pressure, elevated blood glucose, elevated triglycerides, and reduced HDL-C were 61.2%, 38.2%, 29.5%, 40.9% and 22.6%, respectively. The detection rates of CMRF aggregation was 57.8%. The result of multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male, age ≥45 years, smoking, overweight, and obesity were risk factors for CMRF aggregation (all P<0.05). Conclusion The detection rate of CMRF and its aggregation among workers with new forms of employment in Beijing City is relatively high. Targeted prevention and control efforts should be strengthened for high-risk populations, especially males, workers aged ≥45 years, smokers, and those who are overweight or obese.
10.Survey on the awareness and clinical application of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (2022 edition) among clinicians
Yuanyuan KONG ; Yujie GUO ; Yujuan GUAN ; Xuan LIANG ; Zhongjie HU ; Xiaobo LU ; Mingqin LU ; Yongfeng YANG ; Meifang HAN ; Hong YOU ; Zhiyun YANG ; Jidong JIA
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2025;41(6):1068-1074
ObjectiveTo investigate the awareness and clinical practice of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (2022 edition) among clinicians. MethodsFrom July 19 to December 31, 2024, a self-designed electronic questionnaire was distributed via the WeChat mini program to collect related data from 1 588 clinicians nationwide, including their awareness and practice based on 18 questions regarding testing and referral, diagnosis and treatment, and follow-up. ResultsAmong all respondents, only 350 clinicians correctly understood all the updated key points of antiviral indications and treatment for special populations in the 2022 edition of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B, with an overall awareness rate of 22.0%. Only 20% — 40% of the patients with positive HBV DNA and an age of >30 years receive antiviral therapy, while 80% — 100% of the patients with positive HBV DNA and a family history of hepatitis B cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma receive antiviral therapy. The median follow-up rates at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 67.5% 57.5% and 47.5%,respectively, showing a trend of gradual reduction, which might be associated with the influencing factors such as insufficient time for follow-up management by clinicians, insufficient awareness of the disease among patients, and poor adherence to follow-up. ConclusionThere is a gap between the awareness and practice of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (2022 edition) among clinicians. It is recommended to further strengthen training and focus on the whole process of “detection, diagnosis, treatment, and management” for patients with chronic hepatitis B in healthcare institutions, in order to promote the implementation of the guidelines.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail