BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance is commonly used for accessing difficult peripheral veins.For successful access,a tourniquet is required for venodilation.Tourniquets decrease the compressibility and increase the diameter of veins;they also obfuscate artery-vein differentiation on ultrasound.We aimed to establish the upper limit of sphygmomanometer cuff pressure that facilitates artery-vein differentiation during ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. METHODS:We employed the sphygmomanometer cuff as a tourniquet for venodilation and tested it on seven participants at six different levels as follows:0 mmHg,DBP/2,DBP,(DBP+SBP)/2,SBP,and SBP+20 mmHg.We used an ultrasound probe attached to a pressure-measuring instrument to record cross-sectional images of the cubital artery and vein.During ultrasonography,compression was applied to the blood vessels through the skin.The following day,we measured the wrist pulse pressure and observed the oximeter pulse wave at six different tourniquet pressure levels.Repeated-measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)on ranks and Tukey's post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Arterial pulsation was maintained at tourniquet pressures between 0 mmHg and(DBP+SBP)/2.However,arterial pulsation decreased or disappeared when the tourniquet pressure reached or exceeded the SBP.Moreover,at this pressure level,the superior compressibility of veins compared to that of arteries was no longer observed.Compression of the artery to 75%and 50%of its original diameter increased arterial pulsation. CONCLUSION:Arterial pulsation and the superior compressibility are useful indicators for differentiating veins from arteries until the tourniquet pressure reaches(DBP+SBP)/2.However,these indicators are not reliable once the tourniquet pressure exceeds the SBP.

The Endologix AFX is a bifurcated unibody endovascular aortic repair （EVAR） system used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms （AAA）. It consists of an inner metal endoskeleton with multiple metal struts covered by a polytetrafluoroethylene graft fabric, which is suitable for treating AAA with narrowed abdominal aortic bifurcations. However, the risk of type 3 endoleak （T3EL） has been alerted and it is recommended that a sufficient overlap length be considered when using a cuff device on the central side. We present the case of an 81-year-old man with a 45 mm AAA who underwent EVAR with an AFX2 main body device and AFX proximal cuff extension device, adhering to the recommended overlap length. However, postoperative aneurysm enlargement occurred gradually, and complete uncoupling of the main body and cuff was observed 4 years later. A retrospective review of 4 years of computed tomography （CT） scans revealed potential caudal migration of the main body device and cranial migration of the cuff device, potentially resulting in a type 3a endoleak （T3aEL）. An additional device was deployed to bridge both components, and the patient was discharged without complications. In cases where an AFX2 main body device and a cuff device are used on the central side, even with adequate overlap, careful follow-up is necessary because of the potential for sideways displacement or craniocaudal migration. The observation of device displacement using 3D reconstruction CT imaging is particularly useful.

A 76-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy and functional severe mitral regurgitation, suffered from profound dyspnea. He displayed a very low ejection fraction (12%) and was diagnosed with cardiogenic shock. Initially, we inserted the IMPELLA 5.0 heart pump into the patient's left ventricle and began an optimal medical therapy regimen. Once hemodynamic stability was acquired, we performed left ventricular reconstruction, mitral valve replacement, and tricuspid annuloplasty. The patient was supported postoperatively with IMPELLA 5.0 and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The patient was discharged on POD100. Overall, IMPELLA 5.0 may be a useful tool for perioperative support against cardiogenic shock.