Chronic heart failure(CHF) has become a worldwide public health problem due to its high morbidity and mortality, which seriously endangers people's lifespan and quality of life. In recent years, the treatment strategy of CHF has shifted its emphasis on short-term improvement and transformation of hemodynamics to long-term repair as well as improvement of the biological properties of heart failure. At present, with the continuous deepening of medical research, it has been found that histone acetylation is closely related to the occurrence and development of CHF. Traditional Chinese medicine, via regulating histone acetylation, delays ventricular remodeling, improves energy metabolism, inhibits fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and intervenes in the development process of heart failure, thus reducing the mortality and the readmission rate and ultimately improving long-term prognosis. Therefore, this study reviewed the mechanism of histone acetylation in the treatment of heart failure as well as its prevention and treatment with traditional Chinese medicine, to provide reference for clinical treatment of CHF.
Humans ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Histones/therapeutic use* ; Acetylation ; Quality of Life ; Heart Failure/prevention & control*

BACKGROUND: Studies on the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention in Asian patients are relatively lacking compared to those for secondary prevention. Also, it is important to stratify which patients will benefit from ICD therapy for primary prevention.METHODS: Of 483 consecutive patients who received new implantation of ICD in 9 centers in Korea, 305 patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function and/or documented ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia were enrolled and divided into primary (n = 167) and secondary prevention groups (n = 138).RESULTS: During mean follow-up duration of 2.6 ± 1.6 years, appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 78 patients (25.6%), and appropriate ICD shock and anti-tachycardia pacing occurred in 15.1% and 15.1% of patients, respectively. Appropriate ICD shock rate was not different between the two groups (primary 12% vs. secondary 18.8%, P = 0.118). However, appropriate ICD therapy rate including shock and anti-tachycardia pacing was significantly higher (primary 18% vs. secondary 34.8%, P = 0.001) in the secondary prevention group. Type of prevention and etiology, appropriate and inappropriate ICD shock did not affect all-cause death. High levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, New York Heart Association functional class, low levels of estimated glomerular filtration ratio, and body mass index were associated with death before appropriate ICD shock in the primary prevention group. When patients were categorized in 5 risk score groups according to the sum of values defined by each cut-off level, significant differences in death rate before appropriate ICD shock were observed among risk 0 (0%), 1 (3.6%), 2 (3%), 3 (26.5%), and 4 (40%) (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: In this multicenter regional registry, the frequency of appropriate ICD therapy is not low in the primary prevention group. In addition, combination of poor prognostic factors of heart failure is useful in risk stratification of patients who are not benefiting from ICD therapy for primary prevention.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Body Mass Index ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Filtration ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Korea ; Mortality ; Primary Prevention ; Risk Assessment ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock

Cardiac embolism continues to be a leading etiology of ischemic strokes worldwide. Although pathologies that result in cardioembolism have not changed over the past decade, there have been significant advances in the treatment and stroke prevention methods for these conditions. Atrial fibrillation remains the prototypical cause of cardioembolic strokes. The availability of new long-term monitoring devices for atrial fibrillation detection such as insertable cardiac monitors has allowed accurate detection of this leading cause of cardioembolism. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have improved our ability to prevent strokes for many patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Advances in left atrial appendage closure and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device for stroke prevention in NVAF patients who have an appropriate rationale for a nonpharmacological alternative, have revolutionized the field and provided a viable option for patients at higher hemorrhagic risk. The role of patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention in selected patients experiencing cryptogenic ischemic strokes at a relatively young age has become clearer thanks to the very recent publication of long-term outcomes from three major studies. Advances in the management of infective endocarditis, heart failure, valvular diseases, and coronary artery disease have significantly changed the management of such patients, but have also revealed new concerns related to assessment of ischemic versus hemorrhagic risk in the setting of antithrombotic use. The current review article aims to discuss these advances especially as they pertain to the stroke neurology practice.
Anticoagulants ; Atrial Appendage ; Atrial Fibrillation ; Coronary Artery Disease ; Embolism ; Endocarditis ; Foramen Ovale, Patent ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Neurology ; Pathology ; Publications ; Secondary Prevention ; Stroke* ; United States Food and Drug Administration

Testosterone deficiency is common in men with cardiovascular disease (CVD), and randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) have reported beneficial effects of testosterone therapy on exercise-induced cardiac ischemia in chronic stable angina, functional exercise capacity, maximum oxygen consumption during exercise (VO_2max) and muscle strength in chronic heart failure (CHF), shortening of the Q-T interval, and improvement of some cardiovascular risk factors. Testosterone deficiency is associated with an adverse CV risk profile and mortality. Clinical and scientific studies have provided mechanistic evidence to support and explain the findings of the RCTs. Testosterone is a rapid-onset arterial vasodilator within the coronary circulation and other vascular beds including the pulmonary vasculature and can reduce the overall peripheral systemic vascular resistance. Evidence has demonstrated that testosterone mediates this effect on vascular reactivity through calcium channel blockade (L-calcium channel) and stimulates potassium channel opening by direct nongenomic mechanisms. Testosterone also stimulates repolarization of cardiac myocytes by stimulating the ultra-rapid potassium channel-operated current. Testosterone improves cardiac output, functional exercise capacity, VO_2maxand vagally mediated arterial baroreceptor cardiac reflex sensitivity in CHF, and other mechanisms. Independent of the benefit of testosterone on cardiac function, testosterone substitution may also increase skeletal muscle glucose metabolism and enhance muscular strength, both factors that could contribute to the improvement in functional exercise capacity may include improved glucose metabolism and muscle strength. Testosterone improves metabolic CV risk factors including body composition, insulin resistance, and hypercholesterolemia by improving both glucose utilization and lipid metabolism by a combination of genomic and nongenomic actions of glucose uptake and utilization expression of the insulin receptor, glucose transporters, and expression on regulatory enzymes of key metabolic pathways. The effect on high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) differs between studies in that it has been found to fall, rise, or have no change in levels. Testosterone replacement can suppress the levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and stimulate the production of interleukin-10 (IL-10) which has anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic actions in men with CVD. No effect on C-reactive protein has been detected. No adverse effects on clotting factors have been detected. RCTs have not clearly demonstrated any significant evidence that testosterone improves or adversely affects the surrogate markers of atherosclerosis such as reduction in carotid intima thickness or coronary calcium deposition. Any effect of testosterone on prevention or amelioration of atherosclerosis is likely to occur over years as shown in statin therapy trials and not months as used in testosterone RCTs. The weight of evidence from long-term epidemiological studies supports a protective effect as evidenced by a reduction in major adverse CV events (MACEs) and mortality in studies which have treated men with testosterone deficiency. No RCT where testosterone has been replaced to the normal healthy range has reported a significant benefit or adverse effect on MACE nor has any recent meta-analysis.
Androgens/therapeutic use* ; Angina, Stable/drug therapy* ; Body Composition ; C-Reactive Protein ; Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use* ; Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control* ; Chronic Disease ; Coronary Circulation ; Cytokines ; Exercise Tolerance ; Glucose/metabolism* ; Heart Failure/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Insulin Resistance ; Lipid Metabolism ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Oxygen Consumption ; Pulmonary Circulation ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Testosterone/therapeutic use* ; Vascular Resistance ; Vasodilation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY), which was the first national transplant registry in Korea, was founded by the Korean Society for Transplantation and the Korean Center for Disease Control in 2014. Here, we present the initial report of the Korean Heart Transplant Registry. METHODS: A total of 183 heart transplantation (HTPL) patients performed at 4 nationally representative hospitals were collected from April 2014 to December 2015. We analyzed donor and recipient characteristics, treatment patterns, and immediate post-transplantation outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 50.5±13.5 years. The mean age of the male recipients was 4 years greater than that of the female recipients (51.7±13.3 years vs. 47.9±13.7 years, p < 0.050). The mean age of donors was more than 12 years younger than that of heart recipients (37.6±10.1 years). Dilated cardiomyopathy was the predominant cause (69%) of heart failure in recipients, followed by ischemic heart diseases (14%) and valvular heart disease (4%). Rejection episodes were most frequent in the 1–6-month period after transplantation (48%), and rarely required intensive treatment. Infection episodes were most frequent <1 month after transplantation (66%) and bacterial and viral infections were equally reported. The 1-year survival rate was 91.6% and most mortality cases occurred during the perioperative period within 1 month after transplantation. CONCLUSION: With the establishment of the KOTRY in 2014, it is now possible to present nationwide epidemiological data for HTPL in Korea for the first time. The KOTRY is the first national HTPL registry in Korea, and will continue until 2023.
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) ; Female ; Heart Failure ; Heart Transplantation* ; Heart Valve Diseases ; Heart* ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Mortality ; Myocardial Ischemia ; Perioperative Period ; Registries ; Survival Rate ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants*

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for Korean is unclear. We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Korean patients undergoing ICD for primary or secondary prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1999 to December 2016, 396 cases (365 patients) of ICD implantation were performed: Baseline characteristics, procedural findings, and clinical outcome data were collected retrospectively from our ICD registry. The primary outcome was composite of cardiac death, appropriate shock or antitachycardia pacing. RESULTS: Among 365 patients, 91 patients (25.9%) had ICD for primary prevention and 274 patients (75.1%) were for secondary prevention (51.2±17.10 years, male was 80.8%). The median follow-up period was 3.1 years (interquartile range: 1.6–6.0 days). The most prevalent etiology was dilated cardiomyopathy (46.2%) in the primary prevention and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (24.4%) in the secondary prevention. The primary outcome was noted in 28.6% of the primary prevention and 33.2% of the secondary prevention (P=0.44). The rate of cardiac death was 2.2% in the primary prevention and 1.8% in the secondary prevention (P=1.00). The hospitalization due to heart failure was higher in the primary prevention compared with the secondary prevention (23.1% versus 13.5%, P=0.03). ICD therapy occurred in 134 patients (36.7%). Among them, 60 patients (44.8% of ICD therapy) experienced inappropriate shock. The most common cause of inappropriate shock was atrial fibrillation of flutter (AF/AFL). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and safety of ICD in Korean is consistent with the data from Western countries.
Atrial Fibrillation ; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated ; Death ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Failure ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Primary Prevention ; Retrospective Studies ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock ; Tachycardia, Ventricular ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to describe clinical characteristics of patients with left ventriculars (LV) dysfunction and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and to evaluate the effect of ICD therapy on survival in Yeongnam province of Korea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From a community-based device registry (9 centers, Yeongnam province, from November 1999 to September 2012), 146 patients with LV dysfunction and an ICD implanted for primary or secondary prophylaxis, were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the etiology (73 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and 73 with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy), and indication for the device implantation (36 for primary prevention and 110 for secondary prevention). The cumulative first shock rate, all cause death, and type and mode of death, were determined according to the etiology and indication. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the overall ICD shock rate was about 39.0%. ICD shock therapy was significantly more frequent in the secondary prevention group (46.4% vs. 16.7%, p=0.002). The cumulative probability of a first appropriate shock was higher in the secondary prevention group (p=0.015). There was no significant difference in the all-cause death, cardiac death, and mode of death between the groups according to the etiology and indication. CONCLUSION: Studies from this multicenter regional registry data shows that in both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, the ICD shock therapy rate was higher in the secondary prevention group than primary prevention group.
Cardiomyopathies ; Convulsive Therapy ; Death ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Failure* ; Heart* ; Humans ; Korea* ; Mortality ; Primary Prevention ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

The insertion of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) has been recommended by recent guidelines. However, current evidence shows limited benefits to inserting ICDs in patients with NICM. Recently, the defibrillator implantation in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure (DANISH) trial, a large randomized trial of more than 1,100 patients with NICM, was conducted to compare the primary prevention of all-cause mortality between optimal medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and ICD implantation. The DANISH trial revealed no differences in all-cause mortality between the groups after 5 years. However, in patients younger than 68 years of age, the rate of death from any cause was significantly lower in the ICD group compared to the control group. In addition, the rate of sudden cardiac death was lower in the ICD group compared to the control group in patients under 68 years. The results of DANISH will likely change guidelines about the insertion of ICD in patients with NICM, and encourage the use of ICD in patients with NICM.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ; Cardiomyopathies* ; Death, Sudden, Cardiac* ; Defibrillators ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Heart Failure, Systolic ; Humans ; Mortality ; Primary Prevention*

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to elucidate the long-term prognosis of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 405 patients (age, 57.7±16.7 years; 311 men) who had undergone ICD implantation. The patients were divided into three groups: heart failure (HF) and ICD for primary (group 1, n=118) and secondary prevention (group 2, n=93) and non-HF (group 3, n=194). We compared appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy delivery among the groups and between high- (heart rate ≥200 /min) and low-rate (<200 /min) ICD therapy zones. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (58.9±49.8 months), the annual appropriate ICD therapy rate was higher in group 2 (10.4%) than in groups 1 and 3 (6.1% and 5.9%, respectively, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in annual inappropriate ICD therapy rate among the three groups. In group 1, the annual appropriate ICD therapy rate was significantly lower in patients with a high-rate versus a low-rate therapy zone (4.5% and 9.6%, respectively, p=0.026). In group 3, the annual inappropriate ICD therapy rate was significantly lower in patients with a high-rate versus a low-rate therapy zone (3.1% and 4.0%, respectively, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: Appropriate ICD therapy rates are not low in Korean patients with ICD, relative to prior large-scale studies in Western countries. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy could be reduced by a high-rate therapy zone in patients with HF and ICD for primary prevention, as well as non-HF patients, respectively.
Death, Sudden, Cardiac ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Korea* ; Primary Prevention ; Prognosis* ; Secondary Prevention

The use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is an effective treatment strategy for patients with aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Primary prevention of SCD is a strategy involving the use of ICDs in patients who are at high risk for but who have not had any previous events of ventricular arrhythmias or cardiac arrest. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms of heart failure and left ventricular systolic function when used in patients with severe heart failure symptoms, reduced left ventricular ejection, and a wide QRS complex. CRT has also been proven to reduce the rate of hospitalization due to heart failure as well as the rate of death from any cause. In this review, we discuss the clinical trials and current clinical indications for the ICD and CRT.
Arrhythmias, Cardiac ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy* ; Death, Sudden, Cardiac ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Heart Arrest ; Heart Failure ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Primary Prevention ; Tachycardia