Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CACscoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients’ medical records were monitored until November 2023. Results: A total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers’ sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all p<0.001), without a notable increase in the number of false-positives per case (0.11 vs. 0.13, p=0.078 for reader 1; 0.11 vs. 0.11, p>0.999 for reader 2). Per-patient analysis also enhanced sensitivity with DL-CAD assistance (73% vs. 84%, p<0.001 for reader 1; 89% vs. 91%, p=0.250 for reader 2). During follow-up, lung cancer was diagnosed in four patients (1.5%). Among them, two had lesions detected on CAC-scoring CT, both of which were successfully identified by DL-CAD. Conclusion DL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CACscoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 for predicting mortality and liver-related complications compared with the Child-Pugh classification, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, the MELD, and the MELD sodium (MELDNa) score. Methods: We evaluated a multicenter retrospective cohort of incorporated patients with cirrhosis between 2013 and 2019. We conducted comparisons of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the MELD3.0 and other models for predicting 3-month mortality. Additionally, we assessed the risk of cirrhosis-related complications according to the MELD3.0 score. Results: A total of 3,314 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9±11.3 years, and 70.2% of the patients were male. Within the initial 3 months, 220 patients (6.6%) died, and the MELD3.0had the best predictive performance among the tested models, with an AUROC of 0.851, outperforming the Child-Pugh classification, ALBI grade, MELD, and MELDNa. A high MELD3.0score was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared with that of the group with a MELD3.0 score <10 points, the adjusted hazard ratio of the group with a score of 10–20 pointswas 2.176, and that for the group with a score of ≥20 points was 4.892. Each 1-point increase inthe MELD3.0 score increased the risk of cirrhosis-related complications by 1.033-fold. The risk of hepatorenal syndrome showed the highest increase, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.149, followed by hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. Conclusions The MELD3.0 demonstrated robust prognostic performance in predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, the MELD3.0 score was linked to cirrhosis-related complications, particularly those involving kidney function, such as hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.