Background:Shared decision-making(SDM)implementation is a priority for Australian health systems,including general practices but it remains complex for specific groups like older rural Australians.We initiated a qualitative study with older rural Australians to explore barriers to and facilitators of SDM in local general practices. Methods:We conducted a patient-oriented research,partnering with older rural Australians,families,and health service providers in research design.Participants who visited general practices were purposively sampled from five small rural towns in South Australia.A semi-structured interview guide was used for interviews and reflexive thematic coding was conducted. Results:Telephone interviews were held with 27 participants.Four themes were identified around older rural adults'involvement in SDM:(1)Understanding of"patient involvement";(2)Positive and negative outcomes;(3)Barriers to SDM;and(4)Facilitators to SDM.Understanding of patient involvement in SDM considerably varied among participants,with some reporting their involvement was contingent on the"opportunity to ask questions"and the"treatment choices"offered to them.Alongside the opportunity for involvement,barriers such as avoidance of cultural care and a lack of continuity of care are new findings.Challenges encountered in SDM implementation also included resource constraints and time limitations in general practices.Rural knowledge of general practitioners and technology integration in consultations were viewed as potential enablers. Conclusion:Adequate resources and well-defined guidelines about the process should accompany the implemen-tation of SDM in rural general practices of South Australia.Innovative strategies by general practitioners pro-moting health literacy and culturally-tailored communication approaches could increase older rural Australians'involvement in general.

Objective:A study was conducted about the putative links of older rural Australians'health knowledge and preparation with their quality of involvement in patient-general practitioner(GP)communication during health intake visits. Methods:It was a cross-sectional study between January 2021 and April 2022.The 32-item quality of involve-ment in communication scale was designed and incorporated into the Survey Gizmo software.This online survey was administered by sending an email request to the Renmark Rotary Club,which actively promoted this study across five rural towns in South Australia.121 participants completed the surveys.Mean-sum scores were cal-culated based on the questionnaire responses to evaluate outcomes,specifically initiation of information,active participation,and emotional expression.We employed different methods including t-tests,ANOVA,and leaner regressions to analyse data. Results:The demographic profile of participants characterised by a female predominance(58.7％,71/121),a ma-jority falling within the 65-＜70 age bracket(47.1％,57/121),and a high level of educational attainment(58.7％had completed high school or higher,71/121).Additionally,35％of the participants predominantly spoke a lan-guage other than English at home.Regarding the initiation of information with GPs,the mean sum-score was(20.5±3.7),indicating a marginally above-average level of engagement.Contrarily,the active participation was suboptimal,as suggested by a mean sum score of(35.9±6.3).Furthermore,the emotional expression was rela-tively low,with a mean score of(13.9±1.8).Substantial variations were discerned in the quality of patient-GP communication,contingent upon factors such as educational background,language spoken at home,health lit-eracy,and preparatory measures for clinical visits.Participants who predominantly spoke a language other than English at home demonstrated significantly lower levels of information initiation with their GPs(P＜0.001).Higher educational attainment was positively correlated with increased active participation(P＜0.001).En-hanced health literacy and thorough visit preparation were significantly associated with increased levels of active participation(P＜0.001). Conclusion:Meaningful engagement through recognition,empowerment,and support(health literacy pro-grams)for older rural adults is suggested for improving their quality of involvement in communication with GPs.