Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Progesterone hypersensitivity is mediated by type I, III, and IV hypersensitivity reactions to endogenous or exogenous progesterone, involving autoimmune mechanisms in females of reproductive age. It presents with a range of dermatologic manifestations, most commonly urticaria, angioedema, eczema, and maculopapular rashes. Systemic and severe symptoms, such as generalized erythema multiforme or lesions resembling severe cutaneous adverse reactions, have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a 42-year-old woman who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) following exogenous progesterone therapy administered for assisted reproduction. She received high-dose subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal tablets. Despite this being her first procedure, she achieved pregnancy. However, at 8 weeks of gestation and during the third month of progesterone treatment, she developed generalized erythema multiforme, pruritus, and high-grade fever. Her laboratory findings showed increased blood eosinophil counts and inflammatory markers. After oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for several weeks, her skin lesions were partially improved. However, after tapering of OCS, her skin lesions were aggravated with increased blood eosinophil counts. Despite daily OCS (prednisolone, 12.5–60 mg/day) treatment after childbirth, her skin symptoms and eosinophilia persisted. Reslizumab treatment was also attempted, but only the eosinophilia resolved. These clinical findings were much improved after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (upadacitinib 15 mg/day) treatment; consequently, OCS was stopped. Here, we report a case of relapsing DRESS triggered by exogenous progesterone, which has been controlled by JAK inhibitor treatment.

Background: This retrospective observational matched-cohort study of 2,151,216 individuals from the Korean coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness cohort aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the COVID-19 bivalent versus monovalent vaccines in providing additional protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, critical infection, and death in Korea. Methods: Among individuals, those vaccinated with COVID-19 bivalent vaccines were matched in a 1:1 ratio with those who were vaccinated with monovalent vaccines (bivalent vaccines non-recipients) during the observation period. We fitted a time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of COVID-19 outcomes for infection, critical infection, and death, and we defined vaccine effectiveness (VE) as 1–HR. Results: Compared with the bivalent vaccination group, the incidence proportions in the monovalent vaccination group were approximately three times higher for infection, nine times higher for critical infection, and 11 times higher for death. In the early stage of bivalent vaccination, relative VE of bivalent vaccine against monovalent vaccine was 42.4% against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 81.3% against critical infection, and 85.3% against death. In addition, VE against critical infection and death according to the elapsed period after bivalent vaccination was maintained at > 70%. Conclusion The bivalent booster dose provided additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections, critical infections, and deaths during the omicron variant phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: We estimated the population prevalence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including unreported infections, through a Korea Seroprevalence Study of Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Retention and Transmission (K-SEROSMART) in 258 communities throughout Korea. METHODS: In August 2022, a survey was conducted among 10,000 household members aged 5 years and older, in households selected through two stage probability random sampling. During face-to-face household interviews, participants self-reported their health status, COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination history, and general characteristics. Subsequently, participants visited a community health center or medical clinic for blood sampling. Blood samples were analyzed for the presence of antibodies to spike proteins (anti-S) and antibodies to nucleocapsid proteins (anti-N) SARS-CoV-2 proteins using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. To estimate the population prevalence, the PROC SURVEYMEANS statistical procedure was employed, with weighting to reflect demographic data from July 2022. RESULTS: In total, 9,945 individuals from 5,041 households were surveyed across 258 communities, representing all basic local governments in Korea. The overall population-adjusted prevalence rates of anti-S and anti-N were 97.6% and 57.1%, respectively. Since the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency has reported a cumulative incidence of confirmed cases of 37.8% through July 31, 2022, the proportion of unreported infections among all COVID-19 infection was suggested to be 33.9%. CONCLUSIONS The K-SEROSMART represents the first nationwide, community-based seroepidemiologic survey of COVID-19, confirming that most individuals possess antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and that a significant number of unreported cases existed. Furthermore, this study lays the foundation for a surveillance system to continuously monitor transmission at the community level and the response to COVID-19.

The targeting of DNA methylation in cancer using DNA hypomethylating drugs has been well known to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy and immunotherapy by affecting multiple pathways. Herein, we investigated the combinational effects of DNA hypomethylating drugs and ionizing radiation (IR) in human sarcoma cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. Clonogenic assays were performed to determine the radiosensitizing properties of two DNA hypomethylating drugs on sarcoma cell lines we tested in this study with multiple doses of IR. We analyzed the effects of 5-aza-dC or SGI-110, as DNA hypomethylating drugs, in combination with IR in vitro on the proliferation, apoptosis, caspase-3/7 activity, migration/invasion, and Western blotting using apoptosis- or autophagy-related factors. To confirm the combined effect of DNA hypomethylating drugs and IR in our in vitro experiment, we generated the sarcoma cells in nude mouse xenograft models. Here, we found that the combination of DNA hypomethylating drugs and IR improved anticancer effects by inhibiting cell proliferation and by promoting synergistic cell death that is associated with both apoptosis and autophagy in vitro and in vivo. Our data demonstrated that the combination effects of DNA hypomethylating drugs with radiation exhibited greater cellular effects than the use of a single agent treatment, thus suggesting that the combination of DNA hypomethylating drugs and radiation may become a new radiotherapy to improve therapeutic efficacy for cancer treatment.

Purpose: We corrected the axial lengths of the macular and peripapillary significance maps using software embedded in a commercial spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) package. We evaluated the accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis in patients with high myopia, and the clinical implications. Methods: Seventy eyes of 70 highly myopic patients with or without normal-tension glaucoma were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivities and specificities of the color-coded significance maps were calculated using 1% (red) or 5% (yellow) as the abnormality criteria, and the values compared before and after axial length corrections performed using embedded SD-OCT software. Results: At the 1% level of the normative database, we found no significant difference in specificity or sensitivity. At the 5% level, the increase in specificity was significant only for the inferotemporal sectors of the macular significance map. The specificity of the inferotemporal sector of the inner scan circle increased from 61.9 to 78.6% (p = 0.016) and that of the outer scan circle from 69 to 83.8% (p = 0.031). The specificities of the entire chart, the superior sector of the superior/inferior chart, and the 12-clockwise map increased significantly from 54.8 to 78.6% (p = 0.002), 59.5 to 76.2% (p = 0.039), and 59.5 to 76.2% (p = 0.002) respectively. Conclusions Clinicians should note that axial length correction of significance maps reduces the false-positive glaucoma diagnostic rates in highly myopic eyes. Correction of significance maps using embedded software may thus aid clinicians in the diagnosis of glaucoma in high myopic eyes.